
Inquest into deaths of Cradock Four reopened — almost 40 years after their murders
Almost 40 years after the anti-apartheid activists known as the 'Cradock Four' were murdered by Security Branch members, an inquest into their deaths has been reopened.
A third judicial inquest into the deaths of the 'Cradock Four' began in the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Gqeberha on Monday.
The lawyer for Joffel van der Westhuizen, the former commanding officer of the Eastern Province Command and one of those implicated in the killings, said the SA National Defence Force (SANDF) had refused to pay his legal costs.
The lawyer argued that witnesses could not give evidence that implicated Van der Westhuizen, a former general, unless he had funded legal representation.
Judge Thami Beshe ruled that, for the time being, witnesses may only testify about incriminating evidence available in public documents.
While the three police officers who are implicated and still alive have received funding for their legal representatives, their advocates said they had received their funding late and needed time to fully prepare.
The Cradock Four were anti-apartheid activists Fort Calata, Sicelo Mhlauli, Sparrow Mkonto and Matthew Goniwe.
They were returning to Cradock from Gqeberha (then known as Port Elizabeth) on 27 June 1985 when they were arrested at a roadblock manned by the Security Branch, assaulted and murdered.
There have been two previous inquests. The first, in 1987, concluded the men had been killed by 'unknown persons'. No one was prosecuted.
The second, in 1993, presided over by former Eastern Cape Judge President Neville Zietsman, found the police were responsible for their deaths. Again, no individuals were named and no prosecutions followed.
Now, Varney said, the families had little hope for justice. Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC, representing the families and the Cradock community, said they sought closure, healing and reparations.
Eight former police and Defence Force officials applied for amnesty to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) for their roles in the Cradock Four killings:
The 'masterminds': Hermanus Barend du Plessis, Nicolaas Jacobus Janse van Rensburg and Harold Snyman.
Three of the killers on the scene: Johan Martin 'Sakkie' van Zyl, Eric Alexander Taylor and Gerhardus Johannes Lotz.
Two others who played peripheral roles: Jacob Jan Hendrick (Jaap) van Jaarsveld and Eugene de Kock.
All but Van Jaarsveld and De Kock were denied amnesty in 1999. Yet no further legal steps were taken.
'At first,' said Varney, 'the families thought such inaction was the product of a toxic mix of idleness, indifference, incapacity or incompetence on the part of the police and prosecutors. While these factors may have played a role, they now know that something more sinister was at play and that political forces intervened to block their cases from proceeding.'
He said the former Director of Public Prosecutions, advocate Vusi Pikoli, admitted during legal proceedings brought by Thembi Simelane in 2015 for the 1983 abduction and murder of her sister Nokuthula, that political interference had closed down their investigations of TRC cases.
'It is apparent that the Cradock Four case received little or no attention post the winding up of the TRC. Indeed, the investigation docket went missing from the NPA's [National Prosecuting Authority's] offices between 2013 and 2019. This required the docket to be reconstructed.
'Typically, missing dockets are an indication of a cover-up or an attempt to sabotage the investigation. Since it was apparent that no investigation was launched into its disappearance, Fort Calata's son Lukhanyo was forced to open a case of theft in 2020. That investigation was closed in August 2021 without providing any answers,' said Varney.
All six members of the police hit squad who murdered the Cradock Four have died.
State 'dragged its feet'
Varney told the court that the State had 'systematically and deliberately dragged its feet, or blocked justice in this case and the other TRC cases'.
On 20 January, 25 families and the Foundation for Human Rights launched a legal application seeking a declaration of their rights, constitutional damages and an order compelling President Cyril Ramaphosa to establish a commission of inquiry into the suppression of TRC cases. The President has since established such a commission.
Varney said that since the families launched their application in 2021 to compel the NPA and SAPS to complete investigations, several more individuals implicated in the case had died:
Eric Winter, former Cradock Special Branch commander, died on 18 August 2021;
FW de Klerk, former State President, died on 11 November 2021;
Johannes Velde van der Merwe, former police commissioner, died on 27 August 2022;
Adriaan Vlok, former minister of law and order, died on 8 January 2023;
Lukas Daniel 'Niel' Barnard, former National Intelligence Service director, died on 13 January 2025; and
Hermanus Barend du Plessis, former head of the Security Branch for Black Affairs in Port Elizabeth, died on 16 May 2023.
Ngcukaitobi said he hoped the inquest would make a difference to the families and the communities' quest for justice.
