logo
Canadian doctor after devastating Sudan assignment: 'The worst humanitarian crisis in the world'

Canadian doctor after devastating Sudan assignment: 'The worst humanitarian crisis in the world'

Yahooa day ago

Sudan is facing an emergency of staggering proportions, one that has displaced over 12 million people and decimated the nation's healthcare system. But unlike other global crises, this one seems to be happening almost entirely in silence.
'This is not just a war between two parties,' says Sana Bég, executive director of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Canada. 'It's a war on the people of Sudan.'
What began as a power struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in April 2023 has spiralled into what aid workers now describe as the world's largest displacement crisis. According to the World Health Organization, 70 to 80 per cent of the country's healthcare facilities are either nonfunctional or overwhelmed. In parts of Darfur, even the UN is absent, leaving MSF — also known as Doctors Without Borders — as the only international organization delivering aid on the ground.
'Having to choose between one life-saving activity for another are the kinds of decisions our teams are left to make because of this increasingly isolated environment where we're the only ones being relied on to carry out an entire scope of what should be an ecosystem of aid,' Bég says.
This is not just a war between two parties. It's a war on the people of Sudan.
For Dr. Reza Eshaghian, a Vancouver-based physician who recently returned from Darfur, the devastation is unlike anything he has seen before. 'What's happening in Sudan is the worst humanitarian crisis in the world, full stop,' he says. 'There are bombings, sexual violence, armed robbery. There's a lack of protection and international humanitarian law.'
Eshaghian, who began working with MSF in 2014, was stationed in Nyala, a city in South Darfur.
He noted that it's not just the violence itself that is killing people: 'So much of the suffering and death is from preventable illness. We saw women dying from eclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage. People are dying of malaria, malnutrition, diarrhea, dehydration, sepsis. These are things we know how to treat, but there's no infrastructure left to do it.'
The hospital Eshaghian helped support saw overwhelming gaps in supplies and staffing. Although MSF brings in its own equipment, the logistics are gruelling, and his team saw supply shipments often delayed. There was also never enough.
People are dying of malaria, malnutrition, diarrhea, dehydration, sepsis. These are things we know how to treat, but there's no infrastructure left to do it.
Despite the danger, MSF has continued to provide help where it can, but the work has come at immense personal cost, especially for local staff.
'Eighty percent of our workforce globally is locally hired,' Bég notes. 'These are people whose homes are war zones. [They] tell us they have a fear of retaliation or repercussions for any actions that could be interpreted as siding with one warring party or the other. Having to live in fear on a regular basis is far different than what some of our teams that have the ability to get on a plane and leave face.'
In other words, simply providing medical care can be seen as a political act. But that doesn't make it any more secure. The safety protocols MSF follows — clearly marked medical uniforms, identified facilities — are no longer a guarantee.
'We used to rely on international humanitarian law to protect aid workers and patients,' she says. 'That's not the reality anymore. Not in Sudan. The sad reality now is that we are no longer able to guarantee safety in the countries that we're operating in, so we're taking it day by day.'
Among the most at-risk in Sudan, as is often the case in most war zones, are women and children. In one year alone, MSF supported approximately 8,500 births and performed over 1,600 emergency C-sections across Sudan. 'But the numbers don't tell the full story,' Bég says. 'We're talking about women walking 100 kilometres on foot, often pregnant or with sick children, just to reach care.'
Eshaghian recalls one such woman who fled violence in Khartoum and arrived in Nyala with her three-year-old daughter — the last surviving member of her family.
'Her child had a fever. We were able to treat her. But the mother had lost her husband and other children along the way. Everything had been taken from them. And there are endless stories like this one."
In many cases, the trauma goes even deeper. MSF staff are seeing widespread evidence of sexual violence being used as a weapon of war. 'Women have been raped while fleeing,' Bég says. 'Survivors end up giving birth to babies born out of rape, then they have to deal with the shame and fear of stigma and retaliation.'
The scale of the trauma has pushed MSF to adopt community-based care models that, for example, can look like training trusted women in each village to serve as peer counsellors and connectors to formal care.
'We can't be everywhere,' Bég says. 'But we can empower people to help each other.'
Both Bég and Eshaghian say that the world's silence on Sudan is not accidental — it's systemic.
'There are no foreign correspondents in Sudan. No international media,' Bég says. 'We are the eyes to the world, and we see that as a responsibility to speak out about what we're seeing and to call for an urgent scaling of aid.'
That lack of visibility means less pressure on governments and organizations like the UN to act. 'UNICEF, UNFPA — their response is small and, in the case of Darfur, they're barely present,' Eshaghian says. 'There's clearly a lack of political and diplomatic pressure from governments who have the power to push for the end of this war.'
Bég doesn't mince words. She asks, 'Who gets the privilege of our attention? There are certain conflicts that make it to our feeds, to our social media, to the news. There is an inherent inequity and racism in that itself. Where you live shouldn't determine whether you live, and that is what we're seeing in Sudan — willful ignorance.'
Where you live shouldn't determine whether you live.
Still, there are reasons to keep going — glimpses of joy, even in the bleakest corners.
'When you visit patients in the hospital, especially children who bounce back from illness and are quite resilient, you see their happiness. [We] took a lot of pride in ... being able to support the community, to see the impact,' Eshaghian says.
What MSF is now demanding is clear: A significant increase in humanitarian access, stronger diplomatic pressure on Sudan's warring factions, and more support from countries like Canada.
'Our patients have no choice but to wake up with hope every day,' Bég says. 'The least we can do is show up for them and provide care. Hope is not optional, it's our moral imperative. We have to reject apathy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program
Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

