Samsung wins injunction against TCL in Germany
Samsung Electronics has won a temporary injunction against Chinese appliance-maker TCL in Germany, barring TCL from using the contested TV brand name in the European Union.
Samsung filed an injunction lawsuit in November against TCL's German subsidiary at the Dusseldorf Regional Court, alleging that TCL's Nxtframe infringes on the trademark of Samsung's The Frame TV, according to sources.
The court ruled in Samsung's favor on Feb. 26, following an oral hearing on Jan. 29, where it found a likelihood of confusion between the TVs from Samsung and TCL, according to Hoyng Rokh Monegier and Rospatt, the intellectual property law firms representing Samsung.
'Under the Dusseldorf Court's judgement, TCL is prohibited from using the sign NXTFRAME in the course of trade with televisions within the European Union, whether directly or through third parties. In particular, TCL is prohibited from offering or distributing televisions under this sign,' the law firms stated.
The case involved TCL's TV brand Nxtframe, which was first unveiled at the IFA 2024, Europe's largest home appliance trade show, in Berlin in September.
Samsung released The Frame in 2017, a lifestyle TV designed to display artworks and photos when the screen is off. With a picture-frame-style bezel, the TV is designed to look like a framed piece of art that can be hung on the wall. Observers noted that TCL's Nxtframe shares a similar design and concept.
As a result of the court ruling, TCL can no longer use the Nxtframe name in Europe. In response to the ruling TCL's sales websites in the EU have changed the name of the Nxtframe model to A300.
But on other countries' websites, including in the US, TCL is still marketing the TV series as Nxtframe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump speaks with Xi amid stalled talks between the US and China over tariffs
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, have spoken amid stalled negotiations between both countries over tariffs that have roiled global trade. The discussion on Thursday followed Trump suggesting it was tough to reach a deal with Xi. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!,' Trump posted Wednesday on his social media site. Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a May 12 agreement between both countries to reduce their tariff rates in order to have talks. Behind the gridlock has been the continued competition for an economic edge.
Korea Herald
9 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Is foreign appetite for housing a threat to Korea?
Residential properties owned by foreign nationals surpass 100,000 in 2024 Foreign nationals are increasingly entering the housing market, and their growing presence is beginning to raise questions about the future of housing access, investment behavior and regulatory oversight. Over the past three years, the number of homes owned by foreign buyers has steadily increased, rising by 4 to 6 percent every six months. Recently, the trend reached a new milestone. As of late December, foreign nationals owned more than 100,000 housing units in South Korea — the first time the figure has crossed that threshold since the government began tracking it in 2022, according to data from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Though these properties comprise only about 0.5 percent of South Korea's roughly 20 million housing units, the uptick has prompted questions about whether some purchases are being made for investment purposes rather than for residential use. Regulatory gaps for non-residents have also been a point of discussion. The available data provides a broad snapshot but leaves out key details. It does not distinguish between buyers who reside in Korea and those who may be investing from overseas. Nor does it track the motivations behind purchases — whether for long-term living, rental income or speculation. Foreign residents who have stayed in Korea for more than 90 days now number over 2 million, suggesting that, proportionally, foreign ownership remains relatively modest. Still, patterns within the data reveal some concentration. Chinese nationals accounted for the largest share of foreign-owned homes, followed by US and Canadian citizens. The capital region is by far the most popular area for foreign buyers. Nearly three-quarters of all foreign-owned homes are located in the greater Seoul area, with more than 23,000 properties situated within the city itself. Most foreign homeowners — about 93 percent — own just one home. However, a small number hold multiple properties, including 461 individuals who own five or more units, which some see as a potential sign of investment activity. As the trend continues, policymakers and analysts are watching closely, not because the numbers are overwhelming, but because of the broader implications — from housing availability to the effectiveness of existing oversight mechanisms. Dodging the rulebook Some argue that foreign nationals may have an easier time acquiring real estate in South Korea by securing financing from lenders in their home countries, a strategy that could allow them to bypass Korea's stringent loan regulations. Certified transcripts — documents required when purchasing land or housing in Korea — show instances of foreign buyers acquiring high-end properties at record-high prices, often paid in full with cash. 