'There is a possibility that the truth can be told,' he said, adding that this should lay the foundation for reparations to be made to the families. He said Mbulelo Goniwe would testify.
'He was a comrade of the Cradock Four and survived the assassination by the mercy of God,' said Ngcukaitobi. 'Perhaps to remind the country not to forget the story of apartheid and its brutality.'
He said the four men were not only leaders of a generation of activists but also teachers, organisers, fathers and husbands.
'One should not analyse this as a political fight with little emphasis on the personal side of the loss,' he said.
'We will ask for recommendations by the judge for reparations,' he said, adding that these should be broad, as the deaths of the four men were a traumatic event for the entire community.
He said Deputy Defence Minister Bantu Holomisa, the former chairperson of the Military Council in the Transkei, would also testify.
Counsel for some of the former police officers, Jaap Cilliers SC, said this was an emotional inquest and his clients would cooperate as 'fully as possible'.
Poor health
Referring to the former military commander Van der Westhuizen, Varney said: 'His legal representative has disclosed that he is in poor health. An attempt to take his evidence on commission has been stymied because the SANDF refuses to pay his legal costs.'
Van der Westhuizen's attorney Ryan Roos said the SANDF believed his client acted outside the scope of his official duties and therefore refused to fund his legal defence.
Although the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court directed that the SANDF decision be reviewed urgently, the Gauteng Division of the High Court dismissed the review as not urgent, meaning it will take months to be heard.
Van der Westhuizen's counsel, advocate Marius van Zyl, said his client would deny authorising the killing of the Cradock Four.
According to Varney's opening address, on 7 June 1985, Major-General J Frederick Johannes van Rensburg of the State Security Council phoned Van der Westhuizen to discuss Matthew Goniwe.
'The two officers apparently decided that Goniwe and two others (Fort Calata and Mbulelo Goniwe) should be 'permanently removed from society as a matter of urgency,' said Varney.
'As a result of this discussion, Colonel Lourens du Plessis sent a 'Signal Message Form' dated June 7, 1985 — addressed to the State Security Council and detailing the earlier telephone discussion (the signal). It was marked 'urgent' and 'top secret'.'
The form read: 'Personal for General Van Rensburg.
1 Telephone conversation Gen Van Rensburg/Brig Van der Westhuizen of 7 June '85 refers
2 Names as follows
Matthew Goniwe
Mbulelo Goniwe (brother or nephew of above)
Fort Calata
3 It is proposed that the above-mentioned persons, as a matter of urgency, be permanently removed from society.
4 Wide reaction can be expected locally as well as nationally as a result of the importance of these persons, especially the first mentioned, for the enemy.'
Varney said, 'This inquest is probably the very last chance that the families will get to reach a semblance of closure. They deserve nothing less than a full and comprehensive accounting of the past.' DM

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
35 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Police apprehend five for CIT heist in Bronkhorstspruit
Police apprehend five for CIT heist in Bronkhorstspruit Five suspected cash-in-transit robbers were apprehended this afternoon in Sundra following a high-speed police chase. The suspects allegedly targeted a CIT vehicle in Bronkhorstspruit before fleeing along the R42 towards Delmas and then onto the N12 highway heading toward Johannesburg. Their getaway vehicle overturned near the R50 off-ramp to Bapsfontein and Sundra, prompting the suspects to flee on foot through nearby maize fields. A police helicopter was also used to trace the suspects. While unconfirmed reports suggest gunfire may have been exchanged, police have not yet officially commented. A heavy police presence was observed at all three locations involved. Police have also not yet confirmed how much money was stolen. This is a developing story. Scene 1: Scene 2: Scene 3: At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!


