Proposal to make Portland Street Response its own standalone unit moves forward
PORTLAND, Ore. () — The Portland City Council's just passed a resolution to make its own standalone unit.
It now sets the stage for a bigger debate on the future of crisis response across the Rose City.
Driver faces manslaughter in UCC team bus crash
Care, not cuffs — that's the mission of Portland Street Response.
Formed in 2021, Kaia Sand helped launch the initial pilot program as a compassionate alternative for non-violent emergency calls, including mental and behavioral issues.
'These are the street crises that need, you know, an immediate calming, skilled person to come out and deescalate the situation,' Sand said.
Sand is now pushing the community and public safety committee to make PSR its own 24/7 first responder branch, alongside police and fire.
The changes also include a new committee for community oversight, plus full staffing and multilingual support.
OR Senate passes bill to repeal Wildfire Hazard Map
Not all committee members were supportive of the idea, with District 1 Councilor Loretta Smith citing a city budget that is stretched thin.
'We are right now in deficit so I am trying to figure out how do we manage that?' Smith said.
The City of Portland currently faces a $93 million shortfall.
Since June 2023, a Portland State University study shows the street team handled more than 7,000 calls, with no injuries, only 1 arrest with Portland police and over 40% of people helped on-site with no hospital needed.
'You send two responders and a van it's more cost effective, so it's a great thing to be doing in a budget crisis,' Sand said.
Dexter not 'fearful of being loud' after El Salvador
As this heads for a full city council vote, the debate rages on over funding, function and whether it'll hold up.
'It is very normal for us to change things when they're not working,' said District 3 Councilor Angelita Morillo, who is also on the Community and Public Safety Committee.
A petition that has gained 10,000 signatures shows significant public support for expanding Portland Street Response.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
06-06-2025
- Yahoo
City expected to settle with Black Portlanders alleging displacement from Albina district
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Public officials could soon finalize an agreement with Black Portlanders who alleged they were displaced from an area their community once called home. During a meeting on Thursday afternoon, Portland City Council is slated to reach a settlement involving the December 2022 lawsuit from Emanuel Displaced Persons Association 2. The association, representing 26 plaintiffs who live in the Albina district or descend from relatives who did, accused the officials of destroying Black people's homes in the name of 'urban renewal' in the mid-20th century. Tillamook opens first owned-and-operated facility outside of Oregon About two and a half years ago, that several residents were displaced by the construction of Interstate 5 and Veterans Memorial Coliseum in the 1950s and 1960s. The following decade, about 188 properties were demolished to make way for the new Legacy Emanuel Hospital. About 158 of them were residential properties, Black people accounting for about 74% of residents. The displaced buildings also included 32 businesses and four churches or community organizations. The lawsuit claims residents were not adequately compensated, and some weren't compensated at all, after being intimidated by hospital representatives and told that the city would take their homes if they didn't leave willingly. In addition to the City of Portland, Prosper Portland and the hospital were all listed as defendants in the original complaint — but officials say Legacy Health settled their portion of the lawsuit late last year. Both the city and its economic development agency are still expected to dole out $1 million each to defendants. 'Portland's systemic discrimination and displacement harmed Black communities, by excluding them from homeownership and wealth-building opportunities; by denying them access to educational resources, jobs and healthy neighborhoods; and by perpetuating segregation, displacement, and harmful stereotypes through the zoning code, deeds and covenants, lending practices, public housing and urban renewal,' the agreement . FBI Portland addresses halted plan for mass shooting at Washington state mall Along with the payout, officials are Emanuel Displaced Persons Association 2 a 'static display' in the Keller Auditorium if it is renovated. The namesake of the neighboring Ira Keller Fountain led the urban renewal projects that impacted Black Portlanders decades ago, according to the city. The settlement could also direct the music venue to give a '10-year hiring preference' to descendants of the Albina district and establish an annual 'Descendants' Day', among other terms. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Uber urges Portland riders to take stance against proposed fee hikes
PORTLAND, Ore. () — The leading rideshare app is urging Portland customers to take a stance against potential fee hikes on the local and state levels. For some Uber users, a notification that read 'Say No to Higher Fares: The Portland City Council wants to increase your taxes on rideshare by 200%' popped up on their phones on Wednesday. Friends of Frog Ferry continues pushing for river transit along Portland metro area The app is responding to city leaders' proposal to increase the current 65-cent fee on rides booked through Uber, Lyft and similar rideshare platforms. that Portland Mayor Keith Wilson has suggested an updated fee of $1.30 per ride, while District 4 Councilor Mitch Green has suggested $2. 'This proposal would disproportionately affect those who rely on Uber for essential travel to work, school, and critical appointments, especially hitting low-income riders the hardest,' Uber wrote. 'At a time when Portlanders are already facing rising living costs, this additional tax burden, intended to balance the City's budget, could make everyday trips unaffordable for many.' According to proponents of the fee hikes, the additional revenue could help close while also funding services like road repairs and street cleaning. But the rideshare company also highlighted potential changes at the state level. would give drivers a minimum wage of $0.39 for each minute they are active on the app, $1.34 for each mile they drive and $6 per dispatched trip. The bill would also establish minimum paid sick time requirements and prevent companies from deactivating accounts without just cause, among other changes. Jury rules in favor of Black firefighter's racial discrimination case against City of Portland While Drivers Union Oregon has said the legislation could help struggling workers in the industry, Uber has suggested it would increase the cost of rides by 40%. The company has directed users to send state lawmakers an email, asking them to 'keep rideshare affordable.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
Oregon Republicans say Dems delaying vote on wildfire map repeal to get votes for wildfire funding
A wildfire outside Ukiah in Umatilla County in 2024, part of the Battle Mountain Complex of fires that burned more than 183,000 acres. Gov. Tina Kotek has asked the Oregon Legislature for more than a year to find more, stable funding to fight wildfires in the state. (Courtesy of Northwest Interagency Coordination Center) A bill to repeal the state's unpopular Wildfire Hazard Map passed the Oregon Senate unanimously in April, signaling it would be one of the least controversial and most bipartisan bills to pass this session. But that momentum hit unexpected headwinds May 22, when the bill — Senate Bill 83 — landed in the Oregon House's Committee on Climate, Energy, and Environment, where Democrats opted to send it to the House Rules Committee, rather than to the House floor for a final vote. The decision to delay a vote on Senate Bill 83 came as a surprise to Republicans on the Committee, who later accused Democrats, House Speaker Julie Fahey, D-Eugene, and Gov. Tina Kotek of using it as a bargaining chip in negotiations over a wildfire funding proposal that would redirect $1 billion from the state's 'kicker' tax return. That proposal would require a two-thirds supermajority vote in each chamber, meaning at least two Senate Republicans and four House Republicans would need to approve along with all legislative Democrats. 'The speaker has been consistent that we cannot responsibly repeal the wildfire risk maps without also having a clear, workable plan for how we manage wildfire risk in the future, including how we fund that work,' Jill Bakken, Fahey's spokesperson, said in an email. Anca Matica, a Kotek spokesperson, said in an email that 'the legislative branch is the custodian of information regarding bills moving through the legislative process, not the Governor's Office.' Oregon Republicans have long insisted that the kicker — returned to Oregon taxpayers when personal income taxes collected by the state end up at least 2% higher than budgeted — is not to be spent by the Legislature. In a news release May 22, Ashley Kuenzi, communications director for the Oregon Senate Republicans, said the 'spirit of collaboration has seemingly vanished' between Democrats and Republicans on Senate Bill 83. State Sen. David Brock Smith, R-Port Orford, who supported its passage in the Senate, said in the release it was a 'stunning reversal' and 'clear betrayal.' 'Holding rural Oregonians hostage over votes for future wildfire funding is not only obscene, but disgraceful. Put the damn bill on the floor for a vote!' he said. If passed, Senate Bill 83 would repeal the map produced under a multi-year effort by scientists at state agencies and Oregon State University that show where the highest risk of wildfires are throughout the state. The map provoked backlash from homeowners in some high-risk areas worried about wildfire insurance rates and coverage and potentially having to comply with new building requirements. State Sen. Jeff Golden, D-Ashland, who carried Senate Bill 83 in the Senate, has been outspoken that the map should be repealed because of unintended consequences, including widespread misinformation about how the map was intended to be used, creating distrust between some property owners and state agencies. In a text, Golden said House Democrats' decision not to move the bill straight to the House floor for a vote is making the repeal of the maps 'more complicated than it needed to be.' 'To me, the smartest path from the start was to unite around map repeal and get it to the Governor's desk to show folks we all put protecting the state ahead of politics,' he said. 'That's what we did in the Senate. Looks like the thinking in the House was different but nobody's told me what it is.' Golden is also behind the proposal just now gaining steam to use $1 billion of the state's anticipated $1.64 billion kicker to fund much needed wildfire prevention and response work throughout the state. Golden proposed the idea months ago to little fanfare, but Gov. Tina Kotek recently signaled her support for the idea in the absence of other options, telling reporters at a news conference May 20 it would be 'a beneficial approach.' Kotek has asked the Legislature for more than a year to come up with a reliable and consistent funding mechanism to support statewide wildfire work and has so far not received any proposals that come close to meeting her desired target of an additional $150 million per year. Putting $1 billion of the kicker into an account that accrues 5% interest each year could provide the state with at least $50 million of that. 'That would be very helpful for the state,' Kotek told reporters. CORRECTION: Kuenzi is communications director for the Oregon Senate Republicans, not House Republicans, as previously reported. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
