
EXCLUSIVE Are female bosses really meaner? Experts reveal why women in top positions seem stricter
Evoking images of catty Devil Wears Prada stereotypes, women in senior positions may often be perceived as harsher and less approachable than their male counterparts. 'Girlbosses' are presented as being almost immorally ambitious, blunt and un-naturally cold - compared to benevolently 'entrepreneurial' male CEOs.
And according to the latest - albeit decade-old - statistic of its kind, both men and women would rather have a male boss than a female one.
Despite that, the number of women in senior positions is exceeding men, and women in mid level positions are more likely to be promoted.
So as we continue to adjust to a changing professional landscape, why are female bosses seen as meaner?
'To fit in at the top, ambitious women generally feel they need to communicate with those at the top, which are usually men,' Chelsea Brooke-Ward, an employment barrister, told FEMAIL.
'They start acting more assertive, more direct, because they want to be promoted - they're doing it for themselves.
'But there's a perception that women are more nurturing or approachable so when junior workers notice this change, they are unhappy.'
Chelsea added that women find themselves being criticised 'from both sides', with people finding them either too soft or too strict.
'They're criticised at the top for not being assertive enough and by those below for being unapproachable or unsupportive,' she explained.
Perhaps surprisingly, it is often women who are the loudest critics of their female seniors, she noted.
It's usually during serious professional interactions, such as terminations of employment or disciplinary hearings, where most conflict arises.
'Say you've got a woman that's going through a grievance or a disciplinary,' said Chelsea.
'I think those at the bottom expect a level of rapport with a female investigator but if she's standoffish in that type of setting, she's criticised.'
In this sense, women enact an internalised misogyny, where they believe other women should adhere to certain feminine traits.
And they may believe that fellow women, united in the gender struggle, will be kinder to them, regardless of rank.
Chelsea has acted in cases involving sex discrimination, pregnancy and maternity discrimination and hostile workplace cultures.
'I think there are conflicting opinions about how women at the top should behave - they're damned if they do and damned if they don't,' she added.
Interestingly, a large number of the barrister's discrimination cases have been related to the removal of reasonable adjustments by a new female line manager.
'When a female manager takes a male's place, then sometimes those reasonable adjustments are questioned,' said Chlesea.
'I don't know whether scepticism is more inherent in women than men.
'But it's also because women feel their performance is under more of a microscope.'
A working mother herself, Chelsea recalls many cases where a woman in a senior position has returned to work from having a child to find her leadership duties stripped.
'Even if they're just of child-bearing age, they may be overlooked for promotions simply because of the likelihood that they will have children.
'Sadly, it's not uncommon. And there are no proactive steps taken to inform women on maternity leave of potential promotions.
'When they come back, they feel let down but they don't want to rock the boat and appear sensitive.
'One case that's always stuck with me involved a woman returning from maternity leave to find her leadership responsibilities stripped away.
'The employer justified it on the grounds that she "seemed overwhelmed" and "part time working was not suitable to the role" and when questioning the decision she was being "difficult" and "paranoid".'
'She'd just had a baby but she hadn't lost her ability to lead,' Chelsea said. 'That subtle mix of benevolent sexism and outright discrimination is something I see far too often.'
Jody Findley struggled with sexism in her managerial role, prompting her to found MINDSETA, through which she delivers inclusive training to improve work cultures.
'Men automatically get respected in their roles, especially in a senior role,' she told FEMAIL.
'A woman and a man could have the same job, same pay, same responsibilities, but their experiences will be very different. And the difference is respect.'
In her leadership role, Jody says she opted for a collaborative approach.
'What I found is that I didn't get supported,' she said.
'If a man was asking for help, the response was "yes, anything you want".
'Whereas, as a female boss, when I was asking to collaborate it was "I haven't got time. I'm too busy. Do it yourself."
'So my approach didn't work and I can understand why a woman would try to be more stern and assert authority because when you're gentler, you won't get the same response as a man.'
Jody says that women's health also plays a role in the way they are treated professionally.
Women in the workplace often mask serious conditions such as PCOS and endometriosis, as well as the often debilitating effects of pregnancy, menstruation and menopause.
'I've got friends with really bad health problems and their work don't even know,' said Jody.
'They don't want to be devalued by their colleagues.'
When exploring the experience of women, the intersection of ethnicity, age, disability, sexual orientation and class all play a role.
'Black women are almost erased,' said Jody. 'As a Black woman, I've had to step out of institutions because I had no choice.
'The more senior I became, the more devalued and disrespected I was. I've been told to give up my chair for a white man - the level of disrespect is off the chain for a working class black woman.'
'And now, amid the trans debate, how are trans women navigating the workplace?'
Jody's resounding point was that female bosses must be supported by their colleagues.
She called for more workplace training on misogyny, women's health and collaboration.
