UK Border Force is in effect under military command, report says
The UK Border Force is in effect under military command, reflecting a wider increase of 'hyper-militarisation' in policing, according to a new report on international law enforcement.
A report by the Institute of Race Relations (IRR), timed to coincide with the fifth anniversary of George Floyd's death, says the 21st century has seen the emergence of paramilitary and 'political' policing across Europe, employed at borders, during civil unrest and against public protest.
It cites the Home Office's 2020 request for Ministry of Defence (MoD) support and the creation within the Border Force of a new post of clandestine Channel threat commander as evidence of the Channel becoming 'hyper-militarised'.
Liz Fekete, the director of the IRR and the report's author, said: 'What they have begun at the border does not end at the border.
'First, the government portrays asylum seekers arriving in small boats in an already militarised Channel as a national security threat. The plan to allow French police to push back boats in the Channel can only lead to more injuries, more deaths.
'Second, we know that plastic bullets (still used in Northern Ireland) have already been authorised for use at the Notting Hill carnival and BLM (Black Lives Matter) protests of 2020 and that, since then, BLM protests have been subjected to baton charges, horse charges and pepper spray, and that student occupations for Palestine have been violently suppressed.
'Third, we know that discrete firearms units have been created within crime fighting units (recall the deaths of Mark Duggan and Chris Kaba) and that Jean Charles de Menezes died as a result of the 'shoot to kill' approach of Operation Kratos.
'This is why we are saying to the government today that 'it's time to take stock'. For this is demonstrably not policing by consent.'
The report says the MoD's oversight for policing small-boat crossings in the Channel has 'effectively [put] elements of the UK Border Force under military command'. In support of this analysis, it also highlights Keir Starmer's announcement last year that he was giving Border Security Command counter-terrorism powers to deal with people-smuggling, and Drone Watch UK's written evidence to the House of Commons defence committee in which it said that the Channel had been militarised through the use of military-grade drones.
Another theme of the report, titled Paramilitary Policing Against the People, is the 'creeping' growth of 'less-lethal weaponry', which can nevertheless cause life-changing injuries, such as Tasers, which were introduced to policing in England and Wales in 2003, Northern Ireland in 2008 and Scotland in 2018.
The report discusses 69 deaths of migrants, refugees and other racialised people across Europe through the use of such weaponry, mostly asylum seekers from sub-Saharan Africa at the Spanish-Moroccan border. The weaponry is often used in public order situations, it says.
Kojo Kyerewaa, a national organiser for Black Lives Matter UK, said: 'Only racism can explain the British state's fear of Black people on the streets.
'The Met's 5,900 plastic bullets and 700 officers trained to fire them are not 'public safety' tools. They are instruments of racial terror. When we flooded the streets to denounce police brutality, the Home Office aimed those very weapons at us – weapons proven to blind, maim and kill. This is not an oversight. This is their vicious racist designs against us.'
The Met previously said it was 'inaccurate and irresponsible to imply the ethnicity of those likely to be involved in an event or protest influences the tactics considered'.
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Britain has a long tradition of operational independence for the police who keep our streets safe. Any use of their powers is an operational decision.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Police investigate heart surgery patient deaths at East Yorkshire hospital
Police have launched an investigation into the deaths of heart surgery patients at an East Yorkshire hospital. The investigation is focusing on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures carried out on elderly and frail patients at Castle Hill hospital, near Hull. There have been no arrests in connection with the investigation, which Humberside police said was in its 'very early stages'. A BBC investigation found concerns had been raised about the deaths of 11 patients after the procedure to replace a damaged valve in the heart. It is a surgery used in people with heart disease who are not well enough for major heart surgery, as the heart does not need to be stopped, unlike in bypass surgery. However it does still carry serious risk as it involves surgeons inserting an instrument with a balloon into a leg or chest artery, which is moved into position near the opening of the aortic valve. Space for new tissue is then created by inflating the balloon, which supports the heart valve. The Humber Health Care Partnership, which runs Castle Hill through Hull university teaching hospitals NHS trust (HUTH), told the BBC that three separate reviews conducted after concerns were raised found deaths after this type of surgery at the hospital were in line with the national average. It said families who had lost loved ones were invited to ask questions and that the trust was 'happy to answer those directly'. The spokesperson said: 'Three separate external reviews of our TAVI service have been undertaken and shown that mortality rates associated with TAVI are similar to national mortality rates over a four-year period. 'The Royal College of Physicians was invited to review the service in 2021, at the request of the trust's chief medical officer. 'The Royal College report concluded that the TAVI service is essential for the Humber and North Yorkshire region and needs to be expanded. 'It stated however that the design of the service should be reviewed and invested in. The report offered a number of actions for improvement and we have delivered against all of those since it was shared with us.' A Humberside police spokesperson said: 'An investigation is in the very early stages in relation to deaths following surgery at Castle Hill hospital. Inquiries are being carried out and at this time, we can confirm no arrests have been made.'
