Future of tree facing the chop hangs in the balance
The future of an ancient oak tree hangs in the balance after councillors deferred a decision to fell it.
The 16ft (18m) tree, which is more than 100 years old, was said to be the cause of subsidence at several properties in Stanford-le-Hope, Essex, according to an engineer.
But despite damage caused to his home, nearby resident Rob Selwyn was among those urging Thurrock Council to spare it the chop.
The local authority's planning committee chose to delay a final decision on Thursday, saying it wanted more evidence before swinging the axe.
Rooted in the grounds of a listed building on South Hill, the tree is protected by a preservation order.
However, an engineer's report found it was causing "severe damage" to properties in Saffron Close, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Mr Selwyn said he preferred lopping the tree and installing a barrier over felling it.
The 77-year-old's comments came despite cracks appearing both inside and outside his home.
"I don't want to see it cut down," he said. "If it's lopped, that would take back the branches and curb its growth.
"A metal barrier placed between my home and the roots of the tree would also help."
The tree survived a previous bid to fell it eight years ago over concerns about subsidence.
Thurrock Council's planning committee was told that if it did not act this time round, it could be liable for any damage.
But Conservative ward councillor Barry Johnson said evidence of damage caused by the tree was not a "proven fact".
More than 15 objections were also made against the tree's destruction.
Betty Beaumont, who lives nearby, said the tree was a "landmark for the village".
"When you're driving down from the flyover, you know you're home because you can see it, " she said.
Her concerns were echoed by Gary Collins, landlord of The Bell pub, who said the village would be lost without it.
He added: "There must be another way of solving the problem."
In a report made by the council's planning officers, the tree was deemed a "fine specimen that provided a "high level of amenity in the village".
However, the report concluded it must be axed.
"In normal circumstances, its removal would not be permitted," the author wrote.
"However, it is considered that it is likely that the tree is a contributory factor to the subsidence occurring at the property, and therefore its removal is justified."
Planning committee councillors did not follow the recommendations and voted to delay the decision to get more evidence.
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
'Happy outcome' as 120-year-old tree gets reprieve
Anger as 300-year-old oak trees set to be felled
Felling 150-year-old tree 'hypocritical' says head
Thurrock Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major housing scheme decision delayed
A decision on plans to build 150 new homes has been deferred after councillors asked for more details around the developer's contribution towards extra school places. The planning application, from Stonebridge Homes, would have seen the development built off Hatfield Lane, in Barnby Dun, Doncaster. A report by planning officers said the developers would be asked to make financial contributions to local schools, including Hungerhill, to provide additional school places. However, councillors decided they needed answers from the council's education department on how it calculates figures regarding school places for developments. The report said a contribution of £605,000 would have funded 25 additional school places, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. It prompted questions from councillors Steve Cox and Neil Wood, with the latter referencing other developments near to Hungerhill school which would add to demand. Cox moved to defer the decision on planning permission until staff from the council's education department came to offer "clarity". Wood asked if a cumulative figure for places at schools affected by multiple developments to be put in council reports. The vote was carried and the application will come back to planning at a later date. The plans consist of 115 dwellings for "market housing" and 35 dwellings for "affordable housing". The council report stated the proposal "meets all key policy requirements in respect of affordable housing, public open space, education, and biodiversity net gain". A total of 63 objections had been lodged by residents in the area, raising concerns about the impact on services, including GPs in the area. However, officers informed councillors on the committee the GP practice locally "is still accepting new patients and there are others also nearby". Katie Purdam, who spoke on behalf of Stonebridge Homes, said: "The scheme has been subject to a number of changes since it was first submitted." She said it was an "opportunity" shaped with the local community and council "to deliver much need housing on the site". "The proposals have been designed with community in mind," she told the meeting. A decision on the application will be made at a future date. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds or catch up with the latest episode of Look North. Doncaster Council
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Badenoch to launch review examining whether UK should pull out of ECHR
