Marin County Jane Doe remains identified 60 years later
The Brief
Remains of a woman found in 1966 in Tiburon have now been identified, nearly 60 years later
Her identity was determined with the Othram Labs, the Marin County Sheriff's Office and the California Department of Justice
TIBURON, Calif. - It was nearly 60 years ago when a body was found near a cliffside in Tiburon. For several decades her identity was unknown to those who found her and the authorities.
However, Othram Labs, a Texas-based forensic laboratory that works with law enforcement, was able to positively identify the remains as Dorothy Jean Vaillancourt.
The backstory
On Dec. 19, 1966, a hunter came across the remains of a woman near Paradise Drive, according to the forensic lab. Authorities said the woman was between 45 and 60 years old, standing at 5 feet 2 inches, weighing around 105 pounds, and had auburn hair.
At the time of her death, Vaillancourt was wearing a red cotton dress and an off-white trench coat.
Authorities at the time tried unsuccessfully to identify the woman and the circumstances leading up to her death.
The Marin County Sheriff's Office and the California Department of Justice (CA DOJ) collaborated with Othram to identify Jane Doe's remains.
Local perspective
The California DOJ said in May 2008, 17 years ago, the Marin County Sheriff's Office submitted a DNA sample to the state's Missing Persons DNA Program with the hopes that advancements in technology would yield a match.
In 2022, the DOJ was contacted by Othram about their pilot program and requested cases where there were no other leads, the Marin County Sheriff's Office said.
Eventually, Othram was able to get a familial match, and the Marin County Sheriff's Office Coroner's Division contacted the family, obtained a comparison sample, and confirmed the match through the DOJ, sheriff officials said.
What we don't know
It's unclear how Vaillancourt died. A report from DNA Solves said Vaillancourt didn't have enough money for a taxi ride home and sought shelter at a local fire station, but was turned away.
Dig deeper
Before she was positively identified, Vaillancourt's body was buried in Mt. Tamalpais Cemetery and Mortuary in San Rafael as she was presumed dead.
The Source
DNA Solves/Othram, Marin County Sheriff's Office, California Department of Justice
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Attorney: Hogsett probe omitted 'uncomfortable' texts from mayor, contradicted women's claims
The highly anticipated investigatory report into Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett's handling of sexual harassment and assault allegations omits key details, say the women at the heart of the complaints, including late-night and personal texts from the mayor they told investigators made them feel uncomfortable. The report by Chicago-based law firm Fisher Phillips also includes substantive discrepancies from the women's own records they handed over to investigators, which were later obtained by IndyStar. An attorney for the two women said they have been revictimized by the investigative process that appears to take the mayor's statements as fact while diminishing the statements and evidence provided by the women as claims. 'Ms. Roberts and Ms. Ellert not only experienced significant difficulty attempting to report the abuse in the first place — indeed, Ms. Roberts has never been presented with a formal channel to do so — but this investigative process has caused them further unnecessary distress and harm,' said Mark Sniderman, a lawyer representing the women. 'Regardless, they participated voluntarily because of their core commitment to supporting other survivors and changing the systems that continue to harm them. All survivors and whistleblowers deserve better.' The Indianapolis City-County Council ordered and paid for the probe independent of the mayor's office. The action followed allegations first reported by IndyStar in July 2024 from three women who say Thomas Cook, the mayor's former right-hand man and chief of staff, repeatedly harassed and mistreated them when they worked as Cook's subordinates. One of those women alleged Cook sexually assaulted her while he served as the mayor's chief of staff. More: 'I kept saying no': Women accuse top Hogsett aide of preying on subordinates for years The city paid $450,000 for the 54-page report, which revealed Hogsett allowed Cook to resign from the city in 2020 and stay on for about two months to work on economic development projects, despite a recommendation from the city's human resources director that Cook be fired for violating city policy by engaging in an inappropriate sexual relationship with another subordinate employee. The report also concluded Hogsett's administration had followed all applicable law in its handling of the women's claims. Lauren Roberts and Caroline Ellert, two of the women who allege Cook abused them, provided investigators with text messages, hours of interviews and other documentation. But they found the resulting report — which they saw for the first time after it was presented to the public on May 29 — appeared to contradict some of that evidence, according to a statement their lawyer provided to IndyStar: Where the report hinges on Hogsett's account that Ellert didn't use the words 'sexual assault' to describe her allegations against Cook in a 2023 phone call, she asserted that she did and told investigators that. Where the report says Hogsett had no knowledge of Roberts' personal life, texts she provided to investigators show otherwise. Where the report asserts Cook 'and other members' of the administration engaged in 'at times professionally inappropriate workplace conduct,' it didn't mention Roberts and Ellert told investigators Hogsett's messages to them also crossed professional boundaries. Fisher Phillips investigators declined to comment on several questions posed to them by IndyStar. The report has already caused significant political fallout: Democratic City-County Council member Andy Nielsen, who served on the investigative committee, earlier this week became the second council member to call for Hogsett to resign over what he said was a leadership failure by the mayor. Democratic socialist Jesse Brown called for Hogsett's resignation after the 2024 reporting. Cook in the past apologized for his conduct, though he didn't participate in the Fisher Phillips investigation. He has not been charged with a crime. Hogsett, meanwhile, has defended his handling of his past investigations into Cook. The mayor has called on the council to study how to implement various reforms recommended in the investigative report, including dissolving the city's HR department in favor of an independent structure and appointing an inspector general. More: A 'fraternity' culture and an 'opportunity' for self-dealing: 6 insights from Hogsett investigation Hogsett, in a statement, did not answer IndyStar's specific questions about the discrepancies alleged by Roberts and Ellert, nor did he dispute the substance of the text exchanges. Instead, he reiterated the report's findings that his actions in response to the complaints complied with the law. "My cooperation was not only unprecedented but incredibly important to me," he said, referring to the Fisher Phillips investigation. "I have a commitment to the people of this City and the employees of this enterprise to do all we can to make sure our employees feel safe in their working environment. There have been many lessons learned and I believe working together we can continue to move our City forward. I am focused on the future and the next 2 ½ years of this term." He also referred questions about the report to Fisher Phillips. The most glaring omission in the report, according to the women's lawyer, is not referring to the contents of the text message exchanges with the mayor that Roberts and Ellert provided to investigators. 'Ms. Roberts and Ms. Ellert voluntarily provided these messages to investigators and underscored their concerns about the mayor's behavior as both their boss and as a person in a position of authority,' Sniderman said. In at least one instance, those messages contradict an assertion by Hogsett in the report, in which the mayor 'stated (Roberts) never mentioned personal life concerns and that he did not know anything personally about her.' A 2015 text message exchange between Roberts and Hogsett provided to investigators and obtained by IndyStar shows the mayor knew her then-partner's name and referred to Roberts as 'feisty.' After Roberts messaged Hogsett about campaign logistics for the following morning, Hogsett told her 'Happy Valentines Day.' 'Tell (redacted) that he has to get my approval since I'm older than your Dad,' wrote Hogsett, who was 58 at the time. Roberts was 26. Roberts said 'thanks but no thanks,' asserting she didn't need his approval. Hogsett responded again: 'Does he appreciate how feisty you are?' About 20 minutes passed as she weighed how to respond. 'I would imagine so,' she replied. 'Easy now,' he said. She did not respond further. Roberts gave the exchange to investigators and told them it left her feeling 'uneasy' at the time. She resigned from the Hogsett campaign a few months later. Text messages provided to investigators by Ellert reveal the mayor reaching out unprompted late at night. She told investigators the messages made her feel "uncomfortable" and described them as "erratic." She also described being uncomfortable at the time to at least one member of the administration, according to text messages from the same evening obtained by IndyStar. At 10:15 p.m. on June 12, 2020, Hogsett texted Ellert about a years-old photo of the two of them. At the time, Ellert was 26 and was the executive director of the Marion County Democratic Party, a position that often put her at the behest of the mayor, then 63. 'Can I tell you that the picture of you and me in front of the seal (which I know you did not want to take nor did you like taking) is my absolute favorite,' Hogsett wrote. 'It appears so real, as uncomfortable as it may have made you.' He continued in a second message: 'It's almost as if we are both proud that the picture memorializes us in that particular moment, however long ago and that we are happy and proud of each other. I know you weren't but you faked it well.' Ellert didn't respond. Two days earlier, Hogsett had asked her extensively via text about her preferred poetry in another after-hours exchange that appeared to span a few hours. After initially texting Ellert about work-related logistics, he followed up about poetry: 'So, last question. Which poem do you find more meaningful and/or compelling: 'The Wasteland' or 'The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock'?' The topic was familiar — yet unnerving — to Ellert: Cook also had showered her with poetry, including one time placing a poetry book on her desk even after she asked him to maintain appropriate boundaries at work. Hogsett proceeded to ask for her favorite poetry, saying he would read it that night. The mayor then sent repeated messages asking, in various ways, for Ellert's advice on an unspecified issue. In one, he said, 'I care what you think?' 