
Douglas Murray: Liberals turn killers, racists, and haters into martyrs
Why do parts of the left and the media keep asking for sympathy in all the wrong places?
In recent months we have had to put up with crazed activists like Taylor Lorenz claiming that Luigi Mangione is a 'revolutionary' and a 'morally good man' because she finds him 'handsome.'
Unfortunately he is also on trial for gunning down a father of two in cold blood on Sixth Avenue.
In the eyes of many people that still counts against a man.
And then there has been the bizarre defense of absolutely anybody who ICE has tried to deport.
It doesn't matter whether the people being deported are gang members, violent criminals or serial abusers, if ICE wants them out then the illegals must be defended.
In quick succession we went from protestors and Democrat lawmakers objecting to ICE taking illegal aliens from their homes, then to protesting when they are taken to a courtroom.
Above the law?
Then there was the case of Hannah Dugan, the Milwaukee judge who was arrested in April.
She is accused of aiding an illegal alien to evade arrest.
But rather than see the law take its course, Democrats kept suggesting that it was the Trump administration that had broken the rules, not the judge, and the judge who deserves our sympathy.
Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers claimed that the Trump administration was 'undermining the judiciary' and Chuck Schumer called her arrest 'an attack on the separation of powers.'
But isn't it a bad idea for a judge to try to help someone evade the law?
Doesn't it 'undermine the judiciary' for a judge to apparently help a man accused of battery to slip out of her courtroom through a side door so that waiting federal agents could not detain him?
And if you think so, then why make a hero of Dugan?
Why pretend that what she is accused of doing is in any way excusable?
Why not at least wait for the law to take its course — and not make heroes of people who have done deeply unheroic things?
It is the same here in New York, where the authorities, student groups and others continue to try to make a 'free speech martyr' out of Mahmoud Khalil.
In their estimation, Khalil was simply an exemplary student, even though he wasn't a student.
And he apparently has to be given all the rights of a US citizen, even though he isn't a US citizen.
Just because all he did was spend 18 months helping to cause civil unrest and bring about what his group called 'the total eradication of Western civilization.'
'But' — so many people said — 'Khalil has a pregnant wife.'
In which case you might have thought that Khalil would have tried to be on better behavior while enjoying the hospitality and benefits of this country.
But no — it is he that has to be made into the martyr, he and his family who have to be given the sympathy, and he and his family who have to be said to have suffered so much.
Bizarre new height
This week this strange desire to extend sympathy to the worst people reached a bizarre new height.
Habiba Soliman is the daughter of Mohamed Soliman.
He is, the man who was in this country illegally and who last week firebombed Jewish Americans while they were protesting peacefully in Boulder, Colo.
You might have thought in the wake of that gruesome attack — an attack that Soliman had apparently been planning for a year — sympathy might go to a number of people.
Most obviously you might think that it would go toward the 12 people who were badly injured in Soliman's attack — victims including a Holocaust survivor, set on fire on the streets of a US city.
By a man who should never have been here.
And who seems to have had links with Hamas.
But, oh, no.
The real victims — we are now being told — are Soliman's family.
Because the immigration authorities have looked at Soliman's illegal status and now arrested his wife as well as Habiba and her four siblings.
Why should the sympathy go to them?
Well, take the title of USA Today's story on the case: 'Habiba Soliman wanted to be a doctor. Then, her father firebombed Jewish marchers in Boulder.'
Oh, no!
If only that little stumbling block hadn't arisen we could have had another doctor in about a decade.
What a bummer.
CNN chose to go with a similar angle, saying that, 'The family's arrest threatens to derail what looked to be a promising academic career for Soliman's oldest daughter, who graduated days before her father's attack and had recently won a 'Best and Brightest' scholarship from the Colorado Springs Gazette.'
Pity for 'terrorist's kin
We have been told that before the attack, Habiba Soliman apparently wrote an application for a scholarship in which she said that being in the US: 'I learned to adapt to new things even if it was hard. I learned to work under pressure and improve rapidly in a very short amount of time. Most importantly, I came to appreciate that family is the unchanging support.'
And then her dad decided to carry out a terrorist attack.
As a result, it is Soliman's family who are now being pitied.
While the victims of their family member, ranging in age from 25 to 88, are swiftly passed over.
The Trump administration has repeatedly said that it wants to prioritize the deportation of people who are in the US illegally, who have committed crimes and who support terrorism.
It is an effort not only to clear up the open borders mess left by Biden — or whoever was in charge of the autopen in those years.
It is also an effort to dissuade violent criminals and terrorists from thinking this country is an entirely safe space to operate from.
But there is a cost to committing crimes.
And there are costs for carrying out acts of terrorism.
If one of those costs is inconvenience to your loved ones, then perhaps you should think twice about it first.
Because the sympathies of the American public have been stretched quite far enough.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?
Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the U.S. political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the U.S. government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalization". Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by U.S. states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. So far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the U.S. while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump set to attend UFC 316 in New Jersey this weekend
President Trump set to attend UFC 316 in New Jersey this weekend Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump attends UFC 309 at Madison Square Garden President-elect Donald Trump walked into Madison Square Garden alongside UFC CEO Dana White, Elon Musk and Kid Rock for UFC 309. As his feud with tech billionaire and former MAGA darling Elon Musk exploded into public view this week, the White House says President Donald Trump is planning to attend a UFC event in New Jersey this weekend. The event, UFC 316, is slated for Saturday, June 7 at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. The president is scheduled to depart the White House for his golf club in New Jersey Friday afternoon, according to his official schedule, and return to the White House Sunday night. Musk has been high-profile guest for some of Trump's previous visits to the octagon, but the pair had a public falling-out this week after Musk's departure from the Trump administration. 'Siri, play Bad Blood': Internet reacts to Elon Musk and Trump 'breakup' The Trump-Musk fight took off this week when Musk called for Republicans to kill the House-passed tax bill that is a signature part of the second-term president's legislative agenda, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' Two days later, Trump told reporters at the Oval Office on June 5 that he was 'very disappointed' with Musk and suggested their 'great relationship' was over. In response, Musk took to social media shortly afterward to blast the president, saying Trump wouldn't have won a second term and Republicans would have fared worse in elections in both chambers of the U.S. Congress were it not for his efforts on the 2024 campaign trail, where he poured a quarter of a million dollars into Trump's campaign. The tussle escalated in a back-and-forth between the two men, with Trump suggested going after Musk's companies and their federal contracts, and Musk alleging that Trump's name was in the Justice Department's files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The pair's most recent fight appearance was in April, when Trump and Musk sat ringside at UFC 314 in Miami. The president has long attended UFC events, as CEO Dana White was a prominent supporter of Trump during his 2024 presidential campaign. When is UFC 316? UFC 316, which is headlined by Sean O'Malley vs. Merab Dvalishvili, is set to take place at 10 p.m. ET/7 p.m. PT at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. The main card is available for pay-per-view on ESPN. More: Sean O'Malley vs. Merab Dvalishvili 2 predictions; full card, odds, picks for UFC 316 Contributing: Riley Beggin, Sudiksha Kochi and Cydney Henderson, USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk lost $34 billion in net worth as Tesla stock tanked amid Trump online war
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, lost $34 billion in net worth on Thursday after his company's stock plummeted in response to the online fight he got in with President Donald Trump. Over the last week, some Tesla stock investors had begun pulling their investments as Musk insulted Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and made a swift exit from his 'special government employee' position. But, investors acted much more quickly while witnessing the two men engage in a back-and-forth on their respective social media platforms. Trump claimed he asked 'crazy' Musk to leave his administration. Musk took credit for Trump's election win. Trump threatened to pull Musk's government contracts. Musk accused Trump of being named in the 'Epstein files.' Down the stock went, ending the day at a 14 percent loss – equating to a $34 billion valuation for Musk. While many claim to have anticipated the online feud, it's a long way away from Musk jumping for joy onstage at Trump's rallies or the duo's Oval Office press conferences. The cracks started to appear in their relationship after the tech mogul refused to stand by and praise Trump's spending bill, which he has characterized as disastrous for the government. Musk's Thursday loss is part of the 33 percent decline Tesla's stock has seen since Inauguration Day. Although the stock had significant gains after the election, much of that has been wiped out by growing criticisms of Musk's role in the government, DOGE, and now his exit. Musk is still the world's richest man, but a $34 billion drop in net worth is still notable given it's the second-largest loss of the 500 wealthiest people on the planet recorded by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. 'The only bigger one: his own wipeout in November 2021,' Bloomberg reported. But the tech entrepreneur still has plenty of other endeavors to drive his wealth, including SpaceX, one of the world's most valuable private startups, according to Bloomberg, Neuralink and xAI. As the dust settles from the powerful individuals' fight, it's still unclear what path forward Musk and his subsidiaries will take now that Trump has bashed Tesla's climate-conscious mission and threatened to revoke Musk's critical government contracts. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data