North Korea halts foreign tourism weeks after reopening to Western visitors
HONG KONG — North Korea has once again closed its borders, suspending foreign tourism just weeks after the secretive state welcomed its first Western visitors in five years.
North Korea sealed its borders in early 2020 at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, gradually lifting restrictions starting in mid-2023.
The first tourists, a group from Russia, were allowed into the country in February 2024, but the first international visitors from other countries including Britain, Canada, France and Germany only arrived in North Korea for the first time last month.
The visit by the Western group was limited to the remote northeastern city of Rason, which the North Korean government has designated a special economic zone. During the trip they visited factories, shops and statues of late North Korean leaders.
Unlike the Russians, they were not allowed to visit Pyongyang, the capital.
Tour operators said Wednesday that travel to North Korea was no longer possible until further notice. It was unclear why North Korea had closed again to foreign visitors and how long the suspension would last.
'We have been informed that Rason is temporarily CLOSED,' Koryo Tours, a tour operator based in Beijing, said in a statement Wednesday. 'It's an unprecedented situation.'
Other travel agencies that organize North Korea trips made similar announcements.
'We recommend that those planning tours in April and May refrain from booking flights until we have more information,' China-based Young Pioneer Tours said in a Facebook post, adding that refunds are available for tours that are canceled due to the abrupt change.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - HSBC chair's AIA move less startling than it seems
MELBOURNE, June 6 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Never get back together with your ex, they say. Departing HSBC (HSBA.L), opens new tab, ( opens new tab Chair Mark Tucker is ignoring such advice. He's returning to AIA ( opens new tab, where he served as CEO from 2010 to 2017 before joining the UK bank, as head of its board, the $91 billion Hong Kong-based insurer said on Friday, opens new tab. It seems like a backward step. But it's not as startling as it looks. It's not the cleanest of appointments from a governance perspective: elevating a former boss to be chair is generally frowned upon outside of the U.S., where the practice remains common, as it raises concerns the old CEO might try to exert undue control. Tucker should be deemed as independent under Hong Kong Stock Exchange criteria, which encourages a two-year gap since holding an executive role. He has been gone for eight years, and current Lee Yuan Siong, CEO since 2020, joined after his departure. That said, AIA will want Tucker atop the board in part because of the reputation he built at the UK bank for being a hands-on chair willing to shake things up. It won't be lost on Lee for example, that HSBC had four CEOs during Tucker's eight-year tenure. AIA's earnings have grown slightly over the past five years, but its stock is essentially flat over that period - and rival Prudential (PRU.L), opens new tab has been closing the valuation gap. Tucker's soon-to-be fellow board members might not be able to rest easy, either: half of the 10 independent directors have been there for more than a decade, making the staid roster ripe for change. What's more curious is why Tucker wants to go back. AIA, while no minnow, is smaller than the $206 billion bank he currently sits atop by earnings, market value, geographic scope and diversity of businesses. That could have served, for example, as a springboard to another global institution, including U.S.-based ones - Tucker at present lives in New York. But being AIA chair is an appealing role for someone with his experience of and interest in China. Tucker has focused on the region for much of his career, having run the UK's Hong Kong and China-heavy Prudential before becoming AIA's CEO. During his tenure at HSBC, the bank built up substantial operations in the mainland, and Hong Kong is its largest profit centre with around a third of pretax earnings. In January he led the business delegation that accompanied UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves on the government's most important trip to the People's Republic since 2018. If the stars align, his new role at his old flame could make for a productive relationship. Follow Antony Currie on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Chinese beauty brands explore foreign M&A to spur growth
SHANGHAI, June 10 (Reuters) - Some of China's top beauty brands such as Proya and S'Young are exploring acquisitions of smaller foreign rivals to expand their portfolios and replicate the success of global leaders like L'Oreal or Estée Lauder amid slowing growth at home. While still relatively unknown internationally, these Chinese brands have found significant domestic success, even capturing market share from global players. But a prolonged property crisis and concerns about wage growth and employment security have dampened consumer spending in China - posing new challenges to their continued growth. Proya Cosmetics' ( opens new tab founder, Hou Juncheng, said last month that the company's 10-year plan aims to position the firm among the top ten globally, a goal that would require an annual revenue of at least 50 billion yuan ($7 billion). To do so, the Hangzhou-based Proya plans "to acquire some European brands with history and technology", local media reports cited Hou as telling shareholders at a meeting. Proya, which specialises in science-backed skincare at mass market price points, became the first Chinese beauty player to surpass 10 billion yuan in annual revenue in 2024. In comparison, Japan's Shiseido (4911.T), opens new tab, currently ranked tenth globally, raked in $6.9 billion and market leader L'Oreal ( opens new tab generated over $45 billion in revenue last year. S'Young and Ushopal, two prominent Chinese beauty groups, have already made strides in international acquisitions. S'Young owns French skincare brand Evidens de Beaute and U.S.-brand ReVive, while Ushopal added French brand Payot to a portfolio that includes British skincare label ARgENTUM and French fragrance Juliette has a gun. William Lau, a partner at Ushopal, said the company plans to acquire one to two new brands annually. Analysts say buying foreign brands can help Chinese beauty firms diversify revenue streams and reduce reliance on the domestic market, but they also note that some similar efforts by Chinese fashion groups had missed expectations in the past. The beauty and personal care market is projected to generate a revenue of $677.19 billion globally in 2025, versus $41.78 billion in China, German data provider Statista estimates. Chinese brands are likely to target premium-positioned European skincare, fragrance or haircare brands with valuations under $500 million, said Gregoire Grandchamp, co-founder of Next Beauty China, who has advised Chinese groups on global deals. "In coming years, there will be a big Chinese company that will be the Chinese L'Oreal, Estée Lauder, Shiseido, or Amorepacific," Grandchamp predicted. Acquisitions have long been a growth strategy for beauty giants. L'Oreal's $2.5 billion purchase of Australian brand Aesop in 2023 added a premium, natural cosmetics brand to its portfolio, while Estee Lauder's (EL.N), opens new tab $2.8 billion acquisition of Tom Ford in 2022 helped boost its array of high-end perfumes. Chinese beauty brands aim to borrow from this M&A playbook, but there are concerns about their ability to operate brands outside their home turf. In the fashion space, state-owned textile giant Ruyi once made headlines for snapping up foreign brands and touting its ambition to become "China's LVMH" only to see those international deals unwound by creditors in a few short years. But Ushopal's Lau says these challenges are not unique to Chinese groups, citing examples like Shiseido's buyout of Drunk Elephant to L'Oreal's purchase of some Chinese brands that struggled to meet expectations. "Global acquisitions are very difficult" in general and part of the problem is that companies often try to localise brands too quickly after a deal, he said. "One of the reasons you buy a brand is because it's an amazing brand, so if you then redo the entire DNA of the brand, what's the point of buying it?" he added. Mark Tanner, founder and managing director of Shanghai-based marketing and research agency China Skinny, said: "Opening doors to the Chinese market and capital injections, rather than a wholesale management takeover" are more likely to succeed. ($1 = 7.1862 Chinese yuan)
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Hong Kong leader says national security scrutiny of restaurants is necessary
HONG KONG, June 10 (Reuters) - Hong Kong will toughen screening of catering premises for potential violations of national security, which civil servants should accord top priority in deciding on licence approvals, the city's leader said on Tuesday. Critics see the move as targeting the territory's many businesses, including cafes and restaurants, that have displayed posters, symbols or images expressing solidarity with its embattled pro-democracy movement. Such businesses, widely called the "yellow economic circle", have faced growing pressure from authorities, such as tax inspectors, at a time when they are reeling from a broader economic and retail downturn. "Food and environmental hygiene officers ... should place national security as the most important consideration and make appropriate assessments," John Lee told reporters. He called the move "appropriate and necessary", saying all civil servants were expected to rate security as the highest priority under the national security law. The city's food and hygiene department would follow the law in considering new licences and renewing existing ones, he added. In recent years, authorities in the Asian financial hub have made use of sweeping national security laws imposed after mass anti-government protests in 2019 to systematically crack down on many of its liberal pockets. In May, the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department sent letters to thousands of food and entertainment premises, obliging them to accept new terms related to national security. In one document seen by Reuters, the government told business owners to ensure no activity in which they were engaged or involved in "may constitute or cause the occurrence of an offence endangering national security". The former British colony's crackdown on dissent, from arresting democratic activists to shuttering liberal media and civil society groups, has drawn criticism from countries such as Australia, Britain, Canada and the United States.
