Brooke Van Velden Meets With Council Of Trade Unions After Pay Equity Changes
Article – RNZ
A 'frank' half-hour meeting was Brooke van Velden's first with the Council of Trade Unions since 2023., Political Reporter
The Council of Trade Unions has met with Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden, hot on the heels of pay equity changes passing under urgency last week.
The half-hour meeting from 10.15am was the minister's first with the union since 2023, despite her predecessors typically booking monthly catch-ups.
It also coincided with an event hosted by Labour and the Greens to bring union members to Parliament to hear from them about the effects of the pay equity changes.
Ahead of the meeting, CTU national secretary Melissa Ansell-Bridges told RNZ the minister's approach to the relationship was unprecedented, but they hoped to get straight into the substantive issues.
'This is really an opportunity to, I suppose, begin some of those conversations that we haven't been able to have with her to date. Obviously top of the agenda is going to be pay equity and we're going to be conveying to Brooke how we think the changes that they have made are absolutely heading in the wrong direction.'
She said they would be asking for the 33 in-progress claim scrapped last week to be restored, and the changes to the Act reversed.
Other matters they hoped to raise included calls for a ban on engineered stone, the government's policy of banning partial strikes, and other health and safety policies.
Speaking to media afterwards, she said the pay equity request had been rejected.
CTU President Richard Wagstaff said it was 'frank'.
'Frank, a frank meeting. There weren't any profanities … we're all professional, but certainly we were demanding answers to the attack on workers that we're seeing.'
'We did ask her, for example, is there an equal pay claim that she didn't support and she couldn't give an answer to it. We did ask her, had she read the task force report on health and safety emanating from Pike [River disaster], she couldn't really give an answer. We did ask her, did she agree with holding the minimum wage down under under inflation, she couldn't really give an answer.
'So it was that kind of a meeting, but in many ways, that is true to form in our experience with this minister.'
Ansell-Bridges said they asked if the billions of dollars in savings the government expected would come from fewer claims being settled or claims being worth less.
'She said the advice that she had received was that there shouldn't be any fewer claims. Now, that differs from our initial analysis which shows that actually a number of the claims will either be outright prohibited or will struggle to meet those thresholds to initiate.
'The other point is about the value of the settlements and the minister at that point referenced the changes around comparators, and it's clear that she anticipates that the changes to the comparator system will ultimately lead to settlements of a lower value.'
Wagstaff noted the 33 claims being set back with no possibility of backpay would also mean significant savings.
'The care and support claim which covers 70,000 workers looks to be cancelled and can't even be taken now, according to … what they passed in legislation, because it was settled in 2017 – so that's a that's a massive cut in spending just on those alone.'
He said they also requested a regular meeting with the minister be set up but this was also rejected.
'She just said it's not what she does. I can't explain that.
'There was a question in the House by the Greens, actually, to the minister saying 'why won't you meet with the CTU?', and she indicated that we haven't asked for it, even though we have asked half a dozen times. And so at that point we decided to put in another request and she agreed, which we're very pleased she did.'
He said she had given no indication that any further meetings would take place.
'Previous governments – not just the last government, but in fact, with John Key's government – we had a regular meeting with the prime minister, a regular meeting with the minister of finance, a regular meeting with the minister of workplace relations and safety, and other meetings with other government ministers. This government is quite different.
'We have the odd meeting with different ministers but those key ones – prime minister, finance and workplace relations – we're basically shut out.'
Van Velden said the meeting was 'quite odd'.
'The feedback that I've received since then, it's pretty weird that you have people wanting to have meetings with you and then hold press conferences afterwards,' she said.
'A lot of the questions that I received weren't actually things that I could respond to, but look I don't really go around talking about the conversations that I've had in the meetings that I hold and I hope in some ways, this gives a little bit of perspective as to why I don't hold regular meetings with the CTU.
'It's pretty weird and odd that people hold press conferences about the things that I say in my meetings.'
She said she would not hold regular meetings with the CTU 'if they're just going to have press conferences after each of our meetings'.
Pressed on whether the CTU was right in their understanding of her officials' advice, she said it did show the 'large majority' of people who brought the 33 claims previously would be able to again in future.
'That may or may not be the case. But also I'm not a crystal ball gazer, I can't actually tell which people are going to potentially, potentially continue to bring a claim, or whether or not they'd like to pre scope those.
'We are intentionally looking to tighten some of the rules from what Labour had so that we can find gender based discrimination, rather than conflation with inflation or other labour market dynamics, and so it could be the case that the comparators that they choose to use may be different in the newer claims.
'You've then got to ask the unions, why is it then that they have intentionally used comparators that may give them different figures than they currently are able to use.'
Ansell-Bridges helped facilitate the earlier event for opposition MPs and media to hear from union members about the equity changes, which were passed within a couple of days of being announced.
Labour and Green MPs had planned the event – held in Labour's larger caucus room – last week, inviting a handful of women and their families.
Decrying a newspaper opinion article in Parliament which criticised female MPs for backing the legislation, van Velden quoted from it – using the c-word in Parliament seemingly for the first time in New Zealand's history.
Labour's spokesperson for Women Jan Tinetti addressed that at the start of the meeting on Thursday, saying there had been some 'deliberate distractions' from the government over the reaction to its move.
She said she was frustrated and angry about the legislative changes and would continue to fight them.
Speaking to The Detail, at least one academic – Canterbury University senior law lecturer Cassandra Mudgway – also said it was a distraction, and it was a stance Ansell-Bridges also backed.
