CMOs Plan Big Investments In AI For The Next Three Years
Marketers are preparing to take the next leap forward with AI. Boston Consulting Group's annual survey of marketers found that 71% of CMOs plan to invest more than $10 million annually in generative AI over the next three years, and 83% are optimistic about the technology. Worry about the technology has fallen to 23% among CMOs, half of what it was just two years ago.
'It's clear that GenAI has become a core part of how modern marketing teams operate,' Lauren Wiener, BCG managing director and global lead for the firm's marketing practice, said in a release. 'What separates the winners is a commitment not just to scaling the technology, but to empowering the people who use it. Those CMOs investing in tools and talent are the ones rewriting the playbook.'
So far, content creation is a top use of AI technology. More than three-quarters of CMOs are actively using AI for image generation, creating animated videos, writing copy, and translating text into multiple languages. About 30% have plans to pilot live-action-style video generation and enhancement in the near future.
Personalization is also a top use of AI-powered analytics. Half of CMOs have already deployed personalized product recommendations at scale, while more than two out of five are piloting AI tools for content performance forecasting, audience segmentation and optimization, ROI forecasts for advertising spend and demand forecasting. The top priority for investment in AI, the study found, goes back to the consumer: improving digital customer experience.
Aside from content creation and personalization, AI can help marketers dive into data and determine what works and what doesn't, showing actual results from a campaign. International food giant Kellanova took a step in this direction when it used clean room technology to figure out if specific targeting could improve their sales of Special K in the U.K. I talked to Global Senior Director of Insights and Intelligence Louise Cotterill and Chief Growth Officer Charisse Hughes about the technology and process. An excerpt from our conversation is later in this newsletter.
Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images
As Elon Musk leaves Washington, D.C., he plans to add a new function to social networking app X, formerly known as Twitter, part of his campaign to make it an 'everything app.' XChat, an encrypted messaging feature, is set to start rolling out to X users this week, Musk said in a recent post. This update will bring X directly in competition with Meta's WhatsApp and the encrypted messaging platform Signal. XChat will allow for file sharing, vanishing messages, and audio and visual calls made without a telephone number. The new functionality is an update to X's Direct Messages feature, and has reportedly launched early to some premium subscribers.
Meta is making a long-desired update to its Instagram app: allowing images with 3:4 aspect ratio. For years, Instagram photos could only be squares, meaning the vast majority of photos taken on phones needed to be cropped before they could be posted on the social network, writes Forbes senior contributor Paul Monckton. Now, users can post photos just as they were taken, allowing for a fuller look at each picture. Monckton said the rollout seems to be staggered, and not all users have access to this capability yet.
There have also been reports that Instagram is coming to the iPad, which has never offered the app. Forbes senior contributor David Phelan writes that Bloomberg reported Meta employees are actively testing a version of the app for the larger screens on the tablet devices. Meta has been busy extending its social apps to iPads this year; WhatsApp debuted there last month, Phelan writes.
AUSL players stand for the national anthem with Little League World Series players during a game last year in Greenville, North Carolina.
As women's sports continue to grow in popularity, Major League Baseball entered a strategic partnership with the Athletes Unlimited Softball League, a four-team women's professional softball league that kicks off its first season this month, writes Forbes senior contributor John Perrotto. Sportico reports that the partnership includes an eight-figure financial investment. MLB will also work to raise the visibility of the new league through its marketing, events, editorial, digital and social content arms. Some of the AUSL games will also be broadcast on MLB Network and MLB.TV.
MLB Chief Baseball Development Officer Tony Reagins told Perrotto that conversations leading to the partnership have been in progress for a year and a half, and MLB was convinced to make this investment due to the leadership of AUSL. Athletics Unlimited, which also owns and operates professional women's volleyball and basketball leagues, was founded in 2020 by Jon Patricof and Jonathan Soros. Longtime MLB executive and former Miami Marlins general manager Kim Ng is the AUSL's commissioner.
