Hundreds of migrants cross Channel in small boats
At least six boats left France in the first attempted crossings to reach the UK in a week.
French police officers watched as migrants, including children, boarded at a beach in Gravelines, between Calais and Dunkirk, in the morning.
Authorities were then pictured escorting the boats.
France has agreed to change its rules so police can prevent people in the water from getting on to boats, but this has not yet come into effect, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said in recent weeks.
She has been urging the French to make the changes so their maritime forces can intervene in shallow waters as soon as possible, it is understood.
A Home Office source said: 'We have developed strong co-operation with the French and it is important that they have agreed to disrupt these boats once they're in the water – and not just on the shore.
'This vital step now needs to be operationalised to protect border security and save lives.'
The coastguard reportedly issued an appeal for fishing boats to assist a yacht and kayaks in trouble in the Channel as it responded to small boats.
Co-ordinating multiple simultaneous incidents is 'not unusual', the coastguard said, stressing that 'at no time was public safety compromised'.
'In line with standard procedure, coastguard operations centres may contact vessels in the vicinity of an incident, including fishing boats, to provide assistance if they are best placed to help, regardless of other ongoing operations.
'This is routine practice and does not indicate an absence of search and rescue assets.'
The highest number of arrivals recorded on a single day so far this year was 825 on May 21.
This year is on course to set a record for Channel crossings, with more than 13,000 people having arrived so far, up 30% on this point last year, according to analysis of the data by the PA news agency.
Sir Keir Starmer's Government has pledged to crack down on small boat crossings including with measures targeting smuggling gangs.
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security.
'The people-smuggling gangs do not care if the vulnerable people they exploit live or die as long as they pay, and we will stop at nothing to dismantle their business models and bring them to justice.
'That is why this Government has put together a serious plan to take down these networks at every stage.
'Through international intelligence sharing under our Border Security Command, enhanced enforcement operations in northern France and tougher legislation in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, we are strengthening international partnerships and boosting our ability to identify, disrupt and dismantle criminal gangs whilst strengthening the security of our borders.'
The Home Secretary previously said gangs have been taking advantage of a higher number of calm weather days to make the journey.
UK temperatures hit 26C on Saturday, wrapping up the sunniest spring on record.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said boats were 'flooding the channel', with Border Force 'stretched beyond breaking point, and even fishing vessels drafted in because our maritime rescue services are overwhelmed'.
'A nation reduced to chaos on the high seas while Keir Starmer hides behind platitudes and process.
'Labour has completely lost control of our borders. Their pledge to smash gangs in tatters. They scrapped the Rwanda deterrent before it even began and now the boats won't stop coming.
'So far, this is already the worst year on record. Labour have failed on every front, and Britain is paying the price. This is a day of shame for Labour.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK politics live: Labour reveals new nuclear programme and submarines ahead of Starmer defence review
Britain will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme, Sir Keir Starmer is set to announce. The government will unveil its strategic defence review today. Significant investment in the UK warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the government is expected to accept in full. Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said. The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will back the government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, build a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and deliver all future upgrades. From the late 2030s, the fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace seven Astute-class attack submarines the UK is due to start operating. UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest £15bn in warheads The UK will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme, the prime minister will announce today as the government unveils its strategic defence review. Significant investment in the UK warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the government is expected to accept in full. Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said.
