logo
House of Truth

House of Truth

IOL News25-04-2025

IF you're shocked by the speed with which Fascism has taken hold in the United States, you must have been sleeping under a rock for the past, oh... 150 years. American Democracy was always more sham than reality, an idea promoted to the rest of the world through countless movies, TV shows, news broadcasts, and the sprawling machinery of U.S. popular culture that's been pumping out this propaganda for over a century. But let's not kid ourselves: America is not now, nor has it ever been, a bastion of freedom or equality - unless you happen to be white, male, and wealthy.
The truth of the matter is that white Americans, after having nearly wiped out all the Native Americans, never quite got over the outcome of the Civil War, which made it illegal for one person to own another. Oh sure, slavery ended with the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865, but did anyone really think that would stop centuries-old systems of oppression? The South immediately set about reinventing bondage under a new name - Jim Crow - and thus began the long nightmare of legalised segregation. By 1896, thanks to Plessy v. Ferguson, 'separate but equal' became the law of the land, enshrining racism into the very fabric of American society. It wasn't about equality, it was about control, plain and simple.
In the 1920s and '30s, while Europe was busy flirting with fascism, white Americans were hosting lynching parties all over the South to express their views about the notions of 'Freedom,' 'Liberty,' and 'Equality.' We have all their grotesque postcards to prove it, postcards showing grinning white crowds gathered around mutilated Black bodies hanging from trees. These weren't isolated incidents; they were rituals meant to terrorise an entire population into submission. And yet somehow we still call this country the 'land of the free.'
Fast forward to the 1950s, when Black people dared to demand access to buses, toilets, and water fountains without being treated like second-class citizens. You'd think something as basic as sitting where you please on public transportation wouldn't spark outrage, but no, the mere presence of Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat sent shockwaves through the nation. The Montgomery Bus Boycott followed, proving that collective action could challenge even the most entrenched systems of oppression. But change didn't come that easily. When nine brave students attempted to integrate Little Rock Central High School in 1957, they needed federal troops just to walk through the doors. Even then, the message was clear: integration would be fought tooth and nail every step of the way.
Meanwhile, as America lectured the world on the evils of communism during the Cold War, its soldiers were busy dropping bombs on Black and brown people across the globe who dared to show signs of wanting to control the resources of their own countries. From Vietnam to Guatemala, from Iran to Congo, the United States propped up dictators and destabilized nations, all while claiming to fight for democracy abroad. Irony? Hypocrisy? Call it what you will, but the parallels between America's foreign policy and its domestic treatment of minorities are impossible to ignore.
By the 1960s, the Civil Rights Movement had gained momentum, forcing the nation to confront its ugly truths. In 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and delivered his iconic 'I Have a Dream' speech during the March on Washington. Yet even as he dreamed of a better future, Black Americans were being beaten, jailed, and murdered for simply demanding their rights. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were supposed to signal progress, but ask any Black voter in Georgia today how much those laws protect them. Voter suppression tactics may have evolved since the days of poll taxes and literacy tests, but their purpose remains the same: to silence voices inconvenient to those in power.
And then there's the ironic twist of Barack Obama's presidency in 2008, a moment hailed as proof that America had finally overcome its racist past. How quaint. What followed instead was a resurgence of white nationalism so brazen that it culminated in the election of Donald Trump in 2016 and his re-election last year. If Obama's presidency represented hope, Trump's represents fear: fear of losing privilege, fear of losing dominance, fear of a country that might actually live up to its ideals. His new administration has rolled back civil rights protections faster than you can say 'Make America Great Again,' reminding us once again that progress is never linear.
Today, movements like Black Lives Matter carry the torch lit by generations before them. Founded in 2013 after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the killing of Trayvon Martin, BLM has become a global force challenging systemic racism and police violence. And yet critics accuse activists of being divisive, as if pointing out injustice is somehow worse than perpetuating it. Tell that to the families of Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, and countless others whose lives were stolen because of the colour of their skin.
So here we are, staring down the barrel of history repeating itself. White supremacy isn't some relic of the past: it's alive and well, thriving in boardrooms, courtrooms, and statehouses across the USA. The question isn't whether fascism has taken hold in America; the question is whether Americans will finally wake up and do something about it.
Ryan Fortune is a writer, thinker and builder of AI-powered web applications. He can be contacted via his email: ryanfortunecomms@gmail.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk and Trump bromance ends but Americans want Epstein files to be made public
Musk and Trump bromance ends but Americans want Epstein files to be made public

