logo
Here's how much money the South African golfers won at the US Open

Here's how much money the South African golfers won at the US Open

Home » Here's how much money the South African golfers won at the US Open
American J.J. Spaun won the 2025 US Open at Oakmont Country Club in dramatic fashion. Here's how the South Africans in the field fared. Image: Wikimedia Commons
American J.J. Spaun won the 2025 US Open at Oakmont Country Club in dramatic fashion on Sunday in what was only his second PGA Tour title – and first major win.
He also collected $4.3 million.
Runner-up Robert MacIntyre (Scotland) earned $2 322 000 while Norway's Viktor Hovland, who was solo third, picked up $1 459 284.
A total of 66 players from the 156-man starting field made the cut – which included one amateur.
Those that didn't make the halfway cut which fell on 7-over par, each earned $10 000 (R178 000).
Among those players to miss out on the final 36 holes were South African duo Erik van Rooyen (9-over par) and Jacques Kruyswijk (10-over par).
Two South Africans – Thriston Lawrence and Christiaan Bezuidenhout – did make the cut – and both finished in a tie for 12th on 6-over par.
They each pocketed $348 967 (R6.2 million).
For the majors, the US Open hands out slightly more than the Masters, which increased its purse to $21 million in April. The PGA Championship bumped its purse to $19 million for Quail Hollow last month. The Open Championship paid out $17 million at Royal Troon in 2024. FINISH PLAYER EARNINGS 1 J.J. Spaun $4,300,000 2 Robert MacIntyre $2,322,000 3 Viktor Hovland $1,459,284 T4 Cameron Young $876,869 T4 Tyrrell Hatton $876,869 T4 Carlos Ortiz $876,869 T7 Sam Burns $614,423 T7 Jon Rahm $614,423 T7 Scottie Scheffler $614,423 T10 Russell Henley $465,937 T10 Ben Griffin $465,937 T12 Adam Scott $348,967 T12 Thriston Lawrence $348,967 T12 Rasmus Neergaard-Peterson $348,967 T12 Xander Schauffele $348,967 T12 Chris Kirk $348,967 T12 Brooks Koepka $348,967 T12 Christiaan Bezuidenhout $348,967 T19 Rory McIlroy $242,532 T19 Ryan Fox $242,532 T19 Emiliano Grillo $242,532 T19 Victor Perez $242,532 T23 Patrick Reed $161,132 T23 Collin Morikawa $161,132 T23 Jordan Spieth $161,132 T23 Matt Wallace $161,132 T23 Jason Day $161,132 T23 Sam Stevens $161,132 T23 Thomas Detry $161,132 T23 Nick Taylor $161,132 T23 Max Greyserman $161,132 T23 Chris Gotterup $161,132 T33 Tom Kim $113,503 T33 J.T. Poston $113,503 T33 Aaron Rai $113,503 T33 Keegan Bradley $113,503 37 Maverick McNealy $101,379 T38 Taylor Pendrith $90,408 T38 Tony Finau $90,408 T38 Matt Fitzpatrick $90,408 T38 Marc Leishman $90,408 T42 Hideki Matsuyama $72,943 T42 Andrew Novak $72,943 T42 Trevor Cone $72,943 T42 Si Woo Kim $72,943 T46 Niklas Norgaard $56,944 T46 Daniel Berger $56,944 T46 Rasmus Højgaard $56,944 T46 Jhonattan Vegas $56,944 T50 Ryan McCormick $48,101 T50 Michael Kim $48,101 T50 Mackenzie Hughes $48,101 T50 Adam Schenk $48,101 T50 Ryan Gerard $48,101 T55 Justin Hastings (a) $0 T55 Laurie Canter $46,081 T57 Sungjae Im $45,423 T57 Denny McCarthy $45,423 T59 Harris English $44,984 T59 Brian Harman $44,984 T61 Jordan Smith $43,445 T61 James Nicholas $43,445 T61 Johnny Keefer $43,445 T64 Cam Davis $42,351 T64 Matthieu Pavon $42,351 66 Philip Barbaree, Jr. $41,692
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After the Bell: Want a decision from the SA government? Don't hold your breath
After the Bell: Want a decision from the SA government? Don't hold your breath

Daily Maverick

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Maverick

After the Bell: Want a decision from the SA government? Don't hold your breath

There are plenty of cases where the government just takes a long time to make decisions. Even decisions that need to be made by one person can take forever. In some cases, the process is just too technical, with too many steps. And while it can be frustrating, it is also really expensive for our economy. One of the great and terrible certainties about South African life is that you know any kind of government process is just going to take forever. And while it can be frustrating and taxing, in the end it is also hugely expensive for our economy. On Tuesday, 17 June 2025, BusinessLIVE reported on the CEO of Afrimat, who had told shareholders in the annual report that a delay by the Competition Tribunal over its deal with Lafarge SA might have cost the company about R185-million. That's because while the tribunal was considering the case, the equipment, including kilns, fell into disrepair. By the time the tribunal allowed the deal, it was exactly a year since it was first announced. And remember, all the tribunal had to do was consider the recommendations of the Competition Commission — it wasn't as if they were starting the entire case from scratch. Something similar has happened with the Vodacom-Maziv deal, where the two want to work together to roll out fibre. This is something that should greatly benefit our economy. That case took three years before the Competition Tribunal eventually ruled that the merger could not go ahead. And even then, the parties had to wait for months before the final reasons were actually published. Considering how the fibre market has changed in the past three years, this might well have a material impact on whether the deal still has the same value as it did when it was announced. It's easy to pick on the Competition Tribunal. And we should. But there are plenty of other cases where the government just takes a long time to make decisions. In some cases, the process is just too technical, with too many steps. There are also, arguably, too many different forums. For example, Vodacom now has to appeal against the Competition Tribunal ruling in the Competition Appeal Court. It is even possible that if it fails there, it could go to the Constitutional Court. That would mean the whole thing will probably take more than five years. But it is not just our judicial and legal processes that take a long time. Even decisions that need to be made by one person can take forever. Jacob Zuma once took nearly two years just to appoint a new head of the Special Investigating Unit. That was clearly political; he didn't want anyone in the job for reasons that became pretty obvious. But President Cyril Ramaphosa sometimes isn't much better. The head of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), Shamila Batohi, has asked him to suspend the head of prosecutions in Joburg, Andrew Chauke. He is accused of a litany of sins, including sabotaging prosecutions during the State Capture era. Her request was made nearly two years ago. And Ramaphosa has still not made a decision. Considering that he has claimed to want to support our independent institutions, and the NPA, what could his motive possibly be? Two weeks ago, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu withdrew an advert for a new head of the Hawks, after Godfrey Lebeya retired. The process to find a new head will now start again, meaning they will be without a boss for four months. At least. And I'll bet you the cost of a double ticket to see the Springboks at Ellis Park that it will take longer than that. There are many other examples. Former Department of Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Ebrahim Patel was accused by the current head of the National Lotteries Commission, Professor Barney Pityana, of delaying the appointment of the agents who formally assign money to groups that are supposed to benefit from it. The current Health Minister, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, appeared to take forever to publish regulations around the digital nomad visa when he was at Home Affairs. In the end the new minister, Leon Schreiber, had to do it. And was able to claim something for the DA in the process. I think sometimes when there is a long delay we have to ask who is really responsible. In the case of the Competition Tribunal, it is not just that they make decisions businesspeople don't like. It's that the delay is caused because they don't have enough members. As columnist Michael Avery has pointed out, it appears to be seriously understaffed. By the way, they're not the only ones. Mbekezeli Benjamin from Judges Matter once pointed out that the Electoral Court had been without a full complement of staff for a full five years. That's astonishing, no matter how you look at it. And it's only because of the politicians; they are the ones who are ultimately in charge. When there are delays like this, I think we're entitled to ask why. And this is the risk to the politicians. When Ramaphosa can't make up his mind about Andrew Chauke for two years, it looks like he's defending him, even if he's not. When tribunals and courts are left without their full complement of judges and commissioners, it must make them weaker. But sometimes it can be something else. DM

Transnet secures three-year wage agreement with union, promoting stability and growth for workers
Transnet secures three-year wage agreement with union, promoting stability and growth for workers

Daily Maverick

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Maverick

Transnet secures three-year wage agreement with union, promoting stability and growth for workers

After lengthy talks Transnet settled wage negotiations with the United National Transport Union last week. The settlement is for three years and will see workers paid 6% increases annually, including on housing and medical allowances. Transnet has confirmed that it has concluded a wage agreement with the United National Transport Union (Untu) that will be valid for the next three years. Under this agreement workers will receive an annual increase of 6% for the next three years. Untu secretary-general Cobus van Vuuren said the salary increase agreement reflected the power of collective bargaining in improving the conditions of the working class. 'The three-year agreement also ensures much-needed labour stability during a critical period as Transnet works to rebuild its operations, restore service reliability, and regain stakeholder confidence. As the majority union representing the voices of more than 26,000 employees at Transnet, Untu confirms that this newly signed agreement supersedes the previous agreement signed between Transnet and the minority union Satawu,' he said. Earlier in the negotiations the two unions were unable to present Transnet with a joint salary demand. Van Vuuren said the new salary increase agreement between Untu and Transnet placed a strong emphasis on job security by including a firm non-mandatory retrenchment clause, which was one of the key demands tabled by Untu throughout the negotiations process. The agreement provides for a 6% annual increase and a 6% increase for housing allowances and medical subsidies. 'Untu acknowledges the role of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration as the highest dispute resolution body, which intervened to avert industrial action that would have derailed Transnet's recovery and turnaround plan and collapsed an already fragile South African economy,' Van Vuuren said. Transnet said the finalisation of the three-year wage agreement provided labour stability. This, Transnet said, 'will enable the company to focus on its immediate strategic priorities of improving operational and financial performance, while positioning the organisation for future growth, thereby ensuring job security and economic growth'. DM

Skytrax crowns the Best Low-Cost Airline in Africa
Skytrax crowns the Best Low-Cost Airline in Africa

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

Skytrax crowns the Best Low-Cost Airline in Africa

Skytrax has crowned the best of the best airlines in various categories in their annual World Airline Awards, held on 17 June 2025. Amongst these categories was Best Low-Cost Airline in Africa, and one South African budget airline has walked off with the title. Beating out both LIFT Airline, which was awarded the same title last year, and Fastjet in the top three, FlySafair was named Best Low-Cost Airline in Africa for 2025. Known as 'the Oscars of the aviation industry', the World Airline Awards began in 1999, and are completely determined through a customer satisfaction survey conducted by Skytrax. Skytrax once again crowned Qatar Airways as the World's Best Airline, for a record-breaking ninth time. Qatar Airways was also given the titles of World's Best Business Class and Best Airline in the Middle East. The top ten best airlines according to Skytrax were: Qatar Airways Singapore Airlines Cathay Pacific Airways Emirates ANA All Nippon Airways Turkish Airlines Korean Air Air France Japan Airlines Hainan Airlines Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store