Concerns in Mayo town over people walking on road to emergency accommodation hub
Elected representatives have expressed alarm about residents at an emergency accommodation hub who have been walking along the road to and from the facility.
Bus Éireann intend to install a bus stop outside the facility following representations from Mayo County Council's Director of Services for Housing, Tom Gilligan.
Mayo County Council began using the former St Anne's as emergency accommodation after it closed as nursing home in 2023. The 26-bed facility had been operating as a nursing home in the east Mayo town for 40 years and can accommodate up to 100 people.
County councillors Adrian Forkan and Gerry Murray said they had received a number of representations about people walking along the road to and from the facility.
'There is somebody going to be killed along that road, and that is not 'maybe',' said Cllr Forkan.
'I drive the road myself to work every morning and during the winter especially, you cannot see people along that road,' continued the Kiltimagh-based councillor.
'It's waiting for someone to be killed along it, then they might do something about it.
'Another thing is the amount of rubbish which people are discarding along that road, and it is not fair on the people who live along that road,' he added.
The Fianna Fáil representative suggested that an emergency footpath be constructed outside the facility.
Charlestown-based councillor Gerry Murray said that some residents were reported walking in the middle of the road in recent weeks.
'If it went in for planning, it wouldn't have got planning, it's so far outside the town,' said the Sinn Féin councillor.
Tom Gilligan said that Bus Éireann are currently preparing documentation to approve a designated bus stop at the facility, which is located on the Swinford Road outside Charlestown.
'I am hopeful that it will be this week or the next week that we will get confirmation that Bus Éireann will stop there,' said Mr Gilligan.
'It will be a positive because I am aware of issues. Some residents have their own transport, but others don't.'
In line with government policy, Mayo County Council is trying to phase out the use of hotels and B&Bs as emergency accommodation.
In the last week of March, 149 people in Mayo were accessing emergency accommodation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
8 hours ago
- RTÉ News
How Trump's actions against LA protesters defy all precedents
Analysis: Trump's unilateral decision to take federal control over the National Guard pits the president against the state of California Violence has erupted on the streets of cities across southern California over the weekend, as protesters clashed with agents from the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency detaining people they suspected to be illegal immigrants. The US president, Donald Trump, took the unusual decision on Saturday to deploy 2,000 troops from California's National Guard, despite not being requested to by the state's governor, Gavin Newsom. Newsom has threatened to sue Trump over what he has called "an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act". Other California officials have also denounced the move, with Senator Adam Schiff calling it a "dangerous precedent for unilateral misuse of the guard across the country". Raids by ICE agents have increased significantly since mid-May when the Trump administration threatened to fire senior ICE officials if they did not deliver on higher arrest quotas. Several high-profile wrongful arrests of US citizens have further inflamed tensions. Protests have escalated in California, a Democratic stronghold and a "sanctuary state" where local law enforcement does not cooperate with ICE to detain illegal immigrants. At around 24,000 troops, California's National Guard is the largest in the United States. Each state has its own National Guard unit, a reserve force under the control of the governor which can be called upon in times of crisis – often to help out during natural disasters or other emergencies. For example, in January, Newsom activated several thousand troops to aid relief work during the devastating fires that threatened Los Angeles. In 1992, the then president, George H.W. Bush, backed the call of the then governor of California, Pete Wilson, call to deploy National Guard members to quell the South Central LA riots. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, Los Angeles-based reporter Sean Mandell reports on the ongoing LA protests Now troops are back on the streets of LA. But this time not at the behest of the governor. Trump's unilateral decision to take federal control over the National Guard pits the president against the state of California – and importantly, against a state that has constantly resisted his anti-immigrant agenda. Newsom is seen by many as a possible contender for the Democratic Party's nomination in the 2028 presidential election. Historical precedents Is there a precedent for this? Yes and no. The Insurrection Act (passed in 1807, but revised several times) authorises the president to call on the National Guard in times of crisis or war to supplement state and local forces. This has been codified in title 10 of the US Code, which details the laws of the land. In 1871, the law was revised to specifically allow for the National Guard to be used in the protection of civil rights for black Americans. Legal experts have long called for reform of the Insurrection Act, arguing that the language is too vague and open to misuse. From RTÉ News, Trump calls deployment of troops in Los Angeles a 'great decision' In the past, former US presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson all invoked different sections of the Act to protect civil rights, particularly against segregationist states. While the act implies consent between governor and president, it does not require it. Two examples stand out. On June 11 1963, Kennedy issued executive order 11111 mobilising the National Guard to protect desegregation of the University of Alabama, against the wishes of Alabama governor George Wallace. Wallace's determination to block the registration of two black students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, produced