Women's professional sports leagues have existed for decades, but they are now starting to see growing support and dedicated fan bases. Forbes' Justin Birnbaum talked to Michele Kang, the billionaire owner of three women's soccer teams—the National Women's Soccer League's Washington Spirit, France's Première Ligue's OL Lyonnes, and England's Women's Super League's London City Lionnesses—about her investment in women's sports. She took control of the Spirit in 2022 at a $35 million valuation, which was then seen as an astronomical price—though Forbes estimates the team is now worth $130 million. 'This is not charity; this is not some corporate DEI project,' Kang said. 'I'm on a mission to prove that this is good business—not just a business, but a good business.'
LinkedIn headquarters in San Francisco.
If you're looking to attract attention in a B2B campaign, LinkedIn is a key platform. Today, the professional networking site rolled out updates to improve its B2B video advertising offerings to help brands stand out. According to LinkedIn's own research, 75% of B2B marketers feel that video helps them reach decision makers, and 93% feel video is better at driving brand recall than single-image ads.
LinkedIn's expansion allows companies to buy First Impression Ads: vertical video ads for single-day campaigns that can target users in specific businesses, and are guaranteed to be the first ad that those members see during the day. For campaigns lasting longer than 24 hours, B2B marketers can place their sponsored content in the top spot of users' feeds through LinkedIn's new Reserved Ads. The professional networking site has also improved its CTV advertising capabilities and reach, now adding Paramount's premium content and improving tagging to better target the right viewers.
LinkedIn also announced an integration with Adobe Express, bringing the popular video editing tools to its platform to help marketers create the best quality videos.
Kellanova Global Senior Director of Insights and Intelligence Louise Cotterill and Chief Growth Officer Charisse Hughes.
Last year, international food giant Kellanova (part of the company formerly known as Kellogg) was hoping to improve sales of its Special K cereal in the U.K. as competition increased. Their hypothesis: Targeted audiences would buy more Special K with messaging and content that focused on the quality and value of the cereal. In order to test the theory, Kellanova used data clean rooms, a high-tech and AI-powered way to penetrate deep into data. The company was able to show their targeting worked—sales increased 9% among price-conscious shoppers, and 36% among premium shoppers—and has since been using clean room technology for more aspects of marketing.
I talked to Kellanova's Global Senior Director of Insights and Intelligence Louise Cotterill and Chief Growth Officer Charisse Hughes about how they used clean room technology to find success in this campaign and others. This conversation has been edited for length, clarity and continuity. A longer version is available here.
How did you land on using clean room technology to do this?
Cotterill: The most important thing to do is start with a business problem, because if you start with the technology, it will never land and never get embedded in the business. My role is to look at how do we better use advanced sciences in marketing. Media is by far our largest expenditure. We saw a 1% to 2% improvement in media effectiveness and efficiency. That's a significant improvement to our commercial bottom line. We started with that as the objective: How do we create more effective and efficient consumer connections? What that took us to was the role of data collaboration.
Kellanova is one of the most trusted companies. We have to do it at the gold star standard of privacy. The gold standard is a clean room where we can anonymize that data as much as possible. And so that was really where it went.
The crucial part is that it's very easy to be seduced by data, the idea of technology and these shiny objects. If you don't start with a problem that you're [actually] trying to solve, all you get is a very expensive tool that never gets used.
What's been great about the clean room is that we have not only been able to demonstrate impact, it's repeatable into our processes and practices, and that's the key unlock for anything that we do in these AI and data science programs.
When you embarked on this project, was there any pushback, confusion or hesitancy among the team to do something this high tech and bring so many data resources into it?
Cotterill: It was a clear business need, so it was a much easier sell than perhaps it might be [if we said] let's just chase this shiny AI tool. It came with a solve for a problem, but I'll be totally transparent: We didn't knock it out of the park the first time. It wasn't a magic turnkey solution. We had senior leadership who believed in it. And so when we don't see the results the first time, we still have the confidence to keep going and the belief that that will drive a meaningful impact in our business.