'It's a distraction from the real issues. And the real issues is that the Equal Pay Act has been gutted, and over 300,000 working women are ultimately going to be worse off as a result of those changes. So it's a very deliberate obfuscation of the issue by the minister and the government.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
37 minutes ago
- Scoop
The Pentagon, NZ And The New Nuclear Overlap
Article – RNZ The United States is modernising its nuclear weapons command and control system, and while it is not directly involved, New Zealand will feel the effects. Top US officials, nuclear commanders and Pentagon documents say the nuclear command-control-and-communications system – NC3 – will be integrated and 'overlap' with a new global mega-network of battlefield communications. The Combined Joint All-Domain Command-and-Control (CJADC2) mega-network is being built to also cover conventional weapons and all battlefield domains – land, sea, air, space and cyber – with the basic aim to speed up operations and spot threats from far away. 'The two systems have to be overlapped to a great extent so that we can have integration,' the US nuclear command STRATCOM told Congress in 2022. The mega-network is seen by the US as a 'once-in-a-generation modernisation of its approach to commanding military forces', with modernisation of its nuclear system seen as a matter of survival against China and Russia. At the same time, the Pentagon has adopted an aggressive strategy to engage allies and partners more in developing advanced technologies, including the mega-network. New Zealand is involved with this strategy through a growing range of exercises, experiments and agreements on land, sea and in space. The NZ Defence Force (NZDF) has been active for months in anchor CJADC2 projects for both the US Army and US Air Force. 'US, allies and partners integrate for dynamic targeting kill-chain automation experiments,' ran a US Air Force headline about this last year, in a report naming NZ. The NZDF signed up this year for the US Navy's main contribution to the mega-network, called Project Overmatch. The NZ government called these 'efforts to promote peace and security' that would 'improve the survivability and lethality of our platforms'. But the government does not acknowledge any link to the command-and-control of nuclear weapons. The defence forces were 'not involved' in NC3, they said. Ministers, officials and the NZDF had no information or advice about this, RNZ was told. 'Any linkages between the United States NC3 and its joint all-domain command and control strategy are a matter for the government of the United States,' the defence ministry said. US authorities have talked repeatedly about the growing linkage, partly to increase resiliency, using layers of new satellites. RNZ asked the Pentagon if it had considered what that might mean for nuclear-free New Zealand. 'The DOD [Department of Defence] respects the policies of our allies and partners, and routinely accounts for them in planning and cooperation,' it replied. The NZ defence ministry has made one small move, carving out a non-nuclear niche for a US-led satellite-monitoring hub in Auckland. 'You couldn't afford to build two completely separate systems' While there is no suggestion NZ actually has its hands on a nuclear device or trigger, it is subject to the same rapid technological and geopolitical changes disrupting and reshaping the world's armed forces, including the US nuclear wing that NZ shelters under. That nuclear wing is ageing, and the hugely expensive decades-long effort to overhaul it – US President Donald Trump wants to increase spending on nuclear weapons by 29 percent this year to $41 billion – will alter how NC3 works, and what it interacts with. The head of nuclear command Admiral Chas Richard said in 2022: 'It is to our benefit, where appropriate, to use our conventional command and control to add redundancy and resiliency to our nuclear command and control. 'You couldn't afford to build two completely separate systems if we tried to achieve that in the real world.' He told the Senate Armed Services Committee he was 'very pleased that a subset of what JADC2 is doing is for nuclear command and control'. The US added a 'C' at the front of JADC2 last year to reflect allies' growing engagement. A 2022 Pentagon strategy for building CJADC2 detailed five workstreams: The fourth was 'integrating with Nuclear C2 and C3'. 'It's important to realise that JADC2 and NC3 are intertwined because, well, NC3 will operate in elements of JADC2,' the head of STRATCOM Air Force General John Hyten was quoted by US defence media in 2020. 'NC3 will also operate in things that are separate from JADC2 because of the unique nature of the nuclear business, but it will operate in significant elements of JADC2,' Hyten said. 'Not involved' and no information Prime Minister and National Security and Intelligence Minister Christopher Luxon was asked by RNZ if the government had any information linking NC3 to New Zealand. After initially sending the request to the defence ministry, his office later produced a single document, which was not relevant. Asked the same thing, Defence Minister Judith Collins' office said: 'No information in scope of your request has been identified.' The defence agencies also had no information on any links. But they unequivocally stated: 'The New Zealand Defence Force is not involved in the United States' Nuclear Command Control and Communications' and 'The Ministry of Defence has no involvement in the United States' Nuclear Command-Control-Communications.' The Pentagon issued a three-line statement to RNZ: 'The DOD respects the policies of our allies and partners, and routinely accounts for them in planning and cooperation. Our defence relationship with New Zealand remains strong. 'We remain committed to ensuring our cooperation aligns with legal and policy frameworks.' The defence ministry's OIA response said that when the government agreed to the US setting up a hub for monitoring satellites and space activity in Auckland in 2023, the ministry included a condition that the operation 'does not contribute to nuclear command and control systems and that NZDF personnel will not aid or abet activity enabling possession or control over nuclear weapons'. Space – and space launches – are integral to any upgrade of NC3. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said in May that any military participation in space-related activities with the US was subject to 'express caveats to ensure that it does not contribute to nuclear command and control systems'. 'The prospect of nuclear decapitation' Both efforts – NC3 and CJADC2 – are hugely complex and expensive. The US feels it has no choice, with its lawmakers and think-tanks increasingly expressing the idea that it faces an existential threat like never before. 'The United States will face two nuclear peer adversaries for the first time,' said a 2023 congressional report, delivered by only the second Strategic Posture Commission to report back since 2009. 'Their projected capabilities magnify how complex this competition could become, and combine to pose an existential threat to the United States and its allies and partners.' China has more than doubled its arsenal of nuclear warheads in recent years to an estimated 600, heading for more than 1000 by 2030. At the same time, Beijing is adding non-nuclear weapons that will be able to attack in new ways in space, where nuclear command has a lot of its tech. 