
Ignore Greta Thunberg's Circus, There's a Real Path to Help Gaza
Sometimes it takes a self-indulgent public-relations stunt to remind us of what's important. Monday's inevitably intercepted aid flotilla to Gaza was one of those occasions.
As the organizers of the convoy intended, the detention of the Madleen — a yacht carrying irrelevant quantities of humanitarian aid — grabbed international headlines. Climate activist Greta Thunberg was among those held; in this made-for-selfies drama, she told followers she'd been 'kidnapped' and called those watching to pressure the Swedish government into getting her released. That's right: Call Sweden, help me.
Israel's PR machine whirred into action just as quickly. There was a pledge to make Thunberg and the rest of her 'hate' flotilla watch film footage of the atrocities Hamas committed on Oct. 7, 2023. Photos appeared of Israeli soldiers handing the Madleen's passengers water and buns. Quite frankly, a plague on them both.
Here's what was happening at the same time that actually matters. There is, at long last, just a glimmer of hope for ending Gaza's suffering, because the two villains behind the prolonging of the conflict — Hamas and the extremists of Israel's coalition government — are both under growing stress.
Hamas has reveled in the slaughter it brought upon Palestinians by the sheer savagery of its October terrorist spectacular. Yet there are growing signs of dissent within the strip. The arming of Palestinian clans organized under an umbrella called the Popular Forces to take on Hamas and protect aid distribution points faces enormous hurdles by association with Israel, but has provided that opposition with teeth.
Hopes for Hamas's marginalization remain faint; to succeed, this support for an alternative power base among Palestinians needs to be part of a much wider Israeli strategy that doesn't, as yet, exist and would demand its military withdrawal. This has been missing since the start of the war, because almost any iteration would require offering ordinary Palestinians and Gulf State leaders some plausible hope for Gaza's future. That would include the promise, no matter how distant, of a Palestinian state alongside Israel's, as well as putting the Palestinian Authority in charge of Gaza.
Neither is a step that the most right-wing government in Israel's history is willing to take. But even Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, one of the world's great political survivors, may not be able escape for much longer the squeeze between what a majority of Israelis want and his coalition members are willing to accept.
This is only in part about a growing desire among Israelis to prioritize ending the war and the return of all remaining hostages. The immediate risk to Netanyahu lies in coalition demands that he write into law the exemption from military service enjoyed by ultra-orthodox men who study the Torah. The strains of war, combined with explosive population growth among deeply religious so-called Haredi Jews has made this policy toxic among those who do have to serve. If he drives the legislation through, Netanyahu and his Likud party can kiss goodbye to re-election. If he doesn't, the Shas party — a fellow member of the ruling coalition — threatens to force an early election anyhow.
So Israel's prime minister faces a choice. He can double down yet again on his tactic of expanding Israel's multi-front war to distract attention from his failures in Gaza, this time by attacking Iran's nuclear sites. He could go on letting ultra-right cabinet members such Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir define Israeli war aims in Gaza as 'occupation, settlement and the encouragement of voluntary emigration' by its Palestinian population, as he did again last week.
At home, Netanyahu can likewise just go on polarizing the nation and doing his level best to discredit the courts holding him to account over charges of fraud. Last week, Justice Minister Yariv Levin again promoted so-called reforms to resolve a non-existent war between judicial 'tyranny' and 'the people.' There is no judicial tyranny in Israel, only constitutionally mandated checks on executive abuse of power. There is no 'people,' just the limited mandate Likud received from 23.4% of the Israeli electorate in 2022.
The controversy over Haredi draft exemptions makes doubling down to retain power a risky political path for the prime minister, too. It could leave him holding the can for destroying Israel's democracy, inviting charges of war crimes for starving civilians of aid and turning the world's only Jewish state into an international pariah akin to apartheid-era South Africa. A majority of Israelis would never forgive him.
Knowing he may face elections as soon as November, there's an opportunity to persuade Netanyahu to accept a different set of political risks by ending the war in a way that gets the remaining hostages home, brings relief to Palestinians and engages the Gulf States in Gaza's reconstruction.
