EU calls for Gaza ceasefire, stops short of taking action against Israel
European Union leaders meeting in Brussels have condemned the 'catastrophic humanitarian situation' in Gaza, but were unable to unite on means of pressuring Israel to end the war.
Thursday's summit noted a report issued last week by the bloc's diplomatic service, which found that Israel was likely flouting human rights obligations under the EU-Israel Association agreement. Yet, the bloc stopped short of acting on the assessment or ditching the 25-year-old accord.
'The European Council calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the unconditional release of all hostages, leading to a permanent end to hostilities,' the EU said in a statement.
Amid growing accusations – backed by rights groups and United Nations experts – that Israel is starving people in Gaza, the EU ordered a review of its association agreement with Israel in May. The assessment, sent to member states last week, was restricted.
But several media outlets quoted informed diplomats as saying that the findings highlighted Israel's blockade on Gaza, the killing of civilians, attacks on hospitals and mass displacement of Palestinians in the territory, as well as the expansion of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.
With a growing chasm between countries critical of Israeli abuses, such as Ireland and Spain, and Israel-backers Germany and Hungary, the summit's conclusions on Thursday featured an attenuated statement that deplored 'the unacceptable number of civilian casualties and the levels of starvation' in Gaza.
It postponed 'discussions on a follow-up' to the report until next month.'They only managed to come up with this watered-down version of the final statement because of those huge differences between some of the key players here at the EU about how to look forward when it comes to Israel,' said Al Jazeera's Hashem Ahelbarra, reporting from Brussels.
Germany was, he said, 'unequivocal' in terms of its desire to continue providing Israel with political and military assistance.
The timid statement came despite a push by Spain and Ireland to suspend the EU-Israel agreement, which was signed in 2000 and underpins trade ties between the two entities.
'The war must stop,' said Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin before the gathering. 'People of Europe find it incomprehensible that Europe does not seem to be in a position to put pressure on Israel … to stop this war in Gaza, to stop the continuing slaughter of children and innocent civilians.'
On Thursday alone, Israeli attacks killed 62 people, including some near an aid site run by the shady US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a privately run organisation contracted to provide aid under the cover of Israeli troops and security contractors.
Gaza's Government Media Office said on Thursday that at least 549 Palestinians had been killed near GHF sites since it began operations one month ago. The war has killed 56,156 people in total, according to the enclave's Health Ministry.
EU leaders called on Israel to lift its blockade on Gaza 'to allow immediate, unimpeded access and sustained distribution of humanitarian assistance' to Gaza.
They also condemned the escalation in the West Bank, noting 'increased settler violence' and 'the expansion of illegal settlements'.
The EU remains Israel's largest trade partner.Conclusions on the recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran repeated prior calls for de-escalation and stated that Iran 'must comply with its legally binding nuclear safeguard obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty'.
Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, while Israel is widely believed to have a nuclear arsenal.
Iranian lawmakers have already voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, a decision that was greenlighted by the country's Guardian Council on Thursday.
Al Jazeera's Ahelbarra said the wording of the Iran statement showed the EU was 'completely sidelined' over the war, which saw the United States wade in with its bombing of nuclear sites before announcing a ceasefire on Monday.
Besides the Middle East, EU leaders also discussed at Thursday's meeting an 18th round of sanctions against Russia, now into its fourth year of war in Ukraine.
Addressing leaders via video, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pushed for a 'clear political message' that his country was firmly on the path to EU accession.
The EU gathering followed Wednesday's NATO summit in the Hague, where leaders agreed on military spending hikes, aiming to contribute 5 percent of their annual gross domestic product (GDP) to defence by 2035.
Teresa Fallon, director of Brussels' Centre for Russia, Europe, and Asia Studies, told Al Jazeera that with Russia's ongoing offensive on Ukraine, 'you would expect them to invest even more in their defence base, which has been eroding for the last 30 years'.
US President Donald Trump, she said, wanted to 'shift the burden to Europe so that the US can focus more on China'.
