With $50 million spent already, state hires new consultant to restart prison planning
From left, South Dakota Speaker of the House Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen, and Ryan Brunner, an adviser to Gov. Larry Rhoden, participate in a Project Prison Reset meeting on April 3, 2025, at the Military Heritage Alliance in Sioux Falls. (John Hult/South Dakota Searchlight)
SIOUX FALLS — A $729,000 consultant contract will be added to the roughly $50 million South Dakota has already spent on a stalled prison construction effort.
State officials signed a contract this week to pay a consultant to repeat and update a $323,000 prison facilities report that has framed three years of discussions on the state's correctional needs.
The contract with Phoenix-based Arrington Watkins is just the latest deduction from a $62 million pool of money spent down to less than a fifth of its original size to prepare for a now-paused Lincoln County prison project.
On Thursday, representatives with the Gov. Larry Rhoden administration acknowledged that taxpayers will be out most of that money unless lawmakers vote to revive the controversial project — or a scaled-down version of it — during a June special legislative session.
Prison work group peppered with public testimony in first Sioux Falls meeting
About $50 million of the money is already gone. It was spent to secure land, design a campus, and secure a stake in the electrical, water and sewer infrastructure that would've been necessary to house and care for 1,500 inmates. The state's under contract to spend millions more, but has paused that work.
The state could 'claw back' some of that $50 million, but Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen said the administration knew there could be 'significant costs' to shifting course.
'We're doing what we can to reduce that, but it could be a considerable amount, and that's something we have to consider as we move forward,' Venhuzen said after a meeting of the Project Prison Reset work group at the South Dakota Military Heritage Alliance.
The state based its earlier decision to pursue an $825 million facility largely on the recommendations of a 2022 report from the Omaha-based DLR Group. Lawmakers rejected that idea in February.
That report outlined the state's correctional system deficiencies and recommended a host of potential solutions. The lawmakers most skeptical of the Lincoln County prison proposal repeatedly cited that report's lower men's prison price estimate, as well as its smaller-scale alternative prison construction options.
The forthcoming Arrington Watkins report will ask the same sorts of questions. Ryan Brunner, the Rhoden adviser who serves as his point person on prison issues, said Thursday that eight members of the work group reviewed the contract before the state signed it.
The state is also preparing to release a request for information, Brunner said, seeking interest from any landowners who might be willing to sell their property to the state for prison projects.
After the meeting, Venhuizen said the work group would use the Arrington Watkins report and any interest gleaned from the land-seeking notice to decide where to go next on prison construction.
The DLR suggested a 1,300-bed men's prison, but affixed a far smaller price tag than the one lawmakers were presented with last November.
Under the direction of the Department of Corrections, a 2022 summer study group endorsed a 1,500-bed facility.
Initial 2023 design contracts for that facility, partially redacted versions of which were given to South Dakota Searchlight by the DOC last month, put the top price at $450 million — roughly in line with DLR Group's estimates. An amended contract soon pushed that figure higher. A contract amendment in April of 2024 put the 'not to exceed' price at $740 million.
That figure was not offered during a legislative Appropriations Committee the following month, though. At that meeting, and another legislative meeting later that summer, lawmakers were told that the 'guaranteed maximum price' would come in November.
By the time that $825 million number arrived, the state had already spent millions to design the facility, drill test bores for a possible geothermal energy system, and to scan for cultural artifacts and wetlands.
The state continued to sign contracts for the Lincoln County prison project into early 2025. The $825 million guaranteed price expired in March.
Lawmakers who'd hoped to move forward with the project warned their compatriots that the price would only grow through inaction.
Michelle Jensen, one of the Lincoln County landowners who sued the state over the prison plan, offered a different perspective in her public testimony to the work group on Thursday.
Jensen noted that a final decision from the state Supreme Court in that lawsuit could come after the June special session.
The remedy for financial losses in Lincoln County, Jensen said, should have been for the state to 'stop spending money out there if you know it's a thing that might not happen.'
Jensen also suggested that the state could sell the land.
The DOC transferred about $8 million to the Office of School and Public Lands to obtain the title to the 320 Lincoln County acres upon which it had hoped to build its prison. The land had passed into the ownership of the state Office of School and Public Lands years ago when the owners died without heirs or a will.
