Pentagon leaders double down on the destruction from US attacks on Iran
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon's top leaders doubled down Thursday on how destructive the U.S. attacks had been on Iran's nuclear facilities and described in detail the study and planning behind the bombing mission.
In a rare Pentagon news briefing, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, worked to shift the debate from whether the nuclear targets were 'obliterated,' as President Donald Trump has said, to what they portrayed as the heroism of the strikes as well as the extensive research and preparation that went into carrying them out.
'You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated — choose your word. This was an historically successful attack,' Hegseth said in an often combative session with the media.
He said once more an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency, a part of the Defense Department, was preliminary and that the report acknowledged there was low confidence and gaps in information. Hegseth scolded reporters for 'breathlessly' focusing on that intelligence assessment and said such stories were just attempts to undermine the Republican president.
That intelligence report said that while the U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities did significant damage, the sites were not totally destroyed and that Tehran's program was only set back by a few months.
U.S. stealth bombers dropped 12 deep penetrator bombs on Iran's Fordo uranium enrichment site and two on Natanz, a U.S. official told The Associated Press. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss military operations.
Despite the sheer tonnage of weaponry used on Fordo, the DIA report said the sites were not totally destroyed.
At the briefing, Caine described the 15 years of study by two Defense Threat Reduction Agency officers to create a bomb that could penetrate the Fordo nuclear facility being built deep underground by Iran.
Over time, he said, the department had many people with Ph.D.s working on the program, 'doing modeling and simulation that we were quietly and in a secret way the biggest users of supercomputer hours within the United States of America.'
The pilots of the bombers involved in the weekend strikes described the flash after the bomb drop as 'the brightest explosion they had ever seen,' Caine said.
At the briefing, Hegseth responded to some questions by personally attacking the reporter or the press as a whole.
Asked repeatedly whether any of the nuclear material was moved out of the Iranian facilities, Hegseth acknowledged that the Pentagon was 'looking at all aspects of intelligence and making sure we have a sense of what was where.
'I'm not aware of any intelligence that says things were not where they were supposed to be' or that they were moved, Hegseth said.
___
Associated Press writers Eric Tucker and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
12 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with NATO spending goal despite Trump tariff threats
MADRID (AP) — Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez walked away from this week's NATO summit with an opt-out from spending more on defense. He also left with fresh threats of tariffs from U.S. President Donald Trump. On Thursday, the progressive Spanish leader stuck by his decision to break with NATO allies and responded to Trump's comments by pointing out that the European Commission — and not Spain — was who decided the bloc's trade policy.
Toronto Star
13 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Mexico's president slams sanctions on Mexican banks by Trump administration
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum responded sharply Thursday to U.S. government sanctions blocking transfers from three Mexican financial institutions, saying Washington hasn't shown evidence of its allegations of money laundering. The U.S. Treasury Department announced the sanctions Wednesday on the banks CIBanco and Intercam Banco and the brokerage Vector Casa de Bolsa, alleging that they had facilitated millions of dollars in money transfers for Mexican drug cartels.
Winnipeg Free Press
20 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
South Carolina lawmakers won't get paid while justices determine whether their raise was legal
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — All money paid to South Carolina lawmakers while they aren't in session has been stopped by the state Supreme Court as the justices sort through a lawsuit from one of their members, alleging legislators improperly gave themselves an $18,000-a-year raise. The raise is what is called 'in-district compensation' — money set aside for legislative duties that has few limits on how it can be spent and requires no receipts or other documentation. Lawmakers voted, in the budget set to start July 1, to increase it from $1,000 a month to $2,500 a month for all 46 senators and 124 House members. Republican Sen. Wes Climer sued his colleagues, saying the raise violates the state constitution, which bans the legislature from increasing their per diem during their terms. House members would get 18 months of the extra money and senators would get more than three years of payments before facing reelection. Lawyers for the House and Senate disagree. They said the money isn't a 'per diem' considered part of legislators' salaries, but a reimbursement for expenses, even though there are no reporting requirements. They also said the money isn't an extra cost to taxpayers because it came out of funds already set aside to operate both chambers. The compensation is usually paid monthly, but neither the $1,000 that has been paid for decades nor the $1,500 raise will land in lawmakers' direct deposits in July since the state Supreme Court decided Wednesday to suspend the budget item containing the money until it rules. The justices set out a schedule with a deadline in early September for the final legal filings, meaning lawmakers won't get paid for at least two months. If the justices rule the raise is legal, then lawmakers would get back pay for both the raise and their regular pay. In South Carolina, the Supreme Court justices are elected by the Legislature. Along with the in-district compensation, lawmakers also get a salary of $10,400 annually, paid in a lump sum that has not changed since 1990. In addition, they get money for meals, mileage to drive to the state capital in Columbia and hotel rooms while in session. Legislators are considered part-time because South Carolina's General Assembly meets three days a week from January to May, and outside of the in-district compensation, they don't receive any money when not in session. The raise was proposed by Republican Sen. Shane Martin late in the budget process in a proviso, which is a one-year order on how to spend money. The monthly stipend hadn't changed in about 30 years, and Martin said the increase was needed to offset inflation. It is meant to pay for computers or other equipment, travel to events in their districts, or holding town halls. More than 40 of the state's 170 General Assembly members have refused the increase. All are Republicans.
