United Kingdom urgently preparing for ‘wartime scenario', warning nation could come under ‘direct threat'
The UK government has warned that the nation must 'actively prepare for the possibility of the UK coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario', following a tense 12-day war between Iran and Israel, which threatened to spill over at any moment.
Outlined in a newly released national security strategy, the wartime readiness document frames 2025 as a year of 'confrontation with those who are threatening security,' with Russia's war in Ukraine described as 'the most obvious and pressing example of this.'
The strategy also points to 'Iranian hostile activity on British soil' and highlights efforts by adversaries to disrupt critical supply lines and energy infrastructure.
The report calls for an 'all-of-society effort' to improve resilience, warning that 'the country would have to pull together' to meet these threats.
The release coincides with a NATO summit in the Netherlands, where leaders from all 32 member states are expected to commit to increasing total security spending to 5 per cent of national income by 2035.
That target would include 3.5 per cent allocated to core military capabilities and a further 1.5 per cent to broader security measures.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden described the strategy as 'a plan that is both clear-eyed and hard-edged about the challenges we face.'
He said the government aims to strengthen border security, deepen cooperation with allies, and invest in key national industries such as shipbuilding, nuclear energy, and artificial intelligence.
Among the most significant announcements was a £1 billion (A$2.10 billion) commitment to establishing a 'new network of national biosecurity centres' to bolster the country's defences against biological threats.
The strategy document warns that the UK must reduce 'our dependence on others, including the ability of adversaries to coerce or manipulate us,' and says the country has already faced 'hostile activities including assassination, intimidation, espionage, sabotage, cyber attacks and other forms of democratic interference.'
It also highlights the threat posed by foreign disinformation campaigns, with adversaries using social media to 'stoke tensions between generations, genders and ethnic groups.'
Vital infrastructure, including undersea internet cables, is described as an ongoing target.
McFadden stressed the UK would remain 'clear-eyed' in its approach to China, striking a balance between national security and economic interests.
'We must protect our national security and promote our economic interests,' he said.
Following McFadden's address, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy delivered a statement on the government's classified audit of its relationship with Beijing.
Though the audit itself remains unpublished, Lammy called China a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' while acknowledging that its power is 'an inescapable fact.'
'Not engaging with China is therefore no choice at all,' Lammy said.
The UK would adopt a strategy of 'progressive realism… taking the world as it is, not as we wish it to be', Lammy added.
'We will co-operate where we can and we will challenge where we must,' he said, vowing to never compromise on national security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
42 minutes ago
- The Age
NATO countries bowed to Trump's defence demands. It'll cost them 19,800 fighter jets
Governments around the world agreeing to the change will need to make some tough decisions in the context of other budget pressures, says Euan Graham, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 'How the government cuts the pie of the tax take is going to require hard, hard decisions,' Graham says. The UK, for example, which has agreed to hit the 5 per cent target by 2035, is slashing foreign aid to pay for its additional $155 billion defence spending bill. 'That is not an announcement that I am happy to make,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said of the change. 'However, the realities of our dangerous new era mean that the defence and national security of our country must always come first.' Other countries lifting their spending to meet the new target include Germany, France and Italy. They will need to boost their annual spending by $220 billion, $153 billion and $135 billion, respectively. Earlier this month, Rutte warned NATO members that if they didn't pledge to up defence spending to 5 per cent, 'you'd better learn to speak Russian'. But Spain, which spent just 1.3 per cent of its GDP on defence last year, refused the increase. The extra spending would force the country to 'drastically raise taxes on the middle class, or severely cut the size of our welfare state,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said. The NATO agreement could see Australia dragged further into the debate over defence spending by bolstering the Trump White House's argument that US allies can spend more on defence. US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth has told Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, which the Albanese has pushed back against in favour of its plan to lift expenditure to 2.3 per cent. The Coalition went to the election promising to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2035-36, which the Parliamentary Budget Office said this week would cost $156 billion and add $24 billion in interest costs. If Australia's defence spending was lifted to 5 per cent in the same time frame, the cost to the federal budget would be $261 billion and have an additional $40 billion in interest. Rabobank senior strategist Ben Picton said the debate was about 'guns or butter'. 'The Australian government is faced with choices between increasing the defence budget to expand capability or increasing spending on social programs like the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), aged care, and childcare,' Picton said in a research note this week. 'Clearly, Australia is currently choosing 'butter' but retains substantial headroom in the budget to increase spending by comparison to peer economies.' Loading The Australian government spent about $56 billion on defence in 2024-25 – more than the $44 billion it spent on the NDIS. Eminent economist Saul Eslake believes that no government will cut spending on social services to beef up defence. 'You'd make a lot of people pissed off and it's hard to do, which to me means you've got to look to the revenue side [to raise more money],' Eslake says. But Graham says Australians would understand a cut to services – like the NDIS – if the government was 'honest about the nature of the threat' posed to national security.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
'Doesn't he deserve some praise?': NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte hails US President Donald Trump's Middle East impact
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has hailed United States President Donald Trump's handling of the conflict between Israel and Iran. Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Mr Rutte was asked to comment on an effusive message he sent to the President following the announcement of a ceasefire in the Middle East. NATO's Secretary-General refuted suggestions the message made him look weak, before talking up President Trump's handling of the conflict and his impact on global defence spending. "Doesn't he deserve some praise?" Mr Rutte said. "When it comes to Iran, the fact he took this decisive action, very targeted, to make sure that Iran would not be able to get its hands on a nuclear capability, I think he deserves all the praise." Watch all the live coverage and analysis from our hosts and experts amid the escalating Israel-Iran conflict with a Streaming Subscription.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Paying absolute attention': NATO Summit meeting analysed
Sky News host Paul Murray discusses the NATO leaders meeting for a historic summit. 'The NATO leaders are meeting in the Netherlands … the images we have seen over the past couple of hours have been interesting,' Mr Murray said. 'Those paying absolute attention have noticed the Ukrainian leader Volodimir Zelensky is wearing a suit today at the NATO meeting, now that would be fascinating to know why.'