The South African

time7 hours ago

  • The South African

Musk and Trump bromance ends but Americans want Epstein files to be made public

The bromance between tech billionaire Elon Musk and former US President Donald Trump dramatically fell apart on Thursday, generating significant buzz on social media. The two billionaires formed an unlikely alliance last year, but tensions escalated after Trump expressed disappointment over Musk criticising his proposed massive spending bill. 'I've always liked Elon,' Trump said in an interview on Thursday. 'I'd rather have him criticise me than the bill,' he said. 'I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said when asked if he was still close with Musk. Less than thirty minutes later, Musk posted on X, indicating that their relationship with the US President would not remain positive. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he posted. 'Such ingratitude.' Musk also claimed without any evidence that Trump was named in Epstein files that remain sealed. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day,' he tweeted. Since the tweets went viral, many Americans have asked for the Epstein files to be released. 'Everyone in MAGA needs to demand Trump release the Epstein files. Elon Musk has alleged that a foreign nation has blackmail on a sitting president. This is massive if true and Trump has he ability to clear his name with the stroke of a pen,' tweeted @jakeshieldsajj. 'The way Elon Musk is ripping apart Trump without caring that Trump is in power and can harm his business is bravery,' @RoshanKrRaii tweeted. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

AfriForum and the Criminalisation of Black Memory
AfriForum and the Criminalisation of Black Memory

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

AfriForum and the Criminalisation of Black Memory

After losing its hatespeech bid to silence the liberation song Dubul' iBhunu, AfriForum has recast itself as a victim on a Washington roadshow—proof that South Africa's culture wars now trade on transAtlantic markets. Image: IOL The legal campaign by AfriForum against Julius Malema for singing Dubul' iBhunu exposes a deeper problem in post-apartheid South Africa: the refusal to recognise Black historical expression as legitimate political speech. The case becomes a proxy for a wider battle—over how trauma is voiced, who owns remembrance, and whose narrative the law protects. Even though the Constitutional Court ruled in March 2025 that the chant does not constitute hate speech and refused AfriForum's final appeal, the group continues to push a cultural logic that seeks to erase African memory and symbolic resistance. In the wake of that defeat the organisation's leadership flew to Washington, DC, courting White-House-aligned conservatives and evangelical pressure groups. There they resurrected the discredited 'white genocide' myth, recasting their legal loss as a global human-rights emergency and lobbying for US intervention. Through laundering a local culture war into trans-Atlantic respectability AfriForum weaponises the language of victimhood to criminalise Black grief on an international stage. The chant in question gained prominence through the ANC Youth League in the 1980s, where it boosted morale, unified activists, and encoded a shared narrative of resistance. It resurfaced during Rhodes Must Fall and Fees Must Fall, accompanying toppled statues, confrontations with institutional power, and the mobilisation of a generation unafraid to connect past to present. Framing it as a Malema issue ignores the collective histories it carries. Struggle songs such as Dubul' iBhunu emerge from moments of crisis, mourning, and confrontation. They are ritual expressions forged in the crucible of generational trauma. The word dubula is not a literal instruction. It channels defiance, spiritual rage, and unresolved loss. Bhunu became a cipher for the apartheid state's armed wing—those who brutalised, detained, and executed under racial law. AfriForum chooses a narrow, decontextualised reading. Its interpretation deletes the cultural logic of African expression and dismisses the long tradition of symbolic resistance found across pre-colonial societies. Among the Xhosa and other Nguni peoples—including Zulu, Swazi, and Ndebele—war dance was political dramaturgy, signalling readiness without declaring bloodshed. Choreographed movement, chanting, and regalia combined into displays of spiritual authority and communal strength. These traditions preserved dignity, summoned ancestral guidance, and often prevented violence through symbolic confrontation. The Khoekhoe and ǀXam (San) held equally intricate cosmologies of performance and protest. For the ǀXam, trance dance was healing. It was also social memory and boundary. Khoekhoe resistance rituals used song and oral invocation tied to land custodianship and lineage, later suppressed by missionaries and colonial administrators who labelled them chaotic or threatening. Under settler rule, performance was criminalised; suspicion replaced meaning. Similar traditions surface worldwide. The Māori haka projects strength, summons ancestors, and faces power, often in peacetime assertion rather than wartime aggression. Indigenous nations across the Americas and Australia use ritual chant and dance as spiritual-political speech—warning, remembering, dignifying in the face of settler encroachment. Colonial authorities never grasped this. Ritual was 'primitive'. Song was 'subversive'. Expression itself became a crime. That legacy lingers in how courts treat African performance today. While Dubul' iBhunu is condemned and policed, Die Stem remains sacrosanct—its lyrics celebrating settler conquest and Christian dominion. Its presence in the national anthem shows how power still accommodates the spoils of conquest while rejecting the memory of the conquered. Settler symbols are validated by law; Black resistance is sanitised or prosecuted. The demand is reconciliation without responsibility, visibility without history. The aftermath tells its own tale. On Human Rights Day (21 March 2025) EFF supporters sang Dubul' iBhunu in Sharpeville; AfriForum threatened contempt but had no legal foothold. Two months later the lobby group turned to new litigation, filing papers in the Gauteng High Court to strike down the 2025 Expropriation Act as 'part of a genocidal land-grab'. Simultaneously, Washington rewarded AfriForum's alarmism: a special refugee track has begun admitting small Afrikaner cohorts, and an executive order now withholds USAID funds until Pretoria tackles so-called 'farm murders'. President Ramaphosa has condemned the campaign as 'disinformation diplomacy' and lodged a protest note with the US State Department—but the propaganda has already taken flight. The unresolved question is whether the National Prosecuting Authority has the mettle to deem AfriForum's trans-Atlantic lobbying an act of treason against the republic.

Trump directs probe into Biden's use of autopen, Biden says policy decisions were his
Trump directs probe into Biden's use of autopen, Biden says policy decisions were his

TimesLIVE

time2 days ago

  • TimesLIVE

Trump directs probe into Biden's use of autopen, Biden says policy decisions were his

US President Donald Trump directed the White House counsel on Wednesday to investigate whether former President Joe Biden's aides covered up an alleged mental decline and unlawfully used an autopen on Biden's behalf to sign policy documents. Biden, who is fighting cancer, said he made the decisions during his administration and suggested Trump's move was designed to distract Americans from a bill in Congress that would extend tax cuts for the wealthy. Republican Trump has long asserted that Biden, a Democrat who defeated him in the 2020 presidential election, was mentally incompetent and has suggested the use of a mechanical pen to sign memos, executive orders and grants of clemency during Biden's four-year-term may have been improper, potentially rendering them invalid. In a statement late on Wednesday, Biden dismissed those suggestions. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' he said. Biden's team said the use of an autopen is a well established legal practice after a presidential decision. The former president, now 82, stepped aside as the Democratic presidential candidate last year after a disastrous debate against Trump underscored concerns about his age and ability to serve as commander-in-chief for four more years. Trump defeated former vice-president Kamala Harris, who became the Democratic presidential nominee, in November. Biden's office said last month the former president had been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. That development and a new book that cites concerns among Democratic insiders about Biden's mental acuity as he was seeking re-election have brought renewed attention to the former president's health. While in office, Biden's aides denied that his mental acuity had dipped even as they acknowledged he had aged. Trump wished Biden well after the cancer diagnosis but has continued to criticise his predecessor for a host of challenges facing the country. His move to investigate aspects of Biden's time in power took his criticisms to a new level. In a memorandum, Trump ordered his White House counsel, in consultation with the attorney-general, to probe whether 'certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President'. The investigation would also look into documents that were signed by autopen and those who directed the use of that device. 'In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline,' the memo said. 'There are serious doubts as to the decision making process and even the degree of Biden's awareness of ... actions being taken in his name.' A senior official in Trump's justice department told staff on Monday that he has been directed to investigate whether Biden was competent and whether others had taken advantage of him through the use of an autopen when he granted clemency to members of his family and death row inmates at the end of his term.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store