'This entire thing is completely frackup. Advise me how to deliver,' he said in another text. The next: 'I am asking.' The next: 'I need your advice. Thanks' At that point, Ellert asks what he's talking about. Hogsett responded, 'Like what I am going through now?' 'It is only 9am,' he wrote, then correcting the time to "9pm" in a follow-up message. 'So tell me what I should do.' She asked again what he needs advice on. Hogsett replied, 'about all things.' In several follow up messages, the mayor implored Ellert to respond, saying, "Talk to me," "Please," and 'Hello: it's only 9:36pm' The final investigatory report by Fisher Phillips makes no mentions of the messages — or the concerns the young women had shared about those communications with investigators — even though it contains a section on workplace culture in the Hogsett administration and notes Cook "and others" acted unprofessionally around women and other employees. Ellert and Roberts' lawyer said the report "fails to account for all of the evidence that my clients provided and misses the full scope and import of the relevant issues." About three years later, having secured a job away from the Hogsett administration and outside Cook's 'perceived sphere of influence,' as the report notes, Ellert made the decision to report her sexual harassment and assault allegations against Cook to Hogsett. She relayed her testimony in a September 2023 phone call with Hogsett and the city-county's corporation counsel. The final report asserts as fact, twice, that Ellert did not use the term 'sexual assault' during that call. "While (Ellert) did not use terms 'sexual assault' or 'rape,' Mayor Hogsett understood what (Ellert) had described (i.e., non-consensual sex), though she did not use the specific term sexual assault," the report reads. However, she and her lawyer assert she did use that term in the phone call, and they told this to Fisher Phillips investigators. They confirmed this characterization in follow-up correspondence with investigators obtained by IndyStar. 'The report consistently construes the mayor's statements as facts and my clients' statements as mere claims,' Sniderman said. "The mayor claimed that she did not use the term 'sexual assault' during her initial conversation with him in 2023 concerning Mr. Cook's conduct. However, Ms. Ellert clearly told investigators otherwise." Another point of contention was who was really responsible for Roberts as an employee when she worked for the Hogsett campaign more than a decade ago. The Fisher Phillips report asserts Roberts was actually an employee of the Indiana Democratic Party while working for the Hogsett campaign. That contradicts a memorandum of understanding Hogsett signed in 2014 which Roberts provided to investigators, as well as an email from a party attorney. The MOU Hogsett signed when Roberts took a job with his campaign clearly states Roberts is "employed by the Committee," referring to the campaign, and that the state party "is not my employer." It was an agreement spelling out the party's role as a payroll processor. The email, from attorney Karen Celestino-Horseman to Roberts in 2019, states Roberts was 'not employed by the state party' but the party merely handled payroll, as it does for other campaign staff. Roberts has previously asserted that neither the party nor the campaign wanted to take responsibility for handling her harassment case. More: 'No one wanted the ball': Women who experienced harassment say Democrats' response lacked She said she fears complaints made by campaign workers will continue to fall through the cracks if that doesn't change. The women's attorney, Sniderman, said Ellert and Roberts are speaking out in order to advocate for themselves and others who have been "targeted by workplace abuse." "Their goal remains the same," he said. "To help end these cycles of abuse." Contact senior government accountability reporter Hayleigh Colombo at hcolombo@ Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@ or follow her on X@kayla_dwyer17. Sign up for our free weekly politics newsletter, Checks & Balances, by IndyStar political and government reporters. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Hogsett investigation: Late-night texts from mayor, key details left out
Los Angeles Times
14 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. lawyer and son-in-law of Tom Girardi pleads guilty to contempt of court
