'Worse than Latrell': Calls for NRL to punish Angus Crichton after ugly act ignored
NRL fans and commentators are questioning why Angus Crichton wasn't penalised or charged by the match review committee for attacking the face of Lachlan Ilias in the Roosters' win over the Dragons on Anzac Day. Crichton was penalised two weeks ago against the Broncos when he led with his elbow while carrying the ball and collected Adam Reynolds in the throat.
A similar incident occurred on Friday when the Roosters forward raised his arm into Ilias' face during a hit-up. With Crichton standing in the tackle, he then deliberately attacked Ilias' face with his free hand three times, before being taken to ground.
With Ilias lying underneath him, Crichton then pressed his elbow and forearm into his opponent's head and throat - a clear attempt to rattle the much smaller halfback and show him who's boss. But many felt Crichton's actions crossed a line.
Inexplicably, the referee pinged Ilias for a ruck infringement and gave the Roosters a set restart. But many were of the opinion that Crichton should have been penalised.
Players in possession of the ball are allowed to fend tacklers in the face or head with their hand, but they can't raise their forearm or elbow. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed be hit defenders in the face when they're not making a genuine attempt to fend off and free themselves.
RELATED:
Payne Haas and Jahrome Hughes linked to rival NRL team
NRL's 'crazy' move as $120 million disaster could be on the cards
Speaking in commentary for Fox League, Andrew Voss and Greg Alexander said a defender would have been penalised for the treatment that Crichton gave Ilias. But because Crichton was the attacker it was deemed ok (for some bizarre reason).
"Crichton went double palm on Lachlan Ilias, then a forearm and an elbow," Voss said. "You can almost have grounds for a penalty against man in possession."
Alexander added: "If that was a defender he would have been penalised." Voss replied: "100 per cent. Crichton knew what he was doing and it was all attacking the head of Ilias."
TV viewers also took to social media to complain about Crichton, who wasn't charged by the match review committee on Saturday morning either. The only charge to come from the match (won 46-18 by the Roosters) was a $1000 fine for Sandon Smith for a high shot on Ilias.
One fan went as far as to suggest Crichton's actions were worse than those of Latrell Mitchell, who was slapped with a one-game suspension for a high tackle that concussed Sua Fa'alogo on Friday night. While Mitchell's hit was careless, there was an accidental nature to it because Fa'alogo slipped into the contact. However there was nothing accidental about Crichton attacking Ilias' head, which was labelled "dirty" and "grubby" by others on social media.
Writing for , editor Matt Russell called on the NRL to crack down on ball-carriers raising their arms illegally. "It's only going to be a matter of time before Crichton really hurts someone, not to mention the double standards that Brandy (Alexander) raised," he wrote. "It's a good point, too. What punishment would he have copped as a defender?"
So unlike Crichton to go after the smaller man and attack the head.
— CAPEL (@laurencecapel) April 25, 2025
Angus Crichton so dirty. #NRLRoostersDragons
— oldmatespicy ☘⚡️ (@oldmatespicy) April 25, 2025
Unpopular opinion #NRL2025 @NRL What Angus Crichton was doing by elbowing a player laying on the ground was worse than the latrelle Mitchell tackle #NRLStormSouths #NRLRoostersDragons
— kane wilson (@kanewillow1990) April 25, 2025
@BuzzRothfield I hope Angus Crichton is cited for that crap. You can make comment on that as much as you do about the Bulldogs.
— Greg Hancock (@GregHancock2905) April 25, 2025
i see angus crichton is continuing his grubby ways against halfbacks
— abby | aang lovebot (@lowkeyabby) April 25, 2025
Angus Crichton goes the triple fend to the face, then an elbow to Ilias on the ground and somehow gets rewarded with a six again?You beauty
— Scott Pryde (@sk_pryde) April 25, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Wayne Bennett addresses 'secret meeting' with Selwyn Cobbo amid Broncos exit reports
Souths coach Wayne Bennett has shut down links to Selwyn Cobbo after addressing reports he held a 'secret meeting' with the Broncos star in recent days. Cobbo has been tipped to leave Brisbane when his contract runs out at the end of this season and the speculation only intensified over the weekend when he was dropped from Michael Maguire's starting side for the round 14 victory over the Titans. Reports emerged on Tuesday that Cobbo had held talks with Bennett and South Sydney officials about potentially joining the club in 2026. Bennett is a known admirer of Cobbo and spoke glowingly about the former Origin star when he was in charge at the Dolphins. But the veteran mentor insists he's had 'no chats' about bringing him to Souths and says the club 'can't afford him' anyway. 'I don't know where this report has come from but I haven't had a single meeting with Selwyn Cobbo. I don't know him. I've never met him," Bennett told News Corp. 'Look, Selwyn is a wonderful talent but there's been no discussions for him to come here. 