iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max could be the camera phone to beat with these 4 upgrades
It's only May, but the next thing you know it'll be September — which has been typically the time when Apple hosts its iPhone event. I haven't been too excited about new Apple releases the last few years, but all the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max camera rumors have me stoked.
Not only do the rumors hint at hardware upgrades that could help Apple reclaim the title of best camera phone over the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but the iPhone 17 Pros are tipped to gain new functions that could deepen its arsenal and how they're used. That's because these rumored iPhone 17 Pro camera upgrades are arguably going to be the biggest in years.
And even though an iPhone 17 Air is expected to launch alongside them, I'm not convinced its single camera is enough to make me choose it — especially if its price ends up being much higher than the iPhone 17 Pro models.
Before I dig into all the iPhone 17 Pro camera rumors, it's worth detailing what new changes accompanied the most recent releases: the iPhone 16 Pro and 16 Pro Max. Here's a recap on all of their camera changes:
Considering how the main and ultrawide cameras got big upgrades the last couple of years, there's only one other camera left in desperate need of a makeover — the telephoto. Leaks indicate that Apple's going to be arming the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max with a new 48MP sensor that's a big upgrade over the current 12MP one in the iPhone 16 Pros.
While I'm stoked for this hardware upgrade, it could come at the expense of a 'downgrade' of sorts with the optical zoom. Instead of matching the current 5x optical zoom of the iPhone 16 Pro's, we could possibly end up with a 3.5x optical zoom. Now, we've seen this sort of strategy before, like how the Galaxy S24 Ultra ended up with a 5x optical zoom instead of 10x.
I'm not too worried if this ends up happening because I've seen how well Apple effectively uses pixel binning tech and new image processing algorithms to enhance zoom photos in devices like the iPhone 16e. Either way, I'm confident that the zooming performance of the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max will exceed their predecessors to not only deliver sharper zoom photos, but also work better under low light.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Despite rocking the same 12MP TrueDepth for the last few generations, the selfie cameras of the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max could finally see a proper refresh. Interestingly, Apple relied on a 12MP f/2.2 TrueDepth camera going as far back as the iPhone 11 Pro — only to slightly improve it to a faster f/1.9 aperture starting with the iPhone 14 Pro Max.
Longtime analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reports that it's being upgraded to a 24MP front-facing camera, which would consist of a six element lens to deliver even sharper results than ever before. Naturally, I suspect the biggest impact to this change is how it captures photos under harsher lighting conditions.
I've put the iPhone 16 Pro Max through countless 200 photo face-offs by now, like against the Galaxy S25 Ultra and Pixel 9 Pro XL, and know that its selfie camera continues to deliver outstanding results against all of its main rivals. Of course, this upgrade would only make things better.
This is a long time coming, but I'm really hoping that this rumor ends up being true because I've been asking for this exact feature for years now. Well known Apple leaker Jon Prosser hints that Apple will finally bring native dual-video capture with the iPhone 17 Pro models. Meaning, you'd be able to record with both the front camera and rear camera simultaneously.
Now, if this sounds familiar, it should because Apple technically introduced Multi-Capture back with iOS 13, but only to third party apps like DoubleTake by Filmic Pro. This would effectively make it a native feature with the camera app, allowing users to shoot with one of the rear cameras and the front one.
There's still a lot unknown about this potential iPhone 17 Pro camera feature, like whether the two clips would be merged into one or saved separately, but it definitely would give content creators a new way of capturing video. Additionally, it'll be interesting to see if these simultaneous captures would be locked to certain frame rates and resolutions.
One of the earliest iPhone 17 Pro camera rumors that cropped up was Apple could bring a variable aperture, but there's been very little reports about this of late. The claim goes back to a report hinting about Apple's plan to bring a variable aperture to at least one of the iPhone 17 models, which I'd suspect at this point would be the iPhone 17 Pro Max.
Variable apertures aren't new in the world of phones, as they've been featured before in other devices, but this would be the first for an iPhone. The average person might not really think much about a variable aperture, but it could give users more control of their shooting. For example, you would have more control over the depth of field — allowing for everything to be in focus in the shot, or choosing certain areas and blurring out the rest.
There's a lot of creative ways a variable aperture could help out, but given how Apple has consistently locked down settings, like the shutter speed and ISO, I'm not as confident that it'll become a reality. Although, it could ultimately come to the iPhone 18.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
21 minutes ago
- CNBC
Apple's woes deepen following Epic Games ruling. Here's where we stand on the stock now
Apple suffered a major blow in its bid to alleviate one of Jim Cramer's biggest worries about the tech giant: its legal fight with Fortnite maker Epic Games. A U.S. appeals court late Wednesday rejected Apple's plea to halt mandated changes to its App Store that the company has warned could cost it "substantial sums." "Apple's had a bad streak. This is just more negativity," Jim said Thursday. Shares of Apple fell about 0.7% in Thursday's session, trading slightly above $201 apiece. The stock is down roughly 19% so far this year. The ruling Wednesday evening marked the latest setback for Apple in its long-running legal battle with Epic Games, which first sued the iPhone maker in 2020 in an attempt to force Apple to loosen its grip on purchases in apps that utilize its iOS operating system. In late April, a U.S. district judge said Apple was violating a four-year-old ruling that required Apple to change the way it charges commissions on in-app purchases. The solution that Apple implemented in early 2024 , for the first time, allowed developers to include links to external websites where iPhone app users could put in their payment info. However, Apple still charged a 27% commission on in-app transactions that linked out for payments and told developers how these links should be presented. The judge's April ruling said Apple needed to stop those practices. Now, Apple's request to have that decision paused has been denied. Wall Street analysts say this could dent Apple's financials – albeit not by that much. For example, Morgan Stanley estimated that 2% of Apple's earnings per share, 10% of App Store revenue and 3% of overall revenue for its important services division are at risk if the ruling is upheld. The basis for those forecasts is the firm's proprietary survey from May, which found that 28% of U.S. iPhone users are "extremely likely" to circumvent in-app purchases in the App Store. Despite the Epic ruling late last month, App Store growth has remained solid in May. Net revenues for the App Store increased 9.6% year over year in May, compared with an 8% year-over-year gain in April, according to Morgan Stanley, citing Sensor Tower data. "To date, our view has been the App Store injunction is a minor risk to the Apple story / a longer-tailed risk, as changing nearly 20 years of learned consumer behavior doesn't happen overnight," the analysts wrote in a Thursday note. The firm reiterated its buy-equivalent rating on the stock. JPMorgan shared similar sentiments. The analysts projected a "moderation" in services revenue growth and an up to 3% hit to earnings per share. "Although the denial of a stay is a headwind for Apple, we continue to believe the magnitude of impact is likely to be materially lower than currently being feared by investors," wrote the JPMorgan analysts, who also have a buy-equivalent rating on shares. While Jim indicated Thursday that Apple taking a 2% to 3% hit to EPS from the Epic case is a fair assumption, he expressed frustration with the overall implications of the ruling. "I think it is outrageous that they can use Apple as the equivalent of a common carrier, a Greyhound bus," Jim said Thursday. The Apple-Epic saga is one of the reasons why the stock has become such a worrisome position in recent months, Jim explained during our May Monthly Meeting. But it is not the only threat facing Apple's services division, which has long been a big part of our investment thesis in the company. The business — home to the App Store, AppleCare, ApplePay, iCloud and content subscriptions like Apple TV+ — is coveted for the recurring nature of its revenue streams and high margins. AAPL YTD mountain Apple's year-to-date stock performance. The other big risk to Apple's services business is Alphabet -owned Google's legal feud with the Justice Department. The antitrust case threatens Google's massive annual payments to Apple in exchange for being the default search provider on iPhone and iPad devices. In 2022, that was worth $20 billion for Apple. During the May Monthly Meeting , Jim described the matter as potentially "easy money gone," adding that investors "need to be concerned." Apple's woes don't stop there, though. Jim has an Apple worry even bigger than services growth: higher tariffs on electronics imports into the U.S. Last month, President Donald Trump threatened to raise tariffs on Apple by at least 25% for iPhones not made in the U.S. That does not bode well for the Club name because it's the company's biggest money maker. Plus, it's nearly impossible for Apple to get this done in the short term as the majority of its manufacturing is done overseas. CEO Tim Cook has tried to reduce Apple's reliance on China by diversifying its supply chain and expanding production into India. It hasn't been enough to appease Trump, though. All of this comes ahead of Apple's annual developers conference, which kicks off Monday. It has historically coincided with the start of a seasonally strong period for the stock. Investors will be closely watching what Apple says about its generative artificial intelligence system, dubbed Apple Intelligence. We previously thought that the suite of AI tools would usher in a much-needed upgrade cycle for the iPhone. This hasn't been the case as the rollout of new flashy features have been staggered and delayed. Still, we're not planning to bail on Apple shares down here. While there are clearly issues hanging over the stock, there's no denying its products are among the best consumer electronics in the world. As long as people aren't trading in their iPhones and leaving the Apple ecosystem, the ability to make money off that huge user base remains intact. And that's reason enough to stay in the stock. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long AAPL. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Digital Trends
24 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
Save $269 on our favorite open-back headphones and experience music in a whole new way
We may have recently given Sennheiser a bit of flack for launching earbuds that look like AirPods (which is a pretty common thing to do) but that doesn't mean they don't have audiophile-grade offerings. The open-back Sennheiser HD 660S2 are a pretty good example of that. They probably flew under your radar, though, because of their standard price in excess of $600. They're typically rank No. 2 by cost in our list of the best headphones, right after the $1,000+ Dali IO-12. But, right now, with this 40% discount, they're actually cheaper than Apple's AirPods Max. So, if you want to check out audiophile headphones for $411 (that's $269 off their usual price of $680) be sure to tap the button below. Or, keep reading for our take. Why you should buy the Sennheiser HD 660S2 As counterintuitive as it may sound, open-back headphones can absolutely provide a premium sound. The Sennheiser HD 660S2 act as a sort of antonym to the shut-out-the-world ethic of the Sony WH-1000XM6 and not at all in a bad way. These headphones have plush ear cushions with a hefty amount of clamp on the head and an overall minimalist design, though you won't always think of it that way as you peer into the guts of the headphones that their closed-back cousins keep hidden. Our Sennheiser HD 660S2 review calls their sound 'effortless' and says, 'It just springs forth and gently bathes you in its detail, instead of pummeling you, which I now recognize as a possible side effect of closed-back headphones.' Be sure to give the review a read through to see how to get the full audiophile experience from your new HD 660S2s, as well as to get insights on the full extent of how open-back headphones can transform your music listening experience. These audiophile headphones aren't typically down to $411. It's an incredible discount of $269 off of the usual $680 price, making them way more competitive than usual. So, if you want them, don't wait for this deal to go away. However, if you want something else, you should be sure to check out the other best headphone deals going on right now.
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Apple loses bid to halt court ruling that blocks some fees from its iPhone app store
SAN FRANCISCO — A three-judge appeals panel rejected Apple's request to pause an April 30 order banning the company from charging a fee on in-app iPhone transactions processed outside its once-exclusive payment system in a two-page decision issued late Thursday. The setback threatens to divert billions of dollars in revenue away from Apple while it tried to overturn the order reining in its commissions from e-commerce within iPhone apps.