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Mental health sick days soar by 5m in just a year
Britons took an extra 5m sick days for mental health reasons last year after a surge in conditions including stress, anxiety and depression. Staff took a record 20.5m days off because of mental health in 2024, according to the Office for National Statistics, up from 14.8m in 2023. This accounted for 13.7pc of all sick days taken in Britain, the highest proportion since 2019. Jamie O'Halloran, senior research fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the figures reflect 'the tip of the iceberg' as many employees continue working even when they are unwell. He said: 'We must do more to prevent avoidable ill health and create workplaces that support people with health conditions to get into – and stay in – work. 'The lack of progress on mental health is particularly alarming and must become a greater priority for both public health policy and employer strategy.' Poor mental health appears to be more prevalent in the public sector, where it accounted for 16.4pc of absences last year – compared with 6.7pc in the private sector. There has been a surge in diagnoses of mental health conditions such as anxiety and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Overall ill health is also more problematic in the public sector, where it accounts for an absence rate of 2.9pc compared with 1.8pc for private companies. The latest figures also show that it is not only those in work taking time off because of sickness. The number of people of working age who are economically inactive – neither in work nor looking for a job – because of ill health has surged to 2.8m, up from 2.1m before the Covid pandemic. In total, workers took 149m sick days in 2024, which is down 10pc on the previous year. The number of days taken for minor illnesses dropped by a third to 33m, while workers took 26.5m days for musculoskeletal problems, roughly the same as 2023. The overall sickness rate, which charts absences as a share of all working hours, fell to 2pc. As a result the proportion of sick days is back to its pre-pandemic level. Sam Atwell, at the Health Foundation, a charity, said sick employees must be supported to prevent them from dropping out of work altogether. 'Warning sign' 'Employers and government alike should be concerned by these findings as extended or repeated episodes of sickness absence can be a warning sign that an employee is at risk of leaving the workforce and becoming economically inactive,' he said. 'Employers have a key role to play in ensuring that workers are provided with adequate sick pay and are actively supported during sickness absence. 'Our analysis shows that the UK statutory sick pay rate is among the least generous across all OECD countries.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
TfL blocks Save the Children advert calling for end to two-child benefit limit
Transport for London (TfL) has banned adverts from the charity Save The Children calling for the two-child limit on universal credit and child tax credit to be scrapped, deeming them in breach of its bar on 'political' advertising. The adverts, designed to look like a train departure board, carry the message: 'By the time you get to work another child in the UK will be dragged into poverty.' They were due to run in Westminster underground station to coincide with the government's comprehensive spending review due on 11 June. After the adverts were initially rejected, the charity changed a strap line from 'time for the UK government to scrap the two-child limit' to 'it's time to scrap the two-child limit,' but this was also rejected by the transport body. The two-child limit, introduced by the Conservative government in 2017, means parents are unable to receive universal credit or child tax credit for more than two children. Analysis by the End Child Poverty Coalition has shown that the cap is a 'key driver of child poverty' in the UK, and the Child Poverty Action Group found that scrapping the cap would lift 350,000 children out of poverty. According to Save The Children, an average of 109 children a day are pulled into poverty by the limit – equivalent to one every 13 minutes. Save The Children was told the adverts had been rejected for falling foul of TfL's ban on party political advertising. However, adverts by the housing charity Shelter, urging the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to invest in social housing, were accepted and ran earlier this spring. Meghan Meek-O'Connor, policy lead on child poverty at Save the Children UK, said: 'It is deeply disappointing that telling the truth about child poverty in this country should be seen as controversial or indeed political. 'We understand TfL have a difficult line to tread when approving or rejecting advertising on the underground. But in our eyes this advert is far less controversial than other adverts it has approved.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'We won't stop raising our voice to ensure that every child has the support they need to develop to their full potential,' she added. 'It shouldn't be controversial to tell the public that the two-child limit keeps children in poverty, and the situation is getting worse.' Last week TfL reversed a ban on adverts from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas) charity, after an intervention from the London mayor, Sadiq Khan. The posters called on people to lobby their MP to vote in favour of decriminalisation of abortion, and were initially rejected for bringing the Metropolitan police into disrepute. TfL has been approached for comment.
