Corby MP: Rights for terminally-ill staff 'a step closer'
An MP says better protection for workers with terminal illnesses could be implemented across government following his meeting with a minister.Labour's Lee Barron, who represents Corby and East Northamptonshire, wants terminal illness to become a protected characteristic.The move would stop bosses sacking people because they had been diagnosed with an incurable condition.Mr Barron says the Cabinet Office minister, Georgia Gould, signalled her intention "for the whole of Whitehall to sign up" to a charter guaranteeing the rights of workers with terminal illnesses.
Mr Barron, who led a debate on the issue in parliament last December, said: "It's legal in this country to sack a worker diagnosed with a terminal illness. "That is wrong." The Equality Act 2010 prevents employers from discriminating against people because of certain protected characteristics.At the moment, these include things like disability, religion and sexual orientation.Mr Barron told parliament that designating terminal illness as a protected characteristic would mean workers who have been diagnosed would not have to "worry about taking [their] workplace to a tribunal".
'Support, not sack'
He invited the minister to sign up to the TUC's Dying to Work Charter, which "means committing the employer, in this case the UK government, to support, not sack, terminally ill workers".He added that "getting central government endorsement is crucial if we are to change the law".A number of employers have already signed the charter, including RS Components, Wincanton and Royal Mail.Mr Barron said: "Listening to the minister's intention for the whole of Whitehall to sign up to the Charter is reason for much optimism."A government spokesperson said: "The Equality Act 2010 already provides protection for many people with a terminal illness, under the protected characteristic of disability."It is therefore unlawful for an employer to discriminate against them."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
NHS bosses who denied boy, 8, treatment because he attends a private school could be guilty of 'indirect discrimination' says barrister
NHS bosses may have 'indirectly discriminated' against a boy by denying him treatment because he went to private school, a barrister has said. Daniel ShenSmith, a practising lawyer and internet personality, said such a move would be 'unethical' and could breach the Equality Act 2010. It comes after the Mail on Sunday revealed the boy, eight, was denied occupational therapy for this hypermobility syndrome because he is not state-educated. The website of his local NHS Trust, in west London, confirms 'referral criteria' limits the service to children attending a 'state-maintained Richmond school'. On his YouTube channel, Mr ShenSmith explained that such a policy would be potentially 'indirectly discriminatory' because it puts some people with a disability at a disadvantage. He added: 'It's just unethical. How can you justify not treating a child because they go to a private school? 'In my view there is no possible justification for this. 'I think this is indirectly discriminatory. It is a practise that needs to stop. They need to treat all these children in the same fair way, which you might expect an NHS trust to do.' The website of Kingston and Richmond NHS Foundation Trust confirms 'referral criteria' limits occupational therapy to children attending a 'state-maintained Richmond school' He pointed out that the policy is even 'spelt out' on the trust's website, and added: 'I don't think the lawyers looked at this one – and if they did... they need to look at it again.' The intervention comes after the Mail on Sunday revealed the family of the child, who asked to remain anonymous, believe a 'two-tier system' is now at play. However, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has said any suggestion school choice was a factor was a 'miscommunication'. According to the boy's mother, he was referred to a paediatrician at Kingston Hospital in south-west London after she noticed he was 'struggling to hold the pen well enough to write properly', along with other mobility issues. At the hospital appointment she was asked to fill in a form which asked: 'Where does your child go to school?' She had been hoping to get an appointment with Richmond children's occupational therapy service that would have been the 'most important stage' of his assessment. However, days later, she received a text message saying the child had been 'declined' the crucial next appointment with occupational health therapists. She then discovered that the specialist unit had written a letter to her GP saying: 'We are unable to see this child as we do not provide a service to school age children who attend an independent schools [sic]. 'We are only commissioned to provide a service to the mainstream schools.' The boy's older brother – who has the same condition, had been treated without issue several years earlier. In his video about the case, Mr ShenSmith said: 'Why should it make any difference whatsoever whether they attend a state-maintained school as opposed to an independent school?' He said one possible reason for the policy may be to do with administrative processes related to funding. However, he added: 'That's wrong in my view, because that then excludes anyone that goes to an independent school that their parents pay for, and in my view that could be at the very least indirectly discriminatory.' He said under the Equality Act, a blanket policy can be potentially indirectly discriminatory if it 'has an effect which particularly disadvantages people with a protected characteristic'. This would include people with disabilities. Mr ShenSmith, who runs ShenSmith Law, is registered with the Bar Standards Board and was called to the Bar in 2018. He works in a wide range of fields including family, commercial and intellectual property law. In addition, he runs the YouTube channel BlackBeltBarrister, which aims to 'help people understand law'. He added that the Richmond policy was also in breach of the general statutory duty under the current legislation - the National Health Service Act 2006. He told Mail Online: 'This establishes the framework for NHS England to provide universal and free at the point of use service to all eligible individuals including children, regardless of where they attend school.' Health Secretary Wes Streeting was urged this week to 'act swiftly' to intervene in the case. A spokesman for Kingston and Richmond NHS Foundation Trust said the boy had not been denied treatment because of his school. They said occupational therapy services are provided to all children who hold an education, health and care plan (EHCP), regardless of their school. For those without an EHCP, some state schools provide an on-site NHS occupational therapy advice. The spokesman added: 'We are sorry if the wording of our correspondence has caused upset and confusion; we will amend it prospectively.' It is understood anyone without an ECHP who attends a private school would not be able to use on-site services at state schools. A DHSC spokesman said: 'NHS services are free at the point of use to all. 'NHS occupational therapy services are provided for all children with an EHCP. 'For those without an EHCP, some schools provide on-site NHS occupational therapy. 'The Trust has apologised for any miscommunication in its correspondence with the family and is amending its wording to avoid any confusion in the future.' In a separate case, families are currently awaiting a judgement from the High Court on the Government's decision to impose VAT on private school fees. To view Mr ShenSmith's full commentary visit the BlackBeltBarrister YouTube channel.
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
Brigstock pupils call on government for solar panels at school
An appeal by pupils to have solar panels installed at their school has been mentioned during a Parliamentary 5 students at Brigstock Latham's Primary School wrote to Lee Barron, the Labour MP for Corby and East Northamptonshire, who brought their comments to a House of Commons debate on rooftop solar power on Tuesday. Barron said the pupils told him having solar panels would allow their school to cut their carbon footprint, reduce bills and help improve their education, with one pupil writing "we may be a small school, but we can be big sometimes".The pupils were congratulated "on their incredible spirit" by Energy Secretary Ed Miliband. "Young people right across the country care about these issues," he said. "Also, they are pointing out something really important, which is that we have this free resource of the sun and we should use it. "That is why putting solar panels on schools and elsewhere is big project for Great British Energy."In March, the government announced hundreds of schools and hospitals would receive £180m for solar panels from the new state-owned energy company. Brigstock Latham's said it was "so proud of our eco-activists" and explained the children had heard about funding for other schools to get solar panels and "they felt it was unfair that we didn't get any funding".The school, in the village of Brigstock, which has about 15 children in each of its year groups, said solar panels would help it to become more sustainable and save said its pupils were "courageous advocates for green energy and wanting to look after our planet". Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan remains cautious on tariff impact in June econ report
TOKYO, June 11 (Reuters) - Japan's government reiterated its warning on the risks from U.S. tariffs on economic growth, saying in a monthly report on Wednesday that the potential impact on corporate profits needed attention. The economy faces pressure from U.S. import levies of 24% from July unless officials can negotiate them down. Japan's government is also seeking an exemption for its carmakers from a separate 25% import tariff on vehicles. Japan's gross domestic product shrank an annualised 0.2% in the January-March quarter, even before U.S. President Donald Trump announced his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on April 2. "The economy is recovering moderately, while uncertainty is arising from U.S. trade policies," the Cabinet Office said in its monthly report for June released on Wednesday, keeping the assessment unchanged for a third month. In addition to tariffs, the report maintained its reference to "the effect of continued price rises on household sentiment and consumption" as another negative risk to the economy. It also noted that corporate profits were recovering, citing first-quarter business statistics, but added a fresh reference to the potential impact of trade disruptions. "With some firms withholding financial forecasts amid uncertainties surrounding U.S. tariffs, their impact on earnings may come to light only in the data for the April-June quarter or beyond," an official at the Cabinet Office told a press briefing. While no significant impact from U.S. tariffs on Japan's export volumes has been seen so far, trade trends from May onwards required attention, the official added. On wages, this spring's pay negotiations probably led to an average raise of more than 5%, exceeding last year's, although smaller firms lagged bigger companies, the official said, based on the national labour group Rengo's data. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said earlier this week that his ruling party would pledge to achieve growth of more than 50% in Japan's average income by 2040 in campaigning for the upper house elections next month.
