‘Number on formal protection plans for child sexual abuse at 30-year record low'
The number of children on formal protection plans in England because of sexual abuse has fallen to its lowest level on record, according to analysis which has prompted a charity to warn thousands of child victims could be going undetected and unsupported.
The centre of expertise on child sexual abuse (CSA Centre) said there had been 'political rhetoric and media furore' earlier this year on the issue of such abuse, but urged 'concerted and determined cross-government activity' to tackle it.
The Government has pledged to set out a clear timetable by Easter for implementing all the recommendations in the final report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA).
The long wait for the 20 recommendations to be implemented hit the headlines in January after billionaire X owner Elon Musk made comments online focused on child grooming.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer accused him and others of 'spreading lies and misinformation', but within weeks the Home Office had announced an audit looking into the scale and nature of 'gang-based exploitation' across the country as well as local reviews into grooming in some areas.
But the CSA Centre – which is mainly funded by the Home Office and hosted by Barnardo's – said despite the 'significant debate about how children are protected', child sex abuse is 'less likely to be identified and named as a concern in child protection plans than ever before'.
The centre's analysis found that local authority children's services in England placed 2,160 children on child protection plans (CPPs) for sexual abuse in 2023/24.
It said this was the lowest number in the 30 years that this data has been collected.
A child becomes the subject of a CPP if they are assessed as suffering or likely to suffer significant harm.
They will first have been assessed, having been referred to children's social care services and inquiries can be made under section 47 of the Children Act 1989.
CPPs are put in place by local authorities to support families and keep children safe and can be initiated for various reasons including neglect, physical, sexual or emotional abuse.
Centre director Ian Dean said concerns about child sexual abuse accounted for around a quarter of a social worker's child protection caseload three decades ago, but 'is now recorded in barely 4% of child protection plans'.
He described this as 'deeply troubling', with the centre estimating around 500,000 children are sexually abused in England each year.
The CSA Centre said surveys show 'sexual abuse is just as common as other forms of childhood abuse and harm, yet issues such as neglect and emotional abuse remain much more likely to be identified in children's services data'.
The report said: 'The number of children being identified by police and local authorities is only the tip of the iceberg, and the gap is getting wider.'
Mr Dean said while not all children who are sexually abused or at risk of being sexually abused need to be on a CPP, 'child in need and child protection measures are often the only way to track and ensure that action is taken to protect and support them'.
He said: 'Beyond the political rhetoric and media furore, these longstanding issues require concerted and determined cross-government activity, with sustained commitment over the coming years.'
Lynn Perry, Barnardo's chief executive, said: 'This report by the CSA Centre makes it clear that thousands of children experiencing sexual abuse are going undetected and unsupported.'
The charity repeated a call to the Government to guarantee specialist therapeutic support for child victims of sexual abuse, which was one of the IICSA recommendations.
It said: 'There is a unique opportunity here to improve how professionals who are responsible for keeping children safe work better together, and provide the right level of funding, so that police officers, social workers, teachers and others have the resources they need to identify children at risk of abuse, put the right support in place, and give them back their future.'
Annie Hudson, chairwoman of the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, said the CSA Centre report 'highlights some very concerning trends' and described it as 'worrying that the number of children on a child protection plan for sexual abuse is now at the lowest level since the data started being recorded 30 years ago'.
She added: 'It is vital that we recognise the challenges children face in verbally reporting sexual abuse, and that practitioners have the knowledge, skills and confidence to identify and respond to concerns.
'It is critical, therefore, that Government provides strong leadership and delivers a robust strategy to address its stark reality of child sexual abuse in all its forms.'
The Local Government Association said it is 'vital that all professionals working with children, including in children's social care, the police, health and the voluntary and community sector, have high-quality training to enable them to identify and respond to potential signs of abuse rather than relying on verbal disclosures'.
A Government spokesperson said: 'The findings in this report are deeply concerning. Child sexual abuse is an abhorrent crime that no child should ever have to face, and we know that it can have lifelong negative repercussions for victims and survivors.
'As a child-centred Government, we are working at pace to address the recommendations from the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, including introducing the duty for professionals to report child sexual abuse through the Crime and Policing Bill.