'There's a NATO paradox that goes on here because Europeans are fearful that [if] they spend too much, then the US will say: 'Great, you're on your own now and we're going to focus on Asia',' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
'A graveyard of companies': Climate tech startups are feeling the heat from Trump 2.0
Trump's new bill affects tax credits that benefited the clean energy sector and climate startups. It's spooked some climate founders who worked in industries relying on government subsidies. Many are now pivoting to new brands and geographies, and investors expect a reset. The Trump administration's proposed overhaul of green energy tax credits has jolted the climate tech sector — and investors and founders in the ecosystem are scrambling to make fallback plans. Cleantech stocks tumbled in May after a bill cutting tax credits for clean energy incentives passed through the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Now, founders and investors are concerned about the knock-on impact this could have on the country's climate tech ecosystem, which was burgeoning under the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA. They told Business Insider that Trump's bill has stifled startup growth ambitions, pushing them to scale back, pivot to new geographies, or shut down entirely. "There will be a graveyard of companies," Matthew Nordan, managing partner at clean tech fund Azolla Ventures, told BI. "And a lot of startups will hibernate to try to weather the storm." Early-stage startups are already beginning to feel the heat. In April, Spencer Gore, founder and CEO of Bedrock Materials, a sodium-ion battery startup, made an unusual announcement on LinkedIn: the startup would be returning most of its $9 million raised to investors and ceasing operations. The company had plenty of operational cash, but "it was the techno-economics that led us to pull the plug," Gore told BI, adding that the market conditions for climate tech startups in the US were hampered by waning industrial policy. Startups are pivoting and eyeing new geographies A byproduct of the new tax bill — and growing political backlash against ESG incentives — is that Europe is becoming more attractive for climate techs to set up shop. "There's a dramatic retrenchment to Europe occurring within climate tech startups now. It's broad-based, and the EU is doing the opposite of what the US is doing right now," Nordan told BI. Sam Kanner, the CEO of floating wind turbine startup Aikido, an Azolla portfolio company, told BI he's considering moving his company to Europe. Trump's executive orders have "put a chill on investor sentiment and project development in the US," he said. There are "no longer any grant opportunities" through the Department of Energy or other agencies, he added, which means its "go-to-market strategy is now completely focused on Europe." Blain said that startups in the EU could turn to government funding from bodies such as the European Investment Fund, adding that "energy prices make the Nordics very attractive" as a hub. Europe, in particular, has made significant headway in aligning regulatory frameworks with climate targets, which de-risks early-stage tech, said Todd Khozein, CEO of SecondMuse. Kanner said that the UK, France, and Norway had "enacted supportive policies which have had the opposite effect on investors in those ecosystems", encouraging private equity, infrastructure, and venture investors to back wind projects. Startups are also eager to look beyond Europe for expansion. "Generally speaking, the EU has made itself unattractive from a manufacturing standpoint, by over-relying on Russia. We'd look to Brazil, India, and the Middle East," Max Kufner, cofounder of carbon capture and utilization startup Again, told BI. "The Middle East is proving to be a viable partner in decarbonization." Right now, "a lot of climate tech entrepreneurs are asking themselves what it means to be an entrepreneur in the United States, and whether this is really the best place to attract and retain talent," Gore said. "What we're seeing right now with startups is similar to the playbook we saw with Trump 1.0. A lot of companies will make a push to rebrand themselves as energy security and resilience funds," Nordan said. Climate tech startups have had a rocky year The aftermath of a global tech downturn, rising interest rates, and mounting backlash against ESG incentives has made it increasingly difficult for climate tech startups to fundraise. In the first quarter of 2025, climate startups secured $10 billion, down 50% from the $20 billion raised in Q1 of 2024, per PitchBook data. Biden's IRA offered climate companies billions of dollars worth of subsidies, tax credits, and rebates. The Trump administration is now attempting to roll back parts of the $369 billion initiative. "Anything that relied on grants, that came out of the IRA, for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) projects, will be hit the hardest," Nordan said. For example, direct air capture startup Climeworks — which received a $50 million US government grant in 2024 — laid off over 100 employees in May. Its CEO told Bloomberg that the startup's upcoming Louisiana plant would be delayed in light of the Trump administration's green policy decisions. Nordan anticipates more layoffs and shutdowns of companies that were dependent on government grants. Offshore wind and solar projects have also been in Trump's crosshairs. While these aren't usually venture-backed categories, the steep reduction in staff at the Department of Energy's loan program office, which provided debt funding to clean energy startups, will have a more debilitating impact on companies in these sectors, Matthew Blain, an investor at Voyager Ventures, told BI. Still, investor appetite for nuclear fusion, long-duration energy storage, and startups making data centers more efficient has accelerated, partly due to the AI boom, which requires immense energy.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
European stocks set to extend gains after White House hints at tariffs extension
