
UK government says it will seek Supreme Court appeal over Sean Brown inquiry
The UK government has confirmed it will seek a Supreme Court appeal over a court ruling that ordered it to hold a public inquiry into the killing of GAA official Sean Brown.
The statement from the Northern Ireland Office came after Appeal Court judges in Belfast affirmed an earlier High Court ruling compelling the government to hold a public inquiry.
The Appeal Court judges said their final order compelling Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn to establish an inquiry would come into effect on June 2.
Mr Benn had already signalled an intention to take the case to the Supreme Court.
On Friday it was confirmed he would now be seeking leave to take the case to the Supreme Court following the Court of Appeal decision.
Last month the Court of Appeal ruled that the ongoing failure to hold a public inquiry in the Brown case was unlawful.
The judges deferred making a final order for four weeks to give Mr Benn space to consider his response.
Earlier this week, he applied to the court to give him another four weeks for further consideration but the three judges, including Northern Ireland's Lady Chief Justice Siobhan Keegan, proceeded to make their final determination on Friday.
The courtroom in Belfast was packed with supporters of the Brown family as the order was confirmed by Dame Siobhan.
Mr Brown's widow, Bridie, and her children, watched the proceedings from the front of the public gallery.
Mr Brown, 61, the chairman of Bellaghy Wolfe Tones GAA Club in Co Derry, was ambushed, kidnapped and murdered by loyalist paramilitaries as he locked the gates of the club in May 1997.
Sean Brown's daughter Clare Loughran speaks to reporters outside court (Liam McBurney/PA)
No-one has ever been convicted of his killing.
Preliminary inquest proceedings last year heard that in excess of 25 people had been linked by intelligence to the murder, including several state agents.
It had also been alleged in court that surveillance of a suspect in the murder was temporarily stopped on the evening of the killing, only to resume again the following morning.
The Northern Ireland Secretary contends the case involves a key constitutional principle of who should order public inquiries, the Government or the judiciary.
A UK government spokesperson said: 'We acknowledge the court's decisions and now intend to seek permission to appeal from the Supreme Court because this judgment and the terms of the mandatory order raise matters of constitutional significance that go beyond this individual case.
'The court previously invited the Secretary of State to reflect on the judgment and has reiterated today that this process should continue.
'We will of course respond to the court on that issue in early June.
'This will not, however, delay our determination to repeal and replace the Legacy Act, and to implement mechanisms that are human-rights compliant.'
We acknowledge the court's decisions and now intend to seek permission to appeal from the Supreme Court because this judgment and the terms of the mandatory order raise matters of constitutional significance that go beyond this individual case
Earlier, outside court, Mr Brown's daughter Clare Loughran said a public inquiry was the only option open to Mr Benn as she reiterated her mother's plea to him not to take the family to the Supreme Court in London.
'We feel vindicated that we have completed the process here in this jurisdiction, and that the Lady Chief Justice and the Court of Appeal has not upheld the Secretary of State's decision on not giving us a public inquiry,' she said.
Ms Loughran added: 'My mother stood in front of these microphones four weeks ago and appealed to the Secretary of State not to have to make her go to London, and that remains our position.
'She's an elderly lady. We have fought very long and very hard to try and get to the end point of this, which is that public inquiry to get to that truth. And that's all we want at this stage.
'We really appeal again to the Secretary of State. I appeal on my behalf, on behalf of my mother, to please do the right thing. Do not take us to London. Do not take this to the Supreme Court. Do not drag this out any longer.'
The family of Mr Brown were applauded by a large crowd of supporters as they arrived at the Court of Appeal for Friday's hearing.
Stormont First Minister Michelle O'Neill, Sinn Féin president Mary Lou McDonald and other party colleagues were among those who accompanied the Brown family as they approached the court building.
SDLP MLAs Patsy McGlone and Justin McNulty were also among the political representatives present.
Supporters of the family of GAA official Sean Brown applaud as they arrive at court (Liam McBurney/PA)
Mr Benn first signalled his intention to seek leave for the Supreme Court appeal on Wednesday.
It prompted strong criticism from the Brown family and their supporters.
The Court of Appeal, as is routine practice, dismissed Mr Benn's application for leave to the Supreme Court on Friday.
That placed the onus on Mr Benn to apply directly to the Supreme Court for leave to hear an appeal, which he has now confirmed he will do.
Ms Loughran asked what the Government was seeking to 'hide'.
She highlighted that her mother was now 87 and had already endured almost 60 court appearances.
'What are they trying to hide? What are they trying to stall this for further?' she asked.
'All she (her mother) wanted ever is to find out why. We are 10 days away from the 28th anniversary of my father's murder, the worst day of our lives, the most brutal thing that can happen to a really entirely innocent man. Why are they continuing to drag this through further? Let us get the truth.'
