logo
3 reasons why Starmer could U-turn on controversial benefits cuts to PIP

3 reasons why Starmer could U-turn on controversial benefits cuts to PIP

Yahoo2 days ago

An upcoming vote in the House of Commons on government proposals to cut £5bn from the benefits bill has sparked a rift in the Labour Party.
The Labour leader is reportedly facing a growing backbench rebellion over the government's welfare reforms announced in March, with some reports suggesting as many as 100 backbench Labour MPs have signed a letter saying they can not support the proposals as they stand.
Some of the party's MPs have been publicly critical. Imran Hussain said 41,000 disabled people in his Bradford East constituency would be affected and that many were 'rightly horrified' by the policy. Neil Duncan-Jordan, the MP for Poole, is one of those to have signed the letter, branding the reforms wrong".
I have signed this letter calling for the government to rethink its stance on disability benefits because I think the current plans are wrong.We need to be listening to people's concerns and I hope things will begin to change. https://t.co/M89JKeP5Hy
— Neil Duncan-Jordan MP (@NeilForPoole) May 8, 2025
Ahead of the vote (which is expected to take place some time in June) the anger has reportedly led the prime minister to consider softening the proposed reforms – specifically changes to the eligibility rules surrounding the benefits payments to disabled people.
Yahoo News takes a look at what's going on.
The government has proposed a raft of benefits cuts, predominantly affecting those who are disabled or have a long-term health condition.
One of those cuts is to personal independence payments (PIP), a benefit for people in and out of work that helps with the additional costs of living with a disability.
The government wants to limit who is eligible by changing the assessment criteria from 2026. It means at least 800,000 disabled people could lose out on payments, according to figures published by the department of work and pensions.
The health component of universal credit (UC) is also to be frozen until 2030, with the amount cut in half for new claimants from April 2026.
Under-22s who are disabled or have a long-term illness will also no longer be able to claim a health top-up of universal credit from April 2026, with the money saved set to be reinvested by the government into training young people.
In total, the cuts will leave 2.25 million households losing out on £500 per year, according to the government's own impact assessment.
Some of the government's welfare reforms are open to consultation, with the public being asked to submit their thoughts until 30 June 2025.
However, critics have said that only the less serious reforms — like scrapping the work capability assessment for those applying for the health component of universal credit — are open to discussion.
In recent weeks, reports have indicated ministers are considering softening the cut.
According to the Financial Times, one of the rumoured changes includes making the proposed changes to eligibility for PIP less strict, which could mean 195,000 fewer disabled people are affected by the reforms.
Claimants could also get a longer 'transitional period' — from when they are informed their benefits are cut to their benefits stopping — so they have more time to plan for the loss in income, the Times reported.
The rumoured changes reportedly hopes to get frustrated MPs onside, who have taken moral objections with the scale and severity of the cuts, the disproportionate impact for voters in the Labour heartlands, as well as the increasingly positive polling for Reform.
Several Labour MPs have taken issue with the cuts, voicing their concerns that Labour has historically supported and championed a robust welfare system.
According to the Times, 170 backbenchers warned that they may not support the reforms that make it harder to claim PIP as well as cutting incapacity benefits to increase incentives to work. Added to this, it warned that the scale of the cuts had not been seen since George Osborne's austerity reforms, which the party voted staunchly against.
Forty-two MPs — including Nadia Whittome, Diane Abbott and Stella Creasy — wrote to the Cabinet earlier this month saying that the reforms were "impossible to support" and called for "a change in direction".
The letter reads: 'The planned cuts of more than £7bn represent the biggest attack on the welfare state since George Osborne ushered in the years of austerity and over three million of our poorest and most disadvantaged will be affected.
"Without a change in direction, the green paper will be impossible to support.'
Another private letter, signed by 100 MPs, said they could not support the government in the disability vote, the Guardian reported.
MPs don't just have the party whip to answer to — they are also held to account by their constituents.
While the scale of the PIP cuts are clearly far-reaching, the map indicates that the 10 areas most affected by the government's PIP cuts are in Labour heartlands.
In fact, out of top 20 areas where claimants are set to miss out on PIP, 19 voted for Labour in the general election — with Clacton voting for Nigel Farage's Reform UK party.
In fact, many of the areas are emerging Labour/Reform UK battlegrounds. And, in the wake of Labour's chastening local election results in May, some have pointed the finger at the government's welfare cuts as one of the key drivers of discontent among the party's traditional voting base.
3. Reform are out-positioning Labour on welfare
At a national level, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has pledged to reverse the winter fuel cut and scrap the two-child benefit cap if the party came to power in a naked attempt to target Labour's perceived weakness in the area of welfare.
And while the government has signalled a partial U-turn on the winter fuel payment, it continues to dodge calls from campaigners and MPs to ditch the cap.
Overall, the most recent YouGov poll seems to indicate the public are also losing faith in Labour on welfare issues, with 69% saying the government is handling welfare issues badly.
A DWP spokesperson said: "We are determined to create a welfare system that supports people into work and out of poverty.
'At the heart of the government's reforms is £1bn scheme to help the long-term sick or disabled find good, secure jobs.
'Our Plan for Change will change people's lives for the better. That is why we have raised the national living wage, increased benefits, and given additional help to the poorest households.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SUV drivers should pay more tax, Sadiq Khan told
SUV drivers should pay more tax, Sadiq Khan told