'New Russian and Chinese weapons make Washington's nuclear command structure vulnerable to attack,' the vice chair of the non-partisan Commission on the National Defence Strategy Eric Edelman wrote early this month. 'These emerging capabilities raise a spectre that the US government has not had to face for at least 35 years: The prospect of nuclear decapitation.' The US has about 3700 warheads. The problem is not the scale, but the age of the nuclear 'wing': Four-decade-old Minuteman missiles, superannuitant nuclear bombers, and systems that till a few years ago were running on 1980s floppy discs. The US fleet of nuclear-armed submarines is stretched. The parts of the system relied on to detect enemy launches of nukes, track missiles and launch an attack are also old. Trump, like presidents before him, is dependent on NC3 for what he knows about a threat and how he responds, and NC3 remains highly dependent on a few big, old satellites. In March, US lawmakers backed calls by their nuclear and space commanders to push on with upgrades across the nuclear system. 'We are talking about being strong enough to prevent a nuclear war, and nothing could be more important,' Republican senator Roger Wicker, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said at the hearing. That strength will be impacted by Trump's proposed 'golden dome' defence shield against nuclear and conventional missiles. Some analysts say it could actually cut nuclear stockpiles by reducing the perceived threat in Washington, but others say it could fuel a space arms race. 'Number one priority for the United States Army for modernisation' Senior Pentagon leaders have for years been saying that their systems are not up to the task, and not just the nuclear ones. They stated their 'existing command and control architecture is insufficient to meet the demands of the 2018 National Defence Strategy', the Congressional Research Service said in 2022. The response has been to embark on building platforms 'to connect sensors from all of the military services – Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Space Force – into a single network', in a 'once-in-a-generation modernisation'. The mega-network plan predates Trump and its buildout as planned would outlast him. Some defence analysts have expressed doubts it might be too ambitious, congressional reports show. In its statement to RNZ, the Pentagon did not address whether work on CJADC2 was changing at all under the Trump White House. However, a US commander in March called the network 'incredibly important, probably [the] number one priority for the United States Army for modernisation'. 'We will never achieve our warfighting effectiveness if we don't have a command-and-control network that enables our commanders to execute mission command at the point of need on the battlefield. Period, full stop.' 'Bloc confrontation' The work on both nuclear and conventional sides picked up after the US Space Force was set up in 2019, with the pace increasing even more under the recent strategy to work with allies more. Another main driver has been the rapidly deteriorating geopolitical environment, which governments from Wellington to London have cited as the main reason to ramp up defence spending. At the same time, Ukraine has ushered in huge changes to warfighting tech and tactics, with the 'conventional' weapons stable expanding to include very unconventional hypersonic missiles, drones, electromagnetic jammers and lasers. The US Space Force laid out in March a package of six new space weapons it wants to underwrite its aggressive new posture. But anything it can attack with in space represents a potential threat to its own command-and-control networks. The New Zealand government has committed to spending a growing proportion for defence on emerging technologies. Collins, the defence and space minister, repeated this at a recent security summit in Singapore. At the same summit, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said China was 'credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power' in Asia. On the summit sidelines, he also called on Australia to ramp up its defence spending even further, 'as soon as possible'. China accused Hegseth of trying to engineer a Cold War 'bloc confrontation' between it and other countries in the region. In an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, former political leaders Helen Clark and Don Brash, among others, said the country was in danger of taking sides, with the US versus China. But Luxon pushed back on Monday, saying times had changed, and New Zealand had 'deep engagement and cooperation' with both countries. 'We will make our own assessment based on our own needs as to how we navigate those relationships,' Luxon told Morning Report. 'We offer a global launchpad for all things space' Non-nuclear New Zealand finds itself in an unusual position compared to its partners in the Five Eyes intelligence group – the US, Canada, UK and Australia – and compared to others in the Indo-Pacific region. It is a defence minnow, but it is party to intelligence few others get. It is an enthusiastic participant in efforts to build the CJADC2 mega-network, papers show, but has limited high-tech of its own to add, at least until the new spending on defence kicks in. Its armed forces have no space assets, but hosted more space launches than Russia last year. It is very keen to secure international space business. 'We offer a global launchpad for all things space,' Collins told a space symposium outside the US Space Force base in Colorado in April, an OIA showed, but the country also has four-decade-old nuclear-free laws. It added a new law in 2017 forbidding rocket launches that 'contribute to nuclear weapons programmes or capabilities'. The US military began talks this year with New Zealand and several other countries that can launch or want to, about using their spaceports in future, RNZ revealed last month. While both CJADC2 and NC3 would require many more satellites, it remains unclear if these would be allowed to be launched outside the US, given the extra security settings on anything nuclear. This remains classified, along with many other details of how conventional and nuclear systems integrate, although STRATCOM has stressed the highest-security parts of NC3 would be kept separate. Partial separation was vital, said leading nuclear system analysts at the Atlantic Council last year. 'Risk tolerance for NC3 systems is understandably non-existent; there can be no uncertainty in the ability of the United States to positively command and control its nuclear forces at any given moment,' wrote Peter Hays and Sarah Mineiro. 'US and our allies are trailblazing upgrades' Secrets aside, STRATCOM nuclear command has been clear about expanding the 'tent' of its command-and-control. 'You have to have that interface back and forth,' General Hyten said to defence media, when talking about the technology. It has also been transparent about the role of allies. 'The US and our allies are trailblazing upgrades and capitalising on new technologies to maintain credible and effective deterrence,' said the head of STRATCOM General Anthony Cotton last year. The two-pronged integration between technologies and allies is charted across multiple strategies, plans and administrations. 