
U.S. Resumes Visas for Foreign Students But Demands Access to Social Media Accounts
AP file photo
Chinese students wait outside the U.S. Embassy for their visa application interviews in Beijing in 2012.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. State Department said Wednesday it is restarting the suspended process for foreigners applying for student visas but all applicants will now be required to unlock their social media accounts for government review.
The department said consular officers will be on the lookout for posts and messages that could be deemed hostile to the United States, its government, culture, institutions or founding principles.
In a notice made public Wednesday, the department said it had rescinded its May suspension of student visa processing but said new applicants who refuse to set their social media accounts to 'public' and allow them to be reviewed may be rejected. It said a refusal to do so could be a sign they are trying to evade the requirement or hide their online activity.
The Trump administration last month temporarily halted the scheduling of new visa interviews for foreign students hoping to study in the U.S. while preparing to expand the screening of their activity on social media, officials said.
Students around the world have been waiting anxiously for U.S. consulates to reopen appointments for visa interviews, as the window left to book their travel and make housing arrangements narrows ahead of the start of the school year.
On Wednesday afternoon, a 27-year-old Ph.D. student in Toronto was able to secure an appointment for a visa interview next week. The student, a Chinese national, hopes to travel to the U.S. for a research intern position that would start in late July. 'I'm really relieved,' said the student, who spoke on condition of being identified only by his surname, Chen, because he was concerned about being targeted. 'I've been refreshing the website couple of times every day.'
Students from China, India, Mexico and the Philippines have posted on social media sites that they have been monitoring visa booking websites and closely watching press briefings of the State Department to get any indication of when appointment bookings might resume.
'Under new guidance, consular officers will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting of all student and exchange visitor applicants,' the department said in a statement.
'To facilitate this vetting' applicants 'will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to 'public,'' it said. 'The enhanced social media vetting will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country.'
In internal guidance sent to consular officers, the department said they should be looking for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.'
Jameel Jaffer, executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said the new policy evokes the ideological vetting of the Cold War when prominent artists and intellectuals were excluded from the U.S.
'This policy makes a censor of every consular officer, and it will inevitably chill legitimate political speech both inside and outside the United States,' Jaffer said.
International students in the U.S. have been facing increased scrutiny on several fronts. In the spring, the Trump administration revoked permission to study in the U.S. for thousands of students, including some involved only in traffic offenses, before abruptly reversing course. The government also expanded the grounds on which foreign students can have their legal status terminated.
As part of a pressure campaign targeting Harvard University, the Trump administration has moved to block foreign students from attending the Ivy League school, which counts on international students for tuition dollars and a quarter of its enrollment. Trump has said Harvard should cap its foreign enrollment at 15%.
The Trump administration also has called for 36 countries to commit to improving vetting of travelers or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States. A weekend diplomatic cable sent by the State Department says the countries have 60 days to address U.S. concerns or risk being added to a travel ban that now includes 12 nations.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Samsung SDI, SK On face slump and growing Chinese rivalry in Hungary
HAMBURG, Germany -- South Korean EV battery-makers Samsung SDI and SK On in Hungary are facing falling EV demand at a time of rising competition from Chinese peers. China's CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co.), EVE Energy and Sunwoda Electronic are expanding their footprint in Europe by setting up in Hungary after Prime Minister Viktor Orban threw open the country's doors to Chinese investment.


Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
G7 Summit Closes: ‘U.S. absence' Reveals Group's Fragility
This was a summit that symbolically indicated that an era in which the United States led the international order ended and the world is shifting to an extremely dangerous time. The summit of Group of Seven advanced nations, held in Canada, has ended. This year marked the 50th anniversary since the first summit, at which the leaders of six countries — Japan, the United States and European nations — met in 1975. But the leaders at this year's summit failed to adopt a comprehensive leaders' statement. It was the first time in the history of G7 summits. The direct cause of the unusual turn of events was U.S. President Donald Trump. He had opposed the adoption of the leaders' statement and abruptly returned to the United States after the first day of discussions. The G7 nations have maintained unity by sharing values such as democracy and the rule of law. However, Trump touts an 'America First' policy and turns his back on international cooperation. It can be said that the G7 nations have been transformed into a structure of 'the United States plus the group of six.' Although the influence of the United States is decreasing, the reality that the G7 framework cannot function without the United States has also become obvious. The situation in Ukraine, which should have been one of the main topics on the agenda, was not sufficiently discussed due to Trump returning to the United States, resulting in the G7 nations not adopting a joint statement on additional sanctions against Russia. Despite the extremely tense situation in the Middle East, with Israel bombing Iran just before the opening of the summit, it must be noted that the response of the G7 nations to the situation was far too inadequate. There is no doubt that Iran's continued nuclear development is the root cause of the current crisis. However, in a joint statement, the G7 nations did not condemn Israel's military actions. It is obvious the G7 nations are much too biased in favor of Israel. Before the start of the summit, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said, '[Israel's military actions are] absolutely unacceptable and I strongly condemn them.' Despite this, there are no signs that he asserted this point at the summit. With the debate among the United States, Canada and the European nations being dominated by support for Israel, it is unsatisfying that, as the only Asian country to participate in the summit, Japan failed to take advantage of the opportunity to throw a wrench into the discussions. Trump is trying to promote his own response, rather than work within the framework of the G7 nations. He is pressing Iran for an 'unconditional surrender,' and some observers believe that he may step in to intervene militarily at Israel's request. The era of the G7 nations being able to exert their influence by touting their ideals is over. In the face of a deepening crisis, to what specific extent will the behavior of Israel and the United States be tolerated? Europe and Japan are being forced to make tough decisions. Nevertheless, at the very least, the G7 nations should be able to agree on respecting sovereignty and territorial integrity and refusing to allow the status quo to be changed by force. The G7 nations must return to these principles and focus on stopping warfare. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 19, 2025)


The Mainichi
4 hours ago
- The Mainichi
US Steel's strategic importance growing: Nippon Steel CEO
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Nippon Steel Corp. CEO Eiji Hashimoto said Thursday that United States Steel Corp. is of growing strategic importance as higher U.S. tariffs on steel products introduced by President Donald Trump are likely to remain in place. At a news conference in Tokyo, Hashimoto said while his company's acquisition of U.S. Steel should help the world's largest economy, trade levies will not revive its manufacturing sector. "I believe President Trump came to the conclusion that it is necessary to utilize our power to revive the U.S. steel industry," Hashimoto said, adding the Japanese steelmaker aims to bolster its U.S. unit's overseas operations as well. Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-largest steelmaker by volume, said Wednesday it had finalized a $14.1 billion deal to make U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. The deal came after Trump reversed his initial opposition to the acquisition plan, which was announced in December 2023 but blocked by his predecessor, Joe Biden, citing national security concerns. Nippon Steel has concluded a National Security Agreement with the U.S. government, pledging to invest around $11 billion by 2028 in the iconic but struggling company and keep its headquarters in Pittsburgh. During the news conference, Hashimoto shrugged off the possibility that the security pact will hamper its U.S. business. U.S. Steel will also issue a golden share to the U.S. government that grants veto power over key management decisions. Based on the security agreement and the share, the U.S. president or a designated official will have the right to approve certain management decisions, including the closure or idling of U.S. Steel's existing manufacturing facilities in the country. Hashimoto also defended the $11 billion investment, much higher than Nippon Steel initially planned, saying it will be needed to improve U.S. Steel's corporate value.