SCRANTON — A national anti-DEI group has targeted the Geisinger College of Health Sciences with recent filings of discrimination complaints. Virginia-based Do No Harm purported in news releases in March and June that it filed separate complaints with two federal agencies against the college, citing as discriminatory its federally funded Center of Excellence for Diversity and Inclusion and a summer program that aimed to help students from Black, Hispanic or Native American communities that are underrepresented in the medical field transition into medical school. The Do No Harm discrimination complaints come amid President Donald Trump's efforts to dismantle DEI, or diversity, equity and inclusion, programs in the public and private sectors. Trump issued executive orders in the first week of his second term targeting DEI initiatives. 'Geisinger College of Health Sciences did a thorough review of our programs after the presidential executive orders were issued to ensure compliance. The pre-matriculation program referenced in the (Do No Harm) complaint ended in 2024 and is no longer active,' Geisinger CHS said in a statement. Do No Harm is labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an 'anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.' Critics of the SPLC say it's politically biased and its definition of hate group is overly broad. Do No Harm first filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on March 19 against Geisinger CHS, according to a news release posted on the Do No Harm website. A member of Do No Harm then filed a similar complaint June 5 with the U.S. Department of Education, because Geisinger 'did not learn its lesson' from the initial complaint filed with HHS, the advocacy organization announced in another news release. The Times-Tribune could not verify that the complaints were filed with both departments, and whether either agency investigated the allegations or took any actions. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education through separate representatives said they do not confirm the existence of complaints. Do No Harm, established in April 2022, claims it has 17,000 members, including doctors, nurses, physicians and concerned citizens, and cites its mission as safeguarding health care from ideological threats. 'Do No Harm seeks to highlight and counteract divisive trends in medicine, such as 'Diversity, Equity and Inclusion' and youth-focused gender ideology,' the organization's website says. According to the SPLC, Do No Harm in 2024 filed eight lawsuits challenging programs such as scholarships and fellowships for marginalized people. 'The group claims that the practice of nonprofit organizations like the American Association of University Women to provide fellowships to students of color and LGBTQ+ students — groups historically underrepresented in academia and medicine — harms patients by requiring medical schools to accept or fund unqualified candidates. According to the group, the case was dismissed 'after AAUW agreed to drop the racial criteria in the fellowship's selection process,'' the SPLC website says. According to the website of Geisinger College of Health Sciences, it is the research and education arm of the Geisinger health system. Established in 2022, the college unifies the Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger School of Nursing, Geisinger School of Graduate Education, graduate medical education, Center for Faculty and Professional Development and more. * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Show Caption 1 of 3 Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Expand

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program
Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

SCRANTON — A national anti-DEI group has targeted the Geisinger College of Health Sciences with recent filings of discrimination complaints. Virginia-based Do No Harm purported in news releases in March and June that it filed separate complaints with two federal agencies against the college, citing as discriminatory its federally funded Center of Excellence for Diversity and Inclusion and a summer program that aimed to help students from Black, Hispanic or Native American communities that are underrepresented in the medical field transition into medical school. The Do No Harm discrimination complaints come amid President Donald Trump's efforts to dismantle DEI, or diversity, equity and inclusion, programs in the public and private sectors. Trump issued executive orders in the first week of his second term targeting DEI initiatives. 'Geisinger College of Health Sciences did a thorough review of our programs after the presidential executive orders were issued to ensure compliance. The pre-matriculation program referenced in the (Do No Harm) complaint ended in 2024 and is no longer active,' Geisinger CHS said in a statement. Do No Harm is labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an 'anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.' Critics of the SPLC say it's politically biased and its definition of hate group is overly broad. Do No Harm first filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on March 19 against Geisinger CHS, according to a news release posted on the Do No Harm website. A member of Do No Harm then filed a similar complaint June 5 with the U.S. Department of Education, because Geisinger 'did not learn its lesson' from the initial complaint filed with HHS, the advocacy organization announced in another news release. The Times-Tribune could not verify that the complaints were filed with both departments, and whether either agency investigated the allegations or took any actions. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education through separate representatives said they do not confirm the existence of complaints. Do No Harm, established in April 2022, claims it has 17,000 members, including doctors, nurses, physicians and concerned citizens, and cites its mission as safeguarding health care from ideological threats. 'Do No Harm seeks to highlight and counteract divisive trends in medicine, such as 'Diversity, Equity and Inclusion' and youth-focused gender ideology,' the organization's website says. According to the SPLC, Do No Harm in 2024 filed eight lawsuits challenging programs such as scholarships and fellowships for marginalized people. 'The group claims that the practice of nonprofit organizations like the American Association of University Women to provide fellowships to students of color and LGBTQ+ students — groups historically underrepresented in academia and medicine — harms patients by requiring medical schools to accept or fund unqualified candidates. According to the group, the case was dismissed 'after AAUW agreed to drop the racial criteria in the fellowship's selection process,'' the SPLC website says. According to the website of Geisinger College of Health Sciences, it is the research and education arm of the Geisinger health system. Established in 2022, the college unifies the Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger School of Nursing, Geisinger School of Graduate Education, graduate medical education, Center for Faculty and Professional Development and more. * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Show Caption 1 of 3 Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Expand

Fewer than 1 in 4 Colorado voters support Medicaid cuts
Fewer than 1 in 4 Colorado voters support Medicaid cuts

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fewer than 1 in 4 Colorado voters support Medicaid cuts

(Stock photo by) Just 21% of Colorado voters want Congress to decrease Medicaid spending, according to a poll released Tuesday. Concerns about gutted health care access come as U.S. Senate Republican leaders work to push through a tax and spending bill that would cut Medicaid by an estimated $625 billion over the next decade. The poll zeroed in on the 8th Congressional District, which includes the northern Denver metro area and parts of Weld County. In the district, where 1 in 4 residents receive Medicaid benefits, 63% of voters said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to cut Medicaid. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The 8th District is represented by Republican Gabe Evans, who voted in favor of the plan that would reduce federal Medicaid spending when it was brought to the U.S. House of Representatives in May. A spokesperson for Evans defended the vote, saying a proposed provision to institute part-time work requirements for some people to retain Medicaid eligibility would make 'the program more efficient by cutting out fraud, waste, and abuse.' 'Congressman Gabe Evans has been steadfast in his support of protecting Medicaid for the vulnerable populations it was created to serve — pregnant women, kids, and disabled people,' said spokesperson Delanie Bomar in a statement Tuesday. Evans, who was elected to the House last year, represents one of the country's few congressional swing districts. According to the poll, 42% of voters in the district want to see increased federal Medicaid spending, 20% want it to stay about the same and 28% want it to decrease. Medicaid, the state-federal health care program for lower-income people and some with disabilities, serves more than 70 million U.S. residents. The poll of 675 registered Colorado voters was conducted by Broomfield-based firm Magellan Strategies on behalf of the nonprofit Healthier Colorado. It has a margin of error of 3.7%. 'Politicians are saying that they want to cut Medicaid to make it better, but the poll shows clearly that voters aren't buying what they're selling,' said Jake Williams, CEO of Healthier Colorado. 'It shows that there's real political peril for any candidate who votes to cut Medicaid.' Bomar pointed to the poll's findings that many respondents, especially those who are Republicans or unaffiliated, said Medicaid 'should only be for U.S. citizens or legal residents, with some calling for stricter eligibility enforcement.' Immigrants who are in the U.S. unlawfully are not eligible for federal Medicaid benefits, but Colorado and 13 other states provide some state-funded coverage to immigrants lacking permanent legal status. Under the proposed federal cuts, an estimated 7.8 million people, most of them citizens or lawful residents, would lose access to Medicaid, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Some of the main reasons cited in the poll by respondents who said they have favorable opinions of Medicaid are the benefits it provides to low-income Coloradans, seniors, children, people with disabilities and single parents. 'The poll shows that Medicaid cuts would have devastating effects for both our health and economy here in Colorado,' Williams said. 'I also think it shows that Colorado voters aren't dummies.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store