'We seek to network our efforts across domains, theatres, and the spectrum of conflict to ensure that the US military, in close cooperation with the rest of the US government and our Allies and partners, makes the folly and costs of aggression very clear,' said former President Joe Biden's Deputy Secretary of Defence Dr Kathleen Hicks. 'Cutting edge of military experimentation' The CJADC2 mega-network now involves more than three dozen militaries. The first satellites to support it were launched last year from America's spaceports. The NZDF has engaged in US-led ground, air and naval experiments and exercises since at least the start of 2024, with a primary objective to build out the network. An exercise in March -called Convergence Capstone 5 – was 'a critical proving ground' for a networked fighting force, the NZDF said. 'It puts us at the cutting edge of military experimentation.' It had observers for the first time in 2024 at a Global Information Domination Exercise (GIDE), linked to Project Convergence. The 2023 Talisman Sabre US-Australia bilateral the NZDF was invited to let the partners from 16 countries communicate on one system for the first time. 'We've never set up this kind of construct before,' a US officer told media. For Talisman Sabre 2025, while the NZDF is taking just one drone of its own, it gets to work with the US's much bigger and more deadly fleet, on the eve of the Pentagon rolling out its Replicator strategy for tens of thousands of drones across the Indo-Pacific. Interoperability and modernisation were the key, said defence force reports, released under the OIA. A 'priority for experimentation is highly likely to remain focussed on sensor integration and data sharing/availability', it said about Project Convergence. Under the US Air Force's Advanced Battle Management System, the NZDF – along with Japan, Germany and France – took part in targeting accelerated by AI last year. Other experiments took place to connect US operators with the Five Eyes Battle Labs, also known as the Combined Federated Battle Laboratories Network. For Project Overmatch, the US Navy had by 2021 been 'experimenting in a way that allows us to essentially pass any data on any network to the warfighter'. When the NZDF signed a project agreement to join Overmatch along with other Five Eyes partners in February, the Pentagon called the move 'historic'. 'Joint efforts to promote peace and security' In Project Overmatch – under the slogan 'Decide first, win' – faster satellite-to-gun connections have so far been added to three aircraft carrier groups in the Pacific. Collins sought in May to play down joining Overmatch, a move that went unannounced and was only revealed by RNZ. 'The NZDF routinely engages partners in joint efforts to promote peace and security, many of which are not announced or publicised,' Collins told Parliament in response to a question from the Greens. 'Project Overmatch is part of the US Combined Joint Command and Control strategy,' she added. 'The NZDF signed a Project Overmatch programme arrangement to explore ways in which our maritime forces can interoperate with partner nations, connect securely despite the actions of adversaries, and improve the survivability and lethality of our platforms.' However, the minister [ttps:// also said] she had received no aides-mémoire, briefings, memos, notes, reports or any other advice about Overmatch. The NZDF joined Overmatch a few weeks before its $12 billion defence capability plan was unveiled by Collins. NZ resisting the 'deep slide' – govt The government recently restated its anti-nuclear credentials made world-famous by former Prime Minister David Lange's riposte in an Oxford Union debate in 1987: 'I can smell the uranium on your breath.' In a speech in early 2024, Associate Minister of Foreign Affairs Todd McClay warned the world was in a 'deep slide' over nuclear weapons. 'Investments to modernise arsenals and, in some concerning cases, increase arsenals, is likely to lead to the further entrenchment of nuclear weapons for decades to come,' McClay told a disarmament conference. 'And mistrust has grown. 'And in the absence of any discernible progress to disarm, the seeming incentive persists for the 'have-nots' to join the 'haves' and acquire these terrible weapons.' McClay reiterated the country's longstanding calls for full implementation of the treaties on non-proliferation and on prohibition of nuclear weapons. McClay was not available for an interview for this story. 'Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture' Both CJADC2 and NC3 depend on what happens in space, and Hegseth has said space would become the most important battle domain. New satellites to warn against nuclear attack are scheduled to be launched later this year, a step towards replacing a 14-year-old system called SBIRS, a space-based infrared system. Hundreds of small satellites in two layers are also going up to form the 'backbone' of CJADC2, US Space Force said. This 'Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture' (PWSA) is providing big business for several large defence contractors. 'Proliferation' has become the Pentagon buzzword, a strategy of spreading out technology, especially in space, to make it much harder for an enemy to register a knockout blow. Another recent strategy is to contract commercial space companies to help it achieve 'responsive' launch – fast turnaround launches in case satellites do get knocked out. The NZDF has a tiny space footprint but is aiming to make it bigger, with American help. Its first space payloads – which went up this year and last year – are within the Five Eyes newly 'federated space system' and under a bigger project by the US Navy to achieve laser-fast satellite communications Collins denied the experiments had anything to do with the Project Overmatch: 'The Tui and Korimako payloads are for research purposes only and have no direct utility for military operations,' she said. The NZDF had said earlier: 'These experiments will generate NZDF knowledge to drive future military space operations.' 'Force multipliers for strengthening deterrence' The integration and overlap of conventional and nuclear command-control-and-communications systems is going ahead, official records from within the US show. The impetus to do more faster is growing. 'US nuclear planners… need to plan for the possibility of a combined Sino-Russian nuclear attack,' Edelman said this month. His opinion piece on the website Foreign Policy was headlined 'America's latest problem: A three-way nuclear race'. 'The recent joint Chinese-Russian strategic bomber patrols near Alaska demonstrate that this is not just a theoretical concern,' he wrote. While America's defence doctrine does not rule out a first strike, its stress has always been on deterrence. The Pentagon and lawmakers are agreed their old nuclear systems do not provide the best deterrent, and must be modernised. They have also looked at command-and-control on all fronts, arrived at the same conclusion and came up with a joined-up approach – joined-up tech, with joined-up allies and partners. A subsection of a 2024 Pentagon report, headlined 'Optimising innovation cooperation with allies and partners', warned the US was not adequately integrating key allies and partners, and it recommended that the 'DoD should leverage these strengths through new and innovative mechanisms of cooperation'. The Nuclear Posture Review in 2022, in a section on the Indo-Pacific, stated: 'We view the expertise, capabilities, and resources of our allies and partners as 'force multipliers' for strengthening deterrence.'
