
Cheek Media boss Hannah Ferguson planning 2028 independent Senate tilt
Cheek Media co-founder Hannah Ferguson, who curated a distinct progressive voice on social media during the election campaign, will make her own run for parliament at the next election.
Speaking for the first time to the National Press Club, the content creator vowed to run as an independent senator for New South Wales in 2028 – though, she added, 'not because I think I would win'.
'Running a campaign and losing, I think, is a powerful thing to do to show other young women that they can do the same thing and that it's not embarrassing,' Ferguson said.
'It's actually a triumph that you attempted to challenge a system and establishment.'
The room was filled with young women, some within the political space, including Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young (who Ferguson endorsed to become the next leader of the minor party) and members of independent senator David Pocock's office.
Ferguson was part of a growing wave of content creators who dominated the social media space during the 2025 election. She is the CEO of the independent news commentary platform, which publishes short reels on politics attracting tens of thousands of views. She also hosts a podcast, Big Small Talk.
After she was invited to cover the federal budget earlier this year alongside other creators – some of whom had travel expenses covered – Ferguson was criticised by some media outlets.
Highlighting in her speech that she had not accepted payment for political content during the election, she later said she was 'concerned' about being 'lumped together' with paid creators.
'I said 'no' to money from multiple political organisations that offered it to me this election cycle, and that was why so much of it was offensive, because I actively ensured I was a commentator that was freed from [bias] ... Everything was my bias, but I was forthcoming with this.'
While criticising traditional media for perceived bias on Wednesday – and pointing the finger directly at the Murdoch press – Ferguson also acknowledged the social media space should be regulated for its political content.
'I believe that there should be structural accountability for people online … there's guidelines to be changed [and] I think there should be enforceable standards,' she said.
'We have to have frameworks in place to regulate this kind of work. But regulation should be uniform. Let's force the Murdoch media to do the same.'
Ferguson backed a royal commission into Australia's media concentration, but going even further than one proposed by the former prime minister and current US ambassador, Kevin Rudd.
She said a commission should also look at new media.
'A government that will pass a world-first ban on social media for under-16s should establish a royal commission into Australia's media concentration,' she said, 'examining not only Murdoch, but the entire industry, including unregulated space and social media for which I form part.'
Ferguson, who between her personal and Cheek Media pages has a combined following of around 275,000 , called for stronger rules around transparency and accountability for paid content.
'A lot of tests need to be put in place. I'm not an expert but I think in the media landscape there needs to be a fit and proper person test. At a social media level, there needs to be clear regulations and guidance when it comes to authorisations, endorsements, collaborative posting,' Ferguson said.
'There's not really that many limitations to who can advertise on different forms of media and what they can say and how they can lie.'
Ferguson said she considered herself a commentator, rather than a journalist. But she was adamant she and her peers should not be labelled as 'influencers', accusing mainstream media and politicians of trying to 'undermine' their work.
'Influencer has been the dirtiest word of this campaign,' she said.
'They want to invalidate and undermine a group of powerful young women who developed the ability to communicate with audiences in a way that traditional media can't.'
'The idea that influencers is an umbrella term that applies to me and [to] someone being paid by the Greens or a particular candidate, when I refuse to do that, that's my concern. Because it delegitimises me in the process.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe shot at campaign event
The Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe has been shot in Bogotá, with reports he was taken to hospital in a serious condition. The 39-year-old senator, who is running for the presidency in 2026, is a member of the opposition conservative Democratic Centre party founded by the former president Alvaro Uribe. The two men are not related. According to the party's statement condemning the attack, the senator was hosting a campaign event in a public park in the Fontibon neighbourhood in the capital on Saturday when 'armed subjects shot him in the back'. The party described the attack as serious, but did not disclose further details on Uribe's condition. The defence minister, Pedro Sánchez, said a suspect had been arrested in the shooting and authorities were investigating whether others were involved. Sánchez said he had visited the hospital where Uribe was being treated. Colombia's presidency issued a statement saying the government 'categorically and forcefully' rejected the violent attack, and called for a thorough investigation. Uribe is from a prominent family with links to the country's Liberal party. His father was a businessman and union leader. His mother, journalist Diana Turbay, was kidnapped in 1990 by an armed group under the command of the late cartel leader Pablo Escobar. She was killed during a rescue operation. The president, Gustavo Petro, sympathised with the senator's family, posting online: 'I don't know how to ease your pain. It is the pain of a mother lost, and of a homeland.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Former CNN star Don Lemon makes outrageous claims about Trump 2024 presidential victory
Former CNN host Don Lemon claimed 'something was off' in Donald Trump 's second presidential election victory, suggesting the now-president may have 'rigged' the election. Lemon's bold suggestion came during a Tuesday episode of his hit podcast, The Don Lemon Show, featuring comedian and provocateur Kathy Griffin. Griffin, 64, kicked off the controversial discussion about the 47th president's 2024 election victory suggesting Trump 'did not win in a free and fair election.' Before diving into her theory, the Emmy Award-winning actress prepped her comments by first asking if Lemon was ready for a 'tin foil hat' moment, to which he replied that he was. She then laid out her view, which included an Elon Musk aspect to it amid the tech CEO's war with Trump. 'Are you ready for a tin foil hat moment?' Griffin said. 'Yes,' Lemon, 59, replied. 'Okay, I'm just going to be bold and say this. And you know, you can take issue with this all you want,' she said. 'I do not think he won in a free and fair election.' After a dramatic pause from both of them, Griffin went on. 'Yeah, I said it. I'm Kathy Griffin and I do not think Trump won in a free and fair election,' she said. 'I believe there was tampering.' She then added that she didn't know any specifics about what may have been done, saying, 'I don't know if it was the Elon connection. I don't know if it was just a few good old boys in the South, and arguing that past claims of stolen elections by Trump and his supporters are evidence of their own guilt. 'I know I'll take heat for this and people are going to say I'm crazy,' Griffin continued. 'But I've been called crazy before, Don.' To her surprise, the former television host didn't push back. Instead, Lemon suggested she wasn't 'far off' and said he 'won't say he disagrees' with her shocking claim. 'I'd like to see the evidence,' Lemon added, before quickly qualifying, 'I think something was off.' Lemon then echoed one of Griffin's earlier points. 'As you said, every accusation is a confession' - a reference to past GOP claims of election fraud, without noting how similar claims from Trump and his allies were once widely condemned as threats to democracy. 'Vote for me and you won't have to vote again anymore. And also, um, you know, as you said, every accusation is a confession,' he said. Griffin wrapped the conversation with a wry prediction that she might face backlash. 'All right, well, let's leave our viewers with that, because we can't top that. I'm gonna get in trouble and I can't wait.' The candid conversation comes as the president and his 'first buddy' Musk air out their dirty laundry in a very public feud which has seen both men take to social media to criticize the other. In the past few days, Musk has grown increasingly critical of the 'big, beautiful bill' Republicans are trying to pass through Congress - arguing it reversed his work with DOGE - but on Thursday, he took aim at Trump himself. Trump took to Truth Social Thursday afternoon after first criticizing Musk in the Oval Office. 'Elon was "wearing thin," I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. The president then threatened to pull SpaceX and Tesla's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote. Musk then taunted Trump to act. 'This just gets better and better,' he wrote. 'Go ahead, make my day …' Trump's swipes came after Musk said the Republican would have lost the 2024 election had it not been for the world's richest man's help. President Donald Trump (left) and Elon Musk (right) took their spectacular spat online Thursday after Trump was asked in the Oval Office about Musk's recent criticism of Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk claimed. 'Such ingratitude,' the billionaire added on X. Musk had publicly endorsed Trump on the heels of the July 13th assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania and poured $290 million of his fortune on the Republican's campaign. The billionaire also joined Trump on the campaign trail when he returned to the site of the Butler shooting in early October, a month before Election Day. During the transition, Trump announced that Musk would run the newly created Department of Government Efficiency or 'DOGE,' allowing the businessman to take a chainsaw to alleged waste, fraud and abuse. Those efforts didn't play well with the American public, with Musk formally out last week. Now the 53-year-old South African-born billionaire is asserting that he has more staying power in US politics than the 78-year-old president.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Obama's doctor says Biden's physician should have given him cognitive tests
Former President Joe Biden 's doctor should have given him more cognitive tests, according to the doctor of former President Barack Obama. Jeffrey Kuhlman, who served as Obama's doctor between 2009 and 2013, told the New York Post on Saturday that Biden and any politician over the age of 70 should be given "a few hours" of annual mental exams that should be accessible to the public. 'My position is that a 78-year-old candidate, Trump at the time, an 82-year-old president [Biden] would both benefit from neurocognitive testing,' Kuhlman said. He went on to say that "any politician over the age of 70 has normal age-related cognitive decline," and pointed out that he's been recommending annual mental exams for more than a year. Biden's doctor, Kevin O'Connor, oversaw three physicals for the president during his time in office, but Kuhlman says the physical reports did not include notes from a neurocognitive specialist. He also pointed out that Biden did not take the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which Donald Trump agreed to take during his first term. That test is a two-minute screening test of about 30 questions that probes for signs of dementia, according to Kuhlman. Obama's doctor said that he had "no doubts" that Trump "aced" the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, but said he believes that the White House should also release the CT scans taken after Trump's attempted assassination last year. While the Montreal test is able to detect some basic signs of dementia, the doctor noted that it wasn't adequate for determining more serious cognitive issues. According to Kuhlman, mental processing speed and spacial visualization all begin to decline around the age of 60. Kuhlman said he respected O'Connor's medical judgement, but added that "sometimes those closest to the trees miss the forest." O'Connor told the New York Post in July 2024 — just days after the then-president announced he would not run for re-election — that Biden's cognitive health was "excellent." Then-White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre insisted to the public that Biden didn't "need a cognitive test" because he "passes a cognitive test every day." She has since decided to leave the Democratic Party and write a tell-all book about her time in the White House, earning her a savaging by some Democrats. Visitor logs to the White House show that Biden did submit an evaluation form to an expert in Parkinson's Disease, but O'Connor said that the meeting was part of Biden's annual physical. Kuhlman says that the doctor who evaluated Biden in that visit, Kevin Cannard, had been evaluating Biden for 14 years, and that he trusts the doctor's evaluation. O'Connor was subpoenaed by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee on Thursday to stand for questioning about Biden's mental abilities during a hearing on June 27. Shortly after the House investigation was launched, the Trump administration issued a memo stating that it was issuing its own investigation into whether or not people other than Biden used an autopen signature device to sign off on executive actions during the late period of Biden's presidential term. Both investigations follow the release of a book by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, titled Original Sin, that alleges a mass coverup of Biden's cognitive impairment by those closest to him.