That's what we saw with Special K, and now that's embedded into many campaigns in multiple markets. The beautiful thing is these models just get smarter every time we deploy, every time we target, every time we get a result, we are getting smarter and more understanding.
Hughes: When you think about this space that we're all operating in, which is new and unknown by many, it's uncomfortable because it's not how we've always done it. It's techy. All those dynamics, we faced those. Add to that in some cases, you're spending more dollars because you're targeting a smaller group of people. So your CPMs are arguably going up, but you're driving a better return on investment at the end of the day.
For sure it takes some convincing and some test-and-learns. We failed at first, and this spirit of failure, and failing fast and failing cheap, has to be a part of what you're building in terms of the muscle of the organization. It definitely takes time.
My prior life was in retail, and you're able to recover a little bit faster because you're naturally accustomed, moving at that pace and testing and learning and adapting. When you're a bigger organization like Kellogg/Kellanova, you're building more of the internal confidence and belief in what's possible. Then you're using this test-and-learn approach to demonstrate what's possible, but you build it through words, collaboration and a partnership, bringing everybody together to talk through the plans, and really build that allyship and confidence. We are really fortunate that we had Lu, a digital marketer who comes from an agency background, who could be our champion and wave the flag around, and, from my standpoint at the executive level, is bringing my CEO and CFO along on the journey as well.
How do these results compare with ones you'd seen earlier, both through panels, but also through online data before privacy was such a widespread concern?
Cotterill: The biggest shift for us is the granularity that we're able to see what's going on in our business. Panel data has been fantastic, but often the exciting parts in marketing are on the fringes. That's where you identify the insight or the opportunity. Those edges have been softened out for a long time. Whilst you talk about the clean room potentially as a targeting tool, we're bringing it further upstream in our strategy and business planning process because it gives us an incremental visibility we've never had before. We can see things like geographic divides in how our food is sold, or price sensitivity. We can understand that, amazingly, not all women are the same. There's different nuances, and we can target and speak to those in different ways.
Most exciting is the measurement piece: You're not just relying on model data. You've got actual real data. For me, it's really hard to go back to working because the precision you've got, it looks so illuminating and so exciting. As a marketer, you just want to lean into it as much as possible.
Hughes: Being able to talk to our consumers more directly about their behaviors, versus taking a retrospective and constantly having to look back; actually seeing what they're doing and how they're reacting in real time [is great], but the measurement part is probably the most exciting. There are those people who believe marketing is just a line item in the P&L to be cut, that is not really delivering on what we know it can deliver: growth, engagement and long-term business and brand acceleration. Now, we can demonstrate the sales impact as well as the brand impact. Being able to communicate that you need both is critical. Now we have the data, we have the test-and-learns, we have the insights and the capabilities to do that better than ever.
Brands can hold enormous and lasting power over consumers, and can inspire dedicated endorsers on social media. Here are seven ways you can build your brand into one that customers brag about.
President Donald Trump's tariffs—both proposed and in effect—have brought consumer confidence levels way down, and resulting higher prices could interfere with brand loyalty. But the situation creates some opportunities for brands to improve their customers' experience and deepen their loyalty. Here are some tips to work with customers through the economic uncertainty.
Which musician announced last week that she has an anime series coming out on Amazon Prime Video?
