Tech lobby group urges EU leaders to pause AI Act
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Tech lobbying group CCIA Europe , whose members include Alphabet , Meta and Apple, on Thursday urged European Union to pause implementation of the AI Act , saying a rushed roll-out risks jeopardizing the continent's AI aspirations.Europe's landmark AI rules entered into force in June last year with various provisions to be implemented in a phased manner.Important provisions of the EU AI Act, including rules for general purpose AI (GPAI) models, were due to apply on August 2. But some parts of the GPAI, which were expected to be published on May 2, got delayed."With critical parts of the AI Act still missing just weeks before rules kick in, we need a pause to get the Act right, or risk stalling innovation altogether," said Daniel Friedlaender, CCIA Europe's senior vice president.Political leaders such as Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson have also called AI rules "confusing" and asked the EU to pause the Act, ahead of a meeting with other EU leaders in Brussels on Thursday.More than two-thirds of European businesses said they struggle to understand their responsibilities under the EU AI Act, according to a survey by Amazon Web Services.The EU AI Act is more comprehensive than the United States' light-touch voluntary compliance approach while China's approach aims to maintain social stability and state control."We are currently implementing the AI Act," EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen told EU lawmakers earlier this month when asked if she would consider a temporary halt to enforcing the AI Act."I want to implement it in a very innovation friendly manner ... the main concern among some stakeholders is that this is hindering innovations."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Studying in Europe and beyond: A look at countries offering high-quality education at more accessible costs
Rising educational fees in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia are leading to students exploring alternative destinations for higher education. Europe and other lesser-known destinations are becoming more popular for international education. Studying in these countries gives students quality education as well as exposure to different cultures, letting them pursue global careers at a lesser consistently stands out as a favourite, especially among students pursuing science, engineering, and tech-related fields. Public universities typically don't charge tuition fees for undergraduate programs. Instead, students pay a modest administrative fee—usually between €100 and €350 per semester. Monthly living costs hover around €990, depending on the city. One of Germany's major draws is its 18-month post-study work visa, offering graduates ample time to find relevant employment and gain international exposure. Many international students consider Ireland increasingly, mainly to pursue careers in technology, business and life sciences. Irish universities are internationally recognised and have strong links to major industries and research organizations. The tuition for foreign students is generally from €9,000 to €25,000 a year, but the education and industry ties students gain after finishing are much more valuable. Typical living costs are €1,200 a month which can vary based on the area. The two-year post-study work visa offered by Ireland to graduate students is a big benefit, since it allows them to get training and experience in one of Europe's busiest job markets. Spain is another popular option, offering bachelor's programs at public universities for €800 to €1,200 per year (for EU citizens; non-EU students may pay more). Monthly living costs change from city to city, with numbers ranging from €700 to €1,300. In addition to education, Madrid and Barcelona focus on startups and innovation which is good news for business and entrepreneurship combines world-class research with close links to companies in fashion, luxury, and tech. For non-EU students at public universities, undergraduate costs about €2,770 and €3,770 for master's programs. Since typical living costs in France are between €800 and €1,200 each month, many Indian students can study there to gain expertise in creative oradvanced fields. International students prefer the Netherlands for its exemplary education system and various English-language courses. Public universities usually require non-EU students to pay between €6,000 and €15,000 every year, depending on which course and university they attend. Living expenses for students each month tend to be somewhere between €1,000 and €1,500. Because it is strong in innovation, research and entrepreneurship, the Netherlands is appealing to students interested in business, engineering and social one-year post-study work visa (zoekjaar) helps graduates look for work and make a start on their international careers in combination of top academic standards and innovative approaches in Denmark attracts students interested in subjects like sustainability, design, engineering and other modern areas. Tuition fees for non-EU students are between €6,000 and €16,000 annually, depending on both the course and school. Monthly expenses for living expenses tend to be between €1,000 and €1,400 and Copenhagen is toward the top end of that scale. Because of its heavy use of projects and links with industries, Denmark is an excellent destination for those seeking practical skills in education. Graduates of Icelandic universities are eligible for a two-year work visa, letting them search for jobs in Europe's most advanced economy. Even though famous for its history and cuisine, Italy is quickly becoming a leading country for global education. Tuition at public universities is relatively affordable, averaging between €2,000 and €4,000 per semester. Most cities require people to spend €700 to €1,200 per month on living costs. Because of Milan and Florence's strong links with fashion, design and culinary arts, studying these subjects in these places is particularly rewarding. Malta is gaining popularity as a destination to study because of its quality education and peaceful Mediterranean way of life. EU students usually pay between €7,000 and €12,000 each year to study at public universities in Malta. Monthly costs for living are not very high, sitting between €700 and €1,000. Since English is an official language and Malta has strong academic courses in tourism, hospitality, finance and maritime studies, this country stands out to students desiring to study a specialized topic with international relevance. With a rising number of startups and a prime location, Malta opens up internships and jobs later on to many students. Many international students, mainly interested in medical and health science, are choosing Georgia, since it is at the crosspoint of Europe and Asia. Non-EU students pay about €2,500 to €6,000 annually for tuition fees at Georgian universities which is quite competitive compared to neighbouring nations. Students can expect to pay between €300 and €600 every month for living expenses which makes Georgia very budget friendly. Because Georgia has simple visa requirements, teaches in English and its degrees are gaining trust abroad, studying medicine, dentistry and similar fields has become easier and more cost-effective for students. In addition to European studies, some people are choosing Singapore, Dubai and Malaysia. These destinations have lower-cost English-taught programs than big, well-known study centres. For students willing to take a less conventional route, they can provide both cultural richness and academic opportunity. While choosing a destination, students may also explore scholarships such as Erasmus+, DAAD and the Eiffel Excellence program which may cover a big part of their expenses. Many countries in Europe allow students to work 20 hours each week as they study, while post-study work visas last from one to two years which makes the transition from education to work easier. Due to choosing value, exposure and practical goals more often, Indian students are now redefining what a dream education means to them. Places that used to be ignored are now providing a great mix of quality, cost and opportunities. The focus is no longer just on prestige—it's on purpose, and on building a future that makes sense both personally andprofessionally. (The author is Joint Managing Director of Career Mosaic.) (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Punit Goenka reloads Zee with Bullet and OTT focus. Can he beat mighty rivals? 3 critical hurdles in India's quest for rare earth independence HDB Financial may be cheaper than Bajaj Fin, but what about returns? INR1,300 crore loans for INR100? Stamp duty notice to ArcelorMittal, banks. Stock Radar: Titan Company breaks out from 3-month consolidation; check target & stop loss for long positions For risk-takers: More than bullish, be selective; 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 38% Multibagger or IBC - Part 12: If transition is successful then there is no limit. But there is a big 'IF' These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
India–UK FTA: Coequal norms to ease exports; safeguards added to curb misuse
Representative image The draft India–UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) has introduced a first-of-its-kind 'coequal' rule under product-specific origin norms. This move is aimed at offering producers greater flexibility while ensuring stricter checks against misuse of tariff concessions, ET reported citing people familiar with the matter. Under this provision, producers can qualify for FTA benefits by meeting any one of the multiple origin criteria, including wholly-obtained norms, value-add thresholds, or tariff transformation. This is a significant departure from India's earlier FTAs, which typically relied on a single rule of origin criterion. 'This deal secures rules of origin to facilitate improved access to both sides. Co-equal rules will allow a producer of a good to meet any of the criteria of origin to claim benefit under the FTA,' said a person involved in the discussions, according to ET. Experts said the product-specific origin norms, aligned with complex global value chains, are essential to prevent circumvention and dumping of low-quality goods. 'These rules help mitigate any misuse of duty concessions given by India,' said Bipin Sapra as, partner at EY, as cited by ET. The agreement also includes the digital exchange of certificates of origin on a self-certification basis for the first time in any Indian FTA. This, coupled with robust compliance checks, is expected to streamline processes and bolster enforcement. 