First Minister of Northern Ireland Michelle O'Neill (left) and Sinn Fein president Mary Lou McDonald arrive at the Court of Appeal for Friday's hearing (Liam McBurney/PA)
The Brown family's solicitor, Niall Murphy, questioned whether the government was intending to continue to break the law.
He said the Court of Appeal had given a 'strong, firm, unambiguous and very clear order' compelling Mr Benn to establish a public inquiry.
'The position is now crystal clear,' Mr Murphy added.
'The Secretary of State has a binary choice: either comply with the law or continue to break the law. And, as a society, we should all hope that those who make our laws will not be those who will now break our laws.'
Ms O'Neill urged Mr Benn to 'get on with it' and order a public inquiry.
'I think he's living in a fool's paradise if he thinks that the Brown family are going to go away, or if the community of Bellaghy are going to go away, or if the people right across the north (are going to go away),' said the Sinn Féin vice president.
'You've seen how many people came along to support this family yet again in the courts today. The court ruling is crystal clear. Get on with it. Do the public inquiry. Do the right thing.
'Have some degree of decency and stop putting Bridie Brown through this day and daily.'
Mr McGlone said Friday's hearing was a significant moment in the family's pursuit of justice.
'I have stood with the Brown family at court on many occasions over the years and today was particularly moving as the family were given a rapturous applause upon arrival,' said the SDLP Mid Ulster MLA.
'This stands in stark contrast to the way they have been treated by the UK government who are using every dirty trick in the book to stop them uncovering the truth of what happened to their husband and father.
'To try to drag Bridie Brown to London for a Supreme Court hearing all so they can protect the dark forces in state agencies who helped carry out this murder should shame this government.
'It flies totally in the face of their obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Star
a day ago
- Irish Daily Star
Southern Baptists demand Supreme Court reverse gay marriage ruling and restore 'natural law'
Members of the Southern Baptist Church are reportedly calling on the Supreme Court to issue a ban on gay marriage . It was also reported that they also called for legislators to curtail sports betting and to support policies that promote childbearing. The votes on the petition came during the annual meeting of the nation's largest Protestant denomination , which gathered more than 10,000 church representatives. The proposed legislation calls on lawmakers to 'pass laws that reflect the truth of creation and natural law — about marriage, sex, human life, and family.' According to the church, the new laws would oppose those contradicting 'what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.' The resolution calls f or the 'overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family.' Read More Related Articles Melania Trump signals her 'anger' at Trump in humiliating and very public way Read More Related Articles Donald Trump branded 'dumbest President ever' after stunning six-word geography blunder It was also reported that they also called for legislators to curtail sports betting and to support policies that promote childbearing. (Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto) It should be noted that a reversal of Obergefell would institute a ban. Per the Associated Press, the resolution calls 'for laws that affirm marriage between one man and one woman.' The outlet reports that the Southern Baptist Convention's two-day meeting began on Tuesday morning with several praise sessions and optimistic reports about the growing number of baptisms in the US. According to the church, the new laws would oppose those contradicting 'what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.' (Image: Getty Images) The news of the possible challenge to the 10-year Supreme Court decision comes after several LGBTQ groups sued U.S. President Donald Trump after he signed an executive order that dismantled several DEI initiatives. San Francisco AIDS Foundation and the GLBT Historical Society are two groups among several that sued the president. Both groups argue that the orders, which they say deny the existence of trans people, infringe upon their rights. The resolution calls for the 'overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family.' (Image: AP) Civil rights groups, the Legal Defence Fund and Lambda Legal, filed the lawsuit in the US District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday, February 20. Pink News reports that the orders that they are challenging include "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government," "Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing," and 'Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity." "The government is attempting to erase a very specific group of people," Tyler TerMeer, CEO of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation and one of the plaintiffs, expressed to ABC News. "Transgender and non-binary folks in our country are being singled out as individuals who are being told that they don't exist. So this moment is us going to the courts and saying, 'We won't be silenced.'" The outlet reports that the Southern Baptist Convention's two-day meeting began on Tuesday morning with several praise sessions and optimistic reports about the growing number of baptisms in the US. (Image: AP) Despite receiving federal funding for their work, the organisations maintain that the orders breach their Fifth Amendment rights under the US Constitution, which guarantees that "No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Attorney Jose Abrigo of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, remarked: "The orders are vague, use undefined terms and make compliance impossible and enforcement arbitrary. Our plaintiffs have no way of knowing which programs, policies or even word might result in penalties."


