Taiwan to Hold Referendum on Restarting Closed Nuclear Reactor
Taiwan will hold a national referendum on restarting a nuclear reactor that it shut down just last week, potentially opening up a pathway to reverse the government's anti-nuclear policy.
The Aug. 23 poll will decide whether the Maanshan nuclear power plant, the territory's last one to be shuttered, should resume operations if there are no safety concerns, according to a statement from Taiwan's Central Election Commission late on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
How Kurdistan is rebranding itself
CNN speaks to Masrour Barzani, Prime Minister of Kurdistan Regional Government, to discuss how it is positioning itself as not just a gateway to Iraq but also a destination in its own right.
Associated Press
40 minutes ago
- Associated Press
What to know about South Korea's approval of new probes into ousted leader Yoon
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Just a week into his term in office, South Korea's new liberal President Lee Jae-myung moved against his ousted conservative predecessor, approving legislation to launch sweeping special investigations into Yoon Suk Yeol's ill-fated imposition of martial law in December as well as criminal allegations surrounding his wife and administration. The monthslong probes, which will involve hundreds of investigators under special prosecutors appointed by Lee, could dominate his early agenda and inflame tensions with conservatives, as Yoon already faces an explosive rebellion trial carrying a possible death sentence. Here's a look at the bills approved at Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, which Lee is expected to sign into law soon. What the investigations are about The three bills, overwhelmingly passed last week by the liberal-led legislature, call for independent investigations into Yoon's hourslong martial law debacle; corruption and financial crime allegations against his wife; and the 2023 drowning death of a marine during a flood rescue operation, an incident Lee's Democratic Party says Yoon's government tried to cover up. Earlier versions of the bills were rejected nine different times both by Yoon and by the caretaker government that took over following his impeachment on Dec. 14. Lee, who won last week's snap election triggered by Yoon's formal removal from office in April, ran on a platform of unity, promising not to target conservatives out of spite and vowing to ease political polarization. However, Lee called for deeper investigations into Yoon's martial law enactment and allegations involving his wife, citing public demands for accountability. For each of the three investigations, Lee will appoint a special prosecutor from two candidates nominated by his Democratic Party and a smaller liberal ally. The main conservative People Power Party, whose members largely boycotted last week's National Assembly votes, denounced the laws for excluding them from the nomination process. Liberal lawmakers justified the move, citing the conservatives' alleged ties to matters that will be investigated. More than 570 investigators, including some 120 public prosecutors, can be assigned to assist with the inquiries. The special prosecutors are expected to be nominated and appointed in coming weeks, potentially allowing the investigations to begin as early as July. Kang Yu-jung, Lee's spokesperson, said the Cabinet's approval of the bills reflects public demands to 'seek accountability for the rebellion attempt and restore constitutional order.' 'It also carries the meaning of recovering the National Assembly's legislative authority, which had been repeatedly blocked by presidential vetoes,' she said. Why the investigations can be explosive Public prosecutors in Seoul already indicted Yoon in January on charges of masterminding a rebellion and enacting martial law as an illegal bid to seize the legislature and election offices and arrest political opponents. Liberals insisted independent investigations into Yoon are still essential, saying probes by prosecutors, police and an anti-corruption agency were inadequate and hampered by Yoon's refusal to cooperate. Yoon's case will now likely be transferred to the special prosecutor, who will be authorized to expand the existing investigation, including whether he and senior military leaders deliberately sought to provoke North Korea in order to create a crisis that could justify declaring martial law at home. Yoon's martial law decree on Dec. 3, which lasted only hours after a quorum of lawmakers pushed past a blockade of hundreds of heavily armed soldiers to revoke it, came amid heightened inter-Korean tensions, marked by monthslong North Korean flights of trash-laden balloons and South Korean loudspeaker broadcasts at the border. The special prosecutor could also expand the investigation to include PPP lawmakers over suspicions that party leaders tried to obstruct the vote to lift Yoon's martial law, by directing lawmakers to attend an emergency party meeting, instead of the main chamber session. This is almost certain to provoke a fierce reaction from conservatives, already in disarray after Yoon's self-inflicted political downfall. Yoon's wife, Kim Keon Hee, faces multiple corruption allegations, including claims that she received luxury items from a Unification Church official seeking business favors, as well as possible involvement in a stock price manipulation scheme. Kim is also suspected of interfering with PPP candidate nominations ahead of legislative elections in April last year, but has yet to be summoned by law enforcement authorities. While in office, Yoon repeatedly dismissed calls to investigate his wife, denouncing them as baseless political attacks. What's happening with Lee's own legal troubles PPP leaders accuse Lee's government of using its legislative majority to target conservatives – and also shield the presidency from Lee's own legal troubles. Lee faced five separate trials on corruption and other charges, but in three cases where hearings had begun, the courts postponed proceedings until after the election. While South Korea's constitution prevents a sitting president from being prosecuted for most crimes aside from rebellion and treason, it does not clearly state whether that protection extends to criminal charges filed before taking office, leaving room for judicial interpretation. The Democrats, who hold 170 of the 300 National Assembly seats, are pushing to revise the criminal procedure law to suspend all ongoing criminal trials involving a sitting president until the end of their terms – a move PPP leader Kim Yong-tae called a 'distorted' attempt to 'bulletproof' Lee's presidency. 