Sunrise host Nat Barr confronts Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadegh over top secret report US bombing failed to destroy nuclear program
Sunrise host Nat Barr has confronted Iranian Ambassador to Australia Ahmad Sadeghi over the damage to the country's nuclear facilities bombed by the United States last weekend.
US President Donald Trump announced the US bombed three major facilities in Iran on Saturday, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Trump claimed the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Tehran's nuclear sites.
However, CNN leaked a report overnight of an intelligence assessment stating US strikes did not destroy the country's nuclear program. Instead, it only set it back by months.
White House press secretary Karoline Levitt said the report was just a 'clear attempt to demean Trump'.
Barr confronted Sadeghi on Wednesday, asking about the extent of the damage.
'I do not have any exact technical assessment and estimate (on what was destroyed),' Sadeghi said.
'That is something that the technical teams, with regard to Iran, and IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) maybe, later on, have to find out about it, the dimension of the damage.
'Iran does have the right to peaceful nuclear usage.'
The IAEA governs the global proliferation of nuclear resources and technology and conducts inspections to ensure compliance.
Sadeghi called the US bombing an 'illegal action' and Iran's retaliation a defensive action.
Asked if Iran still has a working nuclear program, Sadeghi said: 'We have the right to use a peaceful nuclear program, including enrichment for peaceful uses.'
However, he said Iran is open to negotiations.
'(Iran has) been for a long time in co-operation with IAEA and in negotiation with the different international bodies ... and (we) just recently had five rounds of negotiations with the US Government,' he said.
'Therefore, we are ready to negotiate with them, but we keep our right for peaceful use of energy.'
Israel and Iran 'don't know what they are doing'
Earlier Trump had said of the Israel-Iran conflict: 'You know what? We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the (bleep) they're doing. Do you understand that?'
Sadeghi claimed the Israeli strikes were 'unprovoked'.
'Just reminding once more, it was started from an unprovoked attack by the Israeli regime against Iran that killed many innocents and 500 people martyred and also about 3,000 people injured and hospitalised,' he said.
'We just took defensive measure based on our right upon the Charter of United Nations and hard defensive actions and operations ... Iran has not attacked within 1400 years of the recent history to any neighbours.
'But Israelis have attacked, you know, about 10 major wars against the neighbourhood and many other countries.
'Therefore, as soon as we got the agreement about the ceasefire, we observed it.
'I believe that Mr Trump's reference was mainly to the Israeli side.'
Where is Iran's Supreme Leader?
Sadeghi was asked about the whereabouts of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
'(It) depends on the exigencies, and periodically the Ayatollah (will) address the people of Iran,' Sadeghi said.
'He's not in hiding. He just takes the proper measures, that is ordinary in war time that the enemy just imposed on us.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
11 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Antoinette Lattouf has won $70,000, but her case has cost the ABC so much more
At the heart of the issue was whether Lattouf was sacked at all (yes, according to the FWC and Rangiah), whether she was sacked for holding and/or expressing political views (yes, says Rangiah), and whether her race (Lebanese Christian) played a part (no, Rangiah found). The ABC did itself no favours in attempting to argue that racism could not have been a factor in its treatment of Lattouf because she had failed to prove the very existence of a Middle-Eastern or Arab race. It later withdrew that argument after a fierce public backlash. Complaints about Lattouf, who has been an outspoken critic of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, began flooding into the ABC immediately after she finished her first shift, though nothing she had said on air was deemed controversial. It soon became clear, Rangiah wrote, 'that the complaints were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists'. But Buttrose insisted on sharing them with Anderson and Oliver-Taylor nonetheless. Three days into her five-day hosting stint, management became aware of a post shared on Instagram by Lattouf they believed constituted a breach of the ABC's social media policy. Rangiah found in his 177-page judgment that following this discovery, 'the consternation of senior managers of the ABC turned into what can be described as a state of panic'. Within the hour, Rangiah said, 'a decision was made that Ms Lattouf would be taken off air. The policies she was alleged to have breached were not identified, nor was she given any opportunity to defend herself against the allegations.' Loading The judge found pressure from pro-Israeli activists and an imminent story in The Australia n stoked that sense of panic. He also found Anderson had misconstrued a 'sarcastic' social media post as expressing support for a Hamas campaign of 'ethnic cleansing' (it did not). 'While Mr Anderson was mistaken in his interpretation of the post, it does demonstrate that he attributed to Ms Lattouf hateful anti-Semitic opinions,' Rangiah wrote. The decision to terminate Lattouf's engagement at the ABC was made by Oliver-Taylor alone, though in response to concerns shared at the top of the organisation. 'I find that Mr Oliver-Taylor's reasons for his decision included his desire to mitigate further complaints about the ABC employing someone attributed with holding a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza,' said Rangiah. Holding or expressing a political opinion is not, Rangiah found, a valid reason for terminating someone's employment, even at the national broadcaster. Rangiah found 'protection for employees … against termination of employment for reasons including 'political opinion' encompasses not only the holding of a political opinion but also the expression of a political opinion'. The ramifications of all this for the ABC and other media organisations are potentially profound. Loading In his statement to staff following Wednesday's ruling, Marks stressed 'the fundamental obligations the ABC and its employees have to be independent and impartial in our work to ensure we continue to earn the trust of all Australians. Those obligations don't change as a result of this decision.' But he also acknowledged that there was confusion about the organisation's guidelines around use of social media and promised 'we will talk more about this in coming weeks'. It has arguably never been more important that Australians should be able to trust in the national broadcaster to report fairly and accurately without caving to external pressure.
