logo
Editorial: The joy of reading and the Illinois crisis stealing it away

Editorial: The joy of reading and the Illinois crisis stealing it away

Yahoo05-02-2025

Literacy is a gift we give our children. It's reading a poem by, say, Joseph Bruchac and understanding not just the words, but the emotions behind them: 'The old man must have stopped our car two dozen times to climb out and gather into his hands the small toads blinded by our lights and leaping, live drops of rain.'
The full poem, titled 'The Old Man,' is part of a real fourth-grade reading assignment on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a standardized test measuring student performance across the country. Students are asked to examine how the speaker and the old man feel about the toads and explain the difference using evidence from the poem.
This is one way the test assesses whether a child is proficient in reading. The unfortunate truth? Too many Illinois students are not.
In 2024, just 30% of fourth graders across Illinois were proficient in reading, according to the Nation's Report Card. In 2019, 34% of Illinois fourth graders were proficient in reading. That's a significant decline and a clear sign that our current approach is failing.
A proficient fourth grader can read a poem or story and describe how characters influence one another. They can make inferences from what they read. By contrast, a student who isn't proficient can't do either of those things and may only be able to determine the meaning of familiar words.
Every child who leaves school without the gift of literacy carries a burden — one that gets heavier as they get older. Without strong reading skills, school becomes frustrating. Learning turns into an experience of failure rather than discovery. Students lose confidence, disengage and fall further behind. Many eventually drop out, face job insecurity or even enter the criminal justice system.
This literacy crisis affects children across the state — from East St. Louis to Springfield to the Chicago suburbs. The pandemic accelerated the decline, but our educational shortcomings were evident long before that. The question is: What are we going to do about it?
State lawmakers had a chance to help low-income students by renewing the Invest in Kids Act, a scholarship program that helped children attend private schools that better fit their needs. But in 2024, Illinois legislators let it expire, stripping thousands of students of educational options.
Now, a new opportunity has emerged.
Republicans in Congress have introduced the Educational Choice for Children Act, a federal program that would provide tax-credit scholarships for K-12 students nationwide. Like Invest in Kids, this initiative would offer families a lifeline if their public school isn't meeting their child's needs.
Of course, Chicago Teachers Union leadership will oppose this — but the reality is that school choice remains popular in Illinois, with a majority of residents supporting the concept. More importantly, choice introduces accountability into a system that, for decades, has faced little real competition.
Martin West, academic dean at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a member of the National Assessment Governing Board, sees a troubling trend in national test scores.
NAEP data from the mid-1990s through 2010 showed progress in reading and math, particularly among low-income students. What changed?
'That was a period where there was more consistent emphasis on standards-based reform and holding schools accountable,' West told us. 'Most observers would agree that there's been a softening of accountability since then.'
He's right. Schools, like any institution, need incentives to improve. Right now, there are no consequences when a school fails to prepare the majority of its students to read and do math at grade level. But when families have the option to leave, schools have to find a way to improve outcomes or risk losing students. That's what educational choice provides: a system that rewards excellence, rather than perpetuating failure.
To be clear, though, we just as strongly support excellence in Illinois public schools and think every kid should have access to top-tier reading instruction.
But the Nation's Report Card is clear: Illinois students are struggling. They need options. They need accountability. And they need a system that prioritizes their futures, not the politics of the adults in charge.
If we continue down this path, we will continue robbing children of their potential. Literacy should not be a privilege — it should be a guarantee for all of Illinois' young people. And we have a shared responsibility to make sure every child receives that gift.
Sign up for the Opinion newsletter: Get the latest editorials and commentary curated by the Chicago Tribune's opinion team sent to your inbox each weekday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ActBlue fires back at GOP investigation, saying it appears unconstitutional and partisan
ActBlue fires back at GOP investigation, saying it appears unconstitutional and partisan

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ActBlue fires back at GOP investigation, saying it appears unconstitutional and partisan

