Signal app war plan leak broke the law, Texas expert says
The Brief
Government transparency expert says "war plan" leak through app violates law
Use of Signal App by Hegseth prevented creation of "classified record"
HOUSTON - A Texas expert on government transparency requirements believes the leak of "war plans" by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others may well have violated laws governing retention of government records.
What they're saying
Former Travis County Judge Bill Aleshire helped write Texas's Freedom of Information law.
That statute mirrors in many ways Federal Open Records Law, which demands "record retention" even if the content of the communication between government officials is "highly confidential.
Aleshire says that by using the Signal App, Hegseth and everyone involved in the communication made an end-run around mandated transparency.
"Even in the federal government, it is important for there to be a record made, even if that record must be and is appropriately held confidential. At least, the record is there for those who have access to know what happened," said Aleshire.
Dig deeper
Encryption experts at the University of Houston tell FOX 26, the Signal App is nearly impossible to hack, which means government officials, at all levels, have the capacity to communicate in an unrecorded "black box", but are essentially breaking the law each time they do so.
"We kind of have the worst of both worlds here - the lack of transparency by the use of that app, while on the other hand, spilling the beans to the news media in advance of an attack, exactly what was going to happen, when it was going to happen and who it was going to happen to," said Aleshire.
The Source
FOX 26 Political Reporter Greg Groogan spoke with former Travis County Judge Bill Aleshire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Newsom mocks Hegseth, Trump over ‘job well done' post on National Guard
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) mocked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Trump in a post on the social platform X on Sunday amid tension between the governor and the Trump administration over protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In response to a Sunday post on the social platform X from Hegseth featuring a screenshot of another post from President Trump on his Truth Social platform in which congratulated the National Guard, saying they had done a 'great job' in Los Angeles following 'two days of violence, clashes and unrest,' Newsom mocked Hegseth and Trump as 'smart guys.' 'Smart guys running the operation. The National Guard wasn't even deployed on the ground when Trump posted this. Pete Hegseth runs the Pentagon as well as he throws an axe on a Fox News set,' Newsom said in his own X post on Sunday, referencing a 2015 incident in which a man was struck by an ax tossed by Hegseth. Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard members to the Los Angeles area on Saturday amid protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said previously the action was due to 'violent mobs' recently attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' 'These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens. That is why President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' Leavitt said. California National Guard troops started arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, with the U.S. Northern Command saying on X that the California National Guard had proceeded with deploying troops in the Los Angeles area, 'with some already on the ground.' Newsom's press office also went after the Trump administration over the situation in Los Angeles on X, with one post referencing the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riots, slamming another post from the Department of Homeland Security about 'violent rioters.' The Hill has reached out to the White House, the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security for comment.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
The Legal Issues Surrounding Trump's Plan to Use Troops to Suppress Protests
Setting up a rare use of military force on domestic soil, President Trump ordered the Pentagon on Saturday night to send at least 2,000 National Guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles set off by his immigration crackdown. Mr. Trump has long mused about using military force on domestic soil to crush violent protests or riots, fight crime and hunt for undocumented migrants — a move that his aides talked him out of during his first term. Between his two presidencies, he said that he would do so without the consent of state governors if he returned to power. The order is a significant step in that direction, but for now it stops short of invoking the most expansive power Mr. Trump could claim a right to use. It remains unclear how matters will play out on the ground — and, potentially, in court. Here is a closer look at the legal and policy issues. What did Trump's order do? Mr. Trump called up National Guard troops to be put under federal control. He authorized Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to use troops to protect immigration enforcement agents, buildings and functions from interference by protesters. As justification, the White House cited recent protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles. The order called for at least 2,000 National Guard troops to be deployed for at least 60 days. Mr. Trump also authorized Mr. Hegseth to use regular federal troops 'as necessary' to augment the work of the federalized National Guard units. The National Guard consists of state-based military forces, largely part-time troops who have separate, full-time civilian jobs. Normally, each state's governor controls its guard and can direct it to deal with a disaster or civil disorder. But under certain circumstances, federal law allows the president to take control of a state's guard. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sound Off: July 8, 2025
Sun Herald readers weigh in on local and national topics. Now that Elon Musk and President Trump have divorced, who gets custody of the country? Will they split custody of Sec. Hegseth, or will he go back to living with his friends at FOX News? Our government needs to be run by the people, not a concentrated group of billionaires whose petty arguments, such as between President Trump and Elon Musk, affect our national objectives, like the space station or our international communications. Their childish behavior is putting personal interests before those of our country. What else can you make of Elon's comment, 'Go ahead, make my day,' in response to Trump's disparaging remarks? Guess all the MAGAs who were frothing at the mouth about the Epstein List will quiet down now that Rocket Boy has pointed the finger at President Taco. Before President Trump, Elon Musk was a guy getting government handouts, blowing up rockets and running Twitter into the ground. Sad that he would turn on our president like that. Guess we found out who is really concerned about the country. The second Elon Musk's wealth was remotely at risk, he turned on the president. It's President Trump who is concerned about our country, not Elon Musk. Since it doesn't have anything to do with tariffs, can we be confident that President Trump is going to hold his $25-million (at least) parade? Or is he going to chicken out on that, too? Democrats circle the wagons, remain silent and loyal, even when ghosting the nation over a decrepit, declining President Biden for four years. Republicans will degenerate into nitpicking and infighting over important legislation, personalities, egos and side issues, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. They've done so over decades. It's stupid, wearisome and self-defeating. For the Mississippi GOP delegation of lawmakers on the Hill, please demand of your GOP colleagues and the White House a cease and desist before you ignorantly lose the remit voters gave you last fall. If you squander these four years, you'll be forever getting a similar chance again. I favor lower taxes for all, and not just those in certain jobs that receive a portion of their wage base in tips.. Because the welder and the plumber and the fireman's wages are not tips, we tax all their wages. Some GOP Representatives have admitted that they hadn't read all the contents in the budget bill they just passed. They just signed it because the House Speaker and President Trump told them to. Now they are using ignorance as an excuse for supporting specific measures that hurt their constituents. Sadly, it's apparently too much to ask of our lawmakers to actually read the bills they vote on. You or I would be fired for not doing our work. Our children would receive failing grades for such effort. But let's keep electing them. Hugh Keating's first thoughts and words after ostensibly winning Tuesday night were, 'this energized the conservatives point of view.' In a red city, in a red county, in a red state, Gulfport had less than 25% of registered voters vote. But the roughly 13K votes were statistically split between the 2 parties. So, let the notion of a mandate quickly fade. Good luck to Keating, but he has been part of the problems Gulfport has, and has not fixed, for at least the last decade and a half. And his campaign's caustic rhetoric, ads, mailings and homer-mouthpieces did nothing whatsoever to show anything will change. Still, Let's hope good ol' boy Gulfport politics die a much-needed death. Guess the next Gulfport candidate will have to offer something more than a free lunch. Send your Sound Offs to soundoff@