Good morning from London. European equities look set to extend yesterday's gains at the open on Friday. Futures tied to the FTSE 100 are marginally higher, while those tied to Germany's DAX and France's CAC 40 indexes are up by 0.8% and 0.6%, respectively. It comes after the Trump administration said the July deadlines for so-called reciprocal tariffs "could be extended" and are "not critical." — Chloe Taylor U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for a "One Big Beautiful" event at the White House in Washington, DC., U.S., June 26, 2025. Nathan Howard | Reuters President Donald Trump could extend looming deadlines for reimposing steep tariffs on imports from most of the world's countries, the White House said Thursday. Trump's July 8 and 9 deadlines for restarting tariffs on those nations are "not critical," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. "Perhaps it could be extended, but that's a decision for the president to make," Leavitt said. Leavitt also said Thursday that if any of those countries refuse to make a trade deal with the United States by the deadlines, "The president can simply provide these countries with a deal." In late May, Trump threatened to impose tariffs of 50% on imports from European Union nations, all of whom had already been subject to the reciprocal tariffs imposed in April. Read more here. — Kevin Breuninger
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Von Der Leyen Says EU Ready If US Trade Talks Break Down
00:00 We are ready for a deal. At the same time, we are preparing for the possibility that no satisfactory agreement is reached. This is why we consulted on a rebalancing list and we will defend the European interest as needed. In short, all options remain on the table. Okay. All options remain on the table. Joining us from Brussels is Bloomberg's Oliver Crook, who, of course, was covering that EU leaders meeting for us yesterday, only some EU leaders and pushing for a quick solution. As the deadline looms, how much division is there amongst EU leaders at this point? It seems at this point that they're coming slowly together to a more sort of pragmatic approach, Tom. And we should say that, you know, we are now, what, a week and a half away from that deadline, July the ninth, where the United States would impose 50% tariffs on the European Union. That is obviously a situation that everybody here in Brussels wanted to avoid. The United States probably also wants to avoid. But we should keep in mind, Tom, this is the biggest trading relationship on the planet. So from the EU's perspective and also from the US perspective, it's really important that they get a deal right here and it's one that is relatively balanced. That being said, it appears that the consensus around the table is moving a little bit towards the direction of pragmatism. We heard from the new chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz. This is his first EU leaders meeting that he's ever had. I'm saying that it's better to go fast and simple and then slow and highly complicated. We need to reach a result quickly. We have all agreed on that. There is no disagreement at all. We've also heard similar comments from Giorgia Meloni, who says she's willing to accept some asymmetry. We think, in terms of a trade deal with the United States. But the question is here, Tom, fundamentally, how asymmetrical is this deal going to be with the United States and the EU? Where are they willing to make these concessions? We don't have a very clear answer from the EU at this point. That's why they say that all options are still on the table. I think that the base case, Tom, is that at this sort of minimum, the best case scenario is you're going to have a minimum 10% tariff from the United States and the EU. The question is, with that 10%, will you get retaliation? We've heard from the French that they'd sort of be open to that, but that's going to be the sort of active conversation over the last couple of weeks as we really sort of reach crunch time for those trade negotiations. Well, talking to the French shortly, how willing is President Macron and the French government willing to accept that potential asymmetry in any deal with the US? Yeah. Yeah. So that's something that we've been reporting a lot on and we've been tracking very closely. And it seems at this point that the French are sort of moderating that position a little bit. So we heard from senior he's the commissioner for Industry and competition here. We have reported this a little bit earlier in the week that basically a 10% tariff would garner a retaliation from the European Union. It seems that there is potentially a moderating of that position. That being said, you know, I think that Macron is also very conscious of another dimension here, which is the Trump psychology dimension here. Is it better to sort of placate Trump or is it better to stand up to him? There are different schools of thought on this. He was saying that basically if you are not willing to stand up to him, you're going to, you know, appear naive and you're going to appear weak potentially both. And the EU is neither of those two things. That being said, again, this will rely on the sort of appraisal of what Trump's appetite for escalation is, we should say. There are also other sectors that the White House is trying to target. And I caught up with the competition commissioner yesterday, Tom, the one who is sort of in charge of all the big antitrust fines on those American tech companies. We know the White House wants to target those in some of the trade deals. I asked her if basically that's on the table, any sort of trade negotiation. Have a listen to what she had to say. We do not challenge the United States on how they implement the rules or how they adopt the regulation. I think that we deserve respect the same way. And I think that the Digital Markets Act is a very good proof of how we can be much more effective, much quicker and much cheaper when implementing a well-functioning market in the digital context. So I'm very proud of what we do. So, Tom, from the U.S perspective, you know, the digital regulation is not really on the table. But again, I think that speaks to a broader concern that you have among the Europeans. You have your amendment was alluding to it earlier. We still don't have the sectoral tariffs and there's always the perennial concern with the Trump administration is that they may get something and then come back for more. So the EU, apart from all of these sort of trade negotiations, and they're also thinking their broader term of de-risking from the United States moving forward with the Mercosur deal. That's the big trade deal with South America. But also and this is part of the conversation yesterday and leaders talking about an alternative to the WTO, which they think is sort of dysfunctional. So longer term, you may get a deal with the United States, but Europe is really thinking about how they can de-risk from what is a very volatile administration in the United States.