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

SUV drivers should pay more tax, Sadiq Khan told

Sir Sadiq Khan is under pressure to tackle 'car-spreading' by hitting bigger vehicles in London with even higher taxes and parking fees. In a motion passed by the London Assembly, the Mayor has been urged to write to the Government to demand higher vehicle excise duty for heavier vehicles and tighter restrictions on car sizes. Assembly members, 11 of 25 of whom are the Mayor's Labour allies, also urged him to write to councils across the capital to ask them to adopt higher parking fees for bigger cars – a policy some have embraced already. The motion blamed larger cars for clogging up London's streets, putting pedestrians at greater risk of injury or death and causing road surfaces to wear down more quickly. Elly Baker, the Labour assembly member who proposed it, said the capital's streets 'weren't designed for larger vehicles like SUVs'. She said: 'Their greater size, weight, and higher bonnets put vulnerable road users at greater risk, reduce available parking spaces, and cause more wear and tear on our roads. 'It's time we took sensible steps to manage the impact of oversized cars and ensure our streets remain safe and accessible for everyone.' A spokesman for the Mayor said on Friday: 'The Mayor, Transport for London and borough partners are working to eliminate deaths and serious injuries on our roads, by expanding the cycle network, making road crossings and junctions safer, reducing speed limits on our roads, and making larger vehicles like HGVs and buses safer. 'This year the Mayor will be refreshing his Vision Zero Action Plan, to restate his commitment to reducing road danger and responding to new and emerging risks on our roads'. The assembly's call comes after several English local authorities have proposed higher charges for larger or heavier vehicles, amid complaints they occupy more space, produce higher levels of pollution and take a bigger toll on road surfaces. Such charges have been proposed in Haringey, Bath, Oxford and Bristol, among other places, with many councillors taking a lead from Paris, where Left-wing French politicians have launched their own crackdown on SUVs. Sir Sadiq currently lacks the formal powers to introduce such charges himself but has said he is watching developments in the French capital closely. 'SUVs take up more space and we know there's issues around road safety, we know there's issues around carbon emissions and so forth,' he said in February. 'We know some councils in London are taking bold policies in relation to parking fees, in relation to your tickets and so forth. It's really good to work with those councils.' SUVs have grown in popularity in recent years, with many drivers favouring their higher seating position. They accounted for a third of all new car registrations in the UK last year, compared with just 12pc a decade earlier. SUVs are generally taller, wider and heavier than traditional cars, and less fuel-efficient. The increase in the size of cars has been described as car-spreading. However, Edmund King, the president of the AA, said it should be 'up to Londoners to choose the type of vehicle that best fulfils their needs'. He said: 'It is not really the role of the London Assembly to dictate what cars individuals should drive. 'Some larger families may well need bigger vehicles with more passenger seats, whereas a driver conducting most trips alone may well choose a city car. 'London's streets were developed around the horse and cart, so of course our infrastructure needs modernising to keep up with change.' A recent study found that pedestrians and cyclists are 44pc more likely to die if they are hit by an SUV or similar-sized vehicle rather than a traditional car. The analysis produced by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Imperial College London stated that the figure rises to 82pc for children. Meanwhile, research by the campaign group Transport & Environment has previously found the average width of cars in the UK was growing by about half a centimetre per year. A typical car was 180.3cm wide in 2023, up from 177.8cm just five years earlier. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

