
Decoding Munir's Outbursts: It All Leads Back To Iqbal's Ideology
Last Updated:
Mohammed Iqbal, often hailed as the ideological founder of Pakistan, laid the groundwork for its politics of division. Asim Munir's rhetoric today is a continuation of that legacy
The leader of Pakistan's mercenary force, Asim Munir, delivered a series of rants in April—almost literally on the eve of the Pakistan-backed terror attack in Pahalgam—that exposed the country's repeated and desperate attempts to remain afloat and relevant. Rapidly sliding into the category of an extreme rogue state, Pakistan needed such a misadventure to justify its existence. Munir's outbursts reflect the very essence of Pakistan: a false state built on a fraudulent ideology that fuels its anti-human politics and calculatedly savage, almost animalistic behaviour.
At the BRICS Summit in Goa in 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, without mincing words, aptly and presciently described Pakistan as the 'mother-ship of terrorism." Those countries and entities that have shown sympathy towards Pakistan must now realise that this 'mother-ship of terrorism" can easily come and dock on their shores as well. No one can be safe until the 'mother-ship" itself sinks.
Let us briefly delve into the diabolic mindset that drives the Pakistani deep state. Asim Munir is merely a part—an ephemeral bubble—in the long, festering stream of diabolism that has oozed from the architects of Pakistan's deep state. From Jinnah's 'Direct Action" to Zulfikar Bhutto's infamous and irrational call for waging a thousand-year war against India, to Zia-ul-Haq's efforts in laying the deeper foundations of Pakistan as a radical rogue state with Islamism as its lifeblood—the pattern is consistent. Add to this the Yahya Khan-led Pakistan Army's genocide in East Pakistan, the mass killings of students and Bengali intellectuals, the elimination of minorities in the region, and the deliberate withholding of relief in the aftermath of Cyclone Bhola in 1970, which killed 600,000 people in one night. All are manifestations of a deep-seated, diabolical obsession with shaping Pakistan into the new epicentre of terror and radicalism.
Two interesting episodes from history are relevant here for our discussion. In a rare meeting with Sri Aurobindo in July 1950, thinker, polymath, and leader K.M. Munshi (1887–1971), then Union Minister for Agriculture, recounted a striking remark made by the Sage on Pakistan. Recognising Munshi as his former student from Baroda, Sri Aurobindo granted him a special darshan and audience, during which they discussed both personal and national matters at length. Munshi records Sri Aurobindo as saying that 'Pakistan has been created by falsehood, fraud and force" and that 'it must be brought under India's military ambit." That very triad—falsehood, fraud, and force—remains the foundation of Pakistan, and this is becoming increasingly evident.
The effects of Prime Minister Modi's deft, far-sighted, and sustained diplomatic outreach over the past decade are also becoming clear. Except for a few near-failing and anti-democratic states, no country is commiserating with Pakistan or falling for its false propaganda of victimhood.
The other interesting anecdote from history is of the poet-laureate of Pakistan, Mohammed Iqbal (1877-1938). It bears reiteration now, in order to expose the minds and mindset which pushed for the creation of Pakistan. One of Rabindranath Tagore's foremost biographers, Prabhat Kumar Mukhopadhyay (1892–1985), notes in Rabindra Jibana Katha that when Tagore arrived in Lahore on 14 February 1935 for a two-week visit, Iqbal—himself a native of Lahore—scooted from the city in order to avoid meeting Tagore. Iqbal's conduct was hardly surprising, given that he had already begun composing the subversive hymn of Pakistan. Why else would a poet decline the opportunity to meet Tagore, who by then had attained iconic status and symbolised national unity and cultural nationalism?
Tagore's two-week stay in Lahore was nonetheless significant, particularly for his meetings with Sikh community leaders, who received him with great honour and appreciation.
In 1935, at the time of Gurudev Tagore's visit to Lahore, Iqbal was already well into articulating his demand for a separate Muslim state. Historian Bimal Prasad notes that, in his presidential address at the twenty-first session of the Muslim League in Allahabad in December 1930, Iqbal spoke of concentrating the bulk of Indian Muslims in 'one specified territory." This, Prasad writes, 'contributed significantly to the evolution of the thought-process which finally culminated" in the demand for Partition.
