
The billionaire presidency is here. How's the 99 percent feeling?
NEW YORK — On a Friday night in late March, about 50 people, in costume as members of the 1 percent, arrived at an 'anti-billionaire bash' at the Brooklyn Society for Ethical Culture in Park Slope to playact as plutocrats. The name of the game was 'Billionaire Uh-Oh!' The host, Marcela Mulholland, stood at a lectern and read hypothetical scenarios in which uber-wealthy people got into trouble, and three teams crafted ways out of sticky situations. For instance: Your son hits an elderly woman with his Audi. How do you make sure he still gets into Dartmouth?
The groups mirthfully discussed the possible 'solutions.'
Say she wasn't on the crosswalk!
Say she was crazy!
Find a homeless man! If he's not drunk, get him drunk — and have him hit her!
Another problem: Your wife was overheard singing a racial slur while showering post-SoulCycle. How do you keep her upcoming birthday party in the Hamptons from turning into a bust?
Get the same homeless man — sorry, person experiencing homelessness — to change his gender identity and take the blame!
This was a night of Dada, an attempt by the partygoers to cope with the fact that the billionaire president and his astronomically wealthy advisers are seizing the levers of government, purging civil servants and generally manifesting nightmares for mainline liberals and Bernie Bros alike. Since reclaiming the White House, President Donald Trump has empowered Elon Musk and his U.S. DOGE Service to recommend dramatic cuts to the federal workforce. The Senate has confirmed several mega-rich people to Trump's Cabinet — including Linda McMahon, who is presiding over the administration's bid to dismantle the Education Department, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a pair of Wall Street veterans who have championed the president's combative approach to global trade.
The anti-billionaire party was happening seven subway stops from Zuccotti Park, where Occupy Wall Street activists protested economic inequality in 2011, and just a few blocks northwest of Prospect Park, where Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), in 2016, had welcomed a massive crowd to a 'political revolution' that vilified corporate executives, not federal workers.
Suffice to say, America has gone a different way.
'The wealthiest people have nevah, everrr, in the history of our country, had it so good,' Sanders declared at a March rally in Nevada.
He wasn't waving a white flag: The theme of the rally — and similar ones in Colorado, Arizona and California, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) — was 'Fight Oligarchy,' and backstage the senator from Vermont seemed to be holding hope that the president would notice the large crowds at these events and have a change of heart. 'He's gonna look at that,' Sanders told The Washington Post, 'and say, 'Mmmmmmmm.' You know, 'Hey, guys, hey, Elon, calm down a bit. Maybe the American people don't like what we're doing.''
At the Brooklyn anti-billionaire party, Mulholland wasn't holding her breath. She was very much a Resister during the first Trump term and later the political director of polling firm Data for Progress. Now?
'It feels so futile,' says Mulholland, 27. 'You're like, oh, donate to this, or like, go to the rally or sign this petition. And it's like, I don't actually know that I believe in the theory of change for a lot of those.'
'But at the same time,' she added, 'I feel like something in you dies if you watch injustice happening and you do nothing.'
The party was something. A pop-up sketch comedy show? A solidarity exercise? A flier encouraged guests to donate $10 per drink — vodka-cran labeled 'Theranos juice' was on offer — to a union organizing group. 'Pronouns prohibited,' the invitation read. 'BYOSSRIs. All proceeds to the woke mind virus.' People dressed as Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Jobs, Tiger Woods, Elon Musk.
Katie Mackall, a 27-year-old clinical research coordinator from Bushwick, came as 'Elon Musk's dad's emerald mine.' She wore glittery green eye shadow, sequins and fishnet sleeves, plus a green hard hat with a headlight. (Errol Musk has said he owned a small portion of such a mine in Zambia, though Elon has in recent years questioned the mine's existence.)
Mulholland dressed as Lauren Sánchez, the helicopter pilot, philanthropist and fiancée of Amazon founder (and Post owner) Jeff Bezos. There were a few fake Bezoses, too, mingling in dark shirts and puffy vests. Did they care to comment — in character, of course — on criticisms that they'd been making nice with the Trump administration?