SUV drivers should pay more tax, Sadiq Khan told
SUV drivers should pay more tax, Sadiq Khan told

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

SUV drivers should pay more tax, Sadiq Khan told

Sir Sadiq Khan is under pressure to tackle 'car-spreading' by hitting bigger vehicles in London with even higher taxes and parking fees. In a motion passed by the London Assembly, the Mayor has been urged to write to the Government to demand higher vehicle excise duty for heavier vehicles and tighter restrictions on car sizes. Assembly members, 11 of 25 of whom are the Mayor's Labour allies, also urged him to write to councils across the capital to ask them to adopt higher parking fees for bigger cars – a policy some have embraced already. The motion blamed larger cars for clogging up London's streets, putting pedestrians at greater risk of injury or death and causing road surfaces to wear down more quickly. Elly Baker, the Labour assembly member who proposed it, said the capital's streets 'weren't designed for larger vehicles like SUVs'. She said: 'Their greater size, weight, and higher bonnets put vulnerable road users at greater risk, reduce available parking spaces, and cause more wear and tear on our roads. 'It's time we took sensible steps to manage the impact of oversized cars and ensure our streets remain safe and accessible for everyone.' A spokesman for the Mayor said on Friday: 'The Mayor, Transport for London and borough partners are working to eliminate deaths and serious injuries on our roads, by expanding the cycle network, making road crossings and junctions safer, reducing speed limits on our roads, and making larger vehicles like HGVs and buses safer. 'This year the Mayor will be refreshing his Vision Zero Action Plan, to restate his commitment to reducing road danger and responding to new and emerging risks on our roads'. The assembly's call comes after several English local authorities have proposed higher charges for larger or heavier vehicles, amid complaints they occupy more space, produce higher levels of pollution and take a bigger toll on road surfaces. Such charges have been proposed in Haringey, Bath, Oxford and Bristol, among other places, with many councillors taking a lead from Paris, where Left-wing French politicians have launched their own crackdown on SUVs. Sir Sadiq currently lacks the formal powers to introduce such charges himself but has said he is watching developments in the French capital closely. 'SUVs take up more space and we know there's issues around road safety, we know there's issues around carbon emissions and so forth,' he said in February. 'We know some councils in London are taking bold policies in relation to parking fees, in relation to your tickets and so forth. It's really good to work with those councils.' SUVs have grown in popularity in recent years, with many drivers favouring their higher seating position. They accounted for a third of all new car registrations in the UK last year, compared with just 12pc a decade earlier. SUVs are generally taller, wider and heavier than traditional cars, and less fuel-efficient. The increase in the size of cars has been described as car-spreading. However, Edmund King, the president of the AA, said it should be 'up to Londoners to choose the type of vehicle that best fulfils their needs'. He said: 'It is not really the role of the London Assembly to dictate what cars individuals should drive. 'Some larger families may well need bigger vehicles with more passenger seats, whereas a driver conducting most trips alone may well choose a city car. 'London's streets were developed around the horse and cart, so of course our infrastructure needs modernising to keep up with change.' A recent study found that pedestrians and cyclists are 44pc more likely to die if they are hit by an SUV or similar-sized vehicle rather than a traditional car. The analysis produced by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Imperial College London stated that the figure rises to 82pc for children. Meanwhile, research by the campaign group Transport & Environment has previously found the average width of cars in the UK was growing by about half a centimetre per year. A typical car was 180.3cm wide in 2023, up from 177.8cm just five years earlier.