a produced a sensational media moment when Wallace physically blocked the entrance of the university. Local law enforcement stood by the governor. With the state of Alabama in defiance of federal law, Kennedy saw no alternative but to deploy the guard. Less than two years later, in March 1965 Lyndon B. Johnson again deployed the guard in Alabama, bypassing Governor Wallace. In February, a state trooper in the town of Marion killed a young voters-rights activist, Jimmie Lee Jackson. This shooting, along with several violent attacks by the local police on voter registration activists in Selma, inspired a series of marches in support of the 1965 voting rights bill. On the eve of the march from Selma to Montgomery, tensions between local police and civil rights protesters were at a high. In response, Johnson bypassed Wallace and called in the National Guard to ensure, as he put it, the rights of Americans "to walk peaceably and safely without injury or loss of life from Selma to Montgomery". Before last Saturday, this was the last time a president circumvented the authority of the state governor in deploying the guard. But even in this instance, there was an implied request from Wallace, who explicitly requested federal aid in the absence of state resources. The subtext here is that Wallace did not want to be seen to call up the National Guard himself, so he forced Johnson to make that decision, allowing him to claim that the president was trampling on state sovereignty. Insurrection Act But this is not the current situation in California. The LAPD is the third largest police force in the US, with over just under 9,000 sworn officers. While its ranks have shrunk in recent years, it has been responding to the recent protests and unrest. There is no reason to think that Newsom would hesitate to call in the National Guard if warranted. In reality, Trump has invoked the Insurrection Act to protect ICE agents. Indeed, the National Guard has a complicated history of responding to civil unrest. The current situation is in stark contrast with the past, and faces serious questions of legitimacy. It is difficult not to see this as the latest move by the Trump administration to subjugate California. In early January Trump threatened to withhold federal aid to rebuild after the wildfires. In past months he threatened to withdraw all of the state's federal funding to punish it for its stance on campus protests and the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. Unlike his predecessors, Trump has not mobilised the National Guard to protect civil rights against a hostile police force. Instead, he appears to be using this as leverage to undermine a political opponent he views as blocking his agenda. Circumventing gubernatorial powers over the National Guard in this way has no precedent and heralds the next stage in an extended conflict between the president and the state of California.
RTÉ News
9 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Councillor calls for League of Ireland team to be set up in Clare
The possibility of Clare becoming home to a League of Ireland soccer team is to be raised in the chamber of Clare County Council. At last night's June meeting of the local authority Sinn Féin councillor Tommy Guilfoyle had a motion on the agenda calling for "the appropriate personnel in Clare County Council to come together and set up a discussion to explore the possible setup of a League of Ireland soccer team in the Banner County with all the relevant stakeholders". While the meeting over ran and the motion was deferred to the July monthly meeting, Councillor Guilfoyle is adamant that there is sufficient demand for a League of Ireland team in the county. "For years I've lived in this community, and I've seen the wealth of young people who play soccer," the Clarecastle-based councillor said. "So, we have all these kids playing soccer in county Clare but the majority of them if they want to play League of Ireland are going to Treaty United in Limerick or Galway United," he added. As to who would finance the early stages of this potential project, Councillor Guilfoyle said that it would not be the local authority. "I wouldn't be putting that to the council at all," he said. "My view of the council getting involved is to bring parties together. "We have an economic development department, we have a tourism department and we have a sporting department. "Three people from those departments could come together, call in others, sit down and have a conversation about this." "That conversation would itch the ear off an investor. I know it would," Councillor Guilfoyle predicted. "And what happens then is investors ears cock," he added. In 2023 Newmarket Celtic became the first Clare club to win the FAI Junior Cup while Avenue United reached the final of that competition in 1990. Alan O'Callaghan who is Cathaoirleach of Clare County Council is supportive of the concept of a League of Ireland team being based in the county. "We're sowing a seed into people's heads at a higher level like the FAI," he said. "There are going to be huge challenges with funding but hopefully something might come out of it, you'd never know." "There might be someone that would be willing to say, 'this is not a bad idea,'" he suggested. Funding from county council ruled out However, Councillor O'Callaghan ruled out any source of funding from the county council. "We don't have that kind of money but there are different programmes that do pop-up for funding through Sports Capital Grants. "Maybe the council can put one forward and maybe identify a site." In Lees Road municipal sports ground in Ennis a number of people were supportive of a Clare bid to hosting League of Ireland soccer. "I travel up to Sligo, to Treaty [Limerick] and to Galway to watch League of Ireland. I would much prefer to watch a team in Clare. I'd have more of an emotional attachment to that," one person said. "I think it would be a great idea. There's lots of interest in soccer in Clare. It would be worth giving it a try and see what happens," another added. "The more soccer we have here the better. Anyone interested in soccer in Clare is going to Limerick or Galway to see League of Ireland matches," a third person pointed out.
