Man jailed for sexual assaults at Christian pilgrimage site
A man who sexually assaulted five women at a Christian pilgrimage site in the Republic of Ireland has been jailed for a total of four years.
Tomas Gallagher, 42, of Rathanlacky, Dunkineely, County Donegal, was handed a five-year prison sentence, with the final 12 months suspended, for a range of offences committed in 2022 at St Patrick's Purgatory on Lough Derg.
Appearing before Letterkenny Circuit Court, the court heard Gallagher deceived his victims into helping him fix washing appliances in a laundry room before subjecting them to a series of sexual acts.
In sentencing Gallagher, the judge described his crimes as "egregious acts of violence in a sacred place of pilgrimage".
Judge John Aylmer said an aggravating feature in the case was the ages of some of the victims, two of whom were teenagers, as well as the breach of trust involved.
He described the incidents against the women, who cannot be named to protect their identities, as "deceitful and premeditated".
Gallagher pleaded guilty to a total of seven charges involving five different women at St Patrick's Purgatory, which was recently designated a national pilgrimage site.
He pleaded guilty to six charges of sexual assault.
He also admitted that, during the same period and at the same location, he attempted to invite, induce, counsel or incite a child to engage in sexual touching.
A prosecuting barrister and senior garda (Irish police officer) outlined the details of Gallagher's offending when he worked both as a maintenance man at the retreat and a boat driver, taking pilgrims to and from the island.
Statements given to police by his victims described how Gallagher had approached them, asking them to help him in the laundry room as he needed help fixing various machines, such as washing machines and and tumble dryers, before he sexually assaulted them.
One woman eventually came forward and told a person in charge what had happened to her, which led to others coming forward with complaints of a similar nature against Gallagher.
Gallagher was interviewed by Gardaí (Irish police) on three occasions and initially denied anything untoward had happened.
However, he later admitted the offences and entered a guilty plea.
Victim impact statements from three women were read out in court, while two of the victims chose to read their own statements.
One fought back tears as she spoke of how, despite being the victim, she felt ashamed and disgusted by what had happened.
Another victim said she was made to feel vulnerable and intimidated but was afraid to speak up sooner, fearing she would not be believed.
The court heard from a woman who said she failed exams because of Gallagher's depraved acts. She said she later completed the exams, was proud of herself and was determined not to allow her attacker to ruin her life further.
A teenage victim said she had to attend counselling, while another woman, who gave her evidence by video link, said Gallagher's attack had made her distrusting of men as a result of his actions.
Gallagher took to the witness stand and said he "truly regretted" his actions and was sorry for the hurt and pain he had caused his victims and their families.
The judge said Gallagher came before the court on an early plea and appeared genuinely remorseful.
He said the accused man was fully cooperative with the probation service and had undergone counselling.
In relation to the charges against the children, Gallagher was sentenced to five years in prison.
He was given a sentence of three-and-a-half years on the other charges with the sentences to run concurrently.
The last 12 months of the sentence was suspended for a period of 12 months on condition that Gallagher enter a bond to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for 12 months following his release from prison and on condition that he continue under the supervision of the probation service.
In a statement from the Diocese of Clogher, the Prior of Lough Derg, Monsignor La Flynn, apologised to Gallagher's victims "unreservedly for the hurt they have suffered".
He said that, along with the then operations manager at Lough Derg, he was made aware of allegations of sexual assault in 2022.
"In accordance with safeguarding policies and procedures, the allegations were immediately reported to An Garda Síochána (Irish police) for investigation," Monsignor La Flynn said.
"The member of staff was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. He has since voluntarily resigned from his employment.
"The Diocese of Clogher, of which Lough Derg is a constituent part, and the management of Lough Derg are fully committed to adhering to the highest standards, practices, policies, and procedures for safeguarding, and to cooperating fully with the statutory authorities in all such cases."