'If risk parameters find an issue in a product, then checks will be carried out,' another official said. The India–UK FTA was concluded on May 6 and is expected to be formally signed soon. Once ratified by both governments, the agreement will come into force. India has stated that 99% of its exports to the UK will enjoy zero-duty access, particularly boosting labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, marine products, leather, toys, and auto parts. The UK has committed to reducing tariffs on 90% of product lines, with 85% becoming fully duty-free over the next decade. The agreement also sets the tone for similar coequal origin rules in the ongoing India–EU FTA talks, where Europe has suggested rules specific to textile inputs such as spun yarn. With global apparel trade expected to touch $2.37 trillion by 2030, and India's home textiles and composites markets growing rapidly, the FTA's flexible yet robust rules are expected to play a critical role in boosting India's competitiveness and safeguarding its domestic interests. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Bike taxi ban: Denying permit to new entrants fuels monopoly, owners argue before Karnataka High Court
The counsel representing two bike owners in a case challenging the Karnataka High Court order to suspend bike taxi operations argued Wednesday that refusing to register vehicles as transport vehicles or issue contract carriage permits for motorcycles fuels a monopoly for existing operators. 'By refusing to register vehicles as transport vehicles or issue contract carriage permits for motorcycles, the state is effectively denying citizens their right to carry on a lawful business. This creates a monopoly for existing operators and stifles competition, contrary to the Motor Vehicles (MV) Act's liberal objectives. The market should determine viability through demand and supply, not state intervention,' argued senior advocate Dhyan Chinnappa before the division bench of Justices Kameswar Rao and C M Joshi. In April, the Karnataka High Court ruled that bike taxis cannot be permitted to operate without proper notification of guidelines under Section 93 of the MV Act. With the order coming into effect on June 16, aggregators Rapido,Uber and Ola have stopped bike taxi operations in the state. The counsel for bike taxi owners also stated that the core issue is whether the state can impose restrictions on the operation of transport vehicles, such as motorcycle taxis, through executive policies or decisions that contradict the statutory framework of the MV Act and violate the fundamental right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution. Article 19(1)(g) guarantees every citizen the right to practice any profession or carry on any trade or business, including operating transport vehicles on public roads. The petitioners also pointed out that the state argues it can restrict the operation of motorcycle taxis based on an unwritten or executive policy, citing reasons such as traffic congestion or protection of existing operators such as autorickshaws. 'The state's policy is not formalised through government orders or rules under the Business Transactions Rules. It appears to be based on ad-hoc objections, which cannot override statutory rights,' Chinnappa argued. The counsel added that if the state argues that excessive vehicles necessitate restrictions, such measures must be enacted through legislation, not executive fiat. 'For example, Singapore's vehicle quota system is legislated, not imposed by policy,' he noted. During Wednesday's proceedings, advocate Shashank Garg, representing the Bike Taxi Welfare Association, argued that bike taxis serve a vital function in alleviating traffic congestion and providing last-mile connectivity. 'They are a necessity, not a luxury,' he stated. Garg highlighted the Karnataka government's 2021 E-Bike Taxi Policy, which had initially formalised and supported bike taxi operations, as evidence of the state's prior recognition of their utility. He contended that the state's abrupt reversal of this policy in 2024, banning bike taxis, appeared driven by political motives rather than public interest. 'The 2021 policy laid a clear framework for bike taxis, acknowledging their role in urban mobility,' Garg stated. 'The sudden withdrawal smells of political expediency.' He further challenged the state's reliance on a 2019 expert committee report that recommended against allowing bike taxis in Bengaluru, arguing that the report was rendered obsolete by the subsequent E-Bike Taxi Rules, which permitted such services until their unexpected revocation. 'The state cannot cherry-pick outdated recommendations to justify its actions when its own rules have embraced bike taxis,' Garg asserted. Addressing the bench's queries on regulation, Garg clarified that the state holds the authority to regulate fares, noting that the current rate for bike taxis is approximately Rs 8 per kilometre. He emphasised their affordability and utility, stating, 'In congested areas or remote locations, bike taxis are often the only viable transport option, even for critical services like ambulances.'