'Becoming president does not erase (Lee's) crimes. Suspending trials do not make the crimes disappear,' Kim said Tuesday, calling for the Democrats to scrap the bill. 'This would be a declaration that power would stand above the law.' Two different courts this week handling Lee's cases — on allegations of violating election laws and granting illicit favors to private investors during dubious development projects while he was mayor of Seongnam — decided to suspend the trials indefinitely, citing their interpretations of the constitution.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
We have to act now to keep AI from becoming a far-left Trojan Horse
The hottest topic nowadays revolves around Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its potential to rapidly and imminently transform the world we live in — economically, socially, politically and even defensively. Regardless of whether you believe that the technology will be able to develop superintelligence and lead a metamorphosis of everything, the possibility that may come to fruition is a catalyst for more far-leftist control. The likeliest starting point will be more calls for Universal Basic Income (UBI), a program by which the government guarantees every American some form of ongoing payment (such as a monthly stipend). Despite direct and indirect pilots of UBI being a failure, a potential "crisis" will render that fact moot. Using the prospect of AI software and hardware (aka robots) taking large swaths of American jobs, politicians won't focus on retraining, they will go for the easy popular fix of promising something for "free." And something politicians can offer at someone else's expense while creating more dependence on the government is a far-leftist dream. Unfortunately, that dream is an economic nightmare for the rest of us. The government doesn't produce anything productive, and any money that it has is either taken from us via taxes or "printed" which devalues our purchasing power. With an existing massive debt and deficit problem that has created a weak fiscal foundation, the government is in no position to create new entitlement programs. Further, taking money from workers, laundering it through the government and redistributing it to those who are not working is not a productive use of capital. It's also not good for morale or giving people a sense of purpose in their lives. With that, there will likely be a communist-leaning conversation about any AI that takes jobs and who should have ownership over that AI. If AI drives — or is even perceived to possibly create in the future — a deeper rift between the "haves" and the "have-nots," there's no doubt that government ownership or societal sharing of the AI will be seized upon by those who look for any reason to push socialistic or communistic ideals. Then, there is the potential for tyranny. If you thought the COVID-19 lockdowns were bad, wait until attack drones and robots create societal chaos. It's not hard to imagine a scenario where people are told to lock down or give up their freedoms until protocols are sorted out. This is why we should be imagining and planning for those scenarios today, and not let reactive crises lead to an erosion of our freedoms. Likewise, protecting our individual rights in the digital sphere, particularly as AI companies lobby to help shape regulation, is critical. And a final piece of the puzzle is embedded in the AI itself. A Substack, called "Contemplations on the Tree of Woe," raised a related concern, noting that just as the left captured the culture via the mainstream media and Hollywood, a similar thing is happening with AI. The piece notes, "The code is not neutral … every major LLM is aligned with leftist priors. OpenAI's GPT, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini, every single one leans Left. Even the much-ballyhooed Grok is at best Centrist. (And, unfortunately, the 'center' of the political compass these days isn't exactly Philadelphia 1776.)" The piece goes on to say that if a left-leaning worldview is embedded in the coding and the output, and if something isn't done to counter that, leftist ideals will be at the foundational core of everything, from education to culture to science (or repression of science). If you thought the COVID-19 lockdowns were bad, wait until attack drones and robots create societal chaos. It's not hard to imagine a scenario where people are told to lock down or give up their freedoms until protocols are sorted out. We need balance. A foundational infrastructure that is too far left or too far right can each cause myriad problems that compound and become too entrenched to resolve. Americans tend to be very reactive instead of proactive in addressing issues. But with AI, we cannot wait. If we let AI become a catalyst to move us permanently to the far left, or if the underpinnings of the AI do that inherently and foundationally, we will give up our checks, balances and freedoms for the future.