'Through our landmark Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, we're driving better child protection and improving information sharing between teachers, social workers and other professionals to prevent children falling through the cracks.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Why Trump's Birthday Parade Risks Being a Dark Turning Point
One of the fundamental differences between democracies and dictatorships is how the military is viewed. In democracies, the armed forces are an instrument of national defense, serving the people. But in authoritarian states, the military becomes a weapon the government wields against its own citizens. This week, for the first time in our history, Americans are asking whether we have crossed a dangerous line in that regard. It is the right question to ask. As deeply disturbing and offensive as has been the deployment of troops in response to relatively small, largely peaceful protests in Los Angeles, it is very likely only the beginning. For years, since he was first elected as President, Donald Trump has sought the ability to use the United States military as a blunt instrument against those he perceives to be his domestic opponents. While I was writing my book, 'American Resistance,' former senior officials in his administration reported to me his deep frustration and visible anger whenever he was presented with constraints on his power. He wanted the military and its civilian leaders to do what he said. And virtually all of them warned that, if Trump were to be re-elected, his goal would be to sweep away such constraints. Many expressed deep concern that the result would be him becoming the authoritarian he clearly longed to be. Today, many of those former officials see their warnings being realized. In fact, when I speak to them today, as I regularly do, they are among those who are most disturbed by what is happening. This week, on the 'Words Matter' podcast that I host with political expert Norm Ornstein, our guest was one of those former officials, Miles Taylor, who served as chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during Trump's first term. Taylor, perhaps best known as the author of the 'Anonymous' op-ed in the New York Times that first expressed concerns from within Trump's orbit, was blunt in his warning. He said he believes that too many in the media are understating the dangers of Trump's incipient authoritarianism. Taylor made reference to how those closest to Trump, like current Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, have carefully studied those instances when the law gives U.S. presidents emergency powers—and how they can be exploited. Through Project 2025 and their own planning, they have sought to construct an administration where as many of the personnel and institutional guardrails limiting what a president can do would be removed. Since the inauguration this past January, we have seen plenty of evidence of these efforts. The team around Trump was picked based not on qualifications or experience but rather on the basis of whether they would do exactly as Trump has said. You saw that manifested in the swiftness with which Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth deployed Marines to Los Angeles; to the degree to which Trump's immigration team—Miller, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and 'border czar' Tom Homan—have sought to use assertions of 'national emergency' or 'invasion' to justify sidestepping the rule of law in their efforts to round up 'illegal' immigrants. Indeed, in case after case, Trump and his team of enablers have sought to use the language of crisis (see the president's social media posts about 'insurrectionists' in LA and his wild lies about the extent of the damage they were doing) precisely because it provides a legal justification for him seizing additional powers and removing constraints on the use of that power. While Trump has avoided invoking 'the Insurrection Act' or declaring martial law thus far, with each week of this administration he has moved further in that direction. And this week, with the actions in Los Angeles, he took a particularly ominous stride down that path. Even if they over-reach and the courts serve as a check on their plans—which they still sometimes do despite the efforts of the Supreme Court to help transform Trump into our first monarch since George III—Trump and his team know that legal battles take a long time and often afford them the chance in the interim to bully, cancel, intimidate, arrest, deport and otherwise seek to strip away the fundamental rights and protections hitherto enjoyed by the residents of this country. They might not win every case, but the impact they have while the wheels of justice are grinding as slowly as they often do can boost the president's effective power and advance his agenda. Trump's role models are clear. His contempt for our laws is a matter of record. He and his team have been preparing for years to make his second term different from any presidency in U.S. history. He is unchallenged within his administration, by Congress or, much of the time, by the majority on our highest court. He has—through that court's immunity decision—power unlike any chief executive in our history. He also burns with the desire to impose his will both on behalf of his family and friends but also against those he perceives as his opponents. (Taylor, for example, has been accused of nothing less than 'treason' simply for expressing his views. He is not alone.) For these reasons, for those who know or who have studied Trump, the events of this week are so profoundly chilling. Whether it is boots on the ground in Los Angeles or the polished boots that will be marching a four-mile parade route through our nation's capital this weekend, we now have a president who sees the military as an extension of his own personal power—his most lavish and ostentatious acquisition yet. The unnecessary display of force in California and the D.C. parade alone are expected to cost in the neighborhood of $200 million. The juxtaposition of his turning the unparalleled resources of the world's most powerful armed forces against its own people and then presiding on his birthday over a Soviet-style show of might seems deeply intentional. As a consequence of the agenda Trump has been implementing since he re-took office, many big questions will loom over the parade in dark counterpoint to the celebratory fly-bys of military aircraft. Will we or our children ever look at a parade in the same way again? Will the salutes and fanfare be for the troops or for a would-be American dictator? And will we see the events of this past week, as do many of those who know Trump best, as a dark turning point in our history, a foreshadowing of the undoing of all that America's soldiers have fought and died for during the past 250 years?