The Age
14 minutes ago
- The Age
Antoinette Lattouf has won $70,000, but her case has cost the ABC so much more
At the heart of the issue was whether Lattouf was sacked at all (yes, according to the FWC and Rangiah), whether she was sacked for holding and/or expressing political views (yes, says Rangiah), and whether her race (Lebanese Christian) played a part (no, Rangiah found). The ABC did itself no favours in attempting to argue that racism could not have been a factor in its treatment of Lattouf because she had failed to prove the very existence of a Middle-Eastern or Arab race. It later withdrew that argument after a fierce public backlash. Complaints about Lattouf, who has been an outspoken critic of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, began flooding into the ABC immediately after she finished her first shift, though nothing she had said on air was deemed controversial. It soon became clear, Rangiah wrote, 'that the complaints were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists'. But Buttrose insisted on sharing them with Anderson and Oliver-Taylor nonetheless. Three days into her five-day hosting stint, management became aware of a post shared on Instagram by Lattouf they believed constituted a breach of the ABC's social media policy. Rangiah found in his 177-page judgment that following this discovery, 'the consternation of senior managers of the ABC turned into what can be described as a state of panic'. Within the hour, Rangiah said, 'a decision was made that Ms Lattouf would be taken off air. The policies she was alleged to have breached were not identified, nor was she given any opportunity to defend herself against the allegations.' Loading The judge found pressure from pro-Israeli activists and an imminent story in The Australia n stoked that sense of panic. He also found Anderson had misconstrued a 'sarcastic' social media post as expressing support for a Hamas campaign of 'ethnic cleansing' (it did not). 'While Mr Anderson was mistaken in his interpretation of the post, it does demonstrate that he attributed to Ms Lattouf hateful anti-Semitic opinions,' Rangiah wrote. The decision to terminate Lattouf's engagement at the ABC was made by Oliver-Taylor alone, though in response to concerns shared at the top of the organisation. 'I find that Mr Oliver-Taylor's reasons for his decision included his desire to mitigate further complaints about the ABC employing someone attributed with holding a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza,' said Rangiah. Holding or expressing a political opinion is not, Rangiah found, a valid reason for terminating someone's employment, even at the national broadcaster. Rangiah found 'protection for employees … against termination of employment for reasons including 'political opinion' encompasses not only the holding of a political opinion but also the expression of a political opinion'. The ramifications of all this for the ABC and other media organisations are potentially profound. Loading In his statement to staff following Wednesday's ruling, Marks stressed 'the fundamental obligations the ABC and its employees have to be independent and impartial in our work to ensure we continue to earn the trust of all Australians. Those obligations don't change as a result of this decision.' But he also acknowledged that there was confusion about the organisation's guidelines around use of social media and promised 'we will talk more about this in coming weeks'. It has arguably never been more important that Australians should be able to trust in the national broadcaster to report fairly and accurately without caving to external pressure.
9 News
15 minutes ago
- 9 News
'I need help with you': Trump's blunt message to Putin
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Donald Trump says he rejected Vladimir Putin's offer to help with the Iran-Israel conflict, retorting that he instead needed help dealing with the Russian president's own actions. The US president told reporters Putin phoned him ahead of the temporary ceasefire deal between the warring nations and asked if he needed any assistance. "I said, 'No, I don't need help with Iran, I need help with you'," Trump said before boarding Air Force One to head to the NATO summit in the Netherlands. Donald Trump says Vladimir Putin phoned him offering to help deal with the Iran-Israel conflict. (Getty) "I hope we are going to be getting a deal done with Russia". It's unclear if Putin's call came before or after the US strike on three nuclear facilities in Iran. Leaders are expected to discuss continued support for Ukraine amid Russian aggression during the NATO summit this year, the first meeting of which Trump will join since beginning his second term in January. Ukrainan President Volodymyr Zelensky is set to meet Trump during the NATO summit. (NurPhoto via Getty Images) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is set to meet Trump during the two-day summit in The Hague. Trump says he hopes to strike a deal with Russia to end its invasion of Iran. (NurPhoto via Getty Images) At least 17 people were killed and more than 100 were injured in Russia's latest air strikes on south-east Ukraine on Tuesday. The attack took place as Zelenskyy arrived in the Netherlands for the NATO meeting. CONTACT US
