Looking for a Brand To Call Its Own
These days, a lot of Democrats are feeling like Will Rogers, who said on the eve of the Great Depression, "I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat."
Today, the Democratic Party faces an identity crisis that is eroding its national appeal. Recent polls show that less than 30% of Americans, including lifelong Democrats, struggle to define what the party stands for. While there have been some recent victories in Wisconsin and closer margins in Florida congressional races than two years ago, it would be a mistake to assume that the party is on the brink of some sort of miraculous comeback.
This time of record-low popularity presents an opportunity for constructive reinvention. Democratic politicians across the country should seize this moment to develop a brand identity that resonates with the day-to-day struggles of most Americans.
Its time for the Democrats to move away from largely defining themselves in opposition to Donald Trump and Elon Musk. As Saul Alinsky once wrote, "Thepriceofa successful attack isaconstructivealternative."
The Democratic Party needs to offer voters a clearly articulated alternative vision that fosters a coherent and compelling brand - a vision that addresses basic American needs and values, and looks to the future:
Economic Opportunity - Every American should have the opportunity to get a good job by having access to education and training, regardless of their economic circumstances. This includes vocational training and community college, as well as traditional four-year and advanced educational programs.
Economic Fairness and Security - Cutting taxes for low and middle-income earners so they can afford increased grocery prices and housing costs. Raising taxes on people making more than $1 million annually in net income to generate net savings to cut the deficit and national debt. Reducing red tape to facilitate building affordable homes and help provide affordable mortgages. Access to Medicare for all who want it, while continuing to protect Social Security and Medicaid.
Freedom of Choice - Including reproductive choice and lifestyle choice.
Freedom From Fear - Funding law enforcement, including local and state police and national law enforcement agencies. Enacting the Democrat-Republican Bipartisan Border Security Bill.
Freedom To Enjoy Clean Air and Water- In addition to focusing on the changing climate, Democrats should expand the conversation to include curbing pollution, which will give young Americans a brighter, healthier future.
Respecting the Rule of Law - Guarantee enforcement of the law, regardless of the political whims of any administration.
The core message should be narrowed down to one or two concise phrases or slogans. Then make sure every spokesperson, particularly governors and members of Congress, uses those phrases seamlessly. If every instrument in a symphony orchestra is playing from a different song sheet, listeners only hear a cacophony. Repeat the message over and over. Message consistency has its greatest impact in memorable slogans. (See "Make America Great Again").
In defining its brand identity, Democrats must label their initiatives carefully. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was the master at creating positive context for initiatives designed to address major national problems. For example, FDR labeled his jobs program "The Work Progress Administration," which stressed putting people back to work. He did not call it "The Unemployment Progress Administration," which would have reminded everyone of the nations unemployment. In contrast, Democrats labeled their 2022 legislative centerpiece the "Inflation Reduction Act," which only served to remind voters every day about inflation.
Importantly, in this rebranding process, Democrats will need to be open to reinventing government to ensure that it is fit for its purpose in the modern era. Former Colorado Sen. Gary Hart once said in regard to U.S. military spending, "We must stop debating whether more or less defense spending is better. Better is better." The size of government is less important than the effective delivery of services to Americans.
Democrats wont get a chance to achieve these goals unless they can figure out how to win more elections. All the talk of engaging in more digital communications, less broadcast TV, greater streaming, or greater door-to-door voter contact is less important than establishing a compelling brand with simple, effective messaging; in business terms, it is better to have a good product than a large sales force or advertising budget.
In the end, success will depend at least in part on appealing to voters by fitting the message into the context of diverse American cultures, rather than demanding that voters accept the culture of Democratic Party politicians and campaign consultants. Musicians ranging from heavy metal to country, along with podcast hosts, other cultural icons, and state and local politicians with large followings, can help build cultural bridges and validate commonsense Democratic ideas.
Even with an effective message, Democrats will still need a long-term strategy to rebuild the party up and down the ballot and in every state. Without such a plan, and a commitment of sufficient resources to implement it year in and year out, Democrats risk losing control of the U.S. Senate for a generation, thus preventing the enactment of progressive legislation and ensuring conservatives dominate the Supreme Court for the foreseeable future.
Ultimately, America needs a strong Democratic Party capable of solving the many economic, social, security, and environmental challenges facing the country. The first step in this process is devising a compelling vision - one that will enable Democrats to win more governorships and state legislative seats, while restoring Democrats to the White House and to majority control of Congress.
Rick Ridder is a former presidential campaign manager and senior consultant for five other Democratic presidential campaigns. He is the president and co-founder of RBI Strategies & Research.