Days after a judge sentenced legal titan Tom Girardi to seven years in prison for stealing from clients, his son-in-law — formerly a high-ranking attorney at his now-defunct firm — pleaded guilty to a federal charge in Illinois. David Lira, 65, of Pasadena, admitted Thursday to one count of contempt of court for defying a Chicago judge's order concerning the distribution of settlement funds to clients whose relatives had perished in a 2018 Indonesian plane crash. As part of broader litigation to hold Boeing accountable for defects in its 737-MAX jets, Lira and Girardi negotiated payouts totaling $7.5 million for a group of widows and orphans in 2020. But the clients, who lived in Indonesia, did not receive their full settlements. Evidence would later emerge that Girardi was routinely using client money to underwrite a lavish lifestyle with his wife, 'Real Housewives of Beverly Hills' star Erika Jayne. Lira 'knew that Girardi did not pay the Lion Air Clients' settlement funds in full, in contravention of [U.S. District] Judge (Thomas) Durkin's orders, despite [the Indonesian clients'] inquiries about and demands for their Settlements,' according to a plea agreement filed Thursday. Durkin referred the case for criminal investigation, and prosecutors in Chicago filed wire fraud and other charges against Lira and Girardi in 2021. Prosecutors dropped the Chicago-based case against Girardi, 86, last month. Girardi was separately convicted of wire fraud last year in Los Angeles, resulting in the seven-year prison sentence handed down this week. Lira, who is married to Girardi's daughter Jacqueline, began working at his father-in-law's firm in 1999. He was sometimes called the firm's senior partner, though Girardi was the sole owner. Lira resigned from Girardi Keese about six months before its 2020 collapse, after confronting his father-in-law about the Lion Air case and demanding that Girardi pay the victims. As he moved on to another firm, Lira did not alert the victims or authorities about Girardi's mishandling of the money. Lira's defense attorney, Damon Cheronis, noted that 'the plea agreement did not assert any acts of fraud on the part of Mr. Lira.' 'Mr. Lira continually asked Mr. Girardi to pay these clients their rightful settlement money pursuant to the court order, however Girardi did not,' Cheronis said in a statement. Lira is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 8. Prosecutors have not yet recommended a particular penalty, but they indicated in the plea agreement that under federal sentencing guidelines, Lira faces six to eight years in prison. Girardi and Lira represented the victims in the Lion Air crash alongside Chicago-based lawyer Jay Edelson. It was ultimately Edelson who brought to the judge's attention that the Indonesian clients were not paid by Girardi. 'We're pleased that David Lira, after years of portraying himself as an innocent bystander, has finally admitted he is a criminal,' Edelson told The Times on Thursday. 'We remain hopeful that the other criminals who helped Girardi pull off the largest Ponzi scheme in the history of the plaintiff's bar will also face disbarment and long prison sentences.' The widows and orphans ultimately received their settlement payments after Edelson's insurance provider agreed to foot the cost. The State Bar is pursuing disciplinary action against Lira and two other attorneys who worked at Girardi Keese. Lira continues to practice for a Century City law firm, though restrictions imposed by a bar court judge prohibit him from handling client money.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Private prison operator blocked from housing ICE detainees at shuttered facility
A judge in Kansas issued a Wednesday ruling determining that a private prison operator could not use its shuttered facility to house detainees from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Leavenworth County Judge John Bryant granted a temporary restraining order blocking CoreCivic from housing individuals in the custody of ICE. The order was issued after a March lawsuit was thrown out in May on technical grounds, according to The Associated Press. CoreCivic did not immediately reply to The Hill's request for comment on the ruling. Earlier this year, executives applied to use their 1,033-bed facility to help the Trump administration facilitate removals in its crackdown on illegal immigration. CoreCivic said it would lose $4.2 million each month it wasn't open, according to legal files reviewed by AP. The company applied for a permit to use the grounds for ICE operations but withdrew its application in May alleging it didn't need permission from the city to determine which detainees to house. 'It became clear to CoreCivic that there was not a cooperative relationship,' said Taylor Concannon Hausmann, an attorney for the private prison operator, speaking in court, as reported by the AP. However, city attorney Joe Hatley urged the company to 'follow the rules' and obtain the proper permit for operations. The CoreCivic property is located 10 miles away from Kansas City International Airport and has previously worked with federal officials to house pretrial detainees, according to the AP. In 2021, the Tennessee-based company stopped working for the U.S. Marshals Service after former President Biden urged the Justice Department to cease contracts with private prison operators. Multiple inmate violations were flagged in addition to reported suicides and killings. The Trump administration has been working with the private sector to undertake deportation efforts, including the GEO Group, which is planning to reopen New Jersey's Delaney Hall to hold individuals awaiting removal. Democrats have protested the use of the facility for federal purposes, citing concerns about federal operations within Newark, a designated sanctuary city. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