A. Taylor Swift
B. Megan Thee Stallion
C. Chappell Roan
D. Charli XCX
See if you got the answer right here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
What To Know About The IRS's $4 Billion Tax Assessment On Yum! Brands
KFC Taco Bell (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images) The IRS has assessed $4 billion in taxes, penalties, and interest on Yum! Brands. The issue stems from a tax-deferred reorganization in 2014. Yum! Brands is now suing to prevent the IRS from collecting these funds. M&A is often among the most complicated tax issues large corporations face, which can often lead to uncertainty and scrutiny from the IRS. In this article, I discuss the Yum! Brand corporation, what happened in 2014, and why they are facing such a steep tax penalty now over a decade later. Yum! Brands is the parent company of KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and Habit Burger & Grill. As noted by The Washington Post, this corporation spun off from PepsiCo in 1997 to become among the largest set of restaurant chains in the United States and the world. While it currently features those three staples, the corporation has also previously held other chains, such as A&W and Long John Silvers. Yum! Brands has been known to be innovative by having combination restaurants. In these situations, customers can order from a KFC or Taco Bell (or both) at the same location. What makes Yum! Brands particularly impactful is their international appeal. As stated on the Yum! Brands website, the brands total over 61,000 locations and can be seen in 155 countries. According to CNN, KFC has blossomed to become an international staple in countries like Japan, where people often have KFC as their Christmas dinner. Yum! Brands is also no stranger to tax-related news. In early 2025, the company announced a different restructuring. While the company is famously headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky (hence, Kentucky Fried Chicken), Fortune reported that it will be relocating to Plano, TX, due to, among other things, taxes. Kentucky is a state that levies a corporate income tax (5% in 2025). Meanwhile, Texas famously has a 0% tax rate on corporate profits. Individual income tax is also not levied in Texas. Newsweek suggests that Texas has become a bit of a tax haven for new corporate headquarters such as Tesla, Toyota, Charles Schwab, Chevron, and now Yum! Brands. Prior to 2014, Yum! Brands was made up of separate legal entities based on brand and region. For example, there were separate legal entities for KFC Asia and KFC Europe. According to court filings, On November 30, 2013, Yum! Brands publicly announced a corporate reorganization. In this reorganization, the company would no longer be broken out into segments based on geography. Instead, it would focus its organization based on brands (i.e., KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut). It would also have separate divisions for China and India. The goal of this reorganization was to drive growth. To help facilitate the reorganization, the new subsidiaries issued stock in exchange for stock in the previous subsidiary. This stock for stock reorganization often falls under the Internal Revenue Code Section 368(a)(1)(B), which allows for the acquisition of a corporation solely in exchange for all or part of its voting stock. As long as all of the conditions are met, the Yum! Brand legal entities can exchange the stock without recognizing a gain on the appreciated value of the stock. The conditions for this type of reorganization are as follows: Reorganizations under Section 368 are valuable for a company like Yum! Brands because it wishes to restructure the company's organization to enhance future profits. In a normal transaction where Yum! Brands were selling its stock to another company, Yum! Brands would have a gain (or loss) on the appreciated (depreciated) value of the stock. However, Section 368 allows companies to meet certain conditions to defer the gain to a future period. Importantly, companies still have to recognize a gain on the stock's appreciated value, but this gain will not typically happen until the company ultimately disposes of it. In this case, Yum! Brands thought that the conditions under Section 368(a)(1)(B) were met, which would defer the gain, allowing the reorganization to make more sense from a financial perspective. In Yum! Brand's 2024 10-K financial statements, the company notes the following: As reported by Bloomberg Tax, this disagreement comprises over $4 billion dollars in damages: the $2.1 billion in taxes that the IRS believes Yum! Brands should have paid during their reorganization in 2014, $418 million in underpayment penalties and over $1.5 billion in interest on the money that has not yet been paid to the taxing authority. $4 billion is a large assessment for any firm. However, to put it into context, Yum! Brands in 2024 had a pre-tax income of $1.9 billion and paid income taxes of $414 million on that income. Thus, a tax bill of over $4 billion is astronomical for even a company of this size. NRN reports that the disagreement stems from Yum! Brands believe to have met all of the requirements under Section 368 for the reorganization to be tax-deferred, whereas the taxing authority believes that these matters were not all addressed and initiates billions of dollars of income by way of a sale of appreciated value of stock. NRN also reports that Yum! Brands has taken this matter to court and appeals court but was unsuccessful. In turn, Law360 reports that Yum! Brands have taken the IRS to court to sue them over the collections of this $4 billion. While the matter is still uncertain, many in the M&A tax space continue to watch this saga unfold since it represents a significant assessment being levied against some of the U.S.'s most recognizable restaurant brands.
