logo
QuickCheck: Can you use your phone while stopped at a traffic light?

QuickCheck: Can you use your phone while stopped at a traffic light?

The Star2 days ago

A VIDEO went viral recently after the Road Transport Department (JPJ) issued a summons to a driver for holding a phone while stopped at a red light.
The 46-second video sparked a heated online discussion, with many questioning if merely holding a phone at a traffic light, even if one is not making a call, is an actual offence.
Is it true that you cannot use your phone while you are stopped at a traffic light?
Verdict:
TRUE
Using a mobile phone while driving a car, whether stopped at a traffic light or during a traffic jam, is an offence under Malaysian laws.
Individuals who commit such an offence may be fined under Rule 17A of the Road Traffic Rules 1959.
According to MyCheck Malaysia, JPJ director-general Datuk Aedy Fadly Ramli said mobile phones may be used in certain circumstances with assistive devices.
This includes phone holders, Bluetooth or other hands-free devices.
Other than that, phones may not be used by motorists even if the vehicle is not moving, except when parked in a parking bay.
This is because using a mobile phone while driving or riding a motorcycle can cause a distraction and lead to unwanted incidents when road users should focus on arriving at their destination.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protect coerced drug mules
Protect coerced drug mules

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Protect coerced drug mules

MALAYSIA is facing a pressing human rights and legal crisis. We see a growing number of citizens being exploited by international drug syndicates as couriers and many are ending up on death row in foreign countries. From 2021 to 2023, 77 Malaysians were arrested overseas for drug trafficking. In 2023 alone, 28 individuals were detained in various countries including the UK, France, China and the Maldives. As of early 2024, 74 Malaysians were reported to be on death row abroad, convicted for transporting narcotics across borders, often under circumstances that suggest coercion or deception. The majority were not hardened criminals but individuals lured by false job offers, online romance scams or the promise of quick money. Syndicates have used social media platforms to offer payments of RM5,000 to RM10,000 per trip to smuggle drugs, exploiting economic desperation and emotional vulnerability. In early 2024, British authorities noted a threefold increase in cannabis seizures at Scottish airports involving Malaysians, underscoring the scale of the problem. Closer to home, the Johor Bahru–Singapore trafficking corridor has become a known route for cross-border smuggling. In one high-profile case, Pannir Selvam Pranthaman was convicted in Singapore in 2017 for trafficking over 50g of diamorphine. He has consistently maintained he was unaware the parcel he was carrying contained drugs and alleged he was coerced by a trafficker known as 'Anand'. The late Kalwant Singh, executed in 2022, similarly claimed he was forced into transporting narcotics by an individual identified only as 'Anna'. These cases reveal a deeper systemic flaw as drug syndicates exploit loopholes in Malaysia's legal framework and take advantage of jurisdictional boundaries that restrict foreign authorities such as Singapore from investigating trafficking operations within Malaysian territory. Despite the clear patterns of coercion and manipulation, Malaysia's current legal structure provides little to no protection for individuals caught in these scenarios. While the Penal Code does include defences such as duress/threat (s.94) and mistake of fact (s.76), these provisions are narrowly defined and often inapplicable in complex trafficking cases involving psychological pressure or deceit. More critically, section 25 of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (Atipsom) only grants immunity to victims for immigration-related offences, not for more serious crimes like drug trafficking, even when such acts were committed under coercion. This legal gap is at odds with international norms. Malaysia is a signatory to the UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons (Palermo Protocol), which promotes a victim-centred approach and the principle of non-punishment. This means victims should not be penalised for crimes committed as a direct consequence of their exploitation. Countries such as the UK have already translated this into domestic law through provisions in the Modern Slavery Act 2015, which provide statutory defences for trafficked persons compelled to commit offences. Malaysia, however, has yet to adopt similar legal safeguards. Without legislative reform, the government risks compounding the harm faced by victims. Malaysians who are prosecuted abroad often lack adequate consular assistance, legal representation or mechanisms for proper victim identification. The absence of guidelines or institutional support means that many are misclassified as criminals and denied access to justice, despite strong indicators of coercion. This reflects not only a failure of protection but a fundamental failure of principle. Atipsom must be amended to include broader immunity provisions for victims of trafficking who are coerced into committing serious offences. Section 94 of the Penal Code, which governs duress, should also be revised to recognise psychological coercion and manipulation. Additionally, law enforcement, prosecutors and consular officers must be trained to identify and support potential victims of forced criminality. Malaysia must also strengthen bilateral cooperation with destination countries to ensure the fair treatment, repatriation and rehabilitation of its citizens who have been exploited. Diplomatic intervention is crucial in cases where victims face the death penalty or life imprisonment without the opportunity to raise a defence. The time has come for Malaysia to move beyond a punitive approach and adopt a rights-based, victim-focused framework that reflects our international obligations and national conscience. Those coerced into crime should not be punished. Dr Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid is a criminologist and senior lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya.

