logo
Lesser-Known Provisions of the House-Passed ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Lesser-Known Provisions of the House-Passed ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Epoch Times27-05-2025

Following its passage by the House in the early morning hours of May 22, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—the vehicle to fund and implement President Donald Trump's agenda—is now in the process of being evaluated by the Senate.
Its
Aside from these well-known components of the legislation, several lesser-known—but impactful—provisions were also slipped into the bill, which leaves few areas of government and the federal budget untouched.
Here's what to know about those.
Artificial Intelligence
The bill would begin to integrate artificial intelligence into various sectors of the federal government, while restricting states' ability to regulate the novel technology for a 10-year period.
The text of the bill reads, 'no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.'
Despite several hearings on the topic over the past several years, Congress has until now made little legislative progress on the growing issue.
Related Stories
5/23/2025
5/20/2025
This provision could be unpopular with tech industry chiefs—who have in the past warned of the need for regulation, expressing fears that the technology could escape human control—as well as senators who have investigated the issue.
Additionally, the bill delegates hundreds of millions of dollars to use AI in government functions like examining Medicare payments, naval shipbuilding, and audits of the Department of Defense.
Courts Barred From Enforcing Contempt
Amid the administration's ongoing disputes with the judiciary—particularly over issues related to Trump's mass deportation operation—the bill would limit federal courts' ability to hold members of the administration in contempt.
Specifically, the bill would require plaintiffs to provide a bond before a judge could enforce contempt orders. Under current federal court procedures, this fee can be waived depending on the nature of the case.
This requirement would be imposed retroactively upon enactment of the bill, and could limit the judiciary's options to respond to administration's failures to comply with a court order.
HSAs Boosted
The legislation would enhance Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), federal accounts that allow taxpayers to save tax-free money for eligible medical services, by making gym memberships eligible for the program.
It would allow beneficiaries to withdraw $500 a year to pay for such expenses, or $1,000 for married couples, albeit with a laundry list of rules about what types of physical activity qualify.
For example, eligible facilities cannot be 'a private club owned and operated by its members,' and cannot offer 'golf, hunting, sailing, or riding facilities.' Other materials, such as videos and books related to personal fitness, are not eligible for HSA account funds under the bill.
Certain taxpayers will also be eligible for an increased contribution limit of $4,300 for single taxpayers and $8,550 for married couples, depending on income.
Estate Taxes
The bill would also extend the 2017 estate tax cuts, allowing single-owned estates to pass on up to $15 million tax-free, and allowing couple-owned estates to pass on up to $30 million tax-free.
It's a change that could result in less than 0.1 percent of estates being subject to federal estate tax, by some estimates.
The think tank wrote that with the extension of this exemption, 'one can expect the share of estates subject to the tax to remain close to … 2019 [levels], when only 0.08 percent of estates were taxed.
Free Tax Filing Tool Repealed
The legislation repeals a program that allows taxpayers to file directly, dubbed 'Direct File,' instituted by President Joe Biden's administration.
As part of a push to end the dominance of services like TurboTax and H&R Block—which tend to charge most taxpayers money for specialized services—the Biden administration created 'Direct File.' It sought to save taxpayers money by allowing them to access the same services usually offered for a fee by tax prep companies, and is currently available in 25 states.
The bill would repeal this program entirely, requiring that it be terminated within 30 days of the bill's passage.
It leaves open the possibility of a new, similar service pending a report by the Treasury secretary on the feasibility of such a program and taxpayer sentiments. The legislation suggests that up to 70 percent of taxpayers would be eligible to use the new program at no cost.
'Trump Accounts'
The bill also adds a pilot program for 'Trump Accounts,' a type of federal trust account that would offer parents a $1,000 bonus per child they sign up for the program.
It would allow taxpayers to contribute up to $5,000 a year to the accounts, which would be allowed to grow tax-free until the beneficiary withdraws the money at 18 years or older.
The withdrawal would then be subject to either capital gains or income tax rates, depending on the nature of the expense.
Expenses like tuition, a first home purchase, or small business expenses would be subject to the lower capital gains tax rate; all other uses of the funds would be subject to normal income tax rates, including an additional 10 percent penalty for unqualified expenses.
Tobacco Industry Perks Repealed
Another component of the legislation would strip a tax write-off that some U.S. tobacco companies rely on.
Under current law, tobacco companies pay an excise tax when they manufacture or import tobacco into the United States. But a loophole in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 has historically allowed them to recoup much of this excise tax through a process known as substitution drawback.
The legislation would repeal this refund, meaning that many tobacco companies could face a higher excise tax burden on their domestic sales than they have in decades.
Revocable Tax Exemptions for 'Terrorist-Supporting' Nonprofits
The legislation would enable the administration to revoke the tax-exempt status of nonprofit organizations deemed by the administration as 'terrorist-supporting organizations.'
An amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, §501(p)—passed as part of the PATRIOT Act—sought to crack down on nonprofits that funneled money to, or otherwise materially aided and abetted, terrorist groups.
The legislation would give organizations deemed to be 'terrorist-supporting' 90 days to amend the situation or face revocation of their tax-exempt status.
This provision is seemingly targeted at nonprofits deemed as supportive of Palestinian terrorist groups, such as Hamas, as part of the administration's efforts to combat anti-Semitism in the wake of Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel. However, no explicit criteria beyond those laid out in the original 1986 legislation are provided.
Ending Excise Tax on Firearm Silencers
The legislation also includes a provision to remove the requirement to pay a tax on silencer attachments under the National Firearms Act of 1934.
Currently, such attachments—designed to reduce the sound a firearm makes when fired—are subject to a $20 excise tax. The Republican bill would eliminate that fee altogether.
The move was immediately celebrated by gun rights groups, who portrayed it as a victory for the Second Amendment. Proponents say these attachments can also reduce hearing damage from firearm sounds, while opponents say that such attachments primarily serve to hide evidence of crimes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump orders investigation into Biden's ‘autopen' pardons
Trump orders investigation into Biden's ‘autopen' pardons

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump orders investigation into Biden's ‘autopen' pardons

Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into the pardons granted by Joe Biden to family members and death-row inmates which were signed by 'autopen' in the final hours of his presidency. On Monday, a senior official in the justice department told staff that he was investigating pardons granted by the former president, and whether Mr Biden was 'competent' at the time. In an email to staff, obtained by Reuters, Ed Martin, a controversial Trump loyalist, said his investigation would look at whether Mr Biden 'was competent and whether others were taking advantage of him through use of autopen or other means.' An autopen is a device used to add a signature to a document. Unlike the common e-signature, the autopen is a robot-writing instrument that learns how to mimic and repeat the pen strokes of any individual. They are used routinely by the White House, but Mr Trump and his supporters have spread theories that it was being used by his predecessor as he became less able to conduct the duties of president. The president's allies in Congress have also launched an investigation into its use. In the email, Mr Martin indicated that his investigation will be focused on preemptive pardons issued to several members of the Biden family, and clemency that spared 37 federal inmates from the death penalty, allowing them to serve out their sentences in prison. Mr Biden left office on Jan 20. In the run-up he said he wanted to spare his relatives from politically motivated investigations. Most controversially, he pardoned his son Hunter, who last year pleaded guilty to tax fraud and was convicted of a firearms offence. He also pardoned three siblings – James, Frank, and Valerie – as well as their spouses. A justice department spokesman declined to comment on the investigation other than to say that the email was intended for staff only. Mr Martin, who was recently appointed to several top roles in the department, including pardon attorney, previously worked as interim US attorney for Washington, DC. He was originally nominated to take on that role permanently but his nomination was withdrawn after it became clear that senators were unlikely to confirm him to the role. Even some Republicans baulked at his work defending Jan 6 rioters. A source told The Telegraph that Mr Martin has a broad remit to tackle what Mr Trump believes was the 'politicisation' of the justice department under his predecessor, and to look back at claims of electoral fraud in 2020. He said the election results looked 'weird' during a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host. 'There was the admission that the election was fortified. It was intentionally planned to do that in such a way to get results that looked off,' Martin said. 'Now, does that mean they cheated? We don't have that smoking gun, but we certainly have over and over and over again aspects of things that didn't look right, and we've never had the answers on it. 'So yes, we will get to the bottom of it again.' US presidents have broad power to issue pardons in the case of federal convictions. Mr Trump has also used the power. On his first day in power, he granted clemency to most of his 1,600 supporters facing criminal charges over the attack on Congress in 2021. Mr Martin last month said presidents had power over pardons. 'If you use the autopen for pardon power, I don't think that that's necessarily a problem,' Martin said during a press conference. But he added that Mr Biden's pardons still demanded scrutiny. The email is the latest twist in efforts by Republicans to ask questions about Mr Biden's health in office and to explore whether they can use them to overturn his decisions. Mr Biden, 82, ended his re-election campaign suddenly in July last year after a shambolic debate performance. Last month, he revealed he had been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. His former aides have long dismissed allegations that he was ever unable to perform the role of president during his four years in office. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Romanian man pleads guilty to ‘swatting' plot that targeted Marjorie Taylor Green, other Georgia lawmakers
Romanian man pleads guilty to ‘swatting' plot that targeted Marjorie Taylor Green, other Georgia lawmakers

