We got an inside look at how frontline NATO allies would fight Russia
BI observed Finnish and Polish forces in an exercise simulating a tactical air landing operation.
One team seized a strategically located airfield while another had to counterattack and retake it.
These kinds of operations are a top Russian military tactic and could prove decisive in a conflict.
PYHTÄÄ, Finland — The young soldiers wear dark camouflage and green and black face paint to blend in with the dense forest common on NATO's eastern flank.
These conscripts, members of the 3rd Jaeger Company, a unit within the Finnish Army's Pori Brigade, carry anti-tank missile launchers, large mines, and assault rifles. One soldier looks at a paper map, and another calls in instructions on the radio as they scout out recently seized enemy positions. From the nearby road, they cannot be seen.
The Finnish soldiers are conducting surveillance operations, but the enemy is not real. It's part of an exercise simulating their reaction to the capture of a strategic airfield, a critical operation that's an expected element of a Russian invasion.
Lively Sabre 25, which took place in southern Finland over the past few days, is an element of NATO's larger Swift Response 25 exercise. This event is a series of joint military drills across the Baltic and Nordic regions designed to facilitate cooperation among allies and deter what they see as a serious Russian threat to the east.
During Lively Sabre, a "red team," consisting of Polish airborne forces and Finnish troops, executed a tactical air landing operation at an airstrip in the forest. Paratroopers rapidly seized a strategically located airfield, aiming to hold it and bring in the infantry and heavy weapons to launch a lightning assault from it; Russia used similar tactics in a close battle outside Kyiv in 2022.
The 3rd Jaeger Company was part of a "blue team" made up entirely of Finnish troops whose mission was to contain the so-called airhead and then mass strength to retake the site — an operation where time is of the essence.
Finland doesn't have an airbone brigade in its military structure, so the exercise is a good opportunity to train on battling paratroopers and learn from skilled professionals — in this case, the Polish forces — how to prepare for a tactical air landing, set up a perimeter around the airfield, and defend the site. Establishing an airhead is not an easy operation, especially in an era of widespread sensors and sophisticated air defenses that can detect and destroy an assault force before it lands.
"It's extremely difficult," Col. Matti Honko, the commanding officer of Finland's Guard Jaeger Regiment and the director of Lively Sabre, told Business Insider on the sidelines of the exercise. "There needs to be suppression of the air defense, and there has to be air superiority. You have to be able to actually do lots of things before you can do that."
Brig. Gen. Michal Strzelecki, the commander of Poland's 6th Airborne Brigade, which led the tactical air landing, said these operations have become even more difficult now than they were in past years. But having the airborne capabilities is still crucial, especially in the early phases of a conflict, when enemy air defenses aren't necessarily ready. The rapid deployment of troops could make all the difference.
"Having that kind of capability is essential," Strzelecki told BI at the Pyhtää airfield.
The ability to seize an airstrip and hold the position is important, as is the ability to dislodge it from under enemy control. NATO knows this because Ukraine demonstrated it three years ago, early on in its defense against Russia's full-scale invasion.
Russian forces tried to capture the Hostomel airport on the outskirts of Kyiv amid their initial push to capture the Ukrainian capital city. This would have given Moscow a decisive advantage, as the Kremlin could have then airlifted more troops, artillery, and fighting vehicles to strike Kyiv from a minimal distance.
Russian helicopters carrying assault troops made an initial assault, but they were met with fierce resistance from Ukraine's military. After hours of heavy fighting and counterattacks, Kyiv eventually controlled the airfield.
Swift Response 25, which falls under NATO's larger series of exercises this summer, called Defender, comes as the military alliance grows increasingly concerned with Russia and its behavior across Europe, which Western officials have described as malign and aggressive.
Allies, especially those along the northern and eastern flanks, like the Baltic states, are watching the Ukraine war closely. They are investing a lot in their defense capabilities by increasing their military spending, buying up weapons, and reinforcing their borders. European nations are also anxious about US reliability.
Finland joined NATO just over two years ago, while Poland has been a member for more than two decades. Both share borders with Russia, so they bring an important perspective to the alliance as countries on its front lines. They are well aware of the Russian threat.
Strzelecki said the Lively Sabre exercise helps Poland better integrate its forces with Finland.
"Finland is a new member of the alliance, so we want to interact with them, we want to train with them, we want to share our experience and also learn from the Finnish Army," he said. "Finland has a long tradition of defending against possible aggression from their neighbor."
Indeed, Russia has recently increased its military presence along its shared 830-mile-long border with Finland. Should a clash occur between NATO and Moscow, the region could become a major hot spot.
Honko said Finland's accession to NATO in 2023 has already lifted the threshold of threats, and exercises like Lively Sabre are a key element of deterrence that's needed to avoid a real shooting war.