&
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices ease but hover near two-month highs as Middle East tensions escalate
Oil prices fell on Thursday morning, easing back after rallying but hovered around their highest point in two months, as investors eyed escalating tensions in the Middle East and a potential disruption to supply. Brent crude futures (BZ=F) fell 0.9% to $68.31 a barrel, at the time of writing, while West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) declined 0.9% at $67.56 a barrel. US president Donald Trump said on Wednesday that some of US personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because "it could be a dangerous place to be". This came following reports earlier in the day that the US was preparing a partial evacuation of its embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. CBS News reported that US officials had been told Israel was ready to launch an operation into Iran and that the US anticipated Iran could retaliate on certain American sites in Iraq. Read more: FTSE 100 LIVE: Stocks slump as UK GDP contracts in blow to Rachel Reeves Trump said in an interview with the New York Post, released earlier on Wednesday, that he was "less confident" about getting Iran to agree to halt its nuclear programme. In a press briefing on Wednesday, Iran's defence minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said: "Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition. If a conflict is imposed on us ... all US bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them in host countries." Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said that oil prices remain near a two-month high "driven by rising US-Iran tensions and fears of supply disruptions. At the same time, optimism about energy demand grew after the US and China reached a trade framework, and US crude stockpiles fell more than expected, signalling strong consumption." Gold prices jumped on Thursday morning, as Middle East tensions buoyed demand for the safe-haven asset. Gold futures (GC=F) surged nearly 1% to $3,376 per ounce at the time of writing, while the spot gold price advanced 0.1% to $3,359.49 per ounce. The precious metal is considered to be a safe haven asset, in acting as a hedge amid political and economic uncertainty. Britzman said: "Gold was another winner, with its safe-haven appeal gaining traction amid rising Middle East tensions and softer US inflation data, which gave a modest boost to expectations for rate cuts." Read more: UK economy shrinks by 0.3% in April Data released on Wednesday showed that the US consumer prices index (CPI) rose by 0.1% month-on-month, which was below April's 0.2% rise and lower than economists' estimates of a 0.2% monthly gain in prices. On an annual basis, CPI rose 2.4% in May, a slight uptick from April's 2.3% gain, which marked the lowest yearly increase since February 2021. Investors were also monitoring the latest trade developments, after Trump said in a social media post on Wednesday afternoon that Washington's deal with China is "DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME". The pound rose slightly against the dollar (GBPUSD=X) on Thursday morning, up 0.2% to $1,3571, despite a bigger than expected contraction in UK economic growth. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said that the UK's gross domestic product (GDP) — the standard measure of an economy's value — shrank by 0.3% in April, which was more than the 0.1% contraction expected by economists. The fall followed growth of 0.2% in March and a 0.7% rise in GDP in the first quarter. This latest economic data comes a day after chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered the UK spending review, sharing details of governmental department budgets for the next few years. Key announcements included a £29bn per year increase in funding for the NHS, while the government's defence budget is set to increase from 2.3% to 2.6% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) from 2027. Reeves also shared details of a £39bn boost to funding for affordable housing and £15.6bn for transport projects in England's largest city regions outside of London. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, said: "It's hard not to look at today's headline fall in economic growth as anything other than inevitable. Company after company had warned the chancellor that the decisions taken during last year's budget would impact business growth and create huge uncertainty about existing staffing levels." "Rachel Reeves has said she is determined to deliver growth, and her spending plans have been given a cautious welcome by business groups up and down the country — but the caution speaks volumes," she said. "Can the government's trade policies and spending plans deliver the promised growth or was the energy demonstrated by the UK economy at the start of the year merely a tease?" In other currency moves, the pound fell 0.4% against the euro (GBPEUR=X), trading at €1.1743 at the time of writing. More broadly, the the FTSE 100 (^FTSE) was little changed, trading at 8,863 points at the time writing. For more details, on broader market movements check our live coverage here. Read more: Bitcoin price dips as markets cool after US-China tariff talks What you need to know about UK's private stock market Pisces UK house prices remain flat as buyer demand and sales steadyError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crude Oil: Uptrend May Extend on Cautious Trade Deal Optimism, Supply Risks