Kemi Badenoch is expected to set up a review that will look into whether the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights. The commission will examine whether Britain should pull out of a series of agreements, it is understood. It comes ahead of a speech Conservative leader Mrs Badenoch is expected to make on Friday. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Mrs Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Mrs Badenoch has stopped short of calling for the UK to leave, but in February she suggested that the UK would 'probably' have to withdraw from the convention if it stops the country from doing 'what is right'. She told a London event: 'When it comes to the ECHR, I have always been very clear that the ECHR should not stop us from doing what is right for the people of this country and what is right in our national interest. 'And if it continues to do so, at some point we will probably have to leave. 'What I have not agreed with is deciding that we should leave without having a plan for what that looks like and how to do so in a way that makes sense.' The Convention's Article 8 – a right to a family life – has been notably used by foreign criminals to avoid deportation from the UK. The Government's immigration white paper released last month promised legislation to 'strengthen the public interest test to make it clear that Parliament needs to be able to control our country's borders and take back control over who comes to, and stays in the UK'. Sir Keir Starmer said at the time that the 'the right balance' needed to be made between individual rights and 'the national interest'.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
It's fair to criticise ‘activist' Hermer, says his lawyer friend
Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, can be 'fairly' criticised over his 'activism' as a lawyer, a legal friend has said. Ben Williams KC said Lord Hermer was an 'open activist' throughout his career, and claimed Sir Keir Starmer would have known this when he appointed him Attorney General. He suggested this provided an insight into the Prime Minister's own views on how the law could be used to pursue a political agenda. The suggestion comes despite Lord Hermer's claims that lawyers only take cases based on the 'cab rank' principle, which requires barristers to accept cases within their area of expertise, regardless of the client. Mr Williams, who has presented cases with Lord Hermer, made his comments on Twitter in response to a video issued by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, in which he attacked Lord Hermer for spending his career 'defending Britain's enemies' in court. Credit: X/@RobertJenrick Saying the Attorney General was unfit for the job because of his past legal activism, Mr Jenrick linked him to a range of controversial figures he has represented, including Gerry Adams, Shamima Begum, the Isis bride, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi, described as Osama Bin Laden's 'right hand man'. Mr Williams tweeted: 'As a lawyer [and] a friend of Rich Hermer, I find this unpleasant. But before the usual suspects erupt, it's also entirely fair political comment. 'RH was an open activist throughout his career, [and] Starmer knew this when he chose to knife his shadow AG [Emily Thornberry] to appoint RH instead. 'This is obviously revealing about Starmer's own position on using the law as a political instrument; [and] both he and Rich will have known perfectly well that the latter's long history of acting against the UK Government would be subject to legitimate political attack. 'On reflection, I should have said that I find it discomfiting. It is not unpleasant.' Lord Hermer has come under increasing pressure over several controversial moves in Government, including a key role in Britain's surrender of the Chagos Islands. He was also forced to apologise for a 'clumsy' remark that compared Conservative and Reform calls to quit the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) with the early days of Nazi Germany. Sir Keir has faced calls to sack his Attorney General, with Kemi Badenoch arguing that Lord Hermer 'believes in the rule of lawyers, not the rule of law'. Lord Hermer and his allies have previously argued that he has only represented controversial figures as a result of the 'cab rank rule', an ethical principle that requires lawyers to accept instructions from clients, even if they disagree with the views or alleged crimes. However, in a previous tweet, Mr Williams challenged the concept barristers are strictly forbidden in any case from refusing to represent a client on the grounds they found them objectionable. Responding to a Twitter user making that argument, he said: 'This is at best unreal. You know perfectly well that the Bar is full of people who say 'I only defend', 'I won't represent alleged rapists', or 'I won't represent landlords'. 'As to the last, I went to a judicial valedictory last year where this specific position was openly celebrated. There are entire chambers that declare themselves 'radical'. 'The idea that one can't extrapolate revealed preferences from a career of acting only for a specific demographic is absurd.' In his video, Mr Jenrick challenged Lord Hermer's cab rank defence, saying he 'would have been inundated with cases, able to choose the pick of the bunch'. A Tory source said: 'Starmer and Hermer's mate, Philippe Sands, admitted he refused to represent Augusto Pinochet. The selective use of the cab rank rule is widespread amongst so-called human rights lawyers. Activist barristers now actively boast of their ideological purity.' However, Lord Hermer has been defended by some Tory legal experts. Dominic Grieve, the former attorney general, said Mr Jenrick's video was a 'disgraceful' attack on the UK's 'principles of justice and freedoms' which relied on a 'level playing field' for individuals' legal representation under the cab rank rule. A spokesman for the Attorney General's Office said: 'Law officers such as the Attorney General will naturally have an extensive legal background and may have previously been involved in a wide number of past cases. Barristers do not associate themselves with their clients' opinions.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