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
'One in four children in poverty' across a third of Scotland's Westminster seats
At least one in four children are living in poverty after housing costs across a third of Scotland's Westminster constituencies, new figures show. Analysis from Loughborough University reveals that two-thirds of MPs across the UK represent areas where child poverty affects at least one in four children. While devolved policies in Scotland, such as the Scottish Child Payment, have helped reduce overall poverty levels, a third of Scottish MPs still serve constituencies where more than 25% of children live in poverty. Constituencies with the highest child poverty rates in the UK include Birmingham Ladywood, Bradford West and Leeds South. In Scotland, the highest rates were found in Glasgow East, Glasgow South West and Glasgow North East. The annual analysis by the Centre for Research in Social Policy at Loughborough University looks at local poverty rates after housing costs, which is seen as a more accurate assessment of disposable family income. The UK Government already release data that shows local poverty levels before housing costs are calculated. The report also finds that there is a an 'extremely high correlation' between the two-child limit to Universal Credit policy and the proportion of children in poverty in each constituency. Dan Paskins, vice-chair of the UK wide End Child Poverty Coalition, said: 'Each year this data presents a bleak picture of life for the UK's children. 'A record number are now in poverty and it's under the noses of our MPs, particularly Cabinet members: 80% of Keir Starmer's Cabinet represent constituencies with higher than average child poverty rates. 'The time for action is now, and the Comprehensive Spending Review, and forthcoming child poverty strategy should involve bold action. 'Due to the analysis' finding a strong correlation between child poverty rates in local areas and the number of children impacted by the two-child limit to Universal Credit, it is essential this policy is scrapped as soon as possible.' Speaking on behalf of Scottish members of the End Child Poverty coalition, John Dickie said: 'Child poverty is lower in Scotland and Holyrood policies are driving real progress, but these statistics are a stark reminder that across the country far too many children are still being left behind. 'Children are living in hardship in every part of Scotland and in some constituencies one in three children are still locked in poverty. 'We need to see the UK government step up to the plate with a child poverty strategy that abolishes the two-child limit as an essential starting point. 'Here in Scotland all the political parties need to commit to investing more in the Scottish child payment, childcare, housing and parental employment if Scotland is to meet the statutory child poverty targets that they all backed.' Across the UK, 31% of children in the UK are living in relative poverty, which equates to 4.5 million children. Overall, 42% of constituencies have a higher-than-average poverty rate. That includes the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer's constituency Holborn and St Pancras with a child poverty rate at 47%. Other Cabinet members, Secretary of State for Justice, Shabana Mahmood, Northern Ireland Secretary, Hilary Benn, Foreign Secretary David Lammy, and Pat McFadden, Lord Chancellor, all have child poverty rates of over 40%. The UK Government has promised to deliver a Child Poverty Strategy and drive down child poverty across the UK. A UK Government spokesperson said: 'No child should be in poverty – that's why our Ministerial Taskforce is exploring all levers available across government to give children across the United Kingdom the best start in life. 'As we fix the foundations of the economy to make everyone better off, our Get Britain Working plan and the landmark Employment Rights Bill will help people find and maintain better paid and more secure jobs with stronger rights. We have increased the National Living Wage and are capping how much Universal Credit can be taken for debt repayments to put more money in people's pockets and help families build a brighter future. 'Both of Scotland's governments must work together to help more people into work, while always supporting those who cannot.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'I welcome this report from the End Child Poverty Coalition. We are absolutely committed to meeting the 2030 child poverty targets and thanks to the actions we are already taking, families in the poorest 10% of households are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-26 and this value is projected to grow to an average of £3,700 a year by 2029-30. 'However our policies are having to work harder in the current economic context and as a result of decisions taken by the UK Government, such as keeping the two-child limit on Universal Credit which are holding back Scotland's progress. 'While the Joseph Rowntree Foundation predict child poverty will rise in other parts of the UK by 2029, they highlight that policies such as our Scottish Child Payment, and our commitment to mitigate the two-child limit, are behind Scotland 'bucking the trend'. 'We will publish our third child poverty delivery plan by the end of March 2026, setting out the actions to be taken between 2026-2031 to meet the 2030 targets. We will continue working closely with stakeholders, including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, to shape that plan.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Labour's 'sunlight of hope' is now the darkness of despair
Well, a lot of things were supposed to be different under Labour; the problem is though that they are not. Voters who were promised "Change" are increasingly feeling conned. The "sunlight of hope" which the Prime Minister promised in his General Election victory speech has become the darkness of despair, and anyone hoping that Sir Keir Starmer might show some respect for the voters of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse and turn up to explain himself will be sadly disappointed, with Labour's own sources admitting that the Prime Minister is "not playing well on the doorsteps and is not considered an asset at this point in the electoral cycle". And those are the truest words we've heard from Labour for a long time. Ruth Marr, Stirling. An electoral disaster beckons The way things are going, it does not look as though Labour could win a second term in office. It came in with big ideas about growth and investment to rescue the UK from the yawning chasm of inequality only to find that there was a shortage of funds despite the highest level of taxation for eons. Out of fear of catastrophic headlines, Labour tied its own hands by ruling out increasing taxation in important areas, thus leaving itself little wriggle room for its manoeuvres. In