'I think we do business with whoever the American people choose to elect into office,' said one ersatz Bezos, a comedian named Simon Bloch. 'We don't take sides. We just want to do good business and deliver better for our customers, honestly.'
'People are jealous,' said another, a campaign consultant named Guido Girgenti. 'I built some s--- that everybody can use, right? If you did that, you'd be a billionaire.'
Do Americans resent rich people, or idolize them?
The answer is yes.
'We've always been an aspirational society, since the beginning,' says Jonathan Taplin, the Los Angeles-based author of a book on powerful tech billionaires. 'And the notion for immigrants … that the streets of America were paved with gold, and all you had to do was get past Ellis Island and you, too, could become a millionaire — that's been around for a long time.'
Over the years, the public and its servants have tried to break up monopolies and levy steep taxes on the rich to prevent them from accumulating too much power. But something seems to have changed in recent years, says Guido Alfani, an Italian scholar and the author of a history of the rich in the West. 'Many presidents have been accused of being too close to extreme wealth, and so forth and so on,' he says, 'but no other country has ever got as close as the United States is today to being actually run by the super-rich.'
How did the billionaire(s) win this time? With a crucial boost from the working class. Fifty-six percent of voters without college degrees went for Trump, according to exit polling by Edison Research. Sixty-nine percent of White men without college degrees voted for the president in the same poll. White men without degrees have continued to support Trump overwhelmingly, as of a poll conducted early last month by NBC: 69 percent viewed the president positively. (Musk seems to be reaping the benefits of his association with the Trump administration with that same group: Among all White voters, NBC found, only men without college degrees held a positive view of the world's richest man.) In addition to the White working-class voters who have favored him for a while, Trump's winning coalition last year was buoyed by increases in support from heavily Latino, working-class communities: Pennsylvania factory towns and the Texas borderlands, among others.
Eddie Padron doesn't see Trump and Musk as snooty people with their noses up in the air, but as hard workers trying to build a company — sort of like him.
Padron, a precinct chair for his local Republican Party, has been in the locksmithing business in Brownsville, Texas, for 44 years. About a decade ago, he says, he got a call to drive out to a community about 20 miles outside of town. At a small apartment complex that had been foreclosed on, there were two men asking him to rekey every front and back door. They had one instruction: Put all the locks on the same key. 'And that,' Padron says, 'was our first taste of SpaceX.' Musk and his space technology company were moving in, buying up more and more property, which meant more business for the locksmith.
Padron sees it like this: There's the way business works, and then there's the way government works. If the cashier at your H-E-B supermarket is giving you attitude, you talk to the manager, and they make it right so they can keep getting your dollar. 'For the first time in the history,' he said of Musk's partnership with Trump, 'you have a manager who's taking care of business.'
(Musk recently estimated that his DOGE cuts will save the government $150 billion in the next fiscal year, although some analysts say such savings could be offset if staff cuts at the IRS hamper tax collection.)
The federal bureaucracy can feel sluggish — less responsive to people's needs than the corporations they associate with next-day shipping, on-demand streaming, instant search results, the world in their pocket.
'The reason the government gets blamed and has so much worse popularity and polling than Amazon as a company is because Amazon does what [you expect it to do],' says Corbin Trent, a former adviser to Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez who now runs a home remodeling business in Tennessee. 'The government doesn't do what we expect it to do, which is function for us,' he added.
'What Trump did very intelligently is, he said: 'The system is broken, right? I'm going to smash the system,'' Sanders told The Post.
Some working-class voters may not have seen a vote for Trump as a vote for the billionaire(s). Some may have seen it as a vote for the guy who takes care of business, even when that means smashing things.