He urged anyone with "a concern or complaint, either now or from the past" to come forward and speak to the diocese and statutory authorities.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
34 minutes ago
- Axios
Rep. Mary Miller faces bipartisan fury over "ignorant" Sikh comment
Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) is coming under fire from colleagues in both parties after misidentifying a Sikh man as Muslim and saying he should have "never been allowed" to deliver the House's morning prayer. Why it matters: Even some Republicans are expressing disgust at Miller, a right-wing hardliner who has cultivated a reputation for making inflammatory comments. "People should think before they talk or type," vented one House Republican, speaking on the condition of anonymity to offer candid thoughts on a fellow Republican. Miller's office has not responded to a request for comment on her post. What happened: After Giani Singh, a Sikh Grandhi from Southern New Jersey, delivered the House of Representatives' daily prayer, Miller said in a now-deleted post on X that it was "deeply troubling a Muslim was allowed to lead prayer in the House of Representatives this morning." "This should have never been allowed to happen," she said, erroneously stating that the U.S. was "founded as a Christian nation" and that "our government should reflect that truth." Miller later edited the post to replace "Muslim" with "Sikh," then deleted it altogether. What they're saying: The House Republican who spoke to Axios said Miller's comments make her look "darn ignorant." Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) said in a post on X that "a Sikh prayer on the House floor ... doesn't violate the Constitution, offend my Catholic faith, or throttle my support for Israel," adding, "Live and let live." "I'm deeply disappointed by Rep. Mary Miller's comments," Rep. Donald Norcross (D-N.J.), who has previously sponsored Singh as a guest chaplain, said in a statement to Axios. The Congressional Asian Pacific Islander Caucus condemned"Rep. Miller's anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim bigotry," calling her post "disgraceful." Reality check: The U.S. was not founded as an explicitly Christian nation, and the the First Amendment to the Constitution protects freedom of religion. Zoom out: This is not the first time Miller has been embroiled in controversy.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Mary Miller Loses It Over 'A Muslim' Speaking In Congress Before Deleting Racist Post
Rep. Mary Miller ― a Republican from Illinois who once praised Adolf Hitler ― wrote, edited and ultimately deleted a social media post decrying 'a Muslim' speaking in Congress. 'It's deeply troubling that a Muslim was allowed to lead prayer in the House of Representatives this morning. This should have never been allowed to happen,' she wrote Friday. 'American was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth. May God have mercy!' The man leading the prayer was guest chaplain Giani Singh, a follower of the Sikh faith, not Islam. Miller's Republican colleague Rep. Jeff Van Drew (N.J.) introduced him as such on Friday. 'Day after day, year after year, he leads not just with words. but with example ― with peace, with humility, with service towards all,' Van Drew said. 'These are not just Sikh values, they are American values.' He noted that Singh was serving as guest chaplain on the 81st anniversary of D-Day, when 'Sikh soldiers fought shoulder to shoulder with allied forces' on the beaches of Normandy in 1944. Miller eventually edited her post to change 'a Muslim' to 'a Sikh' but left the rest of her racist post untouched. Finally, she deleted it altogether. A spokesperson for Miller did not immediately respond to HuffPost's inquiries about the post or her decision to delete it. Her fellow lawmakers, however, were quick to respond. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) mirrored Miller's post back to her with a few tweaks. 'It's deeply troubling that someone with such contempt for religious freedom is allowed to serve in this body,' she wrote. 'This should have never been allowed to happen. America was founded as free nation, and I believe the conduct of its legislators should reflect that truth, not drift further from it.' Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.) was similarly appalled. 'What's deeply disturbing is the blatant ignorance and anti-Sikh, anti-Muslim xenophobia coming from my colleague across the aisle,' she wrote. 'There is no place in our country, and especially the Halls of Congress, for this hate and intolerance. The tweet may have been deleted, but we still have the receipts.' The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, which Meng chairs, also called out Miller's ignorance about Sikhism, which has more than 24 million followers and constitutes one of the largest religions in the world. 'Sikhs and Muslims practice two separate and distinct religions, and conflating the two based on how someone looks is not only ignorant but also racist,' wrote the caucus in a post on X. 'America was founded on the principle of religious freedom. It is disgraceful that someone who has such disdain for our nation's values can serve in the halls of Congress.' Miller famously tipped her hat to Hitler shortly after being elected to Congress in 2020. 'Hitler was right on one thing,' she said at an event held by conservative group Moms for America. 'He said, 'Whoever has the youth has the future.'' Arthur Delaney contributed reporting. Trans Lawmaker Sarah McBride Drops Brutal Trump Assessment After GOP Rep's Misgendering Canadian Police Make Arrests In Killing Of Sikh Separatist That Caused Diplomatic Spat With India As Pride Month Kicks Off, Ted Cruz Leads Anti-Abortion Push To Make June 'Life Month'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Why Trump stopped listening to Netanyahu