Irish Examiner
17 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Colman Noctor: France pulls the plug on underage access to pornography
In a significant stride toward safeguarding its children, the French government has enacted stringent age verification laws targeting online pornography. Aimed at curbing underage access to explicit content, the move has sparked a global conversation on the balance between child protection and digital privacy. As of June 4, 2025, all adult websites accessible within the country are required to implement robust age verification systems. These systems must ensure that users are at least 18 years old, using details such as a credit card or ID document, before granting access to their content. In a novel move, the law introduces a 'double anonymity' mechanism, involving an independent third party overseeing the age verification process. These measures combined ensure that pornographic sites do not access the user's personal data. The regulatory authority ARCOM is responsible for enforcement and has warned that non-compliant websites will face significant penalties, including fines of up to €150,000 or 2% of their global turnover, as well as the potential for indefinite blocking in France. In retaliation, Aylo — the company that owns most of the major adult websites such as Pornhub, YouPorn, and RedTube — has threatened to suspend access to its platforms in France citing concerns over user privacy and data security. From last Wednesday (June 5), French-based visitors to Aylo-owned adult sites have been greeted with a message denouncing the country's age verification requirements. The company has indicated that if these laws continue, it will cease operating in France. The French authorities are standing firm against these threats. Free to leave The impetus for this legislation arises from disturbing statistics indicating that approximately 2.3m minors in France access pornographic websites monthly. Exposure to such content at a young age has been linked to distorted perceptions of sexuality, an increased risk of developing unhealthy relationships, and potential desensitisation to sexual violence. The French culture minister Aurore Berge wrote on X that it would 'so much the better' if Pornhub and other Aylo sites cut off access for French users rather than 'conforming to our legal framework'. She went on to say that 'There will be less violent, degrading and humiliating content accessible to minors in France.' Clara Chappaz, France's junior minister for artificial intelligence and digital technology, wrote on X, 'If Aylo would rather leave France than apply our laws, [it is] free to do so.' The ministers seem to have broad public support. A study by the eSafety Commissioner found that a significant majority of adults in France support age verification measures to protect children online, and those objecting to it seem to be a loud minority. Similar sentiments have been echoed in other countries, with a 2017 YouGov survey revealing that 83% of British adults agreed there should be an age limit for accessing pornography online. This view was particularly strong among British parents, with 83% supporting the introduction of age verification processes for access to pornographic websites. In New Zealand, a 2023 poll conducted by Curia Market Research for Family First NZ found that 79% of respondents supported a law requiring age verification on pornographic websites. Despite widespread support, the global implementation of age verification systems raises concerns in certain quarters about user privacy and data security. Critics of this new French law argue that requiring users to submit personal identification could lead to potential data breaches and misuse of sensitive information. It would seem the law's 'double anonymity' approach, which seeks to minimise data exposure by separating the verification process from the content providers, is not reassurance enough for some. Aylo representatives say the 'double anonymity' system is an ineffective mechanism because people's data could still be at risk of being divulged through hacks or leaks. They argue countries should be targeting developers of operating systems like Microsoft's Windows, Apple's iOS or Google's Android, rather than pornography platforms. French authorities have acknowledged Aylo's concerns about potential data breaches. However, they have emphasised that the 'double anonymity' system is designed to safeguard user privacy and ensure that neither adult content websites nor age verification providers can identify users or know which specific sites are being accessed. Making it a movement France's decisive action on age verification highlights the urgent need to protect children from premature exposure to explicit content in the unregulated online world. While maintaining a delicate balance between safeguarding children and preserving individual privacy rights, the implementation of thoughtful, privacy-conscious, and robust age verification systems represents a crucial step forward in our collective effort to protect children. As technology continues to evolve, our strategies must also adapt to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the younger generation online. As countries worldwide observe the impact of the legislation, it could catalyse a broader movement toward stricter online age verification protocols. It is encouraging to see that the European Commission has confirmed the introduction of an EU-wide age verification app, or mini-wallet, in July 2025, aimed at enhancing online protection for minors. Ireland is also making progress in promoting online safety for children and young people by offering educational programmes and resources, helping children, parents, and educators to be more informed. These initiatives include interactive talks in primary and secondary schools, which focus on topics such as protecting privacy, managing digital footprints, and understanding cyberbullying. Organisations like CyberSafeKids provide information sessions to raise awareness about online risks and practical advice on safeguarding children in the digital world. These and other similar initiatives have led to the implementation of voluntary codes regarding the delay of smartphone ownership in primary schools and the potential introduction of smartphone pouches in secondary schools. In addition, Ireland has introduced a new Online Safety Code, in October 2024, which marks a significant development in ensuring safer online experiences for children. Released by the media regulator Coimisiún na Meán, the code sets binding rules for video-sharing platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and X. Platforms that fail to comply with the code's standards, including prohibitions on harmful content and the implementation of age verification measures, could face fines of up to €20m. The code aims to end the era of self-regulation by obligating social media companies to protect users from harmful content, including promoting self-harm, cyberbullying, and other illegal activities. These combined efforts reflect Ireland's commitment to creating a safer digital environment for its younger population. By integrating educational programmes with regulatory measures, the country is taking a comprehensive approach to online safety, ensuring that children are equipped with the knowledge and tools to navigate the digital world responsibly. However, sometimes education and awareness can only go so far, and collective action is required. If we were to follow the bold actions of France and institute a compulsory age verification system, this initiative would lead to significant progress in protecting the safety of our children in the online world. Dr Colman Noctor is a child psychotherapist Read More Colman Noctor: Using a sports psychology game plan to manage exam stress