"We are in the first line, but then, I think we have a very long tradition of defending our own area by ourselves, and that hasn't changed. In a way, we are a security provider, and not a security consumer," Honko said. Still, he added, "We need the alliance if the day comes, and we can deal with the problem together."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Polish Nationalist Moves Ahead in President Vote, New Poll Shows
A nationalist candidate backed by Donald Trump took a slim lead in Poland's presidential election, erasing an earlier edge by the centrist mayor of Warsaw, a fresh exit poll showed. Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and former boxer, won 50.7%, while Rafal Trzaskowski took 49.3%, according to an updated exit poll released on Sunday. Results will be tallied through the night, with official results due early Monday.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Poland Presidential Exit Polls Point to Center-Left Win
WARSAW—Exit polls showed a slim victory for the mayor of Warsaw to be Poland's next president, a result that would mark the latest rejection of the populist right in national races around the world. Drawing the highest voter turnout in a presidential election since Poles cast off Communism in 1989, Rafal Trzaskowski received 50.3% of votes. Karol Nawrocki, supported by the former ruling nationalist Law and Justice Party, received 49.7% of ballots cast. The knife-edge result was well within the poll's margin of error of 2 percentage points.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russia and Ukraine may meet again for peace talks. But neither side gives reason for optimism
Since last sitting down with Ukraine to talk peace, Russia has launched four of its five largest drone attacks against the country, killed more than 340 of its civilians and continued to peddle its false narrative about the unprovoked war it has been waging for more than a decade. Now, Moscow wants to talk. Again. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the next round of talks between Russia and Ukraine would take place in Turkey on Monday. On Sunday, Kyiv confirmed that it would be sending a delegation to the meeting, as Russian state media reported that a Russian delegation was flying to Istanbul for the talks. Kyiv says that Russia and Ukraine agreed to exchange their requirements for a ceasefire during their previous meeting in Istanbul last month. But while Kyiv said it presented its plan last week, Russia has not. The Kremlin has so far ignored the call by Ukraine to present the plan. In a post on Telegram on Wednesday, Lavrov said the Russian delegation would present its memorandum to Ukraine at the meeting on June 2. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Kremlin's failure to hand over its plan was 'another Russian deception' and accused Moscow of not wanting to end the war. 'For a meeting to be meaningful, its agenda must be clear, and the negotiations must be properly prepared,' Zelensky wrote on X on Friday, after hosting Turkey's foreign minister for talks in Kyiv. Zelensky said he'd also discussed the potential second round of peace talks with Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Friday, writing on Telegram: 'We discussed a possible next meeting in Istanbul and under what conditions Ukraine is ready to take part in it. We share the view that this meeting cannot and should not be empty.' In a post on X on Sunday, the Ukrainian leader said that he had requested 'preparation of the (Istanbul) meeting at the highest level' in order to 'establish a reliable and lasting peace and ensure security.' Zelensky added that Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov would lead the delegation again. But even though Russian and Ukrainian officials have agreed to meet on Monday, their summit is unlikely to yield any immediate results. Statements made by Russian officials in recent days make it clear that Moscow is sticking to its maximalist demands. Speaking after a phone call with US President Donald Trump on May 19, Russian President Vladimir Putin reiterated his demand that the 'root causes' of the conflict must be eliminated. The 'root causes' include long-held Russian grievances that include the existence of Ukraine as a sovereign state, and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War. Kyiv has dismissed these demands, as accepting them would effectively amount to capitulation. The talks on Monday may be designed mostly to appease Trump, who has repeatedly told both Ukraine and Russia that there will be consequences if they don't engage in his peace process. Trump has been pressuring Kyiv to talk to Moscow, threatening to walk away from the talks and cut US aid if he concludes that Ukraine isn't cooperating. And while he has threatened 'massive sanctions' against Russia if it doesn't agree with his 30-day ceasefire proposal, he has also voiced concern that potential new sanctions on Russia could jeopardize a deal. On Friday, a bipartisan pair of US senators met with Zelensky in Kyiv. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut are co-sponsoring a bill to impose more sanctions on Russia – including a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. It must pass both chambers of Congress and be approved by Trump to become law. Asked by reporters on Friday if he would support the bill, Trump responded: 'I don't know, I'll have to see it. I'll take a look at it.' Putin has not explicitly rejected the ceasefire proposals, choosing instead to delay and distract. Russia's insistence on having the talks and presenting its ceasefire proposal only once the two sides meet is just the latest example of this tactic. Putin initially proposed the first round of the talks in response to the ceasefire-or-sanctions ultimatum given to Moscow by Ukraine's European allies. The Russian president ignored the ultimatum, proposing instead 'direct talks' between Moscow and Kyiv. This prompted Trump, who initially backed the ultimatum, to change his tune and call on Zelensky to 'take the meeting.' Moscow's conduct since the talks last month suggests no desire to end the war with a ceasefire. Russian forces have intensified airborne attacks against Ukraine in recent weeks, are stepping up ground attacks in many areas along the front line, and Moscow is building up its forces elsewhere. At the same time, Putin ordered one of the largest expansions of the Russian military in recent years. Meanwhile, over the weekend, Ukraine carried out its most ambitious simultaneous strikes on Russian airbases since the war began, using drones to destroy multiple Russian combat planes on Sunday, according to a source in the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU). The Russian Ministry of Defense confirmed Ukraine had targeted Russian airfields across five regions, calling the drone strikes 'terrorist attacks.' The day before, two bridges in western regions of Russia collapsed, killing at least seven people and injuring dozens. It was not clear on Sunday morning whether the two incidents — which both involved trains — in neighboring Bryansk and Kursk were related, or what exactly caused the separate collapses. Investigators from Russia's Investigative Committee were working at the scenes to establish the circumstances of what happened. Expectations were running high ahead of the talks last month, the first direct meeting between Ukraine and Russia since the early days of the full-scale war. This was mostly because of speculation that Putin himself might show up, after being challenged to travel to Turkey by Zelensky. When the Russian leader sent a low-level delegation in his place, it became clear no breakthrough was in sight. Although the two sides agreed to hold the largest ever prisoner exchange during the meeting, there was no sign of a ceasefire agreement being any closer. As for the latest meeting, while it's obvious that neither Moscow nor Kyiv are particularly keen on talking to each other, and have little expectation of actual progress, they are likely to play along just to keep Trump interested. CNN's Catherine Nicholls, Jessie Yeung, Svitlana Vlasova and Billy Stockwell contributed to this report.