On a roadside viewing of the property Wednesday afternoon, Brunner told the work group that the state only needed half the property for the prison, and that the other half was reserved for possible future use.
Brunner sounded a hopeful note Thursday on a $10.5 million contract with the city of Lennox for a sewer line.
The line's not in the ground yet, even though Lennox has collected the money.
Funding for all but $500,000 of that contract came from the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The ARPA dollars had to be obligated to a water or sewer infrastructure project by Dec. 31, 2024.
Had the prison project gone forward, Lennox would've been in line for $50,000 monthly payments from the state. Those monthly payments would amount to less than $30 per person for each of the people — inmates and staff — who'd have used the prison's toilets, sinks and showers.
'It's not that much different than your household sewer bill,' Brunner reasoned on Thursday. 'And so we don't start paying that until we actually start running sewage.'
If the work group picks a site within 10 miles of Lennox in any direction for any other prison project, Brunner said, the state will still get something from that investment.
'If you're within 10 miles of Lennox, it's possible we could run that line to it,' Brunner said.
The state also entered into agreements with Southeastern Electric Cooperative and South Lincoln Rural Water to pay for portions of upgrades planned by the respective utility providers. The state has paid for some of its stake in those projects. Brunner said the state could still pull out of a substation project, since the station has yet to be placed and could move to another location.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
HOOD vs. IBKR: Which Fintech Broker is Poised for More Growth?
Robinhood Markets HOOD and Interactive Brokers Group IBKR are prominent online brokerage players offering commission-free trading platforms. Robinhood appeals to newer, mobile-first retail investors, while Interactive Brokers serves more advanced traders with its comprehensive the stock markets witnessing massive volatility and client activity, HOOD and IBKR are expected to benefit from increased trading activities. As such, investors are bullish on both. This year, shares of HOOD have soared 65.8%, while Interactive Brokers is up 18.4%. Also, stocks have fared better than the industry, the Zacks Finance sector and the S&P 500 Index in the same time frame. HOOD & IBKR YTD Price Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research So, the question arises: which brokerage stock — Robinhood or Interactive Brokers — offers greater upside in the evolving trading market? Let's break down their fundamentals, financial performance, growth prospects and more before taking any decision. Robinhood became extremely popular among younger generations in early 2021, riding on the meme stock wave. Nonetheless, since its IPO in July 2021, a lot has happened on the business front. It has evolved from a brokerage firm primarily trading in digital assets to a more mature and diversified entity, striving to become a one-stop shop for building generational wealth. In this context, HOOD has launched several initiatives to attract more clients and strengthen its market share. Some notable ones are Robinhood Strategies, Robinhood Banking and Robinhood Cortex to boost the wealth management offerings; the prediction markets hub; a credit card and a desktop trading platform. Additionally, Robinhood is expanding via strategic acquisitions, which are helping it foray into new businesses and complement existing ones. On Tuesday, it announced an agreement to buy Canada-based WonderFi Technologies Inc. in a C$250 million all-cash deal, which will help deepen its presence in the Canadian digital asset market. In February 2025, it completed the $300 million acquisition of TradePMR, a custodial and portfolio management platform specializing in services for Registered Investment in July 2024, Robinhood acquired Pluto Capital Inc. With the integration of Pluto's advanced capabilities, the company has revolutionized the investment experience for its users. Further, the impending buyout of Bitstamp (announced in June 2024), a globally recognized cryptocurrency exchange (featuring more than 85 tradable assets and popular in Europe and Asia), will significantly enhance the company's crypto these efforts reflect HOOD's ambition to become a full-spectrum financial services provider. HOOD Sales Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Interactive Brokers' technological superiority remains one of its strongest aspects. The company processes trades in stocks, futures, options and forex on more than 150 exchanges across several countries and technology usage has kept IBKR's compensation expense relative to net revenues (10.8% in the first quarter of 2025) below its industry peers. Further, the company has been emphasizing developing proprietary software to automate broker-dealer functions, leading to a steady rise in Brokers is expanding globally with a series of strategic moves. Earlier this month, it extended trading hours for Forecast Contracts to nearly 24 hours, after having launched them in Canada. In the U.K., it added mutual funds to its ISA offerings, enhancing tax-efficient investing. IBKR also introduced PEA accounts in France and expanded mobile trading via GlobalTrader. Other innovations include almost 24 hours of Overnight Trading on U.S. stocks and ETFs, crypto trading through Paxos with low fees and the launch of IBKR Desktop, a next-gen trading platform for Windows and Mac, underscoring its focus on advanced, global trading company's technological superiority, combined with easier regulations to improve product velocity, will support its net revenues through higher client acquisitions. Net revenues are also expected to strengthen further in the quarters ahead, given the solid Daily Average Revenue Trades (DARTs) numbers and robust trading backdrop driven by higher market participation. IBKR Sales Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for HOOD's 2025 and 2026 earnings indicates an 11.9% and 19.4% rise for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Over the past month, earnings estimates for 2025 have remained unchanged, while for 2026, the same have been revised upward. Earnings Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research On the contrary, analysts are less optimistic about IBKR's prospects. The consensus mark for earnings suggests 0.4% and 7% growth for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Earnings estimates for both years have been revised lower over the past 30 days. Earnings Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Hence, on earnings growth prospects, HOOD clearly has an edge over Interactive Brokers. Valuation-wise, HOOD is currently trading at the 12-month forward price-to-earnings (P/E) of 47.17X. The IBKR stock, on the other hand, is currently trading at the 12-month trailing P/TB of 28.86X. Further, both are trading at a premium to the industry average of 13.82X. P/E F12M Image Source: Zacks Investment Research While Robinhood commands a premium over Interactive Brokers, its valuation is justified, given its superior growth trajectory. Additionally, HOOD's return on equity (ROE) of 15.42% is way above IBKR's 4.97%. HOOD also outscores the industry ROE of 11.97%. This reflects Robinhood's efficient use of shareholder funds to generate profits. ROE Image Source: Zacks Investment Research HOOD has undergone a significant transformation since its IPO, evolving from a disruptive trading app into a comprehensive financial services platform. Through strategic acquisitions, it is aggressively expanding its product suite and global reach. It's also investing in advanced tools like Robinhood Cortex and Robinhood Strategies, targeting a broader investor base. These innovations, paired with a robust ROE and accelerating earnings and sales growth estimates through 2026, suggest strong long-term upside the other hand, Interactive Brokers remains a dominant, tech-driven brokerage favored by professional and institutional investors. Its global reach, low-cost model and powerful trading tools continue to support consistent revenue growth. However, while the company's innovation in areas like Forecast Contracts, GlobalTrader and IBKR Desktop is impressive, its earnings outlook is more muted, with only modest growth expected in the next two years. Combined with a lower ROE and downward revisions to earnings estimates, this suggests that while IBKR is a stable, well-run business, it may not match HOOD's upside potential in a growth-focused Robinhood appears to be the better long-term investment for solid returns. At present, Robinhood and Interactive Brokers carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The changes coming to Trump's 'big beautiful bill have little to do with Elon Musk
Washington was on two parallel tracks this past week when discussing President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." On one front: The nation's capital was transfixed by a seismic fight between Elon Musk and President Trump, centered on the cost of the $3 trillion tax and spending bill. On another front: Republican leaders steadily advanced the pricey package with only a few changes apparently on offer. "Pedal to the metal," Senate Majority Leader John Thune offered in a speech Thursday near the height of the Musk drama — ignoring promises from the world's richest man to oust lawmakers who didn't join his effort to kill the bill. Republicans instead appeared to move closer to passage. They previewed changes that will be of interest to taxpayers and businesses, but with little to fulsomely address the critique from Musk and others around the package's price tag. In spite of Musk's campaign and multiple government and independent analyses that found at least $2.4 trillion in new red ink, Thune dismissed Musk this week by saying "we're a long ways down this track" and that his party is "rowing in the same direction." Thune may be overstating things a touch, with a vocal group of fiscal conservatives emboldened by Musk suggesting they will vote no. But Republican leaders from the president on down echoed Thune's position throughout the week. Stifel's Brian Gardner offered a bottom line in a note this past week, suggesting the fighting "makes for great TV and fodder ... but it is unlikely to fundamentally change the composition of the tax bill." "Musk's sway among