Former Hamas hostage delayed for inspection at JFK airport by U.S. agents
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) confirmed to JNS that former Hamas hostage Liri Albag was delayed for inspection at John F. Kennedy International Airport after she informed officials she had previously been held captive in Gaza.
Article content
Article content
'The traveler applied for admission at JFK and was referred for further inspection after she indicated she was a hostage of Hamas to the CBP officer,' a CBP spokesperson told JNS in response to a media inquiry. 'A CBP inspection was completed, as may be done for anyone who has been in a similar national security situation, and she was promptly admitted into the United States on a tourist visa.'
Article content
Albag, who was abducted from the Nahal Oz IDF base on Oct. 7, 2023, during the Hamas-led assault on southern Israel, was released earlier this year as part of a short-lived ceasefire and hostage deal. She arrived in New York on Sunday for a family vacation.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Hebrew media reported that an outdated alert in the airport's computer systems initially flagged Albag as still being held hostage, raising concerns among U.S. officials that someone might be impersonating her. Her father, Eli Albag, told Israeli outlets: 'It appeared in their system that she was still captive, they hadn't updated their computers. They were afraid someone (else) was entering the U.S. using her name.'
Article content
'It wasn't pleasant — but it's over,' he added, noting that his daughter was not distressed by the episode. 'We've arrived at our hotel, and everything's okay. It's behind us,' he told Channel 12.
Article content
According to reports, several Israeli officials intervened behind the scenes to resolve the issue, ensuring the family's entry after about an hour of delay.
Article content
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Alleged Canadian hacker unmasked after threatening cybersecurity researcher
When an alleged hacker known as 'Waifu' violently threatened her online, cybersecurity researcher Allison Nixon set out to unmask them. Now Connor Riley Moucka, a 25 year old from Kitchener, Ont., is being held in Canada as he awaits extradition to the U.S. to face multiple criminal charges. U.S. authorities accuse Moucka and his accomplices of hacking into at least 10 organizations and stealing troves of sensitive records like payroll and banking information. By holding stolen data for ransom, they allegedly extorted US$2.5 million in Bitcoin from three of their victims. 'I was not working on him until he started posting threats about me,' Nixon told from New York City. Nixon is the chief research officer and co-owner of Unit 221B, a U.S. cybersecurity firm named after Sherlock Holmes' apartment. Like the fictional detective, Nixon and her colleagues investigate cybercrimes and expose culprits. 'I've seen cybercriminals cause their own downfall,' Nixon, a dual Canadian-U.S. citizen, said. 'But this is probably the most ridiculous instance of it.' 'He couldn't stop threatening people' In 2024, hiding behind pseudonyms like 'Waifu,' Moucka purportedly used Telegram group chats to boast of his alleged crimes and threaten Nixon and her company. Nixon believes Moucka was trying to get her attention to find out what Unit221B knew about him – which she admits wasn't much at the time. Those threats, however, quickly made him a target for Unit221B and would be a crucial misstep in his undoing. 'He was drawing attention to himself and causing more people to work on his case and causing his case to become the higher priority,' Nixon said. 'He couldn't stop threatening people that weren't initially working on his case.' Nixon adds that threatening investigators 'is a really great way to get prioritized.' Working with Unit221B colleagues and partners like Mandiant, a cybersecurity company and subsidiary for Google, it took several months of labour-intensive digital sleuthing to reveal Moucka's identity, which was passed on to law enforcement. Nixon would not disclose exactly how Moucka was identified. 'I know that these threat actors try to learn intel collection methods so that they can try to protect their anonymity, so they can continue doing crimes,' she said. 'So I don't want to publicly discuss the details, because I want to continue using the same techniques again against these guys.' 'One of the biggest cybersecurity breaches' Moucka was arrested at his grandfather's house in Kitchener in October 2024 following a request from U.S. authorities. In March, he agreed to be extradited to the U.S., where he faces 20 federal charges, including several counts of conspiracy, computer fraud, wire fraud, extortion and aggravated identity theft. According to a U.S. indictment, Moucka and accomplices accessed personal records belonging to millions of people, including financial information, passport details and social security numbers. The indictment alleged their goal was 'to enrich themselves by: (a) accessing computers without authorization; (b) stealing sensitive personal identifying, financial, and other valuable information from those computers; (c) threatening to leak the stolen data unless the victims paid ransoms; and (d) offering to sell the stolen data online to other criminals.' While specific companies are not mentioned in court documents, the details largely match the massive 'Snowflake' hack from 2024, which targeted users of a cloud-based storage platform. Companies that used Snowflake and were affected by the breach include AT&T, Live Nation, Ticketmaster, Advance Auto Parts and Pure Storage, many of which had Canadian customers. 'It is certainly one of the biggest cybersecurity breaches that we've had in history,' David Jao, a mathematics professor and member of the University of Waterloo's Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute, told CTV News Kitchener last November. 'The case is not over, there are still other criminals that are out there that have not been caught yet.' Court documents also link Moucka to the case against Cameron John Wagenius, a U.S. Army soldier accused of selling hacked AT&T data, including call records allegedly belonging to Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Wagenius reportedly plead guilty earlier this year. Nixon says Moucka knew he would eventually be arrested, so he prepared what she refers to as 'insurance policies.' 'He gave packages of money and files to various contacts of his,' she said. 'One of these involved a package of sensitive call details belonging to the former vice-president, Kamala Harris, and the current president, Donald Trump, and multiple members of the Trump family.' 'Money-making schemes and violence' Moucka, Wagenius and other alleged accomplices are reportedly members of 'The Com' hacking community, which is predominantly comprised of young men from English-speaking countries like the U.K., the U.S. and Canada. According to cyberthreat intelligence firm Intel471, individuals and groups within 'The Com' have engaged 'in cybercriminal activities such as subscriber identity module (SIM) swapping, cryptocurrency theft, commissioning real-life violence, swatting and corporate intrusions.' Nixon says 'The Com' shares many traits with 'pre-internet teenage street gangs.' 'Teenagers with nothing better to do, rough home life, they meet each other, they congregate, they form a critical mass and they perpetrate money-making schemes and violence, and they're a negative impact on their local communities, right?' she said. ''The Com' is the same phenomenon, but playing out on the internet.' As he awaits extradition, Moucka was reportedly being held at the Maplehurst Correctional Centre in Milton, Ont. According to Canada's Department of Justice, 'the matter has now proceeded to the Ministerial phase of the process.' The case is expected to be heard at a federal court in Seattle. Moucka's lawyer did not respond to a request for comment. The charges against Moucka have not been proven in court. 'All this terrible stuff that I'm telling you about, I actually really enjoy investigating it,' Nixon said. 'It's like a puzzle every single time – and I love puzzles.' With files from Reuters and CTV News Kitchener's Krista Simpson
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada, China, Mexico, Japan and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs
Five nations and the European Union, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, documents released on Tuesday showed. Airlines and planemakers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of US$75 billion for the U.S. industry. The documents made public by the U.S. Commerce Department bared concerns over the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as nations such as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the European Union. 'As reliable trading partners, the European Union and United States should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field,' it added. Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10 per cent on nearly all airplane and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, U.S. planemaker Boeing cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for airplanes and parts. Opinion: Carney was right to not retaliate against Trump's latest tariffs 'The United States should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the United Kingdom,' Boeing told the Commerce Department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported US$1.45 billion in aircraft parts, just a tenth of the total, to the United States. The EU said it took U.S. exports of aircraft worth roughly US$12 billion, while exporting about $8 billion of aircraft to the U.S. In early May, the Commerce Department launched a 'Section 232' national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for even higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air Lines and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'Current U.S. tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100 per cent domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing U.S. content in its airplanes over the last decade and its newest airplanes, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88 per cent domestically-sourced content.' The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding that U.S. aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the entire aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defense sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways opposed new tariffs, however, saying, 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilize, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.'
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
U.S. Court rules Trump's tariffs can stay in effect while appeal proceeds
President Donald Trump walks down the stairs of Air Force One upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez) WASHINGTON — A U.S. federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs will remain in place while a case is heard — extending an emergency stay granted after a lower court found the devastating duties unlawful. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found 'a stay is warranted under the circumstances.' It provides a temporary victory for the Trump administration as it hits its first legal barriers for realigning global trade. 'The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country's national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai in an emailed statement Tuesday. 'The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' stay order is a welcome development, and we look forward to ultimately prevailing in court.' The U.S. Court of International Trade last month said Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, is a national security statute that gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. The ruling from the three-judge panel at the New York-based federal court in May said 'any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.' It said 'the challenged tariff orders will be vacated,' representing a nationwide injunction against any further imposition of the duties. The Trump administration quickly was granted an emergency motion, essentially freezing the decision by the trade court that blocked the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs. The appeals court upheld that stay but noted the need for an expedited hearing, saying 'these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration.' A proposed schedule says arguments are expected in court by July 31. That means that countries will continue to be hit by those duties, for now. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called it an 'unfortunate decision.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, represents five American small businesses pushing against the tariffs. He noted that the court did go out of its way to indicate this is not a ruling on the merits, and ordered an expedited schedule for consideration of the case. 'We have a strong case, and I remain guardedly optimistic that the appellate court will ultimately see that the president's claim of virtually unlimited power to impose tariffs is blatantly illegal — which is what every court to have considered the issue so far has concluded,' Somin said in an email to The Canadian Press. Stock markets have been in turmoil and supply chains have been upended as Trump used unprecedented presidential power to enact his tariffs. Up until Trump's return to the White House, IEEPA had never been used by a president to impose tariffs. Trump hit Canada with economywide duties in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl. He partially paused levies a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with duties on nearly every country saying America's trade deficits amounted to a national emergency. The president walked back the most devastating duties a few hours later but left a 10 per cent universal tariff in place for most countries. Trump said the 90-day pause would give countries time to negotiate a deal. The president said if countries didn't comply he would simply set tariff rates himself. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this' and called the lower court's decision 'judicial overreach.' The appeal ruling will consider two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One included the five American small businesses against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other stemmed from 12 states arguing against both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the tariffs. Lawyers for the businesses say IEEPA does not mention tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. They say Trump is misusing the statute. Lawyers for Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont argued that tariffs make U.S. trade policy dependent on Trump's whims. Thirty-three senators also filed an amicus brief — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — in the case, saying the duties would cause harm to small- and medium-sized businesses while also grabbing powers that should be assigned to Congress. 'Small businesses do not have cash-on-hand or capital reserves to pay the increased tariffs, nor can they quickly adapt to them by modifying supply chains,' it said. 'If they cannot pass on the tariff costs to consumers — which would create additional harms for... constituents — many face letting employees go or filing for bankruptcy. Even a few weeks of additional tariffs means small businesses will suffer irreparable harm.' Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025 Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press