Andrew Macey, a mechanical repairman in Clairton, Pennsylvania, voted for Trump in November. It was the first time he voted for a Republican. His union, U.S. Steelworkers Local 1557, had endorsed the billionaire, and although Macey knew wealthy men had different concerns — stock portfolios, not the cost of eggs — Macey had shaken Trump's hand at a rally, and he had faith that the former and future president would use the government to protect the steel industry and make things cheaper for him and his fellow workers.
'He told everybody, no matter what party [they were] in, that it was going to be better his first day in office,' Macey says. 'But the exact opposite has happened. Prices rose. The stock market is in shambles, and the prices are going to go up even higher because of these, you know, across-the-board tariffs.'
Trump's tariffs, which his administration has characterized as part of an effort to protect the jobs of America's working class, have worried some of the president's richest allies. Arguably the president's trade policies represent a willingness to buck corporate interests in favor of a worker-focused agenda, but critics have said his strategy would drive up retail prices and suffocate the economy, resulting in hardship for everybody. Trump has since pressed pause on many of the levies while escalating his trade war with China.
Smashing systems isn't the same as fixing them. It remains to be seen whether the president will stay in the graces of their working-class supporters if his government cuts and economic policies start to make things feel more broken than before.
Michael Rivera, a Republican commissioner in Berks County, Pennsylvania — where Trump saw a surge in support in the heavily Latino city of Reading — says he has been getting questions about the government cuts at his town hall meetings. 'They're like: 'What's going to happen to Social Security? What's going to happen with Medicare? How is this going to affect our jobs here in Berks County?'' Rivera says.
Could the left beat billionaires in the future, with the help of the working class? It's at least healthy if people criticize them, says Hasan Piker, a Twitch streamer and leftist commentator. 'A lot of people yell at me,' Piker says. 'I'm now a very successful content creator, and I have a nice house. I bought it so I can live there with my family. And, you know, I leased a Porsche. People always yell at me for these things. They say, 'You're rich, too.' And I always say it's good. It's good that you hate me for that reason.'
At the Brooklyn party, the imaginary way back to the Bernie timeline was paved with irony. The costumed 'billionaires' flew paper airplanes in a contest to emit the most carbon. They made tiny babies out of Play-Doh, an allusion to pronatalism.
Something to do.
'It's very easy to feel like you can't do anything,' said Anya Schulman, 29, a writer and content creator from Fort Greene who was dressed as Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes. 'These problems are bigger than us, than somebody even living in New York, working like me with a six-figure salary. Like, I'm barely making my rent. How can I do anything? I think events like this are very important to remind us that productive action is actually very doable on a personal level.'
In the end, the group raised about $1,000 for the union organizers. After the games were over, they ate cake — specifically, a Costco slab iced with an edible image of Luigi Mangione.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Israel backs an anti-Hamas armed group known for looting aid in Gaza. Here's what we know
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel is supporting armed groups of Palestinians in Gaza in what it says is a move to counter Hamas. But officials from the U.N. and aid organizations say the military is allowing them to loot food and other supplies from their trucks. One self-styled militia, which calls itself the Popular Forces, led by Yasser Abu Shabab, says it is guarding newly created, Israeli-backed food distribution centers in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting U.N. trucks. Gaza's armed groups have ties to powerful clans or extended families and often operate as criminal gangs. Aid workers allege Israel's backing of the groups is part of a wider effort to control all aid operations in the strip. Israel denies allowing looters to operate in areas it controls. Here's what we know about anti-Hamas armed groups in Gaza: Who are these groups? Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a social media video Thursday that Israel had 'activated' clans in Gaza to oppose Hamas. He didn't elaborate how Israel is supporting them or what role Israel wants them to play. Netanyahu's comments were in response to a political opponent accusing him of arming 'crime families' in Gaza. Clans, tribes and extended families have strong influence in Gaza, where their leaders often help mediate disputes. Some have long been armed to protect their group's interests, and some have morphed into gangs involved in smuggling drugs or running protection rackets. After seizing power in 2007, Hamas clamped down on Gaza's gangs -- sometimes with brute force and sometimes by steering perks their way. But with Hamas' weakening power after 20 months of war with Israel, gangs have regained freedom to act. The leadership of a number of clans — including the clan from which the Abu Shabab group's members hail — have issued statements denouncing looting and cooperation with Israel. A self-proclaimed 'nationalist force' The Abu Shabab group went public in early May, declaring itself a 'nationalist force.' It said it was protecting aid, including around the food distribution hubs run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a mainly American private contractor that Israel intends to replace the U.N.-led aid network. Aid workers and Palestinians who know the group estimate it has several hundred fighters. The Abu Shabab group's media office told The Associated Press it was collaborating with GHF 'to ensure that the food and medicine reaches its beneficiaries.' It said it was not involved in distribution, but that its fighters secured the surroundings of distribution centers run by GHF inside military-controlled zones in the Rafah area. A spokesperson with GHF said it had 'no collaboration' with Abu Shabab. 'We do have local Palestinian workers we are very proud of, but none is armed, and they do not belong to Abu Shabab's organization,' the spokesperson said, speaking on condition of anonymity in accordance with the group's rules. Before the war, Yasser Abu Shabab was involved in smuggling cigarettes and drugs from Egypt and Israel into Gaza through crossings and tunnels, according to two members of his extended family, one of whom was once part of his group. Hamas arrested Abu Shabab but freed him from prison along with most other inmates when the war began in October 2023, they said, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals. Abu Shabab's media office said he was summoned by police before the war but wasn't officially accused or tried. It also said claims the group was involved in attacking aid trucks were 'exaggerated,' saying its fighters 'took the minimum amount of food and water necessary.' The head of the association in Gaza that provides trucks and drivers for aid groups said their members' vehicles have been attacked many times by Abu Shabab's fighters. Nahed Sheheiber said the group has been active in Israeli-controlled eastern parts of Rafah and Khan Younis, targeting trucks as they enter Gaza from the Kerem Shalom crossing with Israel. Troops nearby 'did nothing' to stop attacks, he said. Sheheiber said that when Hamas policemen have tried to confront gangs or guard truck convoys, they were attacked by Israeli troops. One driver, Issam Abu Awda, told the AP he was attacked by Abu Shabab fighters last July. The fighters stopped his truck, blindfolded and handcuffed him and his assistant, then loaded the supplies off the vehicle, he said. Abu Awda said nearby Israeli troops didn't intervene. These kinds of attacks are still happening and highlight 'a disturbing pattern,' according to Jonathan Whittall, from the U.N. humanitarian coordinator, OCHA. 'Those who have blocked and violently ransacked aid trucks seem to have been protected' by Israeli forces, said Whittall, head of OCHA's office for the occupied Palestinian territories. And, he added, they have now become the 'protectors of the goods being distributed through Israel's new militarized hubs,' referring to the GHF-run sites. The Israeli military did not reply when asked for comment on allegations it has allowed armed groups to loot trucks. But the Israeli prime minister's office called the accusations 'fake news,' saying, 'Israel didn't allow looters to operate in Israeli controlled areas.' Israel often accuses Hamas of stealing from trucks. What does all this have to do with aid? Muhammad Shehada, a political analyst from Gaza who is a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said he doesn't believe Israel's support for armed groups is aimed at directly fighting Hamas. So far there has been no attempt to deploy the groups against the militants. Instead, he said, Israel is using the gangs and the looting to present GHF 'as the only alternative to provide food to Palestinians,' since its supplies get in while the U.N.'s don't. Israel wants the GHF to replace the U.N.-led aid system because it claims Hamas has been siphoning off large amounts of supplies. The U.N. denies that significant amounts have been taken by Hamas. Israel has also said it aims to move all Palestinians in Gaza to a 'sterile zone' in the south, around the food hubs, while it fights Hamas elsewhere. The U.N. and aid groups have rejected that as using food as a tool for forced displacement. The Abu Shabab group has issued videos online urging Palestinians to move to tent camps in Rafah. Israel barred all food and other supplies from entering Gaza for 2 ½ months , pending the start of GHF – a blockade that has brought the population to the brink of famine. GHF started distributing food boxes on May 26 at three hubs guarded by private contractors inside Israeli military zones. Israel has let in some trucks of aid for the U.N. to distribute. But the U.N. says it has been able to get little of it into the hands of Palestinians because of Israeli military restrictions, including requiring its trucks to use roads where looters are known to operate. 'It's Israel's way of telling the U.N., if you want to try to bring aid into Gaza, good luck with this," said Shehada. "We will force you to go through a road where everything you brought will be looted.' Magdy and Keath reported from Cairo


Hamilton Spectator
14 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Israel backs an anti-Hamas armed group known for looting aid in Gaza. Here's what we know
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel is supporting armed groups of Palestinians in Gaza in what it says is a move to counter Hamas. But officials from the U.N. and aid organizations say the military is allowing them to loot food and other supplies from their trucks. One self-styled militia, which calls itself the Popular Forces, led by Yasser Abu Shabab, says it is guarding newly created, Israeli-backed food distribution centers in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting U.N. trucks. Gaza's armed groups have ties to powerful clans or extended families and often operate as criminal gangs. Aid workers allege Israel's backing of the groups is part of a wider effort to control all aid operations in the strip. Israel denies allowing looters to operate in areas it controls. Here's what we know about anti-Hamas armed groups in Gaza: Who are these groups? Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a social media video Thursday that Israel had 'activated' clans in Gaza to oppose Hamas. He didn't elaborate how Israel is supporting them or what role Israel wants them to play. Netanyahu's comments were in response to a political opponent accusing him of arming 'crime families' in Gaza. Clans, tribes and extended families have strong influence in Gaza, where their leaders often help mediate disputes. Some have long been armed to protect their group's interests, and some have morphed into gangs involved in smuggling drugs or running protection rackets. After seizing power in 2007, Hamas clamped down on Gaza's gangs — sometimes with brute force and sometimes by steering perks their way. But with Hamas' weakening power after 20 months of war with Israel, gangs have regained freedom to act. The leadership of a number of clans — including the clan from which the Abu Shabab group's members hail — have issued statements denouncing looting and cooperation with Israel. A self-proclaimed 'nationalist force' Besides the Abu Shabab group, it is not known how many armed groups Israel is supporting. The Abu Shabab group went public in early May, declaring itself a 'nationalist force.' It said it was protecting aid, including around the food distribution hubs run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation , a mainly American private contractor that Israel intends to replace the U.N.-led aid network. Aid workers and Palestinians who know the group estimate it has several hundred fighters. The Abu Shabab group's media office told The Associated Press it was collaborating with GHF 'to ensure that the food and medicine reaches its beneficiaries.' It said it was not involved in distribution, but that its fighters secured the surroundings of distribution centers run by GHF inside military-controlled zones in the Rafah area. A spokesperson with GHF said it had 'no collaboration' with Abu Shabab. 'We do have local Palestinian workers we are very proud of, but none is armed, and they do not belong to Abu Shabab's organization,' the spokesperson said, speaking on condition of anonymity in accordance with the group's rules. Before the war, Yasser Abu Shabab was involved in smuggling cigarettes and drugs from Egypt and Israel into Gaza through crossings and tunnels, according to two members of his extended family, one of whom was once part of his group. Hamas arrested Abu Shabab but freed him from prison along with most other inmates when the war began in October 2023, they said, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals. Abu Shabab's media office said he was summoned by police before the war but wasn't officially accused or tried. It also said claims the group was involved in attacking aid trucks were 'exaggerated,' saying its fighters 'took the minimum amount of food and water necessary.' Aid workers say it is notorious for looting The head of the association in Gaza that provides trucks and drivers for aid groups said their members' vehicles have been attacked many times by Abu Shabab's fighters. Nahed Sheheiber said the group has been active in Israeli-controlled eastern parts of Rafah and Khan Younis, targeting trucks as they enter Gaza from the Kerem Shalom crossing with Israel. Troops nearby 'did nothing' to stop attacks, he said. Sheheiber said that when Hamas policemen have tried to confront gangs or guard truck convoys, they were attacked by Israeli troops. One driver, Issam Abu Awda, told the AP he was attacked by Abu Shabab fighters last July. The fighters stopped his truck, blindfolded and handcuffed him and his assistant, then loaded the supplies off the vehicle, he said. Abu Awda said nearby Israeli troops didn't intervene. These kinds of attacks are still happening and highlight 'a disturbing pattern,' according to Jonathan Whittall, from the U.N. humanitarian coordinator, OCHA. 'Those who have blocked and violently ransacked aid trucks seem to have been protected' by Israeli forces, said Whittall, head of OCHA's office for the occupied Palestinian territories. And, he added, they have now become the 'protectors of the goods being distributed through Israel's new militarized hubs,' referring to the GHF-run sites. The Israeli military did not reply when asked for comment on allegations it has allowed armed groups to loot trucks. But the Israeli prime minister's office called the accusations 'fake news,' saying, 'Israel didn't allow looters to operate in Israeli controlled areas.' Israel often accuses Hamas of stealing from trucks. What does all this have to do with aid? Muhammad Shehada, a political analyst from Gaza who is a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said he doesn't believe Israel's support for armed groups is aimed at directly fighting Hamas. So far there has been no attempt to deploy the groups against the militants. Instead, he said, Israel is using the gangs and the looting to present GHF 'as the only alternative to provide food to Palestinians,' since its supplies get in while the U.N.'s don't. Israel wants the GHF to replace the U.N.-led aid system because it claims Hamas has been siphoning off large amounts of supplies. The U.N. denies that significant amounts have been taken by Hamas. Israel has also said it aims to move all Palestinians in Gaza to a 'sterile zone' in the south, around the food hubs, while it fights Hamas elsewhere. The U.N. and aid groups have rejected that as using food as a tool for forced displacement. The Abu Shabab group has issued videos online urging Palestinians to move to tent camps in Rafah. Israel barred all food and other supplies from entering Gaza for 2 1/2 months , pending the start of GHF – a blockade that has brought the population to the brink of famine. GHF started distributing food boxes on May 26 at three hubs guarded by private contractors inside Israeli military zones. Israel has let in some trucks of aid for the U.N. to distribute. But the U.N. says it has been able to get little of it into the hands of Palestinians because of Israeli military restrictions, including requiring its trucks to use roads where looters are known to operate. 'It's Israel's way of telling the U.N., if you want to try to bring aid into Gaza, good luck with this,' said Shehada. 'We will force you to go through a road where everything you brought will be looted.' ___ Magdy and Keath reported from Cairo Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump has rejected police reform. States and localities must take the lead.
Five years after a Minneapolis police officer brutally murdered a handcuffed George Floyd by kneeling on his neck for over nine minutes, prompting worldwide protests against wrongful police killings of Black people, the Trump administration has taken a giant step back from police reform. The Justice Department announced in May that it is abandoning agreements reached with police departments in Minneapolis and Louisville, Ky., mandating reforms designed to reduce killings, brutality and other police misconduct. The Justice Department is conducting a review to determine if it should drop similar agreements with about a dozen other police departments. On top of this, the Justice Department will end civil rights investigations of alleged criminal conduct by the Louisiana State Police and police departments in Memphis, Mount Vernon, N.Y., Oklahoma City, Phoenix and Trenton, N.J. Thankfully, Minneapolis officials announced that they will abide by their agreement, known as a consent decree, reached with the Justice Department in the closing days of the Biden presidency. But it is absurd to depend on police departments to police themselves. The federal government has a duty to protect people from police who engage in criminal conduct. The dangerous pullback by the Justice Department is likely to result in more wrongful deaths at the hands of police — particularly of Black people and members of other minority groups. A nationwide count by the Washington Post of deadly shootings by police from 2015 through 2024 found that Black people 'are killed by police at more than twice the rate' of white people in America. The number of non-Hispanic whites killed by police was 4,657, compared with 2,484 Black people. Because only 14 percent of the American population is Black, the number of people killed by police annually averaged 6.1 per million of the Black population, compared with 2.5 per million of the white