Republican voters is limited," he added. The week saw a flurry of negotiations over changes to the House package, but, perhaps Washington being Washington, even the cost-saving changes appear to have been immediately spoken for. A meeting on Wednesday with the president, Thune, and members of the Senate Finance Committee ended with a focus on two changes. The first could save significant money by paring back a $40,000 tax deduction in the House bill for state and local taxes (SALT). Any changes there will face fierce opposition when the bill returns to the House, but the Washington Post reported this week that Trump has even indicated he is willing to lower the deduction. But any savings there may be quickly eaten up by the second bit of news this week, which concerns making some business tax incentives permanent. These tax deductions to businesses involve property depreciation, interest expenses, and R&D and are currently temporary in the House package. But an array of key Senators are keen to make them permanent (and more expensive). It's still a matter of some debate, with some hawks like Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin having told reporters he is looking to keep those tax breaks temporary and that Trump isn't sold. Johnson had emerged as a fierce critic of the package over spending and is also threatening to reform or break the package into different parts. He would need at least three Republican senators to join him and stand up to what is expected to be a fierce White House pressure campaign. Another key business-world change in the offing that emerged this week involves a provision that says no state may make its own law to regulate artificial intelligence in the coming decade. The need for changes there became evident when Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia acknowledged she hadn't been aware of the provision when she voted yes in the House, but that she would flip to no if it stayed in place. Those proposed revision — seen this week as part of a larger spectrum package released by the Senate Commerce Committee — would change the House plan for a 10-year outright ban to a system that blocks some federal broadband funding if a state passes certain AI laws. Tech companies will be watching those developments closely, but they're not expected to have much impact on the bill's price tag. Another possible change could actually push up the price tag, with a growing debate around changes in the House bill to Section 899 of the IRS code, focused on what Republicans call "discriminatory foreign countries." The provision would allow the president to impose new taxes to combat the practices. Removing that change could cut into future government revenues, allowing the president to levy fewer taxes as a result. Other changes could also be coming that might increase the price tag, with some senators still concerned that current cost-saving measures go too far. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri has been outspoken on one of the key changes around limiting Medicaid benefits, writing in a recent New York Times op-ed that cuts will hurt the working class and that the core of the issue is "will Republicans be a majority party of working people or a permanent minority speaking only for the C-suite?" Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Indian dealers offer steeper discounts as price rally dulls demand
By Rajendra Jadhav and Brijesh Patel (Reuters) - Gold discounts in India widened this week to their highest levels in more than a month, as a rally in domestic prices to near-record highs weighed on demand, while elevated rates also dampened buying across other major Asian hubs. Domestic gold prices were trading around 98,300 rupees per 10 grams on Friday, after rebounding from a low of 90,890 rupees last month and nearing the all-time high of 99,358 rupees. The spike in prices forced Indian dealers to offer discounts of up to $56 an ounce below official domestic prices, which include a 6% import duty and 3% sales tax, up from $31 last week. "Prices have gone up, and that's really hit demand. Hardly anyone was buying this week," said Harshad Ajmera of wholesaler JJ Gold House in Kolkata. Gold demand in India typically remains subdued during the monsoon season, which began earlier than usual this year. Jewellers are not making purchases because the lean demand season has started, and they don't want to build high-cost inventory, said a Mumbai-based bullion dealer with a private bank. Meanwhile, dealers in top gold consumer China charged premiums of $10-$14 an ounce over the global benchmark spot price. Last week, bullion changed hands at par to a $15 premium. "Elevated gold prices appear to have negatively impacted Chinese demand, judging by weaker trading volume," said Hugo Pascal, a precious metals trader at InProved. In Hong Kong, gold was sold at a premium of $0.30 to $1.30, while in Singapore gold traded between at-par prices and a $2.50 premium. "We've seen some of our clients coming to take profit and also on the wholesale side, we've seen some selling because prices are high," said Brian Lan, managing director at Singapore-based GoldSilver Central. In Japan, bullion traded anywhere between a discount of $0.5 and a $0.5 premium over spot prices.