'Foreigners take out loans from overseas banks to purchase housing here, distorting the local real estate market,' said Kwon Dae-jung, a professor of real estate at Sogang University's Graduate School. Others, however, argue that the practice is likely limited in scope, as obtaining loans for overseas property purchases can be difficult. 'Securing a loan in a foreign country to buy residential property in Korea would not be easy, unless the buyer is extremely wealthy,' said an official at a local real estate investment firm. 'Even in commercial real estate, offshore investors usually prefer to finance through local banks. For residential housing, cross-border financing tends to be even more difficult.' Foreign nationals are subject to the same borrowing limits at Korean banks as local citizens, including regulations based on loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios. Still, completely closing off regulatory loopholes remains a challenge. While Korea imposes heavier taxes on multi-homeowners, enforcing these rules among foreign nationals can be challenging, particularly in identifying household members living abroad. Calls for tightened grip Regulatory efforts to manage demand from foreign homebuyers in Korea continue to gain traction, with some measures targeting Chinese nationals — the largest group of foreign property owners in the country. In May, Rep. Ko Dong-jin of the ruling People Power Party proposed a bill that would introduce a permit system for foreign nationals seeking to purchase property in the greater Seoul area. Citing the principle of reciprocity, Ko argued that Chinese nationals' access to Korean real estate should be limited, pointing out that South Koreans face similar restrictions when attempting to purchase property in China. Ko's proposal is part of a broader, bipartisan push by lawmakers in recent years to tighten regulations on foreign ownership. Other initiatives have included calls for higher acquisition taxes and stricter property-related rules for non-Korean buyers. However, none of these measures have passed the legislative threshold. Legal experts argue that regulating property purchases by nationality could violate the constitutional principle of reciprocity. Despite the legal challenges, authorities are continuing their efforts to monitor and respond to growing concerns. On Monday, Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon ordered a comprehensive investigation into real estate transactions involving foreign nationals. He called for a full review of foreign ownership patterns and proposed additional safeguards to prevent potential market distortions or what he described as 'reverse discrimination' against Korean citizens. Although there is currently no conclusive evidence that foreign homeownership is driving instability in the housing market, officials remain wary. 'The government has to figure out a way to strengthen measures to track down foreign purchases of local residential properties. Otherwise, the rising foreign demand will drive up further market distortion," Kwon said.
Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump's chip subsidy renegotiation casts uncertainty over Samsung, SK hynix
The Trump administration is renegotiating subsidies pledged under the previous Biden administration's CHIPS Act, sparking concerns that South Korean chipmakers Samsung Electronics and SK hynix might see cuts in funding for their US investments. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told the Senate Appropriations Committee that some of the subsidy agreements reached during the Biden administration 'just seemed overly generous, and we've been able to renegotiate them,' according to Reuters. 'All the deals are getting better, and the only deals that are not getting done are deals that should have never been done in the first place,' Lutnick was quoted as saying. His remarks suggest that not all grants pledged under the CHIPS Act will be paid out as originally committed, leaving chipmakers who were counting on the funding for their large-scale US projects in doubt. From the campaign trail, US President Donald Trump repeatedly called for the repeal of the subsidies, arguing that imposing tariffs, instead of grants, would be more effective to lure chipmakers to set up manufacturing facilities in the US. During an address to a joint session of the US Congress in March, Trump said the CHIPS Act is a 'horrible thing' and called for its removal. In 2022, then-US President Joe Biden signed the CHIPS and Science Act, allocating $39 billion in subsidies and grants for semiconductor companies setting up manufacturing and research facility in the US. Among the beneficiaries were chip heavyweights including Taiwan's TSMC, Korea's Samsung and SK hynix, as well as US-based Intel and Micron. Any delays or renegotiated terms for investment could deal a blow to Samsung and SK hynix, who had already pledged to invest tens of billions of dollars to build new advanced chip facilities. Depending on funding plans, they may be forced to reconsider their US investment strategies. Samsung is investing over $37 billion to build two new advanced fabrication plants and an R&D facility in Taylor, Texas. In return, the company has been awarded $4.74 billion in direct funding. SK hynix has secured $450 million in direct funding for a $3.87 million investment in building an advanced chip packaging plant and an R&D center in West Lafayette, Indiana. Regarding the future of their funding, a Samsung Electronics official said the company is monitoring the situation. An SK hynix official said there was nothing to comment on at this time.