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Israel can see what Europe can't: the Devil
'The cleverest ruse of the Devil,' wrote Baudelaire in 1864, 'is to persuade you he does not exist.' More than 160 years later, great swathes of Leftists, Israelophobes and Western leaders appear to have fallen under this spell when it comes to the regime in Tehran. Sir Keir Starmer delivered the usual message of pacifism on behalf of Britain. It matched that of Ursula von der Leyen and the other centrist fundamentalist European leaders, all of whom are equally addicted to the numbing opium of appeasement. Instead of seeing a resolve for victory, we were subjected to repeated demands for 'de-escalation' and 'diplomacy'. Having so loudly decried the Iranian threat in recent months, even placing it in the highest category of the new foreign influence register, the Prime Minister seemed unable to connect the synapses. By the time Israel was driven to attack, the international community had not imposed snapback sanctions on Iran. Britain even disgraced itself by refusing to help with Israel's defence. The Ayatollah could be launching nuclear bombs at all the major cities of the West in a sulphurous haze, and David Lammy would still extol the virtues of jaw-jaw. In central Tehran, there is a clock counting down to September 9, 2040, the date of Israel's destruction as prophesied by the Ayatollah. The regime has enriched uranium to a level only required for military uses. When Khamenei gives speeches, the crowd chants: 'Death to America! Death to England! Death to the hypocrites and the infidels! Death to Israel!' Until yesterday, Iran's scientists could produce 15 nukes within days. Khamenei's pet theology lusts after the apocalypse. Triggered by the obliteration of Israel, this cataclysm will supposedly herald the arrival of a mythical figure called the 'Mahdi' to lead the forces of Shia Islam to global victory. These are the convictions that drive actual Iranian foreign policy. De-escalation and diplomacy are laughable, yet this is what Israel has suffered since the Obama era. When Jerusalem was forced to act, you'd have thought the West would rally. But no. Israel was the bad guy. We have seen this movie before. When Jerusalem destroyed Saddam Hussein's nuclear programme in 1981, the world was appalled. 'A clear violation of… the norms of international conduct,' the United Nations huffed. Two decades later, the White House quietly acknowledged that the Jews had done everybody a favour. We may see a similar change of heart by 2045, but there will be much danger before then. Starmer and the Europeans don't realise how outdated they sound in this new, perilous world. As Vasily Grossman put it in Life and Fate: 'Only yesterday you were sure of yourself, strong and cheerful, a son of the time. But now another time has come – and you don't even know it.' Their era has passed. This is Israel's century. While dogs of war bark globally and instability grips America, the countries that will thrive will be those with conviction in their values and the courage and resilience to defend them. 'The world will never pity slaughtered Jews,' observed Menachem Begin. 'The world may not necessarily like the fighting Jew, but the world will have to take account of him.' With Russia and China sharpening their knives, we must not only take account of the fighting Jew but also follow his lead. Just look at Ukraine. First, however, we must accept what our grandparents learned the hard way. The Devil exists. It makes no sense to appease him. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lammy set for further talks with counterparts as Iran and Israel exchange fire
David Lammy is expected to spend the day in talks with counterparts across the Middle East after Iran launched retaliatory attacks against Israel overnight. The Foreign Secretary will be briefed by officials on Saturday and will speak to figures in the Middle East and elsewhere. It comes after conversations with representatives from Iran, Jordan and Saudi Arabia as well as European foreign ministers on Friday. Meanwhile, it has been reported in Iranian state media that Tehran has warned the US, the UK and France to not help Israel stop Iran's strikes. Iran launched missile and drone strikes on Israel overnight after a series of Israeli attacks on the heart of Tehran's nuclear programme and armed forces. Tehran's UN ambassador said 78 people had been killed and more than 320 wounded in the attacks, while Tehran's response was said to have killed at least three and wounded dozens. Speaking to broadcasters on Friday evening, Mr Lammy said: 'I spoke to my Iranian counterpart today to urge restraint at this time and calm. I recognise that this is a moment of grave peril in the Middle East.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump called for 'diplomacy and dialogue' in a call on Friday, amid a diplomatic flurry from western nations to try to calm the conflict. Sir Keir had earlier urged his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to de-escalate and work towards a 'diplomatic resolution'. A Cobra meeting of high-level ministers was convened on Friday afternoon to discuss the situation. The same is not expected on Saturday but Whitehall officials were expected to be meeting. The conflict was ignited by early morning Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear bases on Friday. Israel said the barrage was necessary before Iran got any closer to building a nuclear weapon, although experts and the US government have assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon. Iran retaliated with waves of drones and ballistic missiles, with explosions lighting up the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Sir Keir is set for discussions with other world leaders at the G7 summit in Canada next week. Tensions between Israel, the US and Iran have escalated in recent weeks, amid negotiations over the Iranian nuclear deal, which is aimed at preventing the country from developing nuclear weapons.