In a letter to Jinnah in June 1937, Iqbal asserted that the 'Muslims of north and north-west India, where they were in a majority, must have their own State, on the basis of the principle of self-determination." In his foreword to the booklet Iqbal to Jinnah, which compiled Iqbal's letters, Jinnah acknowledged that 'his views were substantially in consonance with my own and had finally led me to the same conclusions… and found expression in due course" in 'the Lahore Resolution of the All-India Muslim League, popularly known as the 'Pakistan Resolution'." Prasad argues that Iqbal's 1930 address 'strongly underlined some of the basic points which were later used as the main ideological props of Pakistan."
By 1937, an ideologically possessed and driven Iqbal—having shifted focus away from his sublime poetry—wrote to Jinnah, 'I tell you that we are actually living in a state of civil war which, but for the police and military, would become universal in no time…" He also asserted that the 'idea of a single Indian federation is completely hopeless."
Reporting a conversation he had with Jinnah around the same time, Lord Brabourne, then Governor of Bombay, recorded that Jinnah's policy was to 'preach Communalism morning, noon and night…"
While PM Modi's vision of a 'New India" and of 'Viksit Bharat" is powered and driven by the vision, legacy and philosophy of the likes of India's poet laureate, Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore, and is based on his vision of unity and self-reliance, the dark and failing nightmare that is Pakistan continues to be shaped by its poet laureate, Iqbal, who spoke of division, separation, conflict and despair.
Iqbal never articulated any substantial or enduring civilisational vision. Unlike Tagore, he failed to influence or shape global thought in any meaningful way. While Tagore is celebrated across the world, his relevance only growing with time, Iqbal remains entombed—trapped in a decaying sepulchre of his own making. That sepulchre continues to incubate and unleash anti-civilisational ideas and forces. The lies peddled by Asim Munir, like those of his predecessors, are churned out from that very death-bound vault.
Alongside the physical resistance and response to the wraith-state of Pakistan, which must continue unabated, the battle of the mind and of ideas against its founding ideology must also persist with equal resolve—until that dark, nether, and nefarious sepulchre is permanently decimated.
The author is Chairman, Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation, and a member of the National Executive Committee, BJP. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
deep state General Asim Munir Pakistan terrorism
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 12, 2025, 18:41 IST
News opinion Opinion | Decoding Munir's Outbursts: It All Leads Back To Iqbal's Ideology
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Is Trump a partner India can trust? Jaishankar's take on US-India ties
Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, on a visit to Brussels this week, shared candid views on India's foreign policy priorities, the evolving geopolitical landscape, and relations with major powers — including the United States under President Donald Trump. In an interview with Euractiv, Jaishankar, who met European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the EU's foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas, also addressed India's position on terrorism and its relationship with China. Asked whether India trusts Donald Trump and views him as a reliable partner, Jaishankar responded, 'Meaning what?' He said, 'I take the world as I find it. Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests — and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' On India's relationship with China, Jaishankar highlighted a growing trend among global companies seeking to 'de-risk' supply chains by investing in India. He pointed out that many firms are also wary of where they store their data, emphasising that 'they'd rather place it somewhere secure and trustworthy than simply go for efficiency'. 'Would you really want that in the hands of actors you don't feel comfortable with?' he asked, underlining India's pitch as a more reliable economic partner than China. #WATCH | "We strongly believe that there should be zero tolerance for terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. In that context, it is also essential that we never yield to nuclear blackmail. This is a shared and interconnected challenge for the global community, and it is… — ANI (@ANI) June 10, 2025 Terrorism and the Kashmir question Jaishankar also addressed international perceptions of recent violence in Kashmir, where a terror attack in Pahalgam claimed 26 lives. He challenged the framing of the conflict as a simple 'tit-for-tat' between nuclear neighbours. 'Let me remind you of something — there was a man named Osama bin Laden,' he said. 'Why did he, of all people, feel safe living for years in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point? I want the world to understand — this isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism. And that very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.' Jaishankar was also pressed on India's refusal to impose sanctions on Russia or take a stronger stance in support of Ukraine. 'We don't believe that differences can be resolved through war — we don't believe a solution will come from the battlefield,' he said. 'It's not for us to prescribe what that solution should be. My point is, we're not being prescriptive or judgemental — but we are also not uninvolved.' Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar with EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas at the first strategic dialogue in Brussels on June 10. (Photo: X/@DrSJaishankar) Jaishankar defends India's neutrality When challenged on whether India was being too neutral, Jaishankar defended the country's position by recalling its own experiences. 'We have a strong relationship with Ukraine as well — it's not only about Russia. But every country, naturally, considers its own experience, history and interests,' he said. Jaishankar said that India had the longest-standing grievance, as its borders were violated just months after independence when Pakistan sent invaders into Kashmir. 'And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries. If those same countries — who were evasive or reticent then — now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles', I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past,' he said. India in a multipolar world Looking ahead, Jaishankar emphasised the importance of a multipolar world and Europe's evolving role within it. 'Multipolarity is already here,' he said. 'Europe now faces the need to make more decisions in its own interest — using its own capabilities, and based on the relationships it fosters globally.' He acknowledged Europe's growing pursuit of 'strategic autonomy', calling it a term that was once part of India's own vocabulary. 'The EU is clearly a major pole in the global order — and increasingly an autonomous one. That is precisely why I'm here: to deepen our relationship in this multipolar world.' India's reservations on EU green agenda On the European Union's push to set global standards through its Green Deal — especially the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — Jaishankar said, 'Let's not pretend — we're opposed to parts of it.' He said, 'We have very deep reservations about CBAM and we've been quite open about it. The idea that one part of the world will set standards for everybody else is something which we are against.'


India Gazette
43 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"Terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you," says Jaishankar, urges global community to look beyond India-Pakistan lens on Kashmir attack
Brussels [Belgium], June 11 (ANI): Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, during his visit to Brussels this week, met European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the EU's foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas, where he highlighted India's strategic importance, its global positioning, and expressed reservations on key EU policies, according to Euractiv. Speaking amid ongoing EU-India free trade agreement negotiations, Jaishankar made a strong case for India as a reliable economic partner. 'India - a nation of 1.4 billion - offers skilled labour and a more trustworthy economic partnership than China,' he said, as reported by Euractiv in an edited transcript. Turning to recent global coverage of the Pahalgam terror attack in Kashmir, in which 26 lives were lost, Jaishankar pushed back against the narrative that equates India's response with regional tensions. 'Let me remind you of something - there was a man named Osama bin Laden. Why did he, of all people, feel safe living for years in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point?' he said. 'I want the world to understand - this isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism. And that very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.' On India's position regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Jaishankar reaffirmed India's non-prescriptive stance. 'We don't believe that differences can be resolved through war - we don't believe a solution will come from the battlefield. It's not for us to prescribe what that solution should be. My point is, we're not being prescriptive or judgemental - but we are also not uninvolved.' Responding to criticism over India's refusal to join sanctions against Russia, he said, 'We have a strong relationship with Ukraine as well - it's not only about Russia. But every country, naturally, considers its own experience, history and interests.' He further offered a historical perspective on India's foreign policy outlook. 'India has the longest-standing grievance - our borders were violated just months after independence, when Pakistan sent in invaders to Kashmir. And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries.' 'If those same countries - who were evasive or reticent then - now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles', I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past.' On India's role in the changing global order, Jaishankar emphasized multipolarity. 'Multipolarity is already here. Europe now faces the need to make more decisions in its own interest - using its own capabilities, and based on the relationships it fosters globally.' 'I hear terms like 'strategic autonomy' being used in Europe - these were once part of our vocabulary.' 'The EU is clearly a major pole in the global order - and increasingly an autonomous one. That is precisely why I'm here: to deepen our relationship in this multipolar world.' Reacting to the EU's climate policies, particularly the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Jaishankar expressed clear opposition. 'Let's not pretend - we're opposed to parts of it. We have very deep reservations about CBAM and we've been quite open about it. The idea that one part of the world will set standards for everybody else is something which we are against.' When asked whether he trusts US President Donald Trump, Jaishankar responded, 'Meaning what?' On whether Trump is a partner India is willing to deepen ties with, he said, 'I take the world as I find it. Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests - and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' Speaking on China, Jaishankar pointed to efforts by European companies to shift away from dependence on Chinese supply chains. 'I just met with several European companies in India that have chosen to set up there specifically to de-risk their supply chains. Many companies are becoming increasingly careful about where they locate their data - they'd rather place it somewhere secure and trustworthy than simply go for efficiency. Would you really want that in the hands of actors you don't feel comfortable with?' (ANI)


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Chhattisgarh deploys 7 young IPS officers to Maoist-affected districts
The Chhattisgarh government has deployed seven young 2021-batch IPS officers to Maoist-hit districts — Sukma, Dantewada, Bijapur, and Narayanpur — to provide them with a first hand experience of a conflict zone and infuse fresh blood in anti-naxal operations, officials said. Another IPS officer from the same batch has been deputed as ASP in the special task force (STF) for anti-Naxal operations in Durg district. The transfer orders came on Tuesday night, just two days after the death of additional SP Akash Rao Girepunje in an IED blast triggered by Maoists in Sukma district. The transfers of these officers mark a significant reinforcement in Maoist affected districts, with all officers being posted as Additional Superintendents of Police (Anti-Naxal Operations), a move aimed at enhancing both tactical execution and localised planning. A senior officer who is part of anti-Naxal operations said, 'This is a good decision, though it should have come earlier. These officers have already completed over 20 months as City Superintendent of Police (CSPs) and deploying them now in core Maoist areas brings sharper focus to command, execution and supervision.' 'Nearly 20 IPS officers are now posted in just four districts, a first for the state. These young, dynamic officers will bring a decisive edge to operations in tough terrain and the smaller jurisdictions allow for specialised, intensive anti-Maoist efforts. Secondly, the redeployment aligns with the Union home ministry's goal of ending Maoist influence in the core zones by March 2026,' said the officer. The IPS officers who have been transferred to the Bastar region are Rohit Kumar Shah (Sukma), Udit Pushkar (Dantewada), Ravindra Meena and Aman Jha (Bijapur), Ajay Kumar and Akshay Sabadra (Narayanpur) and Akash Shrishrimal (Bhanupratappur, Kanker). The eighth IPS officer, Akash Kumar Shukla, has been posted as ASP in Durg. Bijapur superintendent of police Jitendra Yadav described the move as both timely and tactical. 'This will definitely help. The young batches are highly motivated and hardworking. When they come to Maoist-affected districts, they are given responsibilities of anti-Naxal operations such as intelligence gathering and field operations.' Other officers also believe that Tech and TAC (Technology and Tactics) in anti-Naxal operations have evolved manifold and the young recruits will bring in new strategies. 'We already know that even jawans are actively using new Tech and TAC techniques like data standardisation, data analysis, communication encryption and decryption methodologies, probability theory and game theory techniques,' said a second senior police officer. Narayanpur superintendent of police Prabhat Kumar said more and more young IPS officers are now part of four to five day long operations in the forests. 'Young officers have brought and will further bring a paradigm shift in anti-Naxal operations as it is more of a game of heart and mind than of weapon,' Kumar said. Inspector General of Police of Bastar range, Sundarraj P, said, 'This is not just a reinforcement of manpower but a step toward shaping a more responsive and resilient policing ecosystem. These officers will complement the experienced leadership on ground and help build deeper trust with local communities.' Experts believe that the move will give support and planning for SPs of Bastar districts. Former Special Director General of Police RK Vij added, 'This strengthens the SP-level planning and execution ability. Field operations need real-time intelligence and decision-making, and this shift supports both.' The appointments come just days after a tragic IED explosion on June 10 near Dondra village in Sukma killed ASP Akash Rao Girepunje and left two other officers injured.