Oil prices rose 5% on hopes of a US-China trade deal boosting demand. Tensions with Iran and weak nuclear talks raise the risk of regional conflict and price spikes. OPEC+ supply shortfalls and falling US inventories point to a possible crude shortage. Looking for actionable trade ideas to navigate the current market volatility? Subscribe here to unlock access to InvestingPro's AI-selected stock winners. Oil prices jumped by as much as 5% yesterday, bringing WTI crude close to $70 per barrel. The main reason for the rise is positive news about a possible trade deal between China and the US, though no final agreement has been reached yet. At the same time, talks with Iran over its nuclear program have not made much progress. If the negotiations fail completely, there is a risk of military conflict, which often pushes oil prices higher. Adding to the upward pressure, US oil inventories fell more than expected for the third month in a row. Looking at the different parts of the ongoing tariff war, the situation with China seems to have the biggest impact on financial markets, including oil. The latest statement says that the deal is almost complete, but both Donald Trump and Xi Jinping still need to sign it. Given how quickly things can change, nothing is certain yet. Still, the market is already hoping for a return to normal trade, especially for semiconductors and rare earth metals, which appear to be the key negotiating points for both countries. A revival in trade and a stable long-term deal would help GDP growth, which would also increase demand for oil. Yesterday's decision to withdraw some staff from the US embassy in Baghdad is a bad sign for the US-Iran talks on stopping Iran's nuclear program in exchange for easing Western sanctions. People involved in the talks say that Iran is demanding more, and although negotiations are still ongoing, the chances of a deal look slim. In the worst case, the US could launch strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. If that happens, Iran may retaliate, and the conflict could spread across the region, pushing oil prices much higher. Last month, OPEC+ announced a production increase of 310,000 barrels per day but managed to raise output by only 180,000 barrels. Key producers, led by Saudi Arabia, were unable to boost production as planned. Combined with falling US oil inventories, this points to a possible, at least short-term, shortage of crude on the global market, especially if trade activity and GDP growth in the US pick up. WTI crude oil has broken through the resistance level around $65 per barrel, opening the way for further gains. The next target for buyers is the supply zone near $72 per barrel, which is where a strong downward move started in early April. Any possible pullbacks are likely to face support near the intersection of the rising trend line and the previously broken resistance, which now acts as support. In a very bullish scenario, if prices break above $72 per barrel, they could even move toward this year's highs just below $80 per barrel. *** Be sure to check out InvestingPro to stay in sync with the market trend and what it means for your trading. Whether you're a novice investor or a seasoned trader, leveraging InvestingPro can unlock a world of investment opportunities while minimizing risks amid the challenging market AI: AI-selected stock winners with a proven track record. InvestingPro Fair Value: Instantly find out if a stock is underpriced or overvalued. Advanced Stock Screener: Search for the best stocks based on hundreds of selected filters and criteria. Top Ideas: See what stocks billionaire investors such as Warren Buffett, Michael Burry, and George Soros are buying. This article is written for informational purposes only. It is not intended to encourage the purchase of assets in any way, nor does it constitute a solicitation, offer, recommendation or suggestion to invest. I would like to remind you that all assets are evaluated from multiple perspectives and are highly risky, so any investment decision and the associated risk rests with the investor. We also do not provide any investment advisory services. Related articles Crude Oil: Uptrend May Extend on Cautious Trade Deal Optimism, Supply Risks Silver: Potential Break Above $35 Could Unleash the Next Leg Up Amid Tight Supply Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,380 as Long-Term Drivers Stay Firmly in Place


Hamilton Spectator
13 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal
BANGKOK (AP) — Australia's defense minister dismissed concerns Thursday that a deal between the U.S., Australia and Britain to provide his country with nuclear-powered submarines could be in jeopardy, following a report that the Pentagon had ordered a review. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News Australia that he had known about the review of the deal 'for some time,' saying that it was a 'very natural step for the incoming administration to take.' He noted that the UK's government also reviewed the deal, the centerpiece of a three-way alliance known as AUKUS after it was elected, and that his own government had looked at it as part of its own review of Australia's entire defense posture. 'I think an incoming government having a look at this is something that they have a perfect right to do and we welcome it and we'll work with it,' he said. The deal, worth more than $200 billion, was signed between the three countries in 2021 under then President Joe Biden, designed to provide Australia, one of Washington's staunchest allies in the region, with greater maritime capabilities to counter China's increasingly strong navy . The deal also involves the U.S. selling several of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia to bridge the gap as the new submarines are being jointly built. In January, Australia made the first of six $500 million payments to the U.S. under the AUKUS deal, meant to bolster American submarine manufacturing. Marles met with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of a defense conference in Singapore less than two weeks ago, and told reporters afterward that he had come away with 'a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding.' 'AUKUS is on track and we are meeting all the timelines that are associated with it,' he said. 'We are very optimistic.' Hegseth's address to the defense forum made multiple mentions of cooperation with Australia but no reference to AUKUS, however, though he did later mention the deal when he was taking questions. Hegseth did urge allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defense spending, and underscored the need for a 'strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners' as the U.S. seeks to counter China. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .