Cross-sex hormones for under 18s could be restricted or banned
Health Secretary Wes Streeting, is "actively reviewing" banning or restricting the private prescription of cross-sex hormones to young people, according to evidence given to the High Court.Government lawyers say an expert panel will report in July on the use of this type of medication by under 18s wishing to change their gender. An application by campaigners for a full judicial review of the secretary of state's handling of the issue was rejected on Wednesday afternoon.Dismissing the application, Lady Justice Whipple said "the case had moved on substantially" as a result of the government setting up a review in April.
The case calling for a full judicial review was brought after the NHS announced in December last year that under-18s would no longer be prescribed puberty blockers at gender identity clinics.Campaigners argued that the prescription of cross-sex hormones should also be addressed and criticised the government's failure to intervene.But Lady Justice Whipple said it was not "unreasonable or irrational" for the government to address the question of puberty blockers first and later come to cross-sex hormones.The court in London was also told health officials are looking at "alternative legal mechanisms" to tackle issues around private and overseas providers who prescribe such drugs.Cross-sex hormones are given to people who identify as a gender that is different to their biological sex. The medication helps someone who is transitioning to develop characteristics associated with their preferred gender.For instance, it would help a trans man, a biological female who identifies as a man, develop a deeper voice and facial hair. Existing NHS guidance allows the hormones to be prescribed people aged 16 and over.They differ from puberty blockers, which stop the onset of puberty by suppressing the release of hormones.Existing NHS guidance allows the hormones to be prescribed to people aged 16 and over.The case calling for a full judicial review was brought by Keira Bell and two others, who are remaining anonymous. They wanted a ban on the prescription of cross-sex hormones by non-NHS organisations, such as private clinics and overseas providers.As a teenager, Ms Bell was given cross-sex hormones after attending the now closed NHS Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) run by the Tavistock clinic.At the time she identified as male, but says she deeply regrets the decision to take medication that altered her body permanently.Responding to this afternoon's judgment she said: "I am relieved that the secretary of state is now actively considering a ban on cross-sex hormones outside of the NHS. "These powerful drugs should not be given to children and young people."Her barrister, Zoe Gannon, had argued that while the health secretary banned the private prescription of puberty suppressing drugs in gender cases involving under-18s, he had "failed or refused" to take the same action in relation to cross-sex hormones, and this was "irrational". Iain Steele, barrister for the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), told the court Mr Streeting "is currently seeking clinical and expert advice from NHS England".He also said there were a wide range of medical uses for hormones, such as testosterone and oestrogen, which made decisions on whether to restrict or ban their use in different situations complex.Delivering the judgment rejecting the application for a judicial review, Lady Justice Whipple, sitting with Mr Justice Johnson, said the secretary of state had acted rationally.She said, "This is an immensely difficult and sensitive area of policy formation where there are strong and genuinely held views on each side of the debate and where there is no consensus."She added Mr Streeting was taking practical steps and was therefore entitled to more time to consider the issues.She continued that it was appropriate that there was an active review and that was to be welcomed.
A Department for Health and Social Care spokesperson said children's healthcare "must always be led by evidence". "That is why this government is implementing the recommendations from the Cass Review and acted immediately to extend the puberty blockers ban and make it permanent."The government continues to work with the NHS to reform gender services to young people, the spokesperson added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
First heat-health alert issued for 4 parts of the UK from tomorrow – amid warnings of ‘serious outcomes'
PARTS of Britain face scorching 30°C heat this weekend, with health chiefs warning it could trigger "serious" health risks. It comes as the first yellow heat health alert has been issued for 2025 by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). 3 3 3 "Even moderate heat can result in serious health outcomes," Dr Agostinho Sousa, from the health body said, "[This is] especially for older adults, and it is therefore important that everyone takes sensible precautions while enjoying the sun." The heat alert comes into force from 9pm on Thursday and runs until 8am on Sunday, covering the East of England, East Midlands, London and South East regions. "The forecasted high temperatures are expected to be short-lived but could primarily impact those over the age of 65 or those with pre-existing health conditions," Dr Agostinho added. "If you have friends, family or neighbours who are more vulnerable, it is important to check in on them and ensure they are aware of the forecasts and are following the necessary advice.''