Daily Maverick
41 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Get-rich-quick schemes, pyramids and ponzis: five signs you're being scammed
Avoid 'get-rich-quick' schemes; they are, more often than not, bogus and fraudulent business ventures. Consumers are under a lot of financial strain. The World Economic Forum reports that the cost-of-living crisis is affecting people across the globe. With food and fuel prices rising, it's becoming increasingly difficult to stay financially afloat. On top of that, salaries aren't keeping up with inflation, making it more difficult to save and build wealth. It's during such times of economic difficulty and uncertainty that fraudsters lure unsuspecting consumers into ' get-rich-quick ' schemes, offering an avenue to make easy money by investing in a 'lucrative' financial opportunity. Nothing beats the prospect of making easy money, and every now and again, there seems to be a 'get-rich-quick' scheme circulating on WhatsApp or on social media that seems legitimate. But it's not. Our research interests centre on financial systems in emerging economies, and we advocate for financial inclusion and empowering marginalised communities through financial literacy and financial planning. We use our academic platform to share our expertise on finance, including common financial traps people should steer clear of. 'Get-rich-quick' schemes are one such trap. They're also sometimes called Ponzi or pyramid schemes. The schemes are a form of financial fraud. The people running them take money through deception: the misrepresentation of information and identity. They promise financial benefits that don't exist. You should avoid them because, more often than not, they are bogus and fraudulent business ventures. There have been some massive fraud schemes over the past 30 years. In the early 1990s, MMM Global – one of the world's largest and most notorious Ponzi schemes – defrauded up to 40 million people, who lost an estimated $10 billion. Ponzi schemes have since resurfaced in different forms in South Africa, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Ghana and several other African countries. There are five tell-tale signs of a 'get-rich-quick' scheme. Watch out for them. The five tell-tale signs Firstly, they offer exaggerated and above-market returns within a short period of time, with the promise of little to no risk. There are two golden rules when it comes to investing. The first is that it takes time to make money. Amassing a small fortune within a short space of time should raise questions about the scheme. The second rule is: the higher the risk, the higher the return. In other words, no investment is risk-free or can guarantee significant returns. There is always some risk involved. An investment that promises substantial returns tends to be quite risky, which repels most people with a low appetite for risk. Secondly, new members are constantly recruited to join the scheme. Typically, such schemes are sustained by relying on the investments of new members to pay existing members. Once the number of existing members exceeds new members, the scheme goes 'belly-up'. At best, you lose out on the returns you were promised. At worst,t you lose all the money you've invested. When the scheme collapses, it is almost impossible to recover the money you've lost because you've technically given it to a stranger (remember, the definition of financial fraud encompasses the misrepresentation of identity). Thirdly, there is an urgency to join the scheme and no clarity on how the scheme works. This is a classic characteristic of a 'get-rich-quick' scheme. There is usually no clear answer about the nature of the scheme, what it invests in, how it generates its returns or the credentials of the organisation. Legitimate investments are transparent and can provide investors with all the information they need to help them decide whether to invest. Unsurprisingly, a proper check of 'get-rich-quick' schemes will unmask their fraudulent nature. This is why there's always the urgency and coercion to make an immediate financial commitment under the guise of missing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get rich. Fourthly, the scheme is not registered with or regulated by any recognised authority. Regulatory authorities are important because they monitor the conduct of financial service providers and protect consumers by keeping their best interests in mind. The protection provided by financial regulators also instils confidence in financial systems. 'Get-rich-quick' schemes are not registered and operate outside the framework of regulatory bodies. This makes investors more vulnerable to loss and makes it more difficult to seek legal recourse when the loss occurs. Legitimate investments in South Africa are offered by authorised financial service providers and regulated by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority. You can search for any authorised financial service provider on the authority's website. Fifthly, they use the testimonies from existing members who've earned big bucks to promote the scheme. At the initial stages, the scheme tends to pay out to those who have invested early, and these members are encouraged to share the news of their wealth (which travels fast and far) to promote the scheme. But this is a tactic used to create the impression that you, too, can earn returns in the double digits. These schemes are both unsustainable and unethical, as one person gets wealthy through someone else being deception. Too good to be true It's worth repeating that if it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is. Wealth comes from a sound investment strategy and decisions made over time. Any promise to 'get rich quick' should be treated with the cynicism it deserves. It will ultimately reveal its fraudulent nature. Recognising the signs of 'get-rich-quick' schemes can save you from unnecessary financial distress. It's always a good idea to do your own investigation before committing your finances to any investment. You can find more information on the various types of scams through the South African Banking Risk Information Centre 's website, and report them to the South African Fraud Prevention Service. DM

IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
Ecentric Systems ransom attempt: Cyber extortionist jailed for cyber crimes
A cyber terrorist has been sentenced in the Bellville Specialised Commercial Crimes Court in Cape Town after trying to hold a company to ransom after breaching its security. A cyber terrorist has been sentenced by the Bellville Specialised Commercial Crimes Court in Cape Town for attempting to extort a company following a security breach. Lucky Majangandile Erasmus, 36, was charged with 20 offences, including cyber fraud, data theft, and attempted cyber extortion, and was convicted on 17 of those charges. He entered into a plea and sentencing agreement with the State. The Western Cape spokesperson for the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (known as Hawk), Warrant Officer Zinzi Hani, said Erasmus and his co-accused, both ex-employees, loaded software onto the Ecentric Systems, which allowed them remote access.