'For a start, with our salary cap the way it is, we can't afford him. Selwyn isn't going to take a pay cut to come to Souths, so it's not even an option for us anyway. I've had no chats with him.' BREAKING! According to Triple M, Selwyn Cobbo has met with the South Sydney Bunnies coach, Wayne Bennett, regarding a potential move. — NRLCentral (@nrlcentrall) June 10, 2025 Cobbo is on around $650,000 at the Broncos this season but a salary cap crunch at the club has left his future in Brisbane in doubt. According to reports, the Broncos haven't tabled him a formal offer and have prioritised the re-signing of centre Kotoni Staggs. With Gehamat Shibasaki and Jesse Arthars proving themselves as genuine first-graders, and Grant Anderson set to join the Broncos from Melbourne in 2026, it's looking increasingly likely that Cobbo will depart. If the Broncos choose to keep Cobbo, it'll likely be a one-year extension that would allow him to chase the riches on offer at expansion teams Perth or PNG from 2027. Cobbo's management have reportedly been sounding out interest from rival clubs and are keen to sort out his future in the coming months. News Corp reports that four clubs are potentially looking at signing him, with the Dragons, Roosters and Tigers among those linked with the 23-year-old. It's understood Cobbo sees himself as a fullback but his path at the Broncos is blocked by superstar No.1 Reece Walsh, despite impressing in his teammate's absence this season. Cobbo has expressed a desire to remain at the Broncos but he could potentially command offers in excess of $900,000 per season if he did choose to join a rival club to play fullback. Maguire has indicated that he wants to keep Cobbo at Brisbane but but the 23-year-old would almost certainly have to take a pay cut if he wants to stay. ''Selly' and I talk all the time about what we need to do, so I'll keep that (conversation) between us," Maguire said. 'There's obviously things that every player goes through at times and this is no different. Selly's in the background doing his work to make sure he gets himself right.' Cobbo's future was further clouded on Saturday night as replacement Josiah Karapani starred against the Titans with a try-scoring double. Many fans were quick to point out the tricky task Cobbo faces getting back into the team considering Karapani's performance. However, Maguire said Cobbo "definitely" could force his way back into the first-grade squad after challenging the 105kg powerhouse to work on improvements on his game. Maguire refused to divulge what areas of Cobbo's game he wants to see improvement in, but said: "I'm here to coach the team. We're creating standards and... the more you meet those, the more opportunities you have."
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Incongruity of World Test Championship final fails to dampen Australian excitement
In Australia it is winter, and it is footy season. AFL, NRL, the works. The autumn was passing strange, with unnervingly high temperatures and Gold Coast Suns in the top four. But now it is June, and feeling more as it should, with nights in the southern half of the continent dipping deep into single degrees. The Raiders must be breathing out steam on Canberra mornings, half remembering dreams of ending a premiership wait. And strangely positioned among all this, the Australian Test team is getting ready to play cricket. Australian winter tours happen, but outside the occasional Asian or Caribbean jaunt this century, they're confined to quadrennial visits to England. Two years ago, the first time Australia qualified for a World Test Championship final, that match came directly before an Ashes series. As well as turning the supposed culmination into an incongruous entree, it also made the WTC final melt into the Ashes summer. Advertisement Related: Pat Cummins: 'We want to play hard and fair, and I think we've got it right' This time, things are different. England will shortly start another five-Test series with India, but neither side is involved in the WTC. So it will be England the cricket board rather than England the cricket team that hosts Australia and South Africa, whose struggle for the right to be called world champions will be based not on a series but a single match. An imperfect mechanism, but it means that this time around, in an Australian consciousness, that match will stand alone. So it is that among the footy news of dawn beach sessions and tribunal verdicts, Pat Cummins is back at Lord's this week after half the time that an Ashes cycle would otherwise dictate, wearing the green cap and blazer while wandering about the pavilion doing moody photo shoots as one half of an exercise in height contrast with South Africa's Temba Bavuma. Their squads run drills on the main turf, the pleasantness of white knitted jumpers covering the ugliness of synthetic training kit. The timing may be incongruous, but that classic visual cue says it's time for a Test. The ICC has gone full-court press on promotion, making sure these images are distributed far and wide. Their Hall of Fame announcement was what the marketing types might call something like a brand crossover activation, with four of the seven inductees reflecting the upcoming contest: for South Africa, batting contemporaries Graeme Smith and Hashim Amla; for Australia, their rival Matthew Hayden, along with New Zealand player but current Australia assistant coach Daniel Vettori. Advertisement Approaching the third WTC final, the concept of a Test format decider is starting to cut through. Press access is oversubscribed, largely by English publications for a neutral contest. Public tickets are sold out. It will be a different crowd to the usual. London has plenty of Australians and South Africans, and the latter are starving for global tournament success in any form, so expect both camps to turn out in numbers. After the unhinged reaction that Lord's gave Australia in 2023, in a spontaneous bout of moralising from the Long Room to the back rows, it might make for a nicer atmosphere to have the England supporter base diluted. It will still be plenty aggressive on the field. Kagiso Rabada's preparatory outing against Zimbabwe was vicious, the ball rising from a length at serious pace again and again. Marco Jansen swings it left-arm from a release point about 10ft off the ground. Keshav Maharaj is a vastly experienced left-arm spinner who the Australians in their World Cup semi-final treated with a respect bordering on hypnosis. The fourth link in that bowling chain could be several options, but none