Readers sound off on Keir Starmer, orange air and a handheld fan ban
Readers sound off on Keir Starmer, orange air and a handheld fan ban

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Readers sound off on Keir Starmer, orange air and a handheld fan ban

Edinburgh, Scotland: It was only a matter of time before U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer went down the predictable Tony Blair route of mistaking himself for a latter-day military messiah. 'Peace through strength' (Starmer at a Dublin steel factory, backed by unimpressed workers) is word-waffle, mind-bending nonsense, up there with Blair's weapons of mass destruction as a motive for diverting significant tax income from helping people to hurting people. Recent shameful figures show that Starmer's refusal to move the two-child benefit cap has plunged even more children into poverty. Add to that the betrayal of the elderly, women done out of pension entitlement, the young (Starmer abandoned a previous pledge by the Labour Party to ease student debt) and Labour's shocking role in the slaughter of Gaza — Starmer's ridiculous saber-rattling is clearly a WMD moment. Whereas the lunatic drunkard woman-abuser U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is touting China as the existential threat, Starmer has Vladimir Putin as the main bogeyman already under our beds. That would be the same Putin who has entirely failed to overrun Ukraine, despite thinking he'd have it all done and dusted in a couple of months. Instead, he has — yes — killed many thousands of innocent people, but also decimated Russia. We should all worry, but not because of Starmer's fear-mongering. We should remember just how far weak leaders are prepared to go to cover their failures. Amanda Baker Bronx: Voicer Tal Barzilai thinks Zionists shouldn't be criticized for their reprehensible behavior, but their genocide speaks for itself, and the efforts to starve Gazans is further cruelty. This has been the terrorist Zionist plan all along. Tal then makes specious claims about Jews being the so-called true indigenous people of the region. By that reasoning, since I have Celtic heritage, I should be given free rein to kick a Jewish family out of a European home simply because Celts occupied that area 3,000 years ago. Tal, for 2,000 years it wasn't your land. Time moves on. Please stay relatively safe and secure in New York, the real promised land. You are the unreasonable one. Nick Smith Bronx: To Voicer Jessica Balter: You got it all right on 'actions speak louder' than Mayor 'Avarice' Adams' rhetoric. He runs as an 'Independent' to give folks like me a bad name, skip debates that might show the truth of his corrupt administration and disinvite media events where he can't direct the narrative. It is so telling that as he runs NYC as if it is his private taxpayer public zoo, Greta Thunberg, recognizing the intersection of social issues, braves the open spaces with an international group of do-gooders sailing forward with donated aid for Palestinians under the threat of being 'blown out of the water' with them. It is so telling that other N.Y. officials are also speaking the ills of Adams while operating in his same contaminated, incandescent, yet camouflaged dark space. Dale Benjamin Drakeford Howard Beach: If New York truly wants to keep the city more affordable, why don't they stop increasing property taxes twice a year? Victoria Costanza Manhattan: Though we still think Canada and the Midwest are far away and not part of our lives here in New York, thank you, Daily News, for continuing to confront us with our reality ('City girds for bad air from Canada fires,' June 4). Twenty-five thousand Canadians fleeing their homes, air rated as 'very unhealthy' in Minneapolis — 'Eh, tough!' Wait a minute! 'City girds.' Is that New York City? Is that us? You mean our air could be turning orange again because of Canadian fires ignited in too-dry underbrush? Too dry from carbon dioxide emissions bouncing the Earth's heat back to itself? Same old oil and gas at fault? Wait a minute! Our legislators better not return home from Albany without first passing the NY HEAT Act and convincing Gov. Hochul to unleash the Cap-and-Invest program. Thomas A. Caffrey Brooklyn: Does anybody know what the tariff rate is for the smog Canada is exporting to the U.S.? Damo Baliga Wappingers Falls, N.Y.: I am appalled that Direct TV's charming 'chatty pigeons' TV ads were followed by an ad from Dish Network featuring a child gleefully throwing stones at representations of pigeons while an adult urged her on. Indeed, this company's website features targets on the same pigeons. Pigeons were hailed as heroes who played an important role in World War I, relaying vital messages, saving lives and contributing to the Allied war effort. An award for bravery was bestowed on 32 pigeons for their wartime service. Unfortunately, due to ignorance, prejudice and wrong information, pigeons, like many animals, subsequently became subjects of derision and mocking. Think what Dish did is allowable because they only use statues? If Dish showed ads of kids throwing stones at statues of any ethnic group, it'd be shut down immediately. Please boycott Dish for wanting to capitalize on teaching cruelty. Yliana Franco Merion Station, Pa.: Now that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has chosen Pride Month to remove the name of Harvey Milk, a gay Navy veteran, from a ship, will he also remove the names Kościuszko and Pulaski from military assets during October's Polish American Heritage Month? Will he dare erase African-American names during February's Black History Month, women's names during March's Women's Heritage Month, or those of Asian/Pacific Islanders during May's Asian Pacific American Heritage Month? Native Americans should beat Hegseth at his own game and demand that the Defense Department stop using tribal names and symbols on its weaponry. Gone would be helicopters named for Apache, Black Hawk, Chinook, Lakota, Kiowa, Comanche, Creek, Cheyenne, Little Bird and Arapaho tribes as well as Tomahawk missiles. Paul L. Newman Milford, Pa.: I was sorry to read about Voicer Mahatma Kane Jeeves's problems running his business in the current economic climate. I just watched President Trump on Fox News, and he let everyone know the American economy is booming. So hang in there, Voicer Jeeves. The Trump economic boom should be heading your way soon. Trump, the businessman with so many successful business ventures on his resume, surely knows what he is talking about. He would never mislead or lie to the American people. John Hirt Linden, N.J.: Different news sources and S.E. Cupp ('Trump just can't deliver on any of his promises,' column, June 5) keep stating that the Big Beautiful Bill is loaded with 'pork.' How about illuminating these frivolities and their contributors so that we uninformed taxpayers can remember them when it's time for reelection? C. Olbrys Hammonton, N.J.: S.E. Cupp forgot that Trump did fulfill his promise to secure our border and deport illegals. No bill will reduce our deficit because nobody in Congress wants to risk their jobs to save our nation. We need term limits for that. The Ukraine war will only end if Vladimir Putin withdraws or the Russian army is destroyed. Presidents not keeping promises is not our biggest problem; the impotent, self-serving Congress is. Cupp's hatred for Trump really is an unhealthy obsession that undermines her credibility. I have never liked any presidents in my lifetime and certainly have never trusted Congress, but I don't obsess over it. I just work and try to live a productive life. William Cook Whitsett, N.C.: Handheld fans are a newly banned item on ships. If you cruise and plan to line dance with a handheld fan, it's now banned from use in the club on Carnival ships, and I'm sure that if one ship brand does a ban, then others will follow. So no 'Boots on the Ground: Where Them Fans At?' song line dance with a fan in your hand will be allowed. Perhaps the company has either discovered or suffered a liability when someone gets hurts by someone using the fans on the dance floor, which I can imagine if one accidentally hits someone in their eyes, for example. It can cause a lot of potential damage for someone, indeed. Dee Neveu

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store