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Macron Talks New Caledonia At Pacific-France Summit
Article – RNZ Macron dedicated a significant part of his address to the situation in New Caledonia. , Correspondent French Pacific Desk French president Emmanuel Macron chaired a Pacific-France summit on Tuesday, in the margins of the UN Ocean Conference (UNOC) held in Nice. In his opening speech, the French head of state touched on several aspects of France's cooperation in the Pacific region, including in terms of environment, defence and geostrategy. €2 million Euros for Pacific Forum's Resilient Facility Pledging to maintain France's diplomacy 'in very close connection with our common interests in the Pacific', including the recent opening of a new Embassy in Apia, Samoa, Macron acknowledged the 'central' role played by the Pacific Islands Forum, which will receive about €2 million Euros as a contribution to the Pacific Resilient Facility fund for the region. He also mentioned the opening of a project to introduce new air links connecting French Polynesia, the Cook Islands, Fiji, Tonga and Samoa. He also touched on France-Pacific cooperation at 'strategic and military' levels, through a recently-created 'Pacific Academy' and regular joint regional exercises in order to foster 'common credibility to protect our zones and fight against illegal fishing'. High on the agenda were key issues such as climate change and its adverse effects on Pacific Island states on human lives and biodiversity, natural disasters affecting the region, breaches of sovereignty and security resulting from illegal fishing, and trans-regional crime, especially the rising problem of drug trafficking. In terms of regional maritime security and fight against criminality, especially illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU), France, but also Australia and New Zealand Navys are regularly contributing to patrols in the Pacific Islands Forum's Fisheries Agency (FFA) member states' exclusive economic zones (EEZs). Significant part dedicated to New Caledonia Macron dedicated a significant part of his address to the situation in New Caledonia, one year after the deadly riots that broke out in May 2024 (causing 14 deaths and and estimated €2.2 billion Euros in damages). He told Pacific leaders he was aware of Pacific concerns about 'the events that destabilized New Caledonia a year ago '. 'I want to tell you here… The French state has respected its commitments made decades ago by organizing in recent years three referendums with United Nations observers which were validated and noted. 'But a year ago, violence broke out, triggered by several factors… which we took very seriously.' Macron said since then, France has unlocked 'more than €3 billion Euros' for New Caledonia's economic reconstruction. 'And we have spared no effort with the government, in particular the Minister of State [Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls] to restore dialogue between all parties.' Since February Valls has managed to bring all of New Caledonia's political camps around the same table, something that had not happened since 2022. But the proposal he put on the table in early May, during a behind-closed-doors 'conclave', drew ire from parties in favour of New Caledonia remaining a part of France. They objected, saying Valls' project failed to take into account that the three recent referendums had expressed a rejection of independence and that the Minister's 'sovereignty with France' offer (including transfer of key powers from France to New Caledonia, a dual Kanaky-France citizenship and an international standing) was tantamount to some form of independence which they strongly objected to. A 'new project' on the table in July? On discussions about a resumption of talks to find a bipartisan and comprehensive agreement on the French Pacific territory's future political status, Macron also confirmed that he will 'hold a summit in Paris in the coming weeks to bring together all stakeholders again and manage to come up with a new project'. Macron said after holding three referendums between 2018 and 2021 on New Caledonia's sovereignty, he was not in favour of holding yet another one. 'I must say I honestly believe Pacific, Oceanian or Melanesian cultures are more based on consultation and circularity, not really suited for referendums …whereby you're supposed to express a clearcut yes or no.' We won't make the same mistakes again 'We will not make the same mistakes again in the future,' Macron told Pacific islands leaders, including those from the three French Pacific territories of New Caledonia, French Polynesia and Wallis and Futuna. He said building a political solution for New Caledonia was still work in progress 'with a lot of humility, together'. And in this process, he told regional leaders 'we welcome your advice' and 'recommendations'. He mentioned and thanked Pacific Islands Forum leaders for a fact-finding mission that travelled to New Caledonia in late 2024 and gave rise to 'very productive exchanges'. 'We will do all we can to succeed and I am confident we'll do it with respect for everyone and for all (New) Caledonians, for peace, unity and stability in the region. 'But we are trying to hold this dialogue while respecting the various opinions and the principles of democracy.' During the same Pacific-France summit, Macron also held talks with leaders from Papua New Guinea, Palau, Samoa, Tonga, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Kiribati, the Federated States of Micronesia, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. The Pacific Islands Forum delegation was headed by its secretary-general Baron Waqa.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
The Pentagon, NZ And The New Nuclear Overlap
Article – RNZ The US is modernising its nuclear weapons command and control system – but what does that mean for New Zealand? , Reporter The United States is modernising its nuclear weapons command and control system, and while it is not directly involved, New Zealand will feel the effects. Top US officials, nuclear commanders and Pentagon documents say the nuclear command-control-and-communications system – NC3 – will be integrated and 'overlap' with a new global mega-network of battlefield communications. The Combined Joint All-Domain Command-and-Control (CJADC2) mega-network is being built to also cover conventional weapons and all battlefield domains – land, sea, air, space and cyber – with the basic aim to speed up operations and spot threats from far away. 'The two systems have to be overlapped to a great extent so that we can have integration,' the US nuclear command STRATCOM told Congress in 2022. The mega-network is seen by the US as a 'once-in-a-generation modernisation of its approach to commanding military forces', with modernisation of its nuclear system seen as a matter of survival against China and Russia. At the same time, the Pentagon has adopted an aggressive strategy to engage allies and partners more in developing advanced technologies, including the mega-network. New Zealand is involved with this strategy through a growing range of exercises, experiments and agreements on land, sea and in space. The NZ Defence Force (NZDF) has been active for months in anchor CJADC2 projects for both the US Army and US Air Force. 'US, allies and partners integrate for dynamic targeting kill-chain automation experiments,' ran a US Air Force headline about this last year, in a report naming NZ. The NZDF signed up this year for the US Navy's main contribution to the mega-network, called Project Overmatch. The NZ government called these 'efforts to promote peace and security' that would 'improve the survivability and lethality of our platforms'. But the government does not acknowledge any link to the command-and-control of nuclear weapons. The defence forces were 'not involved' in NC3, they said. Ministers, officials and the NZDF had no information or advice about this, RNZ was told. 'Any linkages between the United States NC3 and its joint all-domain command and control strategy are a matter for the government of the United States,' the defence ministry said. US authorities have talked repeatedly about the growing linkage, partly to increase resiliency, using layers of new satellites. RNZ asked the Pentagon if it had considered what that might mean for nuclear-free New Zealand. 'The DOD [Department of Defence] respects the policies of our allies and partners, and routinely accounts for them in planning and cooperation,' it replied. The NZ defence ministry has made one small move, carving out a non-nuclear niche for a US-led satellite-monitoring hub in Auckland. 'You couldn't afford to build two completely separate systems' While there is no suggestion NZ actually has its hands on a nuclear device or trigger, it is subject to the same rapid technological and geopolitical changes disrupting and reshaping the world's armed forces, including the US nuclear wing that NZ shelters under. That nuclear wing is ageing, and the hugely expensive decades-long effort to overhaul it – US President Donald Trump wants to increase spending on nuclear weapons by 29 percent this year to $41 billion – will alter how NC3 works, and what it interacts with. The head of nuclear command Admiral Chas Richard said in 2022: 'It is to our benefit, where appropriate, to use our conventional command and control to add redundancy and resiliency to our nuclear command and control. 'You couldn't afford to build two completely separate systems if we tried to achieve that in the real world.' He told the Senate Armed Services Committee he was 'very pleased that a subset of what JADC2 is doing is for nuclear command and control'. The US added a 'C' at the front of JADC2 last year to reflect allies' growing engagement. A 2022 Pentagon strategy for building CJADC2 detailed five workstreams: The fourth was 'integrating with Nuclear C2 and C3'. 'It's important to realise that JADC2 and NC3 are intertwined because, well, NC3 will operate in elements of JADC2,' the head of STRATCOM Air Force General John Hyten was quoted by US defence media in 2020. 'NC3 will also operate in things that are separate from JADC2 because of the unique nature of the nuclear business, but it will operate in significant elements of JADC2,' Hyten said. 'Not involved' and no information Prime Minister and National Security and Intelligence Minister Christopher Luxon was asked by RNZ if the government had any information linking NC3 to New Zealand. After initially sending the request to the defence ministry, his office later produced a single document, which was not relevant. Asked the same thing, Defence Minister Judith Collins' office said: 'No information in scope of your request has been identified.' The defence agencies also had no information on any links. But they unequivocally stated: 'The New Zealand Defence Force is not involved in the United States' Nuclear Command Control and Communications' and 'The Ministry of Defence has no involvement in the United States' Nuclear Command-Control-Communications.' The Pentagon issued a three-line statement to RNZ: 'The DOD respects the policies of our allies and partners, and routinely accounts for them in planning and cooperation. Our defence relationship with New Zealand remains strong. 'We remain committed to ensuring our cooperation aligns with legal and policy frameworks.' The defence ministry's OIA response said that when the government agreed to the US setting up a hub for monitoring satellites and space activity in Auckland in 2023, the ministry included a condition that the operation 'does not contribute to nuclear command and control systems and that NZDF personnel will not aid or abet activity enabling possession or control over nuclear weapons'. Space – and space launches – are integral to any upgrade of NC3. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said in May that any military participation in space-related activities with the US was subject to 'express caveats to ensure that it does not contribute to nuclear command and control systems'. 'The prospect of nuclear decapitation' Both efforts – NC3 and CJADC2 – are hugely complex and expensive. The US feels it has no choice, with its lawmakers and think-tanks increasingly expressing the idea that it faces an existential threat like never before. 'The United States will face two nuclear peer adversaries for the first time,' said a 2023 congressional report, delivered by only the second Strategic Posture Commission to report back since 2009. 'Their projected capabilities magnify how complex this competition could become, and combine to pose an existential threat to the United States and its allies and partners.' China has more than doubled its arsenal of nuclear warheads in recent years to an estimated 600, heading for more than 1000 by 2030. At the same time, Beijing is adding non-nuclear weapons that will be able to attack in new ways in space, where nuclear command has a lot of its tech. 'New Russian and Chinese weapons make Washington's nuclear command structure vulnerable to attack,' the vice chair of the non-partisan Commission on the National Defence Strategy Eric Edelman wrote early this month. 'These emerging capabilities raise a spectre that the US government has not had to face for at least 35 years: The prospect of nuclear decapitation.' The US has about 3700 warheads. The problem is not the scale, but the age of the nuclear 'wing': Four-decade-old Minuteman missiles, superannuitant nuclear bombers, and systems that till a few years ago were running on 1980s floppy discs. The US fleet of nuclear-armed submarines is stretched. The parts of the system relied on to detect enemy launches of nukes, track missiles and launch an attack are also old. Trump, like presidents before him, is dependent on NC3 for what he knows about a threat and how he responds, and NC3 remains highly dependent on a few big, old satellites. In March, US lawmakers backed calls by their nuclear and space commanders to push on with upgrades across the nuclear system. 'We are talking about being strong enough to prevent a nuclear war, and nothing could be more important,' Republican senator Roger Wicker, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said at the hearing. That strength will be impacted by Trump's proposed 'golden dome' defence shield against nuclear and conventional missiles. Some analysts say it could actually cut nuclear stockpiles by reducing the perceived threat in Washington, but others say it could fuel a space arms race. 'Number one priority for the United States Army for modernisation' Senior Pentagon leaders have for years been saying that their systems are not up to the task, and not just the nuclear ones. They stated their 'existing command and control architecture is insufficient to meet the demands of the 2018 National Defence Strategy', the Congressional Research Service said in 2022. The response has been to embark on building platforms 'to connect sensors from all of the military services – Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Space Force – into a single network', in a 'once-in-a-generation modernisation'. The mega-network plan predates Trump and its buildout as planned would outlast him. Some defence analysts have expressed doubts it might be too ambitious, congressional reports show. In its statement to RNZ, the Pentagon did not address whether work on CJADC2 was changing at all under the Trump White House. However, a US commander in March called the network 'incredibly important, probably [the] number one priority for the United States Army for modernisation'. 'We will never achieve our warfighting effectiveness if we don't have a command-and-control network that enables our commanders to execute mission command at the point of need on the battlefield. Period, full stop.' 'Bloc confrontation' The work on both nuclear and conventional sides picked up after the US Space Force was set up in 2019, with the pace increasing even more under the recent strategy to work with allies more. Another main driver has been the rapidly deteriorating geopolitical environment, which governments from Wellington to London have cited as the main reason to ramp up defence spending. At the same time, Ukraine has ushered in huge changes to warfighting tech and tactics, with the 'conventional' weapons stable expanding to include very unconventional hypersonic missiles, drones, electromagnetic jammers and lasers. The US Space Force laid out in March a package of six new space weapons it wants to underwrite its aggressive new posture. But anything it can attack with in space represents a potential threat to its own command-and-control networks. The New Zealand government has committed to spending a growing proportion for defence on emerging technologies. Collins, the defence and space minister, repeated this at a recent security summit in Singapore. At the same summit, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said China was 'credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power' in Asia. On the summit sidelines, he also called on Australia to ramp up its defence spending even further, 'as soon as possible'. China accused Hegseth of trying to engineer a Cold War 'bloc confrontation' between it and other countries in the region. In an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, former political leaders Helen Clark and Don Brash, among others, said the country was in danger of taking sides, with the US versus China. But Luxon pushed back on Monday, saying times had changed, and New Zealand had 'deep engagement and cooperation' with both countries. 'We will make our own assessment based on our own needs as to how we navigate those relationships,' Luxon told Morning Report. 'We offer a global launchpad for all things space' Non-nuclear New Zealand finds itself in an unusual position compared to its partners in the Five Eyes intelligence group – the US, Canada, UK and Australia – and compared to others in the Indo-Pacific region. It is a defence minnow, but it is party to intelligence few others get. It is an enthusiastic participant in efforts to build the CJADC2 mega-network, papers show, but has limited high-tech of its own to add, at least until the new spending on defence kicks in. Its armed forces have no space assets, but hosted more space launches than Russia last year. It is very keen to secure international space business. 'We offer a global launchpad for all things space,' Collins told a space symposium outside the US Space Force base in Colorado in April, an OIA showed, but the country also has four-decade-old nuclear-free laws. It added a new law in 2017 forbidding rocket launches that 'contribute to nuclear weapons programmes or capabilities'. The US military began talks this year with New Zealand and several other countries that can launch or want to, about using their spaceports in future, RNZ revealed last month. While both CJADC2 and NC3 would require many more satellites, it remains unclear if these would be allowed to be launched outside the US, given the extra security settings on anything nuclear. This remains classified, along with many other details of how conventional and nuclear systems integrate, although STRATCOM has stressed the highest-security parts of NC3 would be kept separate. Partial separation was vital, said leading nuclear system analysts at the Atlantic Council last year. 'Risk tolerance for NC3 systems is understandably non-existent; there can be no uncertainty in the ability of the United States to positively command and control its nuclear forces at any given moment,' wrote Peter Hays and Sarah Mineiro. 'US and our allies are trailblazing upgrades' Secrets aside, STRATCOM nuclear command has been clear about expanding the 'tent' of its command-and-control. 'You have to have that interface back and forth,' General Hyten said to defence media, when talking about the technology. It has also been transparent about the role of allies. 'The US and our allies are trailblazing upgrades and capitalising on new technologies to maintain credible and effective deterrence,' said the head of STRATCOM General Anthony Cotton last year. The two-pronged integration between technologies and allies is charted across multiple strategies, plans and administrations. 'We seek to network our efforts across domains, theatres, and the spectrum of conflict to ensure that the US military, in close cooperation with the rest of the US government and our Allies and partners, makes the folly and costs of aggression very clear,' said former President Joe Biden's Deputy Secretary of Defence Dr Kathleen Hicks. 'Cutting edge of military experimentation' The CJADC2 mega-network now involves more than three dozen militaries. The first satellites to support it were launched last year from America's spaceports. The NZDF has engaged in US-led ground, air and naval experiments and exercises since at least the start of 2024, with a primary objective to build out the network. An exercise in March -called Convergence Capstone 5 – was 'a critical proving ground' for a networked fighting force, the NZDF said. 'It puts us at the cutting edge of military experimentation.' It had observers for the first time in 2024 at a Global Information Domination Exercise (GIDE), linked to Project Convergence. The 2023 Talisman Sabre US-Australia bilateral the NZDF was invited to let the partners from 16 countries communicate on one system for the first time. 'We've never set up this kind of construct before,' a US officer told media. For Talisman Sabre 2025, while the NZDF is taking just one drone of its own, it gets to work with the US's much bigger and more deadly fleet, on the eve of the Pentagon rolling out its Replicator strategy for tens of thousands of drones across the Indo-Pacific. Interoperability and modernisation were the key, said defence force reports, released under the OIA. A 'priority for experimentation is highly likely to remain focussed on sensor integration and data sharing/availability', it said about Project Convergence. Under the US Air Force's Advanced Battle Management System, the NZDF – along with Japan, Germany and France – took part in targeting accelerated by AI last year. Other experiments took place to connect US operators with the Five Eyes Battle Labs, also known as the Combined Federated Battle Laboratories Network. For Project Overmatch, the US Navy had by 2021 been 'experimenting in a way that allows us to essentially pass any data on any network to the warfighter'. When the NZDF signed a project agreement to join Overmatch along with other Five Eyes partners in February, the Pentagon called the move 'historic'. 'Joint efforts to promote peace and security' In Project Overmatch – under the slogan 'Decide first, win' – faster satellite-to-gun connections have so far been added to three aircraft carrier groups in the Pacific. Collins sought in May to play down joining Overmatch, a move that went unannounced and was only revealed by RNZ. 'The NZDF routinely engages partners in joint efforts to promote peace and security, many of which are not announced or publicised,' Collins told Parliament in response to a question from the Greens. 'Project Overmatch is part of the US Combined Joint Command and Control strategy,' she added. 'The NZDF signed a Project Overmatch programme arrangement to explore ways in which our maritime forces can interoperate with partner nations, connect securely despite the actions of adversaries, and improve the survivability and lethality of our platforms.' However, the minister [ttps:// also said] she had received no aides-mémoire, briefings, memos, notes, reports or any other advice about Overmatch. The NZDF joined Overmatch a few weeks before its $12 billion defence capability plan was unveiled by Collins. NZ resisting the 'deep slide' – govt The government recently restated its anti-nuclear credentials made world-famous by former Prime Minister David Lange's riposte in an Oxford Union debate in 1987: 'I can smell the uranium on your breath.' In a speech in early 2024, Associate Minister of Foreign Affairs Todd McClay warned the world was in a 'deep slide' over nuclear weapons. 'Investments to modernise arsenals and, in some concerning cases, increase arsenals, is likely to lead to the further entrenchment of nuclear weapons for decades to come,' McClay told a disarmament conference. 'And mistrust has grown. 'And in the absence of any discernible progress to disarm, the seeming incentive persists for the 'have-nots' to join the 'haves' and acquire these terrible weapons.' McClay reiterated the country's longstanding calls for full implementation of the treaties on non-proliferation and on prohibition of nuclear weapons. McClay was not available for an interview for this story. 'Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture' Both CJADC2 and NC3 depend on what happens in space, and Hegseth has said space would become the most important battle domain. New satellites to warn against nuclear attack are scheduled to be launched later this year, a step towards replacing a 14-year-old system called SBIRS, a space-based infrared system. Hundreds of small satellites in two layers are also going up to form the 'backbone' of CJADC2, US Space Force said. This 'Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture' (PWSA) is providing big business for several large defence contractors. 'Proliferation' has become the Pentagon buzzword, a strategy of spreading out technology, especially in space, to make it much harder for an enemy to register a knockout blow. Another recent strategy is to contract commercial space companies to help it achieve 'responsive' launch – fast turnaround launches in case satellites do get knocked out. The NZDF has a tiny space footprint but is aiming to make it bigger, with American help. Its first space payloads – which went up this year and last year – are within the Five Eyes newly 'federated space system' and under a bigger project by the US Navy to achieve laser-fast satellite communications Collins denied the experiments had anything to do with the Project Overmatch: 'The Tui and Korimako payloads are for research purposes only and have no direct utility for military operations,' she said. The NZDF had said earlier: 'These experiments will generate NZDF knowledge to drive future military space operations.' 'Force multipliers for strengthening deterrence' The integration and overlap of conventional and nuclear command-control-and-communications systems is going ahead, official records from within the US show. The impetus to do more faster is growing. 'US nuclear planners… need to plan for the possibility of a combined Sino-Russian nuclear attack,' Edelman said this month. His opinion piece on the website Foreign Policy was headlined 'America's latest problem: A three-way nuclear race'. 'The recent joint Chinese-Russian strategic bomber patrols near Alaska demonstrate that this is not just a theoretical concern,' he wrote. While America's defence doctrine does not rule out a first strike, its stress has always been on deterrence. The Pentagon and lawmakers are agreed their old nuclear systems do not provide the best deterrent, and must be modernised. They have also looked at command-and-control on all fronts, arrived at the same conclusion and came up with a joined-up approach – joined-up tech, with joined-up allies and partners. A subsection of a 2024 Pentagon report, headlined 'Optimising innovation cooperation with allies and partners', warned the US was not adequately integrating key allies and partners, and it recommended that the 'DoD should leverage these strengths through new and innovative mechanisms of cooperation'. The Nuclear Posture Review in 2022, in a section on the Indo-Pacific, stated: 'We view the expertise, capabilities, and resources of our allies and partners as 'force multipliers' for strengthening deterrence.'