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Romanian man pleads guilty to ‘swatting' plot that targeted Marjorie Taylor Green, other Georgia lawmakers

The Brief A Romanian man has pleaded guilty to engaging in a plot to use "swatting" calls and bomb threats to target national and Georgia lawmakers. Prosecutors say the group, which was led by Thomasz Szabo, deliberately targeted both sides of the political aisle to cause chaos. Georgia state Sen. Clint Dixon was one of the group's victims and described to FOX 5 the experience of being swatted during Christmas in 2023. WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Romanian man has pleaded guilty to engaging in a plot to use "swatting" calls and bomb threats to intimidate and threaten dozens of people with bogus police emergencies, including several Georgia political leaders. Investigators say Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, and Georgia state Sen. Clint Dixonwere also among those targeted by Thomasz Szabo. What we know In August 2024, federal authorities say they arrested Szabo and Nemanja Radovanovic of Serbia, accusing the pair of organizing swatting calls and plotting bomb threats dating as far back as December 2020. Szabo, also known as "Plank," "Jonah," and "Cypher," pleaded guilty before a U.S. District Court judge on Monday to one count of conspiracy and one count of threats and false information regarding explosives. Prosecutors say the Romanian man was the leader of the group and targeted at least 25 members of Congress and their family members, multiple current or former senior members of the executive branch, members of the federal judiciary, religious leaders, and an unnamed former U.S. president. Szabo told Radovanovic that they should pick targets from both the Republican and Democratic parties because "we are not on any side," the indictment says. Two threats federal prosecutors highlighted were a December 2020 threat to commit mass shootings at New York City synagogues and a January 2021 threat to detonate explosives at the U.S. Capitol. During that time period, one of Szasbo's subordinates reportedly bragged him: "I did 25+ swattings today," and "creating massive havoc in [A]merica. $500,000+ in taxpayers wasted in just two days." Local perspective Sen. Clint Dixon told FOX 5 after the arrest that he and his family were the victims of a swatting call at Christmas in 2023. "My wife was actually upstairs packing. We were leaving for a trip the next day. I was watching football. She started screaming that police were coming up our steps on our front porch. She saw it on the Ring doorbell," he recalled. The SWAT officers were responding to a 911 call from someone reporting a dangerous domestic dispute at Dixon's address. "Met by, I think it was, SWAT team members who alerted me that there had been a call of a domestic dispute that a male had shot a female," he said. "They asked where my wife was and by that time, she comes running down the stairs, and they realized it was a hoax." What they're saying "This defendant led a dangerous swatting criminal conspiracy, deliberately threatening dozens of government officials with violent hoaxes and targeting our nation's security infrastructure from behind a screen overseas," said Attorney General Bondi. "This case reflects our continued focus on protecting the American people and working with international partners to stop these threats at their source." "This plea agreement is a testament to the extraordinary investigative work, tenacity, and global reach of the U.S. Secret Service and our partners," said Special Agent in Charge McCool. "This perpetrator hid behind a computer screen on the other side of the world believing he could commit these crimes with impunity. It was a gross miscalculation to underestimate our determination in pursuing and bringing to justice those who would commit these crimes, wherever they may be." "Swatting is not just a prank, it is a serious violation of the law," said Assistant Director in Charge Jensen of the Washington Field Office. "Today's guilty plea makes clear those engaged these actions will face justice." What's next Charges against Radovanovic are still pending. Online court records indicate that he hasn't made any court appearances in Washington yet. Szabo is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 23 by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington, D.C. The Source Information for this report came from a release by the U.S. Justice Department and previous FOX 5 interviews with Sen. Clint Dixon. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Youngkin sets Sept. 9 special election to fill Connolly's seat in Congress
Youngkin sets Sept. 9 special election to fill Connolly's seat in Congress