In his first term, President Trump was widely seen as a knee-jerk defender of Israel. Now, not so much. Whether and how far Washington splits from Jerusalem — especially on Iran's nuclear-weapons program — has enormous security implications for America, Israel and the wider Middle East. For Trump, personal relationships with foreign leaders equate to the relations between their countries. If he is friendly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then U.S.-Israel relations are good. And vice versa. Today, neither relationship is fully broken, but both are increasingly strained. Seeking the strongly pro-Israel evangelical Christian vote in 2016, Trump pledged to withdraw from President Barack Obama's Iran nuclear deal and generally provide Israel strong support. He kept that promise, exiting the agreement in 2018. Moreover, Trump moved America's embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, merged the separate Palestinian liaison office into the bilateral U.S. mission, recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights and protected Israel at the U.N. Security Council. The transactional basis for these acts was clear. Having close personal relations with Netanyahu, or at least appearing to, buttressed this political imperative. How good those first-term relations really were invites debate, but a continuing rationale was Trump's desire for reelection in 2020 and, later, 2024. Keeping the pro-Israel vote was a top priority in both races. Even though tensions developed between Trump and Netanyahu, few surfaced publicly. In 2024, Trump held the evangelical vote while losing Jewish voters to Harris by a mere 34 points. Even many Harris voters believed Trump would safeguard Israel's interests. But now that electoral constraint is gone, since Trump has essentially admitted he cannot run again. Meanwhile, earlier irritants — such as Netanyahu garnering publicity for his role in the 2020 strike against Iran's Qassem Soleimani, swiftly congratulating Joe Biden for winning in 2020 and his general aptitude for getting more attention than Trump himself — caused personal relations to grow frostier. And all of this was very likely fed by Trump's recurring envy of Obama's 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. So in just four months since the inauguration, Trump concluded a separate peace with Yemen's Houthi rebels, ending inconclusive U.S. efforts to clear the Red Sea maritime passage and leaving Israel in the lurch while Houthi missiles targeted Ben Gurion airport. The White House, without Israel, bargained with Hamas for release of Edan Alexander, their last living American hostage. Trump's first major overseas trip was to three Gulf Arab countries, but he skipped Israel, in direct contrast to his first term. While in Saudi Arabia, Trump lifted sanctions imposed on Syria's Assad dictatorship, clearly breaking with Israel, which retains grave doubts about the militant group that ousted Assad and now rules the country. The record is not entirely negative. Trump sanctioned the International Criminal Court for initiating investigations against Netanyahu and his former defense minister. He broadly, but not unreservedly, backs Israel's campaign against Hamas. But the greatest divergence has emerged over the existential threat of Iran's nuclear weapons program. On April 7, during Netanyahu's second post-inaugural visit to the Oval Office, no one seemed more stunned than he when Trump announced that Steve Witkoff would soon be negotiating with Iran. Trump had previously disclosed writing to Ayatollah Khamenei, expressing openness to negotiation but setting a two-month deadline, implying military force should talks fail. If the clock started from the date Iran received the letter, that two-month period has ended. If it began with the first Witkoff-Iran meeting (April 12 in Oman), the drop-dead date is imminent. Trump could extend the deadline, but that would simply extend Israel's peril. Reports that Witkoff has broached an 'interim' or 'framework' deal further exacerbate the dangers of Tehran tapping Washington along. Time is always on the proliferator's side. While discussions languish, Iran can even further disperse, conceal and harden its nuclear weapons assets. Trump acknowledges pressing Israel more than once not to strike Iran's nuclear program. Such public rebukes to a close ally facing mortal peril are themselves extraordinary, proving how hard Trump is trying to save Witkoff's endeavors. Little is known about the talks' substance, but reports show signs of inconsistency and uncertainty — indeed incompetence — over such critical issues as whether Iran would be permitted to enrich uranium to reactor-grade levels, the original sin of the Obama deal. To say Netanyahu is worried is more than an understatement. Trump's behavior is entirely consistent with greater personal distance from Netanyahu and a desire to be the central figure, rather than Netanyahu's Israel taking dispositive action against Tehran's threat. It may also reflect the isolationist voices within his administration, although not among Republicans generally, as 52 senators and 177 representatives have publicly urged Trump not to throw Iran a lifeline. Israel did not ask permission in 1981 before destroying Saddam Hussein's Osirak reactor, or in 2007 before destroying Iran's reactor that was under construction in the Syrian desert. Trump is grievously mistaken if he thinks Netanyahu will 'chicken out,' standing idly by as Iran becomes a nuclear power. Cometh the hour, cometh the man. John Bolton was national security adviser to President Trump from 2018 to 2019 and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations from 2005 to 2006. He held senior State Department posts from 1981 to 1983, from 1989 to 1993 and from 2001 to 2005. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.