Barrhead, Liboside and Uplawmoor by-election date revealed
Cllr Betty Cunningham, Labour, passed away on Saturday, May 31 at the age of 79 after a period of ill health.
Following her death, tributes flowed in from across the political spectrum, with the council stalwart, who was first elected in 1999, described as a 'formidable' fighter for Barrhead.
East Renfrewshire Council has now revealed it intends to hold a by-election for the Barrhead, Liboside and Uplawmoor ward on Thursday, August 21.
READ MORE: 'Her death is a massive loss': Heartfelt tributes paid to long-serving councillor
The council is currently led by a minority Labour-independent administration, which includes independent councillor Danny Devlin. There are now four Labour councillors, three independents, five SNP and five Conservatives.
At the last election in 2022, Cllr Devlin picked up the most first preference votes in the ward (1,753), followed by the SNP's Angela Convery (1,639). Cllr Cunningham and Cllr Chris Lunday, SNP, were also elected.
Cllr Cunningham — a former Provost from 2003 to 2007 — received an OBE from the Queen in the New Year's Honours List of 2011 for services to East Renfrewshire and Malawi, having first travelled to the African country in 2007. Her charity, the Betty Cunningham International Trust, built a health clinic and nursery schools.
She was also handed a Lifetime Legend award at the Local Government Information Unit (LGIU) annual councillor awards last year.
READ MORE: Bus boss tells MSP to 'get on his bike and leave transport to the adults'
Council leader Owen O'Donnell, Labour, previously said: 'Social justice and the sense of what is right and wrong was ingrained in Betty's DNA.
'She was a ferocious fighter for the people of Barrhead and beyond and would leave then Prime Minister Tony Blair and First Minister Jack McConnell trembling in her wake!
'She had the biggest heart but was also great fun and someone you wanted to spend time with.'
Provost Mary Montague, Labour, added: 'Strong in character and often in her language, she was formidable in fighting for the best interests of Barrhead and East Renfrewshire.
'She was a determined champion for a just cause and, for anyone who found themselves in a difficult situation and asked Betty for help, they got it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
Keir Starmer is in an historic mess. There's only one person to blame
KEIR Starmer's difficulties with his Orwellian 'welfare reforms' continue to mount. Those "reforms" of course consist of cruel cuts to the benefits received by some of the most vulnerable people in society – benefits which as a disabled person myself I know from personal experience are already exceptionally difficult to prove entitlement to. What's more, despite the impression to the contrary which Starmer's ghouls like to present, they are not out of work benefits. Even if they were, Starmer, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall have never coherently explained how cutting the meagre support for disabled people will assist them into work, nor where exactly all the employers queueing up to offer work to disabled people are. Now a large number of Labour MPs, backed by the SNP, the LibDems and the Greens, have signed a wrecking amendment to the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill which would kill it off even more effectively than the bill would kill off disabled people. The bill is due to be debated and voted on in the Commons on Tuesday of next week. As things currently stand, the government does not have the numbers to force the bill through. The Tories, whose main objection is that it's not cruel and nasty enough, smell blood in the water, and have signalled that they will not vote with the UK Government. Starmer has handled the prospect of a backbench rebellion in the same high-handed, arrogant and patrician manner in which he dealt with those Labour MPs who retained a sense of why they been elected and voted with the SNP in the early weeks of Starmer's government to axe the heinous two-child cap on benefits. Those MPs were suspended from the Parliamentary Labour party. Starmer's first instinct when faced with this brewing rebellion was to threaten his allies, telling the potential rebels that they'd be excluded from government positions unless they got back into line. That backfired, and the number of Labour MPs who had signed the rebels' wrecking amendment continued to grow. Reportedly, cabinet ministers including Reeves and Health Secretary Wes Streeting – presumably on a break from courting private healthcare companies for donations – phoned rebel MPs and told them that the vote would be one of confidence in Starmer's leadership. UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting reportedly rang around trying to get MPs to support the cutsThis had the effect of increasing the number of Labour MPs who signed the amendment from 108 to 123. Starmer patronisingly dismissed the growing anger in his party as "noises off" and in consequence, by Thursday the number of Labour MPs who had signed the amendment had increased to 126. It cannot be stressed enough just how remarkable this development is. Starmer was elected with a landslide majority in the Commons less than a year ago, his government should still be in its political honeymoon period, impervious to challenge and able to govern supreme. That the Prime Minister is currently staring at the prospect of defeat at the hands of its own MPs is unprecedented at this stage of the term in office of a British Government with a solid Commons majority. That this has come to pass is entirely due to Starmer, his lies and duplicity about change, and his staggering lack of political ability. Labour's newly elected MPs are facing the realisation that they may be political one-hit wonders and as such they have nothing to lose by rebelling against the government. Even twelve Labour MPs representing Scottish seats, normally the Labour party's most reliable lobby fodder, have signed the rebel amendment. That is one-third of Labour's Scottish contingent in the Commons. This is a direct challenge to Anas Sarwar, who has given his backing to the benefits cuts. READ MORE: Can Keir Starmer find any policy that Anas Sarwar won't support? At First Minister's Questions in Holyrood today, First Minister John Swinney attacked Sarwar for his supine obedience to Starmer, even though these cuts will, by the Labour government's own figures, throw 250,000 disabled people, including 50,000 children, into poverty. Anti-poverty and disabled rights organisations calculate that the true number could be even higher, with in excess of 400,000 disabled people being driven into poverty as a direct consequence of Labour's cuts. Swinney remarked that Sarwar's willingness to blindly follow Starmer's line on cuts to benefits for disabled people is a sign that he "will not be standing up for Scotland any time soon". That about sums it up. This piece is an extract from today's REAL Scottish Politics newsletter, which is emailed out at 7pm every weekday with a round-up of the day's top stories and exclusive analysis from the Wee Ginger Dug. To receive our full newsletter including this analysis straight to your email inbox, click HERE and click the "+" sign-up symbol for the REAL Scottish Politics
Leader Live
29 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Police's disposal of miners' strike documents ‘deeply worrying'
Information related to the so-called Battle of Orgreave is said to be among the two boxes which were disposed of by the force in April 2024. Lucy Powell said anyone involved in the strikes 'must retain the records' and come forward with information when asked to, after Labour MP Ian Lavery raised concerns in the Commons. In its manifesto, the Labour Party pledged to ensure, through an investigation or inquiry, 'that the truth about the events at Orgreave comes to light'. The violent confrontation in June 1984 outside a coking plant in Orgreave, South Yorkshire, led to many miners being injured and arrested, although their trials later collapsed. Speaking during business questions, Mr Lavery said it was 'extremely disturbing news that Northumbria Police has destroyed all documents relating to the miners' strike, including Orgreave'. The MP for Blyth and Ashington said: 'It is absolutely alarming. 'The Labour Government have pledged an inquiry through investigation into these events, yet the wanton destruction of this vital and critical evidence has been allowed to happen. 'Is this a sinister attempt to obscure justice? I'm not sure if anybody is prepared to answer that question. 'Who gave the permission to destroy these documents and what's behind it? 'Can we have an urgent debate into how the Government can instruct all police forces, all authorities, everyone that holds any detail on the miners' strike and on Orgreave (to) make sure that they retain and maintain that evidence, for when the Labour Government maintains its pledge for an inquiry into the events that happened in 1984. 'Because justice cannot be served if the evidence is systematically and deliberately destroyed.' Ms Powell replied: 'This sounds like a deeply, deeply worrying development in this case, and I am sure the whole House will be shocked to hear it. 'He has campaigned for justice and for answers in relation to what happened at Orgreave, 41 years ago, raised it with me last week. I will continue to raise that with ministers on his behalf. 'And I would join him in saying to people, anyone involved, that they must retain the records and they must come forward, as they would be expected to do when those questions are asked, with every bit of information they've got on what happened.' News of the destroyed boxes came to light following a freedom of information request from Joe Diviney, a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, the Guardian reports. A Northumbria Police spokesperson said: 'We can confirm two boxes containing data in relation to the miners' strike were disposed of in April 2024 following a formal review, retain or disposal process in line with force policy and the Data Protection Act 2018.'
Leader Live
29 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Starmer seeking to quell revolt over welfare reform plan
Downing Street insiders said talks were taking place with Labour MPs about the legislation after 126 of them publicly backed a move to block the legislation. The first vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to take place on Tuesday and a concerted effort has been launched by ministers to win round potential rebels. A No 10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. 'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.' The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'. They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and the Government were 'ongoing' as six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126. The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. 'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown-up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published. Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street. Asked about attacks on Mr McSweeney, trade minister Douglas Alexander said: 'I'm much less interested in the gossip about SW1 than whether this legislation works on the streets, in the towns, in the communities right across the country.' He said it was 'for the Prime Minister to make his judgments' about who works in Downing Street but the fact is that team delivered us an historic victory only last July, against expectations'. Mr Alexander told Sky News: 'The task of government is hard, there are always going to be people with strong opinions on all sides of an issue like welfare reform.' He told ITV's Good Morning Britain: 'If there are practical ways that we can improve this legislation, we should. 'We should do it not to buy off rebels, but because it's a Labour thing to do and that's the conversation that I expect ministers will be engaged in in the coming days.' Analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank indicated overall, 800,000 fewer working-age people are expected to receive a Pip daily living award in 2029–30 due to the reforms. The tighter criteria are set to lead to 430,000 new applicants – who would have received an award without reforms – receiving no award, and 370,000 existing claimants losing out following reassessment. Most of the 800,000 losers will receive £3,850 per year less in Pip. But even if the reforms are fully implements, official forecasts still suggest that the number of working-age claimants of Pip or its predecessor in England and Wales will rise from 3.1 million in 2024–25 to 3.9 million in 2029–30. The 2.2 million existing claimants of the health element of universal credit who are expected to still be claiming in 2029–30 are estimated to see a £450 real decline in their support in that year due to the freezing of the payment. There are also set to be 700,000 new claimants who will typically receive £2,700 a year less than they would have done under the current system, the IFS said. The changes are aimed at increasing incentives to work for people who are able to, but IFS senior research economist Eduin Latimer said: 'The changes may lead to an overall increase in employment, though any boost to employment income is unlikely to come close to offsetting the direct income losses experienced by affected claimants.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the Government should pull the Bill and 'go back to the drawing board' instead of 'cutting vital support from thousands of vulnerable people'.