ActBlue is fighting back against a House Republican investigation into its workings, saying the probe appears to have become an unconstitutional abuse of power to help the White House. The Democratic online fundraising platform said Monday in a letter obtained by POLITICO that it was reevaluating whether to cooperate with the ongoing congressional investigation into fraud on its platform in light of President Donald Trump's executive action to investigate potential foreign contributions on ActBlue and House Republicans' public statements supporting the White House. 'If the Committees are now working to gather information on behalf of Department of Justice prosecutors, rather than for legitimate legislative purposes, that would fundamentally transform the nature of your investigation — and violate ActBlue's constitutional rights,' ActBlue's lawyers wrote in the letter Monday to GOP Reps. Jim Jordan, James Comer and Bryan Steil. The allegations are an escalation in the conflict between House Republicans and ActBlue, the behemoth Democratic fundraising platform that has long been in GOP crosshairs as it has helped the left build a massive fundraising advantage. ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones told POLITICO last month that ActBlue believes the platform has 'nothing to hide' but needs to better communicate its role in light of the attacks. In the letter, lawyers representing ActBlue ask the congressional committees investigating the platform to clarify the purpose of their work. They argue public statements from Jordan, Comer and Steil indicate they are seeking to help the Trump Justice Department's separate investigation into ActBlue, rather than carry out congressional oversight. And they note that the "selective focus" of the investigation does not appear to include WinRed, the GOP's primary online fundraising counterpart — and thus may be intended to hurt Democrats, not provide legitimate oversight of American elections. 'The Committees' selective focus on ActBlue also suggests that the investigation may be a partisan effort directed at harming political opponents rather than gathering facts to assist in lawmaking efforts,' the letter reads. 'Such an action would raise substantial First Amendment concerns.' Spokespeople for the GOP committees investigating ActBlue did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday afternoon. A spokesperson for ActBlue also did not immediately comment. The letter comes as the Trump administration is also going after ActBlue. Trump signed a memorandum in April ordering Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the potential use of foreign 'straw' donations in online fundraising, citing concerns about foreign influence in elections based in part on the work of the GOP-led congressional committees. ActBlue was the only platform named in the order. The memorandum calls for Bondi to report back in 90 days, which would be late July. Under federal law, only U.S. citizens and green card holders can give to campaigns and political action committees. Republicans have long argued that ActBlue, which processed billions of dollars in donations for Democrats last year, is not strict enough in weeding out potential foreign contributions. ActBlue has countered that it has processes to catch illegal donation attempts and that similar challenges exist on other platforms, including WinRed. The platform's lawyers also suggested that ActBlue's further cooperation with the congressional probes could depend on the extent of the committees' work with the Justice Department. 'In light of your public statements, it is essential that we receive more information about your agreement to coordinate the Committees' activities with the Executive Branch, so that ActBlue may properly evaluate its ongoing efforts to cooperate with the Committees,' the platform's lawyers wrote. ActBlue previously turned over thousands of pages of internal documents to the committees, some voluntarily, and then later under subpoena. The committees released an interim report in April that cited cases of fraud identified in the ActBlue documents as a means to argue that the platform had an 'unserious' approach to fraud prevention.

In looming Hegseth hearings, Republicans may air their budget peeves
In looming Hegseth hearings, Republicans may air their budget peeves