Peace, reunited families, the marginalization of Hamas, a revival of the Abraham Accords and Israel's military successes in Lebanon under Netanyahu are the stuff of election campaigns, win or lose. International attention should focus entirely on cajoling Israel's prime minister to take that chance — not some meaningless propaganda circus in the Mediterranean.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
Gaza Aid Group Says Hamas Attacked Its Palestinian Workers
An aid group in Gaza backed by Israel and the United States said that on Wednesday night a bus carrying some of its Palestinian workers was attacked by Hamas, leaving at least five people dead and others injured. At the time of the attack, the bus was carrying about two dozen of the group's workers and was en route to an aid distribution site in southern Gaza, according to a statement from the group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Some of the workers 'may have been taken hostage,' it said, adding that it was still gathering information. 'We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms,' said the foundation, which is run by American contractors. 'These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives every day to help others.' The New York Times could not independently verify the attack. Hamas did not comment on the accusation that it had attacked workers from the group, and the Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The foundation said it held the militant group 'fully responsible' for the deaths of 'dedicated workers who have been distributing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people.' The group called on the international community to condemn Hamas for the attack. 'Tonight, the world must see this for what it is: an attack on humanity,' it said. The aid organization has repeatedly criticized Hamas, saying that for days it had 'openly' threatened workers and civilians. On Saturday, the foundation said it was 'impossible to proceed' with aid distribution because Hamas had menaced its staff. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation says Hamas attack has killed multiple aid workers
Multiple aid workers were killed after a bus was attacked in Gaza on Wednesday night, according to a US-backed humanitarian aid organization which accused Hamas of carrying out the assault. Hamas has yet to respond to the allegations. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial US and Israeli-backed aid initiative, said that a bus carrying more than two dozen of its team members was attacked by Hamas at around 10 p.m. local time. 'We are still gathering facts, but what we know is devastating: there are at least five fatalities, multiple injuries, and fear that some of our team members may have been taken hostage,' GHF said in a statement. The group was en route to a distribution center in the area west of Khan Younis, GHF said, adding further details would be provided once they became known. 'We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms,' the GHF said in a statement. The GHF also accused Hamas of repeatedly threatening the organization in recent days. On Sunday, Hamas media said its forces have 'full authority and mandate to strike decisively against any entity or individual collaborating with the enemy's plans or with any rogue, criminal, or traitorous elements that violate the law and the traditions of our people.' 'All agents, thieves, and armed criminal gangs are considered legitimate targets for the resistance and its security apparatus,' the militant group said. The GHF was established amid Israeli accusations that Hamas is stealing aid in Gaza and profiting off its sale but the organization has been controversial from the get-go and criticized by multiple international aid agencies. The humanitarian situation in Gaza remains desperate. Restrictions imposed by the Israeli military on aid routes, ongoing airstrikes, a lack of security and the continuous displacement of tens of thousands of people are aggravating an already alarming situation, according to the United Nations and other aid agencies. The supplies that do get in risk getting looted and only a fraction of what is needed is getting in. Multiple Palestinians have been killed by gunfire near aid distribution sites since GHF began operations. This is a developing story and will be updated.


Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
People in Gaza are thanking Trump for aid, leader of US-backed group says
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's (GHF) new chairman is ignoring critics and keeping his focus on what he calls the group's "singular mission" of making sure the people of Gaza have food. "Our mission has nothing to do with Hamas. It has nothing to do with Israel. It has everything to do with making sure that hungry Gazans get food. That is our singular mission. No other mission," Rev. Johnnie Moore, GHF's executive chairman, told Fox News Digital. Moore took the helm June 3, just a few days after the Israeli- and U.S.-backed aid group began its distribution operations. Even before GHF began distributing aid, it faced criticism in the weeks leading up to its launch. The United Nations came out strongly against the group. U.N. Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher was a vocal critic, claiming the U.N. already had the infrastructure and ability to distribute aid. Moore, however, believes GHF is "trying to solve a problem that the U.N. hasn't been able to solve," namely, the issue of Hamas stealing aid. Rather than admonish critics, Moore is urging them to join GHF's efforts to get food to people on the ground in Gaza. The GHF chief also noted that, despite what critics have said, Gazans have been "incredibly grateful" to receive the support. Not only have the beneficiaries been thanking the U.S., they've been thanking President Donald Trump. Moore attributes this to a promise the commander in chief made in the Oval Office. "They're thanking President Trump specifically because a few weeks ago, in the Oval Office, in one of the many, many press briefings that President Trump does, he made a passing comment," Moore said. "And the comment related to how Hamas was treating the Gazan people very badly when it came to humanitarian aid. And he made a promise that the United States would do something about it. And the people in Gaza are attributing our free distribution of food as a direct response to the promise of the president of the United States." Israel and the U.S. have repeatedly said that GHF is the best mechanism for distributing aid to Gazans and ensuring that Hamas does not get anything. Moore told Fox News Digital humanitarian aid officials have faced a "false choice" for years between Hamas and the people of Gaza. "I think for many, many years, the aid community thought that the cost of giving aid to the people of Gaza is that you had to lose a certain amount of that aid to all of these other nefarious purposes. We're just showing that that's a false choice. That doesn't have to be the case. We can actually give aid without facing these dilemmas," Moore said. "Since the Israeli authorities allowed the U.N. to resume bringing limited aid into Gaza after nearly 80 days of a total blockade of any supplies, there have been understandable instances of trucks carrying food being offloaded by hungry civilians," Eri Kaneko, spokesperson for the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, told Fox News Digital. "In some cases, we have also seen unacceptable looting by armed, criminal gangs, which posed tremendous risk to our drivers' safety. To meet humanitarian needs in Gaza and help reduce looting, far more essential supplies should be allowed into Gaza through multiple crossings and routes." In late May, Israeli U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon revealed the international institution was using "mafia-like" tactics against NGOs that were open to working with GHF. The U.N. removed several NGOs from a shared aid database, which acts as a "central system for tracking aid deliveries into Gaza," according to Danon. The following week, after Danon exposed the U.N.'s actions, the U.S. vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. The resolution also addressed humanitarian aid, though Danon said it would have undermined, rather than advanced, such efforts. Just minutes before vetoing the resolution, U.S. Chargé d'Affaires Dorothy Shea urged the U.N. to support GHF "to help it safely deliver aid without being diverted by Hamas. The GHF has emphasized it will deliver aid consistent with the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence."