GE2025: More opposition voices in Parliament will not weaken the Government, says PSP
GE2025: More opposition voices in Parliament will not weaken the Government, says PSP
SINGAPORE - The leaders of the opposition PSP spent the last day of campaigning assuring voters that more opposition voices in Parliament will not weaken the Government and that it will instead result in more robust debates that could ensure policies benefit Singaporeans.
Speaking on May 1 on the sidelines of a walkabout at Boon Lay Place Market - part of the West Coast-Jurong West GRC that PSP is contesting - PSP chairman Tan Cheng Bock said the ruling party's claims of a weakened Government was 'very old'.
With more opposition voices in the Parliament, Dr Tan said, there will be more diverse views and ideas.
The PSP's NCMPs – party chief Leong Mun Wai and first vice-chair Hazel Poa – have demonstrated through their term in Parliament that they are able to robustly debate policies, he added, saying the PSP was a credible opposition party.
Singapore goes to the polls on May 3. May 2 is Cooling Off Day, and no campaigning is allowed then.
Saying that opposition parties, if voted in, represent the views of the people, Dr Tan added: 'You don't brush it off (and say) that 'there are too many (opposition) and we'll be weakened'.'
Mr Leong said that the PAP has lost ministers and GRCs before, but it did not seem to have weakened the Government.
'Would a weak Government be able to pass through or bulldoze the GST (increase) in 2022? It must be a strong Government, with all the power to amend constitutions… So the argument that the minister had about losing some minister or GRC will weaken the government is not quite accurate,' Mr Leong said.
Responding to Health Minister Ong Ye Kung's comments that a strong opposition is unnecessary and could lead to gridlock in Parliament, Mr Leong said Mr Ong's comments are 'out of this world'. 'I think most Singaporeans will agree that there's a need for more opposition,' Mr Leong said.
When asked about Prime Minister Lawrence Wong's remarks on how opposition parties have been using personal attacks to bring down the PAP, Mr Leong said that PSP does not adopt such a strategy.
'I don't think there are many comments that are just directed at a person. For one thing, PSP has not adopted such a strategy or said such things,' he said.
He said his comments about Minister for National Development Desmond Lee were 'targeted at the fact that he has not responded concretely to some of the policy debates we are trying to have', adding that they are 'not a personal attack'.
On April 30, Mr Lee hit back against statements by Mr Leong that he had 'been silent on national housing issues throughout the campaign'.
None of the PSP's opponents in the constituencies the party is contesting have taken up the party's challenge to debate policies, said PSP first vice-chair Hazel Poa. The PSP had while on the campaign trail issued invitations to the PAP to engage them in a debate on national policies.
In GE2025, PSP is contesting West Coast-Jurong West and Chua Chu Kang GRCs, as well as Pioneer, Marymount, Bukit Gombak and Kebun Baru SMCs.
'We do wish that there are more debates on policy matters in this election. But unfortunately, it is not just up to us,' she said.
Mr Leong added that the government should commit to implementing 'concrete solutions' over the next five years.
'The government has so far always stuck to its script, made certain statements, but we can see that a lot of the problems remain,' said Mr Leong, citing issues like high prices of public housing and lease decay.
Responding to a question of how there has not been much talk by the incumbent on PSP, Dr Tan said: 'I think the fact that there is not much confrontation between my party and the PAP is testament to the fact that we want to have a fair fight.'
'I think they find that the ground that we have built for the party is strong enough. (When) they take us, we can reply. Our rebuttals are there. We don't have to resort to shouting,' he said.
'But generally, I think it's important people will see PSP as a very responsible party coming to Parliament.'
'We are confident that residents of West Coast - Jurong West GRC will be able to see that PSP is a credible opposition party, and PSP MPs in Parliament will be able to contribute a lot to their lives and livelihood,' said Mr Leong.
Dr Tan, Mr Leong and Ms Poa are part of the five-member team contesting the West Coast-Jurong West GRC in upcoming polls. Joining them are new faces Sani Ismail and Sumarleki Amjah.
The constituency, under its old boundaries, saw the closest contest at the last election, with the PAP winning with 51.68 per cent of the vote against the PSP.
This result sent Mr Leong and Ms Hazel Poa into Parliament as NCMPs as they were the top losers of the polls.
Both teams have returned with renewed slates, setting up a rematch.
The PAP team is anchored by Mr Lee. Mr Ang Wei Neng returns, and the pair is joined by Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Finance and Education Shawn Huang, and new faces Hamid Razak and Cassandra Lee.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?
I was heartened to learn that our Government is extending support to the 151 Singaporean students at Harvard (S'porean undergrads at Harvard can continue studies in universities here, June 6). I am sure the Government will similarly extend support to Singaporean students at other elite US universities if the situation deteriorates there. I sympathise with the Singaporeans studying at Harvard, but I wonder if the message is that our local universities do in fact have the capacity to take in more local students. Or is it that our local universities will reduce the number of places available to local students, to accommodate the returning US students? Many local students do not have the financial resources to seek an overseas education, and universities at home are their only option. But due to limited capacity, not every eligible applicant is accepted. So, I was surprised to learn that local universities are able to accommodate the affected Singapore students at Harvard. Wouldn't this be at the expense of eligible local applicants? Finally, these Ivy League students no doubt have the ability and resources to study in the US. They took the decision to study abroad willingly. In the face of adversity, is our Government expected to offer a safety net back home? What about a safety net for local students? Roy Tan Choon Kang More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Singaporeans living in Los Angeles take extra precautions amid immigration protests
Some Singaporeans living in Los Angeles say they are taking extra precautions, like avoiding downtown LA, as US immigration protests enter the fourth day. They tell CNA that the Singapore embassy has also not issued any warnings or advisory notes, as the bulk of the Singaporean community who are still there feel relatively safe.

Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Job security today must be complemented by future job mobility: NTUC president
NTUC president K. Thanaletchimi spoke about the need to reskill workers for emerging sectors at the International Labour Conference. PHOTO: INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION LIVESTREAM SINGAPORE – To help workers adapt and thrive amid global economic uncertainty, the labour movement must aim to not only secure today's jobs, but also help workers ride on future opportunities. To this end, the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) will push on with reskilling initiatives so workers can improve their chances of landing roles in emerging sectors, its president K. Thanaletchimi said in a plenary speech on June 9. 'We believe that job security today must be complemented by job mobility tomorrow,' she said, while addressing a mostly foreign audience at the 113th session of the annual International Labour Conference in Geneva, Switzerland, held from June 2 to 13. The Singapore delegation attending the conference, organised by the International Labour Organization (ILO) , comprises representatives from the Government – including Manpower Minister Tan See Leng – NTUC and the Singapore National Employers Federation. In her speech, Ms Thanaletchimi said providing jobs, labour rights and economic growth have been key to Singapore's peace and progress over the last 60 years of independence. She said Singapore, like many other nations, is navigating the challenges of global economic uncertainty – an issue that came to the fore after US President Donald Trump announced unilateral 'Liberation Day' tariffs on most trading partners on April 2. This poses risks to the supply chains that Singapore is part of in key industries such as electronics and maritime – and the job security of those who work in these and other related sectors. To tackle the risks, the Government, employers and the labour movement have come together to set up the Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce, she noted. She added that NTUC has also set up some 3,000 Company Training Committees (CTCs), with 400 transformation projects benefiting more than 7,400 workers to date. Under the CTC programme, employers form committees with unions and industry experts to map out the skills workers need to stay relevant. As for workers' rights, Ms Thanaletchimi highlighted two new laws passed in Singapore to shore up protections for platform workers as well as stamp out workplace discrimination, as she addressed delegates from the ILO's 187 member states. Under the Platform Workers Act, for instance, platform operators are now required to provide work injury compensation insurance for platform workers, as well as pay more in Central Provident Fund contributions. She also expressed hopes that the ILO and its constituent members will be able to come together to develop one or more international agreements to safeguard the rights of platform workers, who often 'face challenges such as poor working conditions, misclassification and exclusion from existing labour laws and social protections'. In his earlier speech, Manpower Minister Tan cited the two new laws as examples of how patient, honest dialogues between the Government, employers and unions could lead to 'win-win-win solutions'. Another example he cited was the Progressive Wage Model, which sets out sector-specific minimum salaries tied to a worker's skills and productivity improvements, with the Government stepping in to boost lower-wage workers' income through the Workfare Income Supplement scheme. Over the last five years, wages at the 20th percentile rose faster than the median, indicating that wage gaps have been narrowing, Mr Tan said. 'The trust, painstakingly built over decades, is what allows us to have difficult conversations, find common ground, and move forward in a way that is good for workers, employers and Singapore,' he said. The minister added that Singapore hopes to extend this same spirit of partnership to support efforts in creating decent work regionally and globally. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.