Agriland
2 days ago
- Agriland
Farmer convicted at Tyrone court for water pollution offence
A Co. Tyrone farmer pleaded guilty and was convicted at Dungannon Magistrates' Court today (Monday, June 9) in relation to a water pollution offence. Harry Brown (62), Lurganeden Road, Pomeroy, Co Tyrone, pleaded guilty and was fined £1,500 plus a £15 offenders levy for a pollution offence that had impacted the Claggan River – a tributary of the Ballinderry River which flows into Lough Neagh. Dungannon Magistrates' Court heard that Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) water quality inspectors responded to a water pollution incident that took place between June 12 and June 13 last year. The NIEA inspectors discovered that 'dark grey coloured agricultural effluent was flowing along a ditch, alongside the Pomeroy Road, before discharging to the Claggan River'. The court was also informed that the inspectors 'traced the flow of effluent to farm premises at Lurganeden Road'. Brown, who was present on the farm, told the inspectors that he had been cleaning out one of the poultry houses. Dungannon Magistrates' Court also heard that a 'nearby wooded area was inspected and dark grey coloured agricultural effluent was observed to be actively flowing through that area, and then entering land drainage pipes, before discharge to the waterway'. Pollution As part of the investigation, a statutory sample of the discharge was collected and analysed. The sample results indicated that the sample 'contained poisonous, noxious or polluting matter which would have been potentially harmful to aquatic life in a receiving waterway'. According to the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) it is an offence under the Water (Northern Ireland) Order 1999 to 'make a polluting discharge to a waterway'. Water pollution management in Northern Ireland has been divided into nine areas. Each of the nine areas is staffed by an environmental health (rivers) officer (EHRO) or senior water quality inspector (SWQI) and a number of water quality inspectors (WQIs) who act as field agents on behalf of DAERA. If a pollution incident is reported to DAERA or is discovered during its work, the pollution response team 'will find and stop the source of the pollution, identify the polluter and when necessary collect enough evidence to secure a prosecution'. The department has also advised that if anyone wants to report a pollution incident they can call a 24-hour NIEA incident hotline on 0800 80 70 60.


Sunday World
4 days ago
- Sunday World
Convicted drug dealer and former soccer club boss moved to Midlands jail
Andrew Noonan was jailed for 13-and-a-half years in relation to his 'high' level role in a €2.7 million heroin importation enterprise last month CONVICTED drug dealer and the former soccer club boss, Andrew Noonan has been transferred from Mountjoy to the Midlands Prison. Sources said the former manager of Bluebell United in Dublin, who was jailed for 13-and-a-half years in relation to his 'high' level role in a €2.769 million heroin importation enterprise last month – was moved for 'operational reasons.' These are understood to relate to the chronic overcrowding currently being experience by inmates in Mountjoy. Noonan role in the heroin importation scheme was discovered after gardaí posed as delivery men in a controlled delivery of the drugs to a co-accused, Keith Quinn (36) Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard last month that gardaí believe 45-year-old Noonan had a supervisory role in relation to his co-accused Quinn and say Noonan's level in the overall context of the enterprise was 'high.' Andrew Noonan News in 90 Seconds - 7th June Quinn pleaded guilty in relation to his own role and received a seven-and-a-half year sentence with the final three-and-a-half years suspended in 2021. This was later increased by the Court of Appeal to eight years imprisonment with 18 months suspended. He has since been released. Noonan, of Redhills Park, Ellistown, Co Kildare, was convicted following a trial of three drugs offences in relation to the possession, sale and supply of the drugs at Rosemount Business Park, Dublin 11, on August 5th, 2020. He was also convicted of possession of a phone with an encrypted application, Enigma, giving rise to a reasonable inference that it was to be used in connection with a drug trafficking offence. He was acquitted of possession of a signal blocker. The court heard Noonan does not accept the verdict of the jury and denied any role in relation to the drugs. Garda Redmond O'Leary of the Garda Drugs and Organised Crime Bureau told John Berry SC, prosecuting, that in August 2020, British police authorities became suspicious of a package travelling through the UK. It was analysed and tested positive for heroin. A garda operation involving a controlled delivery was put in place, and the package was delivered to Quinn's workplace in the Dublin industrial estate by a garda posing as a UPS driver. Internal CCTV of the workplace showed Quinn taking out his phone and interacting with the package in what was later found to be a picture and text messages sent to Noonan. No suspicion attaches to Quinn's former workplace. Quinn placed the package in his car and was observed driving in convoy with another car, driven by Noonan, to another office in the estate. Quinn got out, placed the package in the office and then drove in convoy with Noonan to a coffee shop where gardaí intercepted them. Noonan was, at this stage, found in possession of the keys to the office where Quinn had placed the package. Three phones were also retrieved from Noonan's person and his car. Passing sentence, Judge Elma Sheahan said foremost in the court's mind in sentencing was the devastating harm caused by the drugs trade, which the court deals with on a daily basis. She said the value and quantity of the seizure were also critical factors. Judge Sheahan said at the time of this offending, Noonan was the manager of a soccer team and employed in a family business. She said he was in a position of trust and influence over young men. She said this did not sit easy and offends all society expects from an individual in such a role.