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
The AI Paradox: When More AI Means Less Impact
Young business man with his face passing through the screen of a laptop on binary code background AI is in the news every day. On the one hand, this highlights the vertiginous speed at which the field is developing. On the other, it creates a sense saturation and angst that makes business organizations either drop the subject altogether or go at it full throttle without much discernment. Both approaches will lead to major misses in the inevitable AI-fication of business. In this article, I'll explore what happens when a business goes down the AI rabbit hole without a clear business objective and a solid grasp of the available alternatives. If you have attended any AI conference lately, chances are that, by the end, you thought your business was dangerously behind. Many of these events, even if not on purpose, can leave you with the feeling that you need to deploy AI everywhere and automate everything to catch up. If you've succumbed to this temptation, you most likely found out that is not the right move. Two years into the generative AI revolution, a counterintuitive truth is emerging from boardrooms to factory floors. Companies pursuing 100% AI automation are often seeing diminished returns, while those treating AI as one element in a broader, human-centered workflow are capturing both cost savings and competitive advantages. The obvious truth is already revealing itself: AI is just one more technology at our disposal, and just like every other new technology, everyone is trying to gain first-move advantage, which inevitably creates chaos. Those who see through and beyond said chaos are building the foundations of a successful AI-assisted business. The numbers tell a story that contradicts the automation evangelists. Three in four workers say AI tools have decreased their productivity and added to their workload, according to a recent UpWork survey of 2,500 respondents across four countries. Workers report spending more time reviewing AI-generated content and learning tool complexities than the time these tools supposedly save. Even more revealing: while 85% of company leaders are pushing workers to use AI, nearly half of employees using AI admitted they have no idea how to achieve the productivity gains their employers expect. This disconnect isn't just corporate misalignment—it's a fundamental misunderstanding of how AI creates value. The companies winning the AI game aren't those deploying the most algorithms. They're the ones who understand that intelligent automation shouldn't rely on AI alone. Instead, successful organizations are orchestrating AI within broader process frameworks where human expertise guides strategic decisions while AI handles specific, well-defined tasks. A good AI strategy always revolves around domain experts, not the other way around. Consider how The New York Times approached AI integration. Rather than replacing journalists with AI, the newspaper introduced AI tools for editing copy, summarizing information, and generating promotional content, while maintaining strict guidelines that AI cannot draft full articles or significantly alter journalism. This measured approach preserves editorial integrity while amplifying human capabilities. AI should be integrated strategically and operationally into entire processes, not deployed as isolated solutions to be indiscriminately exploited hoping for magic. Research shows that 60% of business and IT leaders use over 26 systems in their automation efforts, and 42% cite lack of integration as a major digital transformation hurdle. The most effective AI implementations focus on task-specific applications rather than general automation. Task-specific models offer highly specialized solutions for targeted problems, making them more efficient and cost-effective than general-purpose alternatives. Harvard Business School research involving 750 Boston Consulting Group consultants revealed this precision matters enormously. While consultants using AI completed certain tasks 40% faster with higher quality, they were 19 percentage points less likely to produce correct answers on complex tasks requiring nuanced judgment. This 'jagged technological frontier' demands that organizations implement methodical test-and-learn approaches rather than wholesale AI adoption. Harvard Business Review research confirms that AI notoriously fails at capturing intangible human factors essential for real-world decision-making—ethical considerations, moral judgments, and contextual nuances that guide business success. The companies thriving in 2025 aren't choosing between humans and machines. They're building hybrid systems where AI automation is balanced with human interaction to maintain stakeholder trust and capture value that neither could achieve alone. The mantra, 'AI will replace your job,' seems to consistently reveal a timeless truth: everything that should be automated will be automated, not everything than can be automated will. The Path Forward The AI paradox isn't a failure of technology—it's a lesson in implementation strategy. Organizations that resist the allure of complete automation and instead focus on thoughtful integration, task-specific deployment, and human-AI collaboration aren't just avoiding the productivity trap. They're building sustainable competitive advantages that compound over time. The question isn't whether your organization should use AI. It's whether you'll fall into the 'more AI' trap or master the art of 'smarter AI'—where less automation actually delivers more impact.