population. There are, of course, times when police must use deadly force to prevent the killing of others. But this wasn't the case with Floyd and many others killed by police. Floyd, who was unarmed, was only suspected of using a counterfeit $20 bill to buy cigarettes. As a Black man like Floyd, I have experienced the unfair and harsh treatment some officers give to people who look like us. I've been stopped on the road and detained in front of my home by police several times when doing nothing wrong. I've been ordered out of my home and car to lay on the ground, had guns pointed at me, been handcuffed and been threatened with arrest. I don't think I would be treated this way were it not for the color of my skin. Most police officers never beat, shoot or kill anyone. They risk their lives to keep us safe and deserve our gratitude. But it is naive to believe that officers can do no wrong, that we live in a colorblind society or that there is no such thing as systemic racism. In the wake of the Trump administration's rejection of its duty to protect us all from police misconduct, the job of implementing needed reforms must go to state and local governments that oversee police agencies. Here are some actions they should take. Increase police funding to implement reforms: After Floyd's murder, some progressives adopted the slogan 'defund the police.' That was a mistake. Police departments need more federal, state and local government funding to better train and pay officers and to put more officers on the street to do police work the right way. More funding will make it less likely that police engage in the kind of unlawful violence that killed Floyd and too many others. Polling by CBS in 2022 found only 9 percent of Americans believed providing less funding for police would help prevent violent crime, while 49 percent said more funding for police would do so. A Gallup poll the same year found 89 percent of Americans believed minor or major changes were needed to improve policing — including 87 percent of whites, 90 percent of Hispanics and 95 percent of Blacks. Focus on preventing crime, not just crime response: Putting more cops on the street and having them get out of their patrol cars to build relationships with people and businesses helps officers gather intelligence about bad actors. The increased presence of officers in communities will prevent crime. This is an expensive but necessary step if we are serious about police reform. Independently investigate alleged misconduct: Rather than relying on police departments to police themselves and investigate officers accused of misconduct, states and localities should set up independent commissions to objectively conduct such investigations. Reward good cops and punish bad ones: Officers who report misconduct by colleagues should be rewarded financially and with promotions, while officers acting improperly should be disciplined, including with firing and prosecution when they commit crimes. A national database of fired officers should be established so bad cops can't get hired by departments in other localities. Increase police pay and education requirements: Raising police pay will make it easier to attract well-qualified job applicants. Departments should require every new hire to have at least two years of college and eventually a four-year degree. A 2017 national survey found that about 52 percent of officers had two-year college degrees, about 30 percent had four-year degrees and about 5 percent had graduate degrees. Governing Magazine reported in 2023 that 'research suggests that officers with college degrees generate fewer substantiated complaints and … are less likely to shoot or kill members of the public.' Increase screening of police recruits and veteran officers: Use psychological tests and in-depth interviews to identify those unsuitable for police work because they are too eager to use violence — especially if they feel threatened — or too prejudiced against certain groups. Increase officer training: Better training will make officers better able to do their jobs without resorting to deadly force. This should include training in psychology and mental health to assist officers in dealing with people experiencing a mental health crisis. Alternatively, set up a division of mental health police officers to address incidents where drugs or mental issues are the source of bad conduct. 'One in five fatal police shooting victims may have been experiencing a mental health crisis … at the time of their death,' a federal study of 633 deadly police shootings concluded. These recommendations are all common sense and promote justice and public safety. With the Trump administration abandoning its responsibility to investigate police misconduct and demand reforms, the job passes to state and local governments. Doing so would be a fitting tribute to George Floyd and the many others wrongfully killed by police. A. Scott Bolden is an attorney, former New York state prosecutor, NewsNation contributor and former chair of the Washington, D.C. Democratic Party.