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Youngkin sets Sept. 9 special election to fill Connolly's seat in Congress

U.S. Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Fairfax, died last month from a resurgence of cancer. At least four Democrats have signaled their interest in filling the vacancy. (Photo by Robin Bravender/States Newsroom) Gov. Glenn Youngkin on Tuesday set a special election for Sept. 9, 2025, to fill the congressional seat left vacant by the death of Rep. Gerry Connolly, a longtime Democratic fixture in Northern Virginia who passed away May 21 after a recurrence of cancer. The writ of election, issued by Youngkin's office, triggers a high-stakes contest in Virginia's 11th Congressional District, a region that leans solidly Democratic and is home to a large population of federal workers. Candidates hoping to compete must file by July 11, with eligibility details available on the Department of Elections website. Connolly, 75, died just weeks after announcing he would not seek reelection. First elected to Congress in 2008 after a decade on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, including five years as chair, Connolly became known as a detail-oriented legislator with a focus on government oversight and civil service protections. Before his time in local government, he worked on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and held positions in the private sector with firms like SRI International and SAIC. His death set off a cascade of questions about how and when the seat would be filled. Virginia law requires the governor to call a special election to replace a congressional representative, but offers flexibility on timing. Elections must be held on a Tuesday and cannot occur within 55 days of a regularly scheduled general or primary election — a restriction that ruled out much of the summer due to Virginia's June 17 congressional primaries. Manisha Singh, chair of the 11th District Democratic Committee, told The Mercury last week her group has been preparing for this moment while awaiting Youngkin's decision. She described the task ahead as urgent but clear — to ensure a transparent and accessible nomination process. 'Our voters will have plenty of opportunity to have their voice heard,' Singh said. She added that the local party's role is not to favor any one candidate, but to oversee a fair election process. Democratic Party of Virginia Chair Sen. Lamont Bagby, D-Henrico, said last week that the party intentionally held off on finalizing its plans out of respect for the governor's timeline. With the election date now set, he said, urgency will be key. 'I want to see a nomination process that gives voters time and space to be heard,' Bagby said. Democrats are expected to hold a 'firehouse primary' in mid-July to select their nominee. The Fairfax County Democratic Committee has already begun lining up polling locations, with plans to offer at least one site in each magisterial district. Several candidates have already stepped forward or signaled interest in the Democratic nomination. Braddock District Supervisor James Walkinshaw, who once served as Connolly's chief of staff and had already received the late congressman's endorsement, is widely seen as a frontrunner. Also weighing bids are state Sen. Stella Pekarsky, D-Fairfax; Fairfax Planning Commissioner Candice Bennett; and attorney Amy Roma, a Vienna resident who specializes in global energy policy. Singh acknowledged the difficulty of replacing a lawmaker as experienced and deeply rooted in the community as Connolly. 'It is a humongous void that we are feeling right now, and it's some really big shoes to fill,' she said. Still, she voiced confidence in the emerging field of candidates. 'We have some excellent candidates who I am very sure are up to the challenge.' On the Republican side, Mike Van Meter, a former law enforcement officer who lost to Connolly in 2024 by a 67-33% margin, has announced plans to run again. So far, no other Republican contenders have entered the race. Connolly's legacy looms large over the upcoming contest. In his final message to constituents, delivered just weeks before his death, he reflected on his 30 years in public service and expressed gratitude for the opportunity to serve: 'My extended family — you all have been a joy to serve.' The full writ of election is available on the Virginia Department of Elections website. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store