that maintains the proven quality of the other three. The Australians have an edge there, with Cummins likely to join Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Starc, and Josh Hazlewood yet again in a fully rounded attack. When Scott Boland took 10 Indian wickets in the Sydney Test last January, he looked the man, but Hazlewood recovered from injury to dominate a title-winning IPL season. Boland has been wildly successful in scant opportunities, but Hazlewood has 279 Test wickets, and last year took them at 13 runs apiece. Current Australian selection tends towards stability, so career-length pedigree should pip one of the best understudies the game has seen. Related: Australia v South Africa: where the World Test Championship final will be won and lost Advertisement Likewise, the other selection questions feel all but decided. Sam Konstas is unlikely to be thrown in at Lord's as he was at the MCG, with Marnus Labuschagne the seasoned candidate to open instead. That means Cameron Green takes Labuschagne's slot at No 3, after a run-filled county cricket stint. With Green unable to be a fifth bowler due to injury, Beau Webster stays at six. Though if selectors trust the fitness of their four main bowlers, Josh Inglis should be considered for that spot, not just because of his recent century on debut in Sri Lanka, but his ability to problem-solve so many batting situations. Whatever the configuration, the players are excited, the press attentive, and the audience has committed. The Test decider is vindicated further each time it is played. It may be a strange time of year for an Antipodean, and a strange tournament structure for anybody involved. But the important thing now is the game: jumpers on, caps fitted, seats taken, rain cursed, sunshine welcomed. Channel changed. The footy can wait a week.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
League great slams NRL as Benji Marshall spray lands Tigers coach in hot water
League great Greg Alexander has leapt to the defence of Benji Marshall after the Wests Tigers coach's criticism of officials looks set to land him in hot water with the NRL. Marshall blew up over two controversial calls against Jarome Luai during Sunday's loss to Penrith, with the penalty for a late tackle on Panthers kicker Blaize Talagi particularly baffling. Luai was also pinged for an escort penalty during the second half of the 18-14 defeat that Marshall thought the officials also got wrong. But the NRL's head of football Graham Annesley insisted on Tuesday that both incidents were reviewed and the right calls were made. 'It's clear from the vision that Jarome Luai props on his left foot and turns his back to initiate contact with Liam Martin,' Annesley said about the escort penalty. 'Regarding the contact on kicker Blaize Talagi, the rules are very clear, and have been reinforced with clubs on multiple occasions over recent seasons. "Players have a duty of care to avoid dangerous contact with kickers who are in the process of kicking and in a vulnerable position. This is a player safety policy which has been in place for a number of years.' But a frustrated Alexander wasn't having a bar of that explanation and echoed the fan backlash by insisting that Luai made the tackle on Talagi as he was kicking the footy. Luai's shot was not late, high or dangerous and the former premiership winner lamented the fact that current rules tend to penalise defenders for what has long been celebrated as exemplary kick pressure. "The tackle wasn't late, it wasn't high. He was within his rights to make that tackle," Alexander said about the penalty against Luai. "Please tell me that we haven't ruled that out of the game. "Do we just allow a kicker to take all the time in the world to kick the ball? As long as he hasn't made contact with the legs of the kicker - which he didn't - then I think it's gotta be alright. Veteran NRL commentator Andrew Voss agreed it did not warrant a penalty. "If he was passing the ball, then there's no dramas," he added. With the scores locked at 10-10 at the time, the decision proved costly as Nathan Cleary's ensuing penalty goal put the defending premiers up by two, before Thomas Jenkins completed his hat-trick late on to help get Penrith home. Marshall was clearly infuriated in his post-match press conference and suggested the officials decided the outcome, in comments that look to have landed him in hot water. 'The game is so hard and demanding. And I actually feel sorry for our players because they didn't actually get to decide tonight," the Wests Tigers coach said. RELATED: 'Cringey' Galvin promo infuriates fans as Raiders hero cops huge snub Slater under fire for Ezra Mam move as QLD axe skipper DCE 'It was a wrong call. I agree with protecting the kickers, but he didn't take his legs out. They didn't put him in a dangerous position. It was simultaneous when he kicked it and he made contact there. Like, that's not a penalty. "And I thought it actually cost us because we're in a cycle there where they got field position, kicked the goal, got the ball back, went down, got a penalty and then scored, so anyway, I've had my rant.' And it could prove costly for Marshall and the Tigers, with CODE Sports reporting that the NRL is reviewing the comments to determine whether any form of sanction will be handed down. That's two horrible calls by officials this week when it's come to putting pressure on the kicker. You want Luai to do that every 5th tackle play if he could #NRLTigersPanthers — Jay Keegan (@JayMK1994) June 8, 2025 Free 2 points there because of a perfect tackle by luai, game is so far gone. #NRLTigersPanthers — Tiger96🐅 (@tiger959505) June 8, 2025 Jarome Luai has done absolutely nothing wrong then 🤦♂️ #nrltigerspanthers — Alex Sutton (@TosBetting) June 8, 2025 This game is unwatchable. Nothing wrong with that tackle from Luai.#NRLTigersPanthers — Rewster (@Rewster7) June 8, 2025