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Points of Light, founded by the Bush family, aims to double American volunteerism by 2035
NEW ORLEANS — The Bush family's nonprofit Points of Light will lead an effort to double the number of people who volunteer with U.S. charitable organizations from 75 million annually to 150 million in 10 years. The ambitious goal, announced in New Orleans at the foundation's annual conference, which concluded Friday, would represent a major change in the way Americans spend their time and interact with nonprofits. It aspires to mobilize people to volunteer with nonprofits in the U.S. at a scale that only federal programs like AmeriCorps have in the past. It also coincides with deep federal funding cuts that threaten the financial stability of many nonprofits and with an effort to gut AmeriCorps programs, which sent 200,000 volunteers all over the country. A judge on Wednesday paused those cuts in some states , which had sued the Trump administration. Jennifer Sirangelo, president and CEO of Points of Light, said that while the campaign has been in development well before the federal cuts, the nonprofit's board members recently met and decided to move forward. 'What our board said was, 'We have to do it now. We have to put the stake in the ground now. It's more important than it was before the disruption of AmeriCorps,'' she said in an interview with The Associated Press. She said the nonprofit aims to raise and spend $100 million over the next three years to support the goal. Points of Light, which is based in Atlanta, was founded by President George H.W. Bush to champion his vision of volunteerism. It has carried on his tradition of giving out a daily award to a volunteer around the country, built a global network of volunteer organizations and cultivated corporate volunteer programs. Speaking Wednesday in New Orleans, Points of Light's board chair Neil Bush told the organization's annual conference that the capacity volunteers add to nonprofits will have a huge impact on communities. 'Our mission is to make volunteering and service easier, more impactful, more sustained,' Bush said. 'Because, let's be honest, the problems in our communities aren't going to fix themselves.' According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau and AmeriCorps, the rate of participation has plateaued since 2002 , with a noticeable dip during the pandemic . Susan M. Chambré, professor emerita at Baruch College who studied volunteering for decades , said Points of Light's goal of doubling the number of volunteers was admirable but unrealistic, given that volunteer rates have not varied significantly over time. But she said more research is needed into what motivates volunteers, which would give insight into how to recruit people. She also said volunteering has become more transactional over time, directed by staff as opposed to organized by volunteers themselves. In making its case for increasing volunteer participation in a recent report , Points of Light drew on research from nonprofits like Independent Sector, the National Alliance for Volunteer Engagement and the Do Good Institute at the University of Maryland. Sirangelo said they want to better measure the impact volunteers make, not just the hours they put in, for example. They also see a major role for technology to better connect potential volunteers to opportunities, though they acknowledge that many have tried to do that through apps and online platforms . Reaching young people will also be a major part of accomplishing this increase in volunteer participation. Sirangelo said she's observed that many young people who do want to participate are founding their own nonprofits rather than joining an existing one. 'We're not welcoming them to our institutions, so they have to go found something,' she said. 'That dynamic has to change.' As the board was considering this new goal, they reached out for advice to Alex Edgar, who is now the youth engagement manager at Made By Us. They ultimately invited him to join the board as a full voting member and agreed to bring on a second young person as well. 'I think for volunteering and the incredible work that Points of Light is leading to really have a deeper connection with my generation, it needs to be done in a way that isn't just talking to or at young people, but really co-created across generations,' said Edgar, who is 21. Karmit Bulman, who has researched and supported volunteer engagement for many years, said she was very pleased to see Points of Light make this commitment. 'They are probably the most well known volunteerism organization in the country and I really appreciate their leadership,' said Bulman, who is currently the executive director of East Side Learning Center, a nonprofit in St. Paul. Bulman said there are many people willing to help out in their communities but who are not willing to jump through hoops to volunteer with a nonprofit. 'We also need to recognize that it's a pretty darn stressful time in people's lives right now,' she said. 'There's a lot of uncertainty personally and professionally and financially for a lot of people. So we need to be really, really flexible in how we engage volunteers.' ___ Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit .
