Cardiff University issues new statement on compulsory redundancies
Cardiff University issues new statement on compulsory redundancies
The UCU union is holding an extraordinary general meeting today (Thurs May 1) to discuss this proposal with their members
Cardiff University
(Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne )
Cardiff University has issued an update on compulsory redundancies with more than 1,000 staff still under threat of losing their jobs.
The university said that if staff agree to suspend all industrial action then it won't make any compulsory redundancies of all staff connected to the proposed cuts programme before the end of the 2025 calendar year. The university said it was able to do this because of the number of applications for voluntary redundancy currently received. The UCU union is holding an extraordinary general meeting today (Thurs May 1) to discuss this proposal with their members.
Trade unions say that staff still in-scope for redundancy in the cuts "need clarity".
The university said it will publish an interim timetable next week, showing what happens between the end of the cuts consultation and a meeting of the university council on June 17. You can get more story updates straight to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletters here.
"That council meeting is the point at which we can give a definitive update on plans and their impact on staff and their at-risk status," the university said.
"We want to recognise the very real human impact that the Academic Future project has had, and the level of anxiety felt more broadly across the academic and professional services. Again we have committed to working in partnership together to assess the steps that we can take to ensure that we are looking after the health and wellbeing of our staff."
Article continues below
Members of the UCU put the first planned day of strike action over proposed compulsory redundancies on hold after agreeing to talks with bosses chaired by the Advisory, Conciliation, and Arbitration Service (Acas) on April 30.
The union said that as a gesture of goodwill, and to allow time for members to consider any possible outcomes from these talks, it had suspended the first day of its planned strike action
All other planned industrial action is still set to go ahead. This includes an indefinite marking and assessment boycott, which could affect graduations, and action short of strike beginning on May 6.
The university announced proposed sweeping cuts, including erntire department closures, in January. Since then it has agreed to consider not closing the school of nursing The initial 350 job losses proposed have also gone down with many staff taking voluntary redundancy.
The full joint statement of Cardiff University executive board, the University and College Union (UCU), Unite and Unison:
Earlier this week, the University and College Union (UCU) agreed to suspend the industrial action planned for Thursday, in order for us to meet collectively to discuss the 'Our Academic Future' project.
We had very positive and constructive dialogue, and are grateful to ACAS (the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) for their chairing.
Colleagues from UCU, Unite, Unison and the University Executive Board have all reconfirmed our strong desire to work in partnership together for the benefit of staff, students and our wider University community.
The University is able to confirm that, should UCU members agree to suspend all industrial action under the current mandate for 2025, the University will rule out compulsory redundancies for all staff connected to Academic Future or the wider transformation programme, before the end of the 2025 calendar year.
The University is able to do this because of the number of applications for voluntary redundancy currently received. The UCU will hold an extraordinary general meeting tomorrow (Thursday, 1 May) to discuss this proposal with their members.
Colleagues from the trade unions have emphasised the need for clarity for those members who are still in-scope. Valid questions have been raised about the outcome of the consultation process, and when staff will be informed of those outcomes.
We have committed to publish an interim timetable next week, showing what happens between the end of the consultation and the Council meeting on 17 June. That Council meeting is the point at which we can give a definitive update on plans and their impact on staff and their at-risk status.
We want to recognise the very real human impact that the Academic Future project has had, and the level of anxiety felt more broadly across the academic and professional services.
Article continues below
Again we have committed to working in partnership together to assess the steps that we can take to ensure that we are looking after the health and wellbeing of our staff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Cardiff University defends job cuts process amid crisis claims
Cardiff University bosses have defended the way a process to cut hundreds of jobs and axe some departments has been evidence to a Senedd Committee, Vice Chancellor Prof Wendy Larner said it had been "difficult" but they had taken "the right approach".Prof Larner was asked whether announcing plans to close some departments, including nursing and then "backtracking" had been wise in view of the impact on staff morale and the institution's comes after a union claimed the process had led to a "severe and urgent mental health crisis" among staff. Proposals initially included cutting 400 jobs and closing some subject areas including music, modern languages and nursing, which will now be during the consultation period and more than 150 staff leaving voluntarily also led to a reduction in the number of posts to be cut - currently down to 69 by 2029-30 Prof Larner told MSs. She said she was "delighted by the quality of the alternative proposals" which enabled them to change the initial plans "quite significantly".But she confirmed the business case going to the university council for sign off on 17 June would still mean stopping ancient history and religion and asked whether she had any regrets about the process, she said she regretted that some members of staff had learnt their jobs were at risk through media coverage after a "leak" of also expressed regret that the university had received an "undue share of attention" for the cuts despite many other universities facing similar challenges."Our intention all the way through has been to ensure that Cardiff University is successful for the future," she said. Prof Larner and chairman of the University Council Patrick Younge's appearance in front of MSs follows the University and College Union's (UCU) claim there was a "total health and safety crisis" at the said there had been a "comprehensive breakdown of trust and morale" between university bosses and staff."I think we've worked really hard to do what we can to ensure that staff have been adequately supported", said Prof Younge said the university had been "blindsided" by the UCU referring it to the Health and Safety Executive when it was due to agree a strategy to address the union's to the union's move, he said he was "deeply disappointed in some of the behaviours." Mr Younge outlined the financial challenges facing the university and said its reserves had to be spent on securing the university's future - including improving halls of residence which, he said, required a spend of £300m to £ about the university's new campus in Kazakhstan's capital, Astana, Prof Larner said the university had spent money on "due diligence" but the campus, which opens in September, was paid for by partners in said so far there had been 186 application for the two foundation courses initially offered on the site which was part of a "slow rollout".In response, Cardiff UCU said it remained "deeply concerned" about the proposed added the changes risked affecting the university's "ability to contribute" to teaching, research and training in Wales.
Wales Online
a day ago
- Wales Online
Wales coal tips will never be safe because the money needed is 'so enormous'
Wales coal tips will never be safe because the money needed is 'so enormous' MPs were told the current funding allocated to coal tip safety in Wales just 'scratches the surface' The site of a landslide at a coal tip in Tylorstown in February 2020 (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) There will more than likely never be enough funding for the risk posed by disused coal tips in Wales to be taken away, MPs have been told. Representatives from three Welsh councils appeared in front of the House of Commons' Welsh affairs committee on Wednesday morning (June 11) and explained why funding announcements for coal tips are welcome, they only "scratch the surface" of the scale of the problem within their local authorities. The committee was held just hours before chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that the UK Government will give Wales £118m over the next three financial years to "keep coal tips safe in Wales". Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan explained that the amount pledged by the UK Government was the maximum they had asked for from their UK Labour counterparts. The Welsh Government previously said £600m is needed to remediate the dangerous legacy of mining in the south Wales valleys and is carrying out mapping of recorded coal tips in order to provide a more up-to-date cost estimate. That figure is not yet available. However, adding together the UK and Welsh Government money, the total allocated to making coal tips safe in Wales currently sits at £221m. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Article continues below The Welsh Government had long said it shouldn't have to foot the bill for issues arising from something that happened before devolution. You can read more on that here. Mark Williams, representing Caerphilly County Borough Council, told the committee that it is unlikely that funding allocated to coal tip safety will be enough to completely eliminate any risk from the tips. He added that the the funding does not currently address any remediation costs and just "scratches the surface" in terms of monitoring and maintenance. He said: "The funding that the Welsh and UK Governments have passported through in terms of tips has been very helpful. It enables us to manage the sites that we have - monitor them, undertake any remedial or emergency works to avoid problems in the future - perhaps an Aberfan or a Tylorstown. "What it doesn't do is allow the risk to be completely taken away. I'm not sure we'll get there because the bill is absolutely enormous." Nicola Pearce, from Neath Port Talbot Council, explained that the majority of the £14.48m of funding which has been allocated to her local authority since 2020, has only been spent on one scheme for one tip. She told the committee: "The funding we've had since 2020 has allowed us to undertake significant work on one large pit, Dyffryn Rhondda Tip , which was a concern due to its instability. "Out of the £14.48m of funding that scheme, which is still being delivered, will have cost £12m by the time it's completed - and that's just one scheme. "We have 617 tips within Neath Port Talbot so that gives you an understanding of the cost of remediating these tips and making them safe compared to the scale of the problem we have in Wales - there is quite a disparity." Ms Pearce, Mr Williams and Jacqueline Mynott, representing Rhondda Cynon Taf Council, all told the committee that they welcome funding and the Disused Mine and Quarry Tips (Wales) Bill introduced by the Welsh Government, but said greater funding for coal tip safety was needed from the UK Government as a priority. Ms Mynott said climate change causes a particular problem for coal tips, including those that were remediated in the 1970s and 80s. "We need to review those sites in the context of climate change and rain forecasts to revise the risk and that needs funding," she explained. Mr Williams agreed that former tip sites remediated years ago still need to be monitored. " The tips are still there so with climate change, water management and drainage can become an issue. "The major challenge is the amount of water and drainage issues that tips can throw up with climate change, which is obviously what happened with Tylorstown." Article continues below
Wales Online
a day ago
- Wales Online
The big questions about the UK Government's £445m rail announcement
The big questions about the UK Government's £445m rail announcement There is a difference between the money being assigned to building new stations and the most recent cost estimate There are plans for more train stations on the south Wales mainline (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) A few hours before the chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered her spending review to MPs in the Commons, details of what she would announce for Welsh rail emerged. It would be, we heard, a package of almost half a billion pounds for rail infrastructure. Yet what's now apparent is that there are still a lot of questions remaining to be answered about exactly what the money will be used for and the time period in which it will be spent. The opposition parties have jumped on the Chancellor's statement during her speech to the Commons that the money will be spent over 10 years. They claim this means it is far from generous and less than Wales would have received under the Tories. Yet briefings from Treasury officials and the Wales Office suggests it is more complex than that - although there is still a lack of detail about when the money will be spent, what it will be spent on and how much progress will be possible when the sum promised is less than the cost of the big ambitions for rail in Wales. These are the big questions that remain following the Chancellor's speech How long a period is the funding meant to cover? How generous this £445m really is will depend on how long a period it's meant to cover. Article continues below The Chancellor handed her opponents in Wales a stick with which to criticise this when she said that the funding was for ten years. Her exact words were: "For 14 years, the Conservatives failed the people of Wales. Those days are over. Following representations from my right Honourable Friend the Welsh secretary, the First Minister for Wales and Welsh Labour MPs I am pleased to announce £445m for railways in Wales over 10 years including new funding for Padeswood sidings and Cardiff West junction." The Treasury suggests it isn't this simple, that most of the money will have to be spent in the period of the spending review, which covers four years for infrastructure investment. But a smaller amount is budgeted for the development of projects and won't necessarily be spent in the next four years, hence the 10 year timeline. However the Chancellor's words created significant uncertainty. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Who will get to spend the money? The £445m is not one big pot. Because most of the rail network in Wales is owned by the UK government, the bulk of the cash will be for Network Rail to spend. But there is also a pot of money for the Welsh Government to use to spend on the track it owns in the Valleys Lines. And a third pot to develop future projects. Wales Secretary Jo Stevens has said the scheme was made up of: £300m of UK Government investment in heavy rail £48m of money going to the Welsh Government to invest in the Core Valley Lines Around £97m for developing future projects She said: "There is an agreed pipeline of projects produced by the Wales Rail Board, agreed through Welsh Government, DFT, and that is what the delivery money will be spent on. "Separately, there's the £48m going directly to Welsh Government to spend on upgrades to the Core Valleys line and then there is a small element for development money that will be spent to develop the projects that will be ready in three years time." Referring to the £97m for longer-term projects, she said: "[So] we will have projects that have been properly developed in order to deliver after the end of the spending review period. It stops that cliff edge, because you can't literally pick up a rail project on a Monday and say ' here's some money for it, we'll do it now', it takes years of development work to get them ready'. Mr Jones said that this spending review allocates budgets until 29-30 but they were "pre-announcing additional funding that really shouldn't be announced until the spending review until 2027". "We want to get that certainty of funding to allow the development to kind of keep the projects rolling. "The reason that you end up with the 10-year number is because essentially, the way we commit to that is by making the commitment in the 10-year infrastructure strategy but it doesn't mean that that money is spread out over a ten year period. What exactly will it all pay for? When the Government promises £66bn for HS2 we know what we're getting. A rail line that costs £66bn (or probably more by the time it has finished). But this announcement is different, it is a sum of money with a vague list of projects attached. Many of those projects, like the Burns stations, have a full price tag that is bigger at £320m than the sum of money available. Ms Stevens and chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said the reason for the £300m sum being allocated was that it was the most that it would be possible to spend on those projects during the three year period. Ms Stevens said: "We have put in a maximum that it is possible to actually spend on delivery over the period of the spending review, so that will deliver projects directly; new stations, more and faster trains on key lines across north and south Wales that is as much as the rail sector can physically deliver over the period of the spending review." Mr Jones added: "We worked very hard to look at what the capacity is in terms of delivery in the time that we have and we have gone as far as we possibly can in maxing that out." So how much progress will be made on those schemes in three years? We tried to find out how much progress it would be possible to make on the big project mentioned in south Wales, the five new stations planned for the south Wales mainline known as the Burns stations, given the fact there isn't enough money in the £300m Network Rail portion of the budget to fund the full £320m cost. Ms Stevens was unable to say. She said: "Today is about the broad figures. "We'll set out in coming weeks the specific projects," she said. Asked if it was not simply known how the money would be divided, or whether we just won't see all five stations in the review period, we were referred to the Treasury. We then went to the Treasury with the following questions: Article continues below Does the Treasury mean "Burns Review stations" to be the five previously discussed at Cardiff East, Newport West, Maindy, Llanwern and Magor? Will all five of those be built? Have revised plans or costs been calculated? We are awaiting those answers.