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The £12 at-home prostate cancer test that could save you weeks of waiting for a GP
It's a slightly odd moment when I fire the little spring-loaded lancet into my own hand and, despite my attempts to bleed neatly, the kitchen table takes on a crime-scene feel. I've waited until family members are out and I'm able to process results alone, decide on next steps, and set my face if needed. I'm taking a prostate health blood test that I bought in Sainsbury's. It uses the little white plastic result tray familiar from Covid, capturing a drop of blood. The makers of the test I'm using say take up has increased 69 per cent since launch, two years ago. More and more of us are checking ourselves in this way, but what does it entail and what do you need to know? There is something satisfying about taking some control of your own health, and that's how it feels to take a prostate health test in your kitchen. It requires some self-education and a little caution, but I'm a fan. There are two kinds currently available – the pin-prick quick response that I am trying, and those that require a larger sample to be sent to a lab. Other commercial screenings exist, but have not been rolled out for home use yet. The commercial laboratory tests are much the same as an NHS blood test, only without the doctor to interpret results and place them in context (many provide this as an optional extra). Both measure PSA, a naturally occurring protein that can be an indicator of cancer. Testing at home for medical conditions is a booming business, with the global at-home medical testing market estimated at $7.4 million (£5.5m) in 2024. I have to confess, the idea of peering into my health in the privacy of my own home is very appealing – especially while there is no national screening programme. The faff of arranging appointments, the vulnerable feeling that overtakes you as you walk through the door of the surgery, and the worry about managing feelings: all of this makes lightly stabbing myself at the kitchen table feel more than worth it. Pros of self-test kits They are (reasonably) accurate Nick James, professor of prostate and bladder cancer research at the Institute of Cancer Research, and the Royal Marsden Hospital in London says, 'We did a bit of research on tests of this type and they weren't bad, to be honest. We dual-tested 50-100 [patients], comparing our lab results with their results – there was some inaccuracy at the borderline between normal and abnormal, but did that matter? Probably not. Once you have a properly abnormal PSA they will be accurate'. They are quick Prof James says: 'It is quite a good way of circumventing the initial chat with the GP. Most things in life you have control of, you want a pizza you pick up the phone and it arrives. It's only in medicine where you have to be grateful for what the NHS gives you, which might be great or it might be rubbish.' They are a useful start 'There's not much you can do wrong with them really,' says Prof James. 'If you have the test and it's normal, probably the NHS test would be normal too, if it's abnormal that should allow you to drive a referral. I tried to get an NHS PSA just to see the process, and it took me weeks and weeks.' They are cheap and easy Frederick Manduca is a director of Newfoundland Diagnostics, which makes the lateral flow PSA test I used. He says: 'There's a convenience factor, you can buy the test in Sainsbury's with your shopping and the result is there within ten minutes. It retails at £12, so you can screen regularly. It's easy to use. You only need a few droplets of blood and you can put it through the lateral flow test.' They are set up for the most at-risk group Newfoundland tests record any PSA score up to four as normal. 'We chose four as the dividing line,' says Manduca. 'It's all based on what we see as the most helpful cut-off for age. If we were screening 20-40 year olds the cut off would be much lower, but because that group is at such low risk, we weren't focused on them. At 70-plus, an abnormal result comes in between 4 and 5 PSA, between 50 and 70, anything from 4.00 upwards is definitely raised. It's the mid-point for that age range.' Cons of self-test kits Interpreting the results It's about self-education. PSA is not a cancer indicator in itself. Manduca says: 'The key is people understanding when they should test and what the results mean – this is a test for a protein the body produces, it's not a test for prostate cancer.' The Newfoundland tests come with a leaflet produced in conjunction with a cancer charity. How do the self-test kits compare to a clinical screening? There has been some controversy about this. A BBC report into the rapid response tests (no brands were specified) said: 'Of the five kits analysed by the BBC, one did not produce a readable result; three came back all clear; but one did show a solid dark line, indicating a PSA level above 4.0 ug/l. A private blood test taken the same day and sent to a laboratory, showed a much lower reading of 0.27 ug/l.' Manduca says the Newfoundland kits are tested against approved independent lab results: '92 per cent of the time the lab tests and the rapid tests were agreeing. There are slight deviations and cut-offs, if you were right on a boundary number, say 3.9.' He warns, however, that there are less reliable tests sold online and consumers need to check for official approvals before buying. The Prostate Cancer UK site says: 'We recommend that if you're worried about prostate cancer and want a PSA blood test, you should speak to your GP. It's crucial that, before you have a PSA blood test, you get balanced information or counselling from a healthcare professional, and that you get professional follow-up about your result and what to do next.' How to read your self-test kit results Any PSA is far from conclusive. Using a cheap and reasonably accurate home test can allow you to track your number and spot any changes. An NHS PSA test is also not definitive, and a high number should mark the start of an investigation. Figures for 'normal' PSA scores by age are available online, but any worries need full investigation with MRI scans via the doctor. Fredrick Manduca says: 'It's a tool in an overall toolkit. A lot of men don't know that if do they have a raised PSA only one-in-four of them will have prostate cancer. The general concept is for someone to test every year or every two years depending on how at risk they are, and see if there's a change.' My test, by the way, was normal, matching my most recent PSA which came in under 4.00. But I shall continue to monitor myself, looking for tell-tale changes.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The five superfoods which can help you live a DECADE longer, according to a top nutritionist
The new buzzword in health writing is 'longevity'. Maybe it's because weight-loss drugs have made slimness less elusive; or maybe it's because we're living longer, and are now focused on how we can make those extra years as healthy and enjoyable as possible. Whatever is responsible, a recent survey found Brits are paying for as many as 18 supplements a day to try and boost their mental and physical wellbeing.
