
False information on ivermectin continues to circulate worldwide
"The Media laughed and said Ivermectin was ONLY for horses and cows? THEY KNEW it was made for people since 1987," begins a May 7, 2025 Facebook post.
It goes on to list 12 uses for ivermectin to treat everything from Covid-19 to cancer.
The image shows an injectable version of ivermectin intended for cows and swine, implying that people should purchase the product in its formulation for animals -- a notion explicitly rejected by pharmacists (archived here).
Image
Screenshot of a Facebook post taken May 13, 2025
Canadians posted the same text in French, while AFP identified other posts spreading versions of the claim in Spanish, Hungarian, Dutch, Bosnian, Greek, Czech and German.
Keyword searches revealed the identical text has been shared across social networks since at least January 2025, around the time that actor Mel Gibson made unproven claims about ivermectin curing cancer on Joe Rogan's popular podcast.
This follows years of misinformation about the drug, particularly among those skeptical of the mRNA vaccines developed to protect against Covid-19 (archived here). The false belief in positive off-label uses for ivermectin triggered legislative moves in several US states to allow access to the drug without a prescription.
In Canada, ivermectin is only approved for use by humans to treat "parasitic infections (oral) and rosacea (topical)" (archived here).
Similarly, in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration approved ivermectin tablets "to treat some parasitic worms," while topical formulations are available for head lice and rosacea (archived here).
Ivermectin has been shown to be "clinically effective against certain worm infections and scabies," Akos Heinemann, research head in the department of pharmacology at the Medical University of Graz (archived here), told AFP on April 29, 2025.
"Anything else is unsubstantiated speculation based on scientifically untenable data or is simply fabricated," he
Potentially dangerous
While the widely shared text focuses on the potential benefits of ivermectin use, the drug has possible serious side effects (archived here).
In 2021, amid increasing calls to poison centers, Health Canada issued a warning against taking ivermectin off-label or in formulations for livestock (archived here). "Canadians should never consume health products intended for animals because of potential serious health risks, including seizures, coma and even death," it said.
Heinemann said: "Prescribing or taking ivermectin outside of its approved indications is grossly negligent."
Monika Redlberger-Fritz, researcher at the Center for Virology at the Medical University of Vienna (archived here), agreed. "Ivermectin should only be used as authorised; all other uses are not indicated," she said on April 29, 2025.
Covid-19 misinformation
The text shared across social media claims ivermectin "has been associated with a significant reduction in infection, hospitalization and mortality rates" due to Covid-19, but there is no data to back that claim.
During the pandemic, researchers explored whether ivermectin could treat Covid-19, but studies failed to find a clinical benefit.
and provincial health authorities, including in Alberta, do not recommend the use of ivermection to prevent or treat Covid-19.
The post also claims that ivermectin cures the "damage caused by mRNA vaccines through spike proteins."
This repeats a recurring false claim that the spike proteins produced after vaccination against Covid-19 cause harm or can be shed to the detriment of others.
Experts estimate the Covid-19 vaccines saved millions of lives (archived here).
Health Canada says the approved vaccines "reduce the risk of severe illness, death and post Covid-19 condition (long Covid)" (archived here).
Clinical trials needed
The social media post further claims that ivermectin kills cancerous cells and prevents their spread, but provides no evidence.
The effectiveness of ivermectin in treating cancer is currently an avenue of research for scientists, but it is far from being considered an alternative to existing
Since the mid-1990s, in vitro and animal studies have shown that the ivermectin molecule could have anti-cancer properties.
Jérôme Hinfray, head of scientific information for the French Anti-Cancer League, told AFP in March 2025: "Scientists have shown that the molecule could have antiproliferative properties, which therefore slow the development of cancer cells, and anti-metastatic properties, which would prevent the spread of cancer in the organisms of the animals that were the subjects of the experiment."
However, such studies cannot be extrapolated to humans, and further research and clinical trials are needed, said Claude Linassier, oncologist and director of the prevention, organisation and care pathways unit at the National Cancer Institute of France in March (archived here).
"We cannot in any case transpose data from an experimental model in mice to treatment in humans," he said.
"To claim that ivermectin is effective in curing cancer is certainly false or fanciful and is not based on any scientific data," he warned.
Research shows that cancer arises from mutations in cells, not from an external parasite (archived here), but the false belief that cancer is a parasite also fuels unproven faith in ivermectin and fenbendazole to cure it.
Following Gibson's claim, which was viewed more than 10 million times on YouTube, the Canadian Cancer Society took to X to warn against the "false hope" provided by misinformation on cancer treatment (archived here).
"Surgery, radiation and approved cancer drugs like chemotherapy are safe and proven to stop cancer cells from growing and spreading. Choosing to use an alternative therapy can have serious health effects, such as the cancer spreading or getting worse," the organization said.
More of AFP's reporting health misinformation is available here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Scientists on the front line in climate change ocean research
France 12:05 Issued on: Modified: From the show Ahead of the United Nations Oceans Conference in Nice, our reporters went to meet some of the French scientists working to better understand and preserve the ocean. From high-tech robots 6,000m below sea level to critical mineral exploration in the Pacific, the team takes a look at some of the initiatives across the country. They also explore how cuts to climate change projects in the US are having an impact in France.

LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Cadmium, a proven carcinogen, has contaminated some of the most consumed foods in France. Doctors warn against a 'public health time bomb'
This is neither a pesticide nor a so-called " forever chemical." Yet it has massively contaminated the French population, especially children, through their diet. The situation has become so serious that private practice doctors have sounded the alarm about what they call a "public health time bomb": cadmium. Less well-known than lead, mercury or arsenic, cadmium is a heavy metal classified as a proven human carcinogen. Present in phosphate fertilizers used in agriculture, it accumulates in soil and has contaminated some of the most widely consumed foods: breakfast cereals, bread, pasta and potatoes. In a letter sent on Monday, June 2, to the prime minister and the ministers of health, agriculture and environment, the National Conference of Regional Unions of Private Practice Health Professionals (URPS-ML) expressed its "grave concern." "Exposure to cadmium is a public health time bomb," said Pascal Meyvaert, coordinator of the URPS-ML's health and environment working group. "This is a public health emergency; it is our duty to alert the authorities to protect citizens. The government can no longer ignore this public health scourge!"


Sustainability Times
6 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'Radioactive Dust From the Desert': Nuclear-Contaminated Saharan Sand Rains Down on France, Shocking Scientists and Alarming the Public
IN A NUTSHELL 🌍 The Sahara regularly transports sand to Europe, sometimes carrying invisible particles that can be hazardous. regularly transports sand to Europe, sometimes carrying that can be hazardous. 🔍 In March 2022, cesium-137 was detected in sand that fell on France, initially linked to French nuclear tests. was detected in sand that fell on France, initially linked to French nuclear tests. 💡 Recent research identified that the radioactivity originated from international nuclear tests during the Cold War. during the Cold War. 🌱 Climate change may increase the transport of radioactive materials, necessitating international cooperation for monitoring. In March 2022, a striking phenomenon captivated both scientists and the public in Western Europe. A Saharan sandstorm swept across the region, painting the sky an ominous orange. While visually arresting, this event unveiled a hidden danger: the presence of radioactive particles in the sand deposits. Initially, authorities attributed this radioactivity to French nuclear tests conducted in the 1960s in Algeria. However, recent research has uncovered far more complex and concerning origins for this contamination. The Supposed Origins of Radioactivity in Saharan Sand The Sahara, often seen as a timeless traveler, regularly transports vast quantities of sand to Europe. This sand, laden with invisible particles, can occasionally prove hazardous. In March 2022, Parisian skies turned ochre, prompting scientists to analyze air quality. The findings revealed the presence of cesium-137, a radioactive particle. Initially, the contamination was linked to French nuclear tests in Algeria, with traces believed to have persisted, still tainting European skies. However, this explanation turned out to be incomplete. Researchers discovered that the source of this radioactivity was far more global. Analyses highlighted that the cesium-137 originated from international nuclear tests conducted during the Cold War. This discovery underscores a far more complex and worldwide history of contamination than previously believed. Avian Apocalypse in the Desert: Saudi Arabia's 105-Mile-Long Megastructure Threatens Mass Bird Deaths Along Key Migration Corridors Scientific Analysis of Radioactive Particles Researchers measured a median concentration of 14 becquerels per kilogram of cesium-137 in the sand, with peaks reaching up to 1,000 Bq/kg. While these figures are significant, they remain below the safety thresholds defined by the European Union. Nonetheless, vigilance is essential, as even low concentrations can have long-term effects on public health. To determine the origin of this radioactivity, scientists employed advanced isotopic analysis techniques. Each nuclear test leaves a unique chemical signature, enabling identification of precise sources of contamination. This expertise revealed that the radioactive particles stemmed from atmospheric residues left by American and Soviet tests, raising questions about international responsibility for radioactive pollution. 'Jurassic Tree Lives Again': 200-Million-Year-Old 'Dinosaur Tree' Successfully Bred in Stunning Scientific Breakthrough Environmental Impact and Climate Change With climate change, Saharan sandstorms may become more frequent, increasing the transport of radioactive materials. Growing erosion and shifting climate conditions exacerbate this phenomenon. Experts estimate that global warming is altering weather patterns, thereby facilitating the dispersion of toxic particles over distant territories. This raises concerns about the already fragile global ecological balance. Deposits of radioactive dust could have worrying ecological and health impacts if these episodes become more frequent. Consequently, international cooperation is crucial to monitor and understand these natural processes, which have become involuntary vectors of health risks. '268 Olympic Pools Below Ground': World's Largest Hidden Reservoir Discovered in Shocking Subterranean Water Breakthrough What Are the Stakes for Tomorrow? In light of these challenges, it is imperative to strengthen interdisciplinary research to anticipate the effects of climate change on the dispersion of radioactivity. This situation calls for close cooperation between countries to ensure continuous monitoring and develop reliable atmospheric predictive methods. Decision-makers and communities must be prepared to implement effective adaptation strategies. The question remains: how can we balance environmental protection and health risk management in a context where climate and nuclear issues are increasingly intertwined? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (21)