its desperation to show that it could be steely in its determination, it hit targets which were clearly going to provoke vociferous public outcry destined to damage its standing in opinion polls and to test the strength of its resolve. The reduction in numbers of those eligible for the winter fuel allowance has left an indelible imprint in the minds of many voters which will backfire on Labour at the next election while the National Insurance increase on employers' contributions has put a squeeze on Labour's much-vaunted ambition to boost business growth. Read more letters Labour must have hoped that the electorate would understand that Labour's project to reform the economy would take time, but it had not factored in the the fragmentation of society where individual groups and institutions do not see themselves as members of the larger national community but are interested only in protecting their own members' interests and devil take the hindmost. Where Labour needs every business, public service and trade union to realise that a sinking ship needs all hands to the pumps, it faces demands from all sides for a restoration of parity with the economy prior to 2010 and additional funds to put into operation the about-turn Labour advocates for the economic betterment of the UK. Unless patience and belief in the efforts of community action replace the selfishness and impatience of individual entitlement, Labour will be in the position of Sisyphus, condemned never to succeed in the task it has taken on. That will just spell out electoral disaster when the burden of blame rests elsewhere. Denis Bruce, Bishopbriggs. By-election opportunity For the last few weeks, the environment in the UK has been particularly stressful: widespread anti-government protests have swept the country, whereas the approval ratings of Sir Keir Starmer have hit a record low of 22%. Such an outcome is a response of the population against rising taxes, withholding social safety net programmes and healthcare reform. But despite the growing frustration of the public, the PM has been building up multi-billion aid to Ukraine from already shaky budgets with no concern about internal problems. Taking into account the reluctance of the Government to scale back its ambitions that are affecting the population, the victory of Reform UK in the English local elections seems to be no surprise. Even Nigel Farage is regarded as a worthier candidate than any member of the Conservative or Labour parties that left the public disappointed with their unpopular policies. As people didn't manage to get through to the Government by ordinary means, they resorted to drastic measures. 'Change your political course, otherwise we'll replace you with the opposition' – that's what the population wanted to say by voting for the right. The by-election in Scotland on Thursday is one more opportunity to show the Government that Reform UK's big win in local elections was no accident. People can't put up with the fact that their problems are being put on the back burner, they are now in a serious mood to struggle for their welfare. And in this struggle every single voice is badly needed. Iain Brocklebank, Glasgow. • The Hamilton by-election seems to be an opportunity for all mass media outlets to be showing images of Nigel Farage grinning. This is a little disturbing because of the uncanny resemblance between Mr Farage and Joe E Brown, the actor who stole scene after scene from Marilyn Monroe, Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon, as the useless millionaire Osgood Fielding III in Some Like it Hot, Billy Wilder's 1959 smash-hit comedy. Given that the film's two male actors pretended to be women throughout and the trouble we're having in Scotland with the issues of gender identity, seeing the final scene in which Joe E Brown, with his trademark wide, wide grin announces that "Nobody's perfect" is quite comforting. Nobody is, but I still can't quite imagine Nigel Farage adopting such a magnanimous position – on anything. AJ Clarence, Prestwick. Joe E Brown and Jack Lemmon in Some Like It Hot (Image: United Artists) Existential crisis for the NHS I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments expressed by Dr Andrew Docherty (Letters, May 29) regarding the parlous state of the NHS. It is perhaps going too far to say that the NHS, which is supposed to protect us from danger, has become the danger in the same way as Frankenstein's monster turned on its creator, but long waiting lists and lack of adequate resource (both human and material) mean that people are dying needlessly. The truth of the matter is that the NHS has become a huge, bloated, costly monster with an insatiable appetite for cash on which it gorges but with no consequent improvement in patient outcomes. This is hard to accept as it goes against everything we have been taught as believers in the 'national religion' and the myth of the NHS's saintliness. I would emphasise that this assessment does not apply to the doctors, nurses and other medical support staff who are generally excellent, but the organisation they work for, which is well past its sell-by date. The problem is simple but difficult. Unlike most other business entities, the NHS does not exist to make money. It exists to spend it and so, because it is taxpayers' money it is spending it has to be monitored by a committee to ensure there are no financial shenanigans going on behind the scenes. As that committee is a public body it has to be monitored to ensure it meets all its sustainability and diversity targets. Then the body set up to do that will need an HR department to ensure that the mental health issues are being properly addressed. Then all these bodies, panels and committees will need to be housed in offices which will have to be financed. Then suddenly there is a need for a CEO who will need some supporting staff, and they will need an HR department too, which means a private finance operation will have to be started which will in turn need an oversight committee which will need another HR department. And then from way down the food chain a doctor will say that he could do with some new PPE and there will be a massive outcry about buying medical supplies. This means a procurement committee will be necessary and the Chancellor will announce she is spending enough already so Labour will be accused of underfunding the NHS. No private company would allow this to happen. It would concentrate on the core business and house the HR department in a Portakabin in the car park. Private companies exist to make money, not to waste it on meeting mindless irrelevant targets Of course, you can't just shut the NHS down for six months to do the required reforming and restructuring followed by a grand reopening ceremony but accountability and good governance completely focused on patient outcomes is the only way out of this existential crisis. Keith Swinley, Ayr.