Naimah to challenge MACC's freezing order on overseas assets
Naimah to challenge MACC's freezing order on overseas assets

Daily Express

timean hour ago

  • Daily Express

Naimah to challenge MACC's freezing order on overseas assets

Published on: Wednesday, June 04, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jun 04, 2025 By: FMT Reporters Text Size: MACC obtained a court order to freeze £132 million or RM758.2 million worth of assets in London belonging to Naimah Khalid and her family. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA: Naimah Khalid, the widow of former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, will challenge the court order obtained by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to freeze RM758 million worth of assets abroad linked to her and her family. Naimah claimed that the assets were lawfully acquired and that her lawyers would immediately move to set aside the freezing order, which was granted ex parte. 'I will challenge this order to defend what should never be taken from any of us: our rights, our voice, and a country governed by law, not by fear. 'Let there be no doubt that I will fight this politically motivated, reckless, vindictive and lawless action, through all legal means at my disposal,' she said in a statement today. She argued that no reasonable person would say the order was in accordance with fairness or the rules of natural justice, accusing MACC of obtaining it by ambush. The Kuala Lumpur High Court reportedly granted MACC's application to freeze £132 million (RM758.2 million) worth of assets in London belonging to Naimah and her family. The assets include two commercial buildings, five luxury residences, and one bank account, Utusan Malaysia reported. Naimah alleged that the move was part of a 'long and continuous smear campaign' against her family by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki since late 2022. 'No crime of any kind has ever been proven against Daim. No charges were brought in his lifetime, and none after his death,' she said, adding that the Anti-Money Laundering Act cited by MACC required a serious offence to be proven first. She warned that failure to push back against such actions would embolden those in power to act with impunity. 'A line has been crossed. And if we do not resist, there may soon be no lines left at all. Then no Malaysian will be safe from the reach of unchecked power,' she said. Daim was charged in January last year with failing to declare assets to MACC, including interests in 38 companies, 19 land plots in five states, six properties, two unit trust accounts and seven luxury vehicles. MACC said he had asked for five deadline extensions but still failed to comply. After Daim's death on Nov 13 last year, the prosecution withdrew the charges, and the court granted an order discharging and acquitting him. Naimah also faces an asset declaration charge. She is accused of failing to declare her ownership in various companies, several plots of land here and in Penang, and two vehicles. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

VEP Enforcement July 1: RM300 Fines for Singapore
VEP Enforcement July 1: RM300 Fines for Singapore

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

VEP Enforcement July 1: RM300 Fines for Singapore

PUTRAJAYA: Malaysia will fully enforce the Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) system for foreign-registered vehicles entering from Singapore via the land border starting Jul 1, Transport Minister Anthony Loke said today. He said non-compliance would result in a compoundable fine of RM300 and could lead to denial of entry. 'From July 1 onwards, enforcement will be strict. We urge all foreign vehicle owners, especially Singaporean drivers, to complete their VEP registration, install the RFID tags, and activate them immediately. 'This will ensure smooth and hassle-free entry and exit at the border,' Loke said during a press conference at the ministry, here.. The initiative, which was soft-launched through advocacy campaigns in October last year, has been implemented in phases to allow vehicle owners ample time to comply, Loke added. He explained that the Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) system utilises Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology to monitor foreign vehicles and ensure adherence to Malaysian road regulations. 'It also enables authorities to track and enforce outstanding fines for traffic offences committed within the country,' he added. As of June 2, more than 231,000 VEP tags have been issued to private vehicle owners, with nearly 195,000 already installed and activated. For private company vehicles, over 2,600 tags have been activated. Loke also stressed that foreign vehicles must have a valid VEP to enter Malaysia. 'If a private individual's vehicle does not have a valid VEP, a summons will be issued. 'The fine must be settled, and VEP registration completed, before the vehicle is allowed to exit Malaysia.' 'Even if a vehicle is pre-registered but not fully compliant, it will still face summonses and payment requirements,' he said. He said the same rules apply to private company vehicles without valid VEPs. 'In some cases, a reminder notice may be issued to allow temporary exit but vehicle owners must still comply to avoid penalties. 'We want to avoid inconveniences for everyone, so cooperation is essential,' Loke said. He added that summonses must be settled before exiting Malaysia and can be paid via cashless methods at Road Transport Department (RTD) counters, mobile units, or online via MyEG. To avoid congestion, Loke said enforcement checks would not be carried out at the border itself. 'Inspections will be carried out through scheduled operations at selected locations from time to time, not by stationing officers at the border,' he said. 'We know which vehicles haven't registered — the system automatically detects those without valid VEPs.' Beyond enforcement, Loke highlighted the VEP system's role in facilitating smoother traffic flow and enhancing Malaysia-Singapore relations. 'This initiative reflects our commitment to effective border management while respecting the close ties between our countries. 'RTD continues to monitor compliance closely and has already issued summonses to foreign vehicle owners who remain unregistered or whose VEP tags are inactive. 'Vehicle owners are encouraged to register and activate their VEP tags promptly via the official RTD website or at service centres located at the Causeway and Second Link.' He further said that by improving security and compliance, the VEP system is expected to reduce congestion and speed up processing times at border crossings. 'Ultimately, this is about creating a safer, more efficient travel experience for everyone,' Loke said. The VEP system for foreign vehicles entering Malaysia from Singapore via land routes was introduced on October 1 last year. Under this scheme, all foreign vehicles are required to obtain an RFID-based VEP tag issued by the Malaysian Transport Ministry. These tags must be installed, activated, and linked to a valid Touch 'n Go eWallet account before the vehicle can enter Malaysia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store