'We need men to help women in the workplace - they're the gatekeepers. We need them to stand up and give a platform to women.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Express
15 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog
Consumers have been advised to steer clear of using car finance claim firms, as the UK's top financial watchdog says they could be spending money unnecessarily. The Financial Conduct Authority has begun setting out advice surrounding a possible redress scheme with regard to the ongoing car finance scandal which, according to experts, could see billions of pounds made available for potential claims. Advertisement - Article continues below However, with countless companies now popping up to assist potential claimants, the FCA is keen to remind motorists that in using one 'they may end up paying for a service they do not need and having to pay up to 30 per cent in fees out of any award they may receive'. Rather than utilise one of these paid services, consumers can submit timestamped complaints and claims themselves. Tools such as those on the MoneySavingExpert website can help people search for previous finance agreements, while the site also provides a template in order to draft a letter of complaint. With the Supreme Court set to make its judgement next month in regard to whether 'discretionary commission arrangements' (DCAs) were illegal in the first instance, the FCA is also advising finance firms on how they should calculate claims for disgruntled clients. The FCA is keen for a redress scheme to strike a balance between being fair to consumers, but at the same time not disrupting the market by putting finance firms out of business. In its latest release, the FCA says that the latter scenario could 'reduce competition and could make it more expensive for consumers to borrow money to buy a car in the future'. Such a scheme will fall under one of two arrangements: 'opt-in' and 'opt-out'. With the former – considered the most likely scenario – claimants would be required to notify their finance provider prior to a specified date if they wish to be considered for redress. 'Opt-out', on the other hand, would mean that everyone who is eligible will automatically be included, unless they contact their firm to be taken off the list. Consumers can expect the FCA to announce within six weeks of the Court's judgement in July as to whether a full redress scheme will be implemented, and how exactly it will operate. Tell us which new car you're interested in and get the very best offers from our network of over 5,500 UK dealers to compare. Let's go…


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar
A former employee at one of London's most prestigious law firms has been banned from working in the legal profession after touching a junior colleague's bottom in a karaoke bar. Vivek Ramsaroop has been punished after the solicitors' watchdog found that he grabbed a fellow worker's waist and started 'rubbing himself' against her while on a work night. At the time, he was an employee at the magic circle firm Linklaters. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has ruled that the incident, which took place in November 2022, amounted to 'serious sexual misconduct' and banned him from working for other law firms in Britain. As part of its findings, the SRA said Mr Ramsaroop harassed a junior colleague, referred to only as 'Employee A', at a social event organised for Linklaters' London office. The SRA said: 'Whilst at the karaoke bar, Mr Ramsaroop approached Employee A and stood closely to her talking and said the words 'you're gorgeous' and 'you're amazing'.' He then put his arms around her waist and kissed the side of her face for several seconds, the regulator said. 'Shortly afterwards, Mr Ramsaroop started dancing directly behind Employee A, grabbed her waist with both hands and touched her bottom,' the SRA added. Mr Ramaswoop then 'started rubbing himself against' his colleague on the dancefloor 'with his pelvis pressed against Employee A's bottom,' the watchdog said. During his time at Linklaters, Mr Ramaswoop – whose last known address was in Johannesburg – was involved in Linklaters' legal practice but not employed as a solicitor. He specialises in mergers and acquisitions. The SRA said Mr Ramaswoop's conduct constituted 'serious sexual misconduct' as it involved repeated physical contact directed towards a junior colleague. As a result, the regulator issued a so-called 'Section 43' notice against Mr Ramaswoop, which restricts firms from employing individuals deemed to have committed misconduct, even if they are not working as lawyers. Mr Ramaswoop was also ordered to pay a portion of the SRA's £1,350 legal bill. The regulator says it expects law firms to take a 'zero tolerance' approach to sexual misconduct, which covers any abuse of a person's 'professional position to initiate or pursue an improper sexual or emotional relationship'. Linklaters is one of Britain's four 'magic circle' law firms. Last year, it paid its partners an average £1.9m, while its newly-qualified lawyers received starting salaries of £150,000. A Linklaters spokesman said: 'This relates to an incident involving a former employee who had joined the firm a few weeks prior. We had reported the matter to the SRA and the individual left the firm with immediate effect.'


BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Kent County Council Doge head quit due to 'doubt' over project
The tech entrepreneur who quit heading up Reform UK's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) says he did so because the resignation of the party's chairman left him with "a bit of doubt" about the future of the 11 months in the role, Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf resigned on Thursday alongside Nathaniel Fried, who was said to be leading the unit. Speaking to Politics South East, Mr Fried said the outgoing chairman was "spearheading" the Doge initiative and expressed concerns that the scheme "might not turn out how I wanted it to" without councillors at Kent County Council (KCC) have said it is "business as usual" following the double resignation. KCC deputy leader Brian Collins said "absolutely nothing's changed" following the double departure."We have a focus, we have a mission, that mission hasn't changed, business as usual," he told BBC South East on Friday Mr Yusuf and Mr Fried were part of the Doge team which attended its first meeting at KCC on said the meeting was "very productive" but the party admitted it did not know how long it would take for the unit to produce scheme, modelled on the Doge unit created by billionaire Elon Musk as part of Donald Trump's second term as US president, aims to identify and eliminate wasteful to claims that the "engine room" of the unit had now been lost, Mr Collins said: "The engine room is the 57 councillors that have been elected to run this council." 'Circus coming to town' Conservative councillor Sarah Hudson described the current situation as a "mockery".She said: "It's like a circus coming to town, and then you've got various clowns, and they've thrown their toys out of the pram at the first issue that's come along."Mr Fried said he took on the project for free because he felt the "social contract between tax payers and the British government has been a little bit broken".Asked what people in Kent would make of the resignations, just four days into the project, he said he was sure they were "disappointed"."I have great confidence in the local councillors who are working very hard at the moment, especially the head of the council," he said."I'm sure that people are disappointed but thus is politics."A spokesperson for Reform UK said: "The work of the Reform UK Doge unit will continue. The team is larger than just one man."Many Reform-controlled councils already have their respective Doge cabinet members, so this work was happening before and will continue after."