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

In looming Hegseth hearings, Republicans may air their budget peeves

The first time Pete Hegseth testified before Congress the hardest questions he faced were from Democrats who accused him of sexual and alcohol abuse — both of which he denied as 'anonymous smears.' Now, as America's defense secretary returns to Capitol Hill for a week of testimony, he's likely to get sharper questioning from his own party. After five months atop the Pentagon, Hegseth has dismissed top U.S. officers, slashed the Defense Department's workforce and fired much of his own staff. For a defense secretary confirmed by the narrowest margin possible, the rapid changes have concerned even some Republican members of Congress. 'This is it. This is really the first oversight' of Hegseth's time as secretary, said Mark Montgomery, a retired rear admiral and former Senate Armed Services Committee aide. Alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine, Hegseth will testify in multiple hearings focused on defense spending. But in an unusual twist, these hearings will occur without the Pentagon actually releasing its budget request, which is already months late. As in his January hearing, Hegseth will likely face blistering criticism from Democrats aghast at his handling of the Defense Department — from sharing sensitive attack plans on a group chat to tasking the U.S. military with more missions on American soil. But he may also face hard questions from Republicans, many of whom have publicly chafed at the administration's plans for military spending. Hegseth returns to Capitol Hill to defend Trump's defense budget plan In May, the administration asked Congress for a $892.6 billion base defense budget, of which around $850 billion would go to the Pentagon. The number amounts to a cut when accounting for inflation. 'It's going to be hard to say you're actually putting forward a 'Peace through Strength' policy when you're asking for less money than your predecessors projected,' said Elaine McCusker, a top official in the Pentagon's comptroller office during the first Trump administration. Per the scarce budget documents already released by the administration, the Pentagon's procurement account is poised for a major cut — almost $20 billion less than the Biden Pentagon had projected, McCusker said. The drop could harm some of the administration's top priorities, such as the Golden Dome missile defense system and investments in shipbuilding, both of which are also popular in Congress. 'It appears the Trump administration's [fiscal year 2026] defense budget request will double down on the Biden administration's material neglect for the glaring national security threats challenges about which they speak with great alarm,' chair of the Senate appropriations subcommittee on defense Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., wrote in a May statement. Both McConnell and Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee Susan Collins, R-Maine, voted against Hegseth's confirmation. Many top Republicans in Congress are calling for the kind of military buildup the administration is asking of its European and Asian allies — closer to 5% of GDP spent on defense. The administration has defended its budget by saying it's not the only military spending planned for this year. Congress is also debating a massive party-line bill that would include $150 billion for defense, spread over four years. This bill includes much of the money slated for top priority weapons purchases, like missile defense and warships. 'This budget provides that level [of spending] while ensuring that only Republican-votes are needed by using reconciliation to secure those increases without Democrats insisting on increasing wasteful government,' Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought posted on X in May. Still, such supplemental defense bills haven't been counted as part of the defense budget in the past and would introduce new uncertainty. Pentagon officials plan the funding for major weapons programs years into the future to make sure funding is predictable. If, say, Golden Dome is only funded in a stand-alone spending bill, then there's no guarantee it will get more money in the future. 'The appropriate defense budget isn't that you give it a huge chunk of change but that you grow it year over year,' Montgomery said. Privately, some Republicans are also concerned about the increased use of U.S. forces on American soil to support immigration enforcement. Some 9,000 active-duty troops have either been deployed to the southern border or are approved to do so. Such missions are under even higher scrutiny after the protests in Los Angeles against the Trump administration's recent deportations in the city. Over the weekend, Trump called up 2,000 National Guard troops to protect officials carrying out the mission. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has decried the choice and said he plans to sue for their removal. Meanwhile, U.S. Northern Command posted on X Sunday that parts of an infantry brigade team from the California National Guard have already begun deploying to Los Angeles. Hegseth, who has said active duty Marines may follow, shared the post from his personal account.

Consumer Fed. of America Director of Financial Services Adam Rust on the national watchdog CFPB
Consumer Fed. of America Director of Financial Services Adam Rust on the national watchdog CFPB

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Consumer Fed. of America Director of Financial Services Adam Rust on the national watchdog CFPB

Adam Rust (Courtesy photo) A decade-and-a-half ago in the aftermath of the Great Recession and the financial crisis that sparked it, consumer advocates in North Carolina and around the country succeeded in spurring the creation of a new federal government watchdog known as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In the years since, the CFPB has done prodigious work – winning billions of dollars in refunds for ripped-off homebuyers, student loan borrowers, and banking customers and even putting some predatory lenders out of business. Now, however, the Trump administration and some congressional Republicans are heeding the calls of business lobbyists to gut the agency and recently NC Newsline caught up with Consumer Federation of America Director of Financial Services Adam Rust to find out just what such a move would mean. Click here for the full interview with Adam Rust.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store