Pokrovsk in peril? Tensions surge as 111,000 Russian troops gather near Ukraine's frontline hotspot
Ukrainian commander Oleksandr Syrskyi reports that Russia has amassed over 110,000 troops near Pokrovsk, designating it the "hottest spot" on the frontline. Despite repeated offensives and numerical superiority, Russia has failed to capture the city, a key strategic point for connecting military hubs. Russia's persistent efforts are driven by a desire for symbolic victories and psychological impact.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Pokrovsk is 'Hottest Spot' in Ukraine
Vladimir Putin's Broader Goal
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why Pokrovsk Matters to Russia
The Kursk Diversion That Shifted the Battle
What Russia Wants: Symbolism Over Strategy
FAQs
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The eastern Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk is bracing for what could become one of the most intense confrontations of the war, as Russia has massed over 110,000 troops near the city, revealed Ukrainian military commander Oleksandr Syrskyi on Friday, as per a CNN report.Describing Pokrovsk as the 'hottest spot' along Ukraine's 1,200-kilometre frontline, Syrskyi said that Russia appears determined to break through Ukrainian defenses, according to the report.This comes as Russian forces had already been trying to capture Pokrovsk for over a year, staging one grinding offensive after another, and even though they had an advantage in terms of the number of troops and weapons available, Moscow has failed to take over the city, as reported by CNN.ALSO READ: Iran moves women prisoners to hellhole farm jail after airstrike hits notorious Evin prison Even Russian President Vladimir Putin had asserted that his goal is to seize all of the eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk his forces partially occupy, according to the report.While Kyiv and its allies have accused Putin of delaying peace efforts so that his forces can seize more Ukrainian territory, as reported by CNN.Pokrovsk is a strategic target for Moscow because it is has key supply road and railroad that connect it with other military hubs in the area, and along with Kostiantynivka, Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, it forms the backbone of Ukrainian defenses in the part of Donetsk region that is still under Kyiv's control, according to the report.ALSO READ: No holding, no swiping: California's tough no touch phone law for drivers, simplified Last year, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a US-based conflict monitor, had revealed that Ukrainian defensive operations in Pokrovsk had forced Russia to leave its initial plan to take over Pokrovsk in a frontal assault as Ukrainian troops started using drones in their defensive strategy and integrated it with their ground forces, according to the CNN report.Meanwhile, Russia was not even able to increase the number of troops in the area a lot, as it was trying to contain the surprise incursion of Ukrainian troops into its own territory in the southern Kursk region, as per the report.Last week, Syrskyi highlighted that 'This allowed us to weaken the enemy's pressure on the main fronts and regroup our troops. And the enemy's capture of Pokrovsk, announced back in September 2024, has not yet taken place, thanks in part to our Kursk operation ,' as quoted by CNN.Then on Friday, Syrskyi revealed that Russia continued to try to break through to the administrative border of the Donetsk region, and he said, 'They want to do this not only to achieve some operational results, but primarily for demonstrative purposes. To achieve a psychological effect: to put the infamous 'foot of the Russian soldier' there, plant a flag and trumpet another pseudo-'victory,'' as quoted by CNN.Over 110,000 troops have been positioned near the city, making it one of Russia's largest concentrations in the region.Syrskyi believes it's more about symbolism, planting a flag and calling it a victory, than genuine strategic control.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Jailed fishers, struggling families: A Palghar story
Sami Kishore Masya's tin-roofed tenement is so dark in the sunny afternoon that a volunteer has to turn on a mobile torch to converse with her. Sami speaks haltingly in Marathi. "My husband was our main breadwinner. Survival is hard as there are many to feed (five children, her mother, and herself) and income is unsteady and paltry," she says. The family lives in Khunwde village in Dahanu Taluka, Palghar district. Sami is the wife of Kishore Ukhadya Masya, one of 18 fishermen currently imprisoned in Malir Jail in Karachi, Pakistan. The men were arrested when their boats were swept into international waters by gusty winds. Acting on repeated petitions by peace activists, in 2023 the Maharashtra govt announced a daily allowance of Rs 300 to each of their families. Incidentally, all 18 fishers from Maharashtra are from tribal villages in Palghar district. Activists seeking financial aid on their behalf blame bureaucratic indifference for their families' hardships. "The state govt has sanctioned Rs 16.20 lakh to the families of fishermen, as opposed to the Rs 64.16 lakh proposed by the fisheries department of Palghar, as of May 2025," says Mumbai-based peace activist Jatin Desai, who has worked for the repatriation of Indian and Pakistani fishermen imprisoned in each country. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "The remaining amount (Rs 47.97 lakh) should be released immediately, followed by Rs 9,000 credited monthly to their bank account. " You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai There are 193 Indian fishermen, including 18 from Maharashtra, in Pakistan's custody, while 81 Pakistani fishers are in Indian jails. Each year, on January 1 and July 1, both countries swap lists of the fishermen and civil prisoners they hold from across the border. Desai says both countries have violated the bilateral agreement. "Section (V) of the bilateral agreement on consular access, 2008, says that both govts have to agree to release and repatriate persons within one month of confirmation of their national status and completion of their sentences," he explains. "Of the 193 Indian fishermen in Pakistan's jails, 180 completed their sentence and their nationality was verified. " Ajay Vasant Varu of Jalwai village in Dahanu Taluka was arrested on November 5, 2021, along with seven others, by Pakistan Maritime Security Agency when their boat drifted across the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL). "I have three children and Ajay's old father to look after. The little income (Rs 250 per day) from plucking chikoos is inadequate to run the house. This too stops as chikoo plucking is seasonal and I then have to look for farm work," says Ajay's wife Bhagyashree. The desperation of the families is acute. While men either work on fishing boats of Porbandar and Diu, or at factories and back offices located in the neighbouring districts of Gujarat, women toil at chikoo orchards and on paddy fields. Local volunteer Ganpat Lakshman Bujad says the tribals possess little beyond their modest houses in their hamlets on the hills. Bujad's cousin Vinod Lakshman Kol's body was brought back from Pakistan to his village on May 1 last year, after he died of a heart attack on March 17. "People take risks and go fishing deep into the sea because hunger haunts their families back home," he says. Working between August and April, with a three-month monsoon break from May to July, fishers are under pressure to net a large catch so that boat owners, who spend Rs 4-5 lakh on a 20-day trip, can profit from each trip. In addition to the diesel cost, fishermen are paid Rs 20,000-25,000 each. "Pollution from effluents and industrial waste flowing into the sea have driven fish further away from the coast. This has forced fishermen to sail deeper into waters and risk drifting into Pakistani territory," says Bharat Mody, ex-president, Porbandar Fishermen Boat Owners Association.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US trade talks need political push for final leg
The fine print of a preliminary trade deal between India and the US has mostly been worked out by negotiators from both sides but the ball is now in the court of the political leadership to break a stalemate, people aware of the parleys told HT, disclosing two of the topmost sticking points that remain. Trade experts said an interim trade deal between India and the US is possible by July 9, provided both respect practical and political sensitivities of each other. (AFP File) According to these people, these issues are: an unequivocal assurance that New Delhi seeks from Washington that all punitive levies will be repealed, and a freer access to India's politically sensitive agriculture sector that the American side has sought. 'The two-day deliberation that started in Washington on Thursday will likely stretch over to next week,' one of these people, who has direct knowledge of the talks, told HT. Both sides are in a sprint to announce a breakthrough, which will be a preliminary deal covering some portion of the trade between two nations, with a larger bilateral trade deal expected to be signed by October. Once the deal is done, India wants America to withdraw all existing and potential retaliatory tariffs, including the 26% reciprocal tariff — this comprises a 10% baseline tariff imposed from April 5 and an additional 16% country-specific levy set to trigger from July 9. India also wants the US to revoke all safeguard duties disputed at the World Trade Organisation—50% on Indian steel and aluminium and 25% on automobiles and auto parts—and to reciprocate New Delhi's move by proportionately slashing its most favoured nation tariffs. 'Washington has not yet given any unequivocal commitment on these matters, which are crucial for Indian interests,' another person said. American negotiators have been suggesting India replicate the US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal model, where Britain accepted continued 10% baseline tariffs on most goods while securing relief from additional sectoral tariffs. However, Indian negotiators have rejected this approach. The other sticking point is the US insistence on India opening its agriculture and farming sector. While the American side is open to tariff rate quotas (TRQ) — a mechanism under which concessional duty or duty-free access of any specified item applies to a limited quantity — their insistence on some sensitive sectors is a challenge. 'The problem lies in wanting India to also open its sensitive sectors. Dairy imports are restricted for two reasons. First, India's dairy farming is at a subsistence level with one or two cows or buffaloes. The livelihoods of millions of farmers are at stake as they could not compete with America's commercial-scale dairy farms. Secondly, the US cattle feed includes non-vegetarian products, something against religious sentiments of Indian consumers,' a third person said. Similarly, India is unable to accept the US demand to allow unrestricted access to American agricultural items such as corn and soybean because Indian law does not permit genetically modified crops. 'America is unwilling to accept an institutional mechanism which would certify that its India-bound agriculture produce are not genetically modified, saying there is a practical problem in segregating GM and non-GM products,' this person said. This person added that solving such issues now require a political directive from the highest levels of the government. 'While majority of issues have been resolved with near consensus, including on removing tariff and non-tariff barriers on most of the items of interest for both countries, certain sensitive matters require political directives from the two leaders. An interim India-US trade deal, mainly involving goods, is possible to conclude before July 9, depending on political resolution of the stalemate,' the second person said. The Indian negotiating team could extend its stay in Washington next week and the two parties would discuss contentious issues, depending on any political directive, according to the first person. The Indian negotiating team led by chief negotiator and special secretary-commerce Rajesh Agrawal was still in Washington on Saturday, indicating that talks may extend into next week. Trade experts said an interim trade deal between India and the US is possible by July 9, provided both respect practical and political sensitivities of each other. Global Trade Research Initiative founder Ajay Srivastava outlined a likely scenario: 'The more likely outcome is a limited trade pact—styled after the US-UK mini trade deal announced on May 8. Under such a deal, India is expected to cut MFN tariffs on a wide range of industrial goods, including automobiles, a persistent demand from Washington. In agriculture, India may offer limited market access through tariff reductions and TRQs on select US products such as ethanol, almonds, walnuts, apples, raisins, avocados, olive oil, spirits, and wine.' 'However, India is unlikely to budge on sensitive sectors. No tariff cuts are expected for dairy products or key food grains like rice and wheat, where farm livelihoods are at stake. These categories are politically and economically sensitive, affecting over 700 million people in India's rural economy,' he added. Srivastava warned that 'the talks may collapse' if the US continues to insist on opening India's core agriculture sectors or allowing entry of GM products. The prudent move for Washington would be to respect Indian sensitivities and forge a deal for stronger strategic cooperation in future, he said, noting that 'agricultural goods account for less than 5% of US exports to India.' Another expert working in a multinational consulting firm said: 'Now it is the time for America to act as India has already given several concessions, making its intent clear for stronger and everlasting economic cooperation with the US.' After a week where tariffs took a back seat to the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities and the massive tax and spending bill in the US Congress, the Trump administration's trade negotiations have picked up. News agency Reuters reported Washington had sent a new proposal to the EU on Thursday and held talks with Japan on Friday. Both India and Japan are in advanced negotiations.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Unacceptable': Marco Rubio condemns Iran's demand to arrest IAEA chief; calls for inspector safety
Marco Rubio (AP) US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has denounced calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi, describing them as 'unacceptable' and calling for international condemnation. In a post on 'X', Rubio said, 'We support the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran and commend the Director General and the IAEA for their dedication and professionalism. We call on Iran to provide for the safety and security of IAEA personnel.' His statement comes amid escalating tensions following Israeli and US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran's parliament recently approved a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA unless its nuclear facilities are guaranteed protection, according to The Guardian. Grossi has warned that Iran is 'not far' from developing nuclear weapons capability and urged diplomacy to avoid a crisis, as reported by Moneycontrol. Meanwhile, AP noted that indirect talks between the US and Iran are expected next week, amid a fragile ceasefire. The New York-based Wired magazine reported that Iran's enriched uranium stockpile is approaching weapons-grade levels, further complicating global non-proliferation efforts. As the standoff intensifies, Rubio's message highlights US support for the IAEA's role and raises alarm over potential threats to its personnel in Iran.
