Diane Abbott Slams Keir Starmer's Immigration Speech For Being 'Fundamentally Racist'
Diane Abbott has declared that Keir Starmer's 'island of strangers' immigration speech was 'fundamentally racist' and copying Reform UK's rhetoric.
The prime minister sparked comparisons right-wing former Tory minister Enoch Powell after he announced Labour's plans to slash the number of migrants coming to the UK last month.
At the time, he said: 'In a diverse nation like ours, and I celebrate that, these rules become even more important.
'Without them, we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.'
Speaking at anti-austerity rally on Saturday, Abbott, a respected Labour backbencher, joined the chorus of critics who have called out the speech.
The left-wing MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington particularly tore into Starmer's warning about becoming an 'island of strangers'.
She said she was 'disturbed' to hear his remarks, noting: 'I thought that was a fundamentally racist thing to say, in the contrary to to Britain's history. My parents came to this country in the 50s.
'They were not strangers, they helped to build this country. So, I think Keir Starmer is quite wrong to say that the way you beat Reform is to copy Reform.'
She also alleged that Starmer's claim that immigration has done 'incalculable damage to this green and pleasant land' is 'nonsense'.
Abbott, formerly the shadow home secretary under Jeremy Corbyn, told the cheering crowds: 'Immigrants built this land, built this society!'
She also warned that there was an international struggle to 'fight the rich and the powerful [and] to fight the racists,' including within her own party.
Abbott concluded: 'We have to stand against these cuts, we have to stand against the austerity budget, and by coming together today, rallying together, we will win.'
Thousands of trade unionists, campaigners and activists gathered to 'send a message' to the government about its welfare reforms ahead of the spending review next week.
When pressed about the backlash to Starmer's immigration comments last month, his spokesperson told reporters the prime minister stood by his words.
He said: 'The prime minister has made the argument that migrants make a massive contribution to the UK and have done for generations, not least those who came after the war.
'But it is also reasonable to recognise that uncontrolled migration of recent years has put pressure on public services.'
The spokesman also said Starmer 'rejects previous speeches' made by Powell.
Follow for the very latest political news!Abbott made the comments at an anti-austerity march earlier today pic.twitter.com/SiQf0Cwb0n
— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) June 7, 2025
Abbott has become a regular critic of the prime minister over the last year, after she beat an attempt by the Labour hierarchy to drop her as an MP at the last election over allegations of anti-semitism.
She accused the PM of having 'no feel for politics' when he chose not to compensate Waspi women and alleged Starmer treated her as a 'non-person' when a Tory donor said she 'should be shot'.
'He Has No Feel For Politics': Diane Abbott Re-Ignites Her Feud With Keir Starmer
Diane Abbott Says Keir Starmer Treated Her As A 'Non-Person' Over Frank Hester Race Row
Tory Party Accepts Another £5 Million From Donor Who Said Diane Abbott 'Should Be Shot'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The National Guard comes to Los Angeles: What's going to happen? Is it legal?
The Trump administration says it will send 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles after two days of isolated clashes between federal immigration agents and protesters. Officials say the Guard will assist in operations related to Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. Many questions remain unanswered, but here is what we know: Officials said the troops were arriving in L.A. as soon as Saturday night, though it was unclear when the full 2,000 personnel would be in place. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on X that the Guard was being deployed "immediately to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles. And, if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' said on Fox News that officials were trying to "address violence and destruction occurring near raid locations where demonstrators are gathering. ... American people, this is about enforcing the law, and again, we're not going to apologize for doing it." It is possible they will provide backup during future immigration raids and prove protection of some federal facilities, including a detention center in downtown L.A. has was the scene of protests and some vandalism; California Gov. Gavin Newsom sid local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' '[T]here is currently no unmet need,' Newsom said. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of UC Berkeley School of Law, said in a text to The Times that Trump has the authority under the Insurrection Act of 1807 to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws.' Yes, the National Guard has been deployed to Los Angeles numerous times amid civil unrest and natural disaster. Jessica Levinson, a law professor at Loyola Law School, noted that when the National Guard was sent to L.A. before, it was because California requested it and the response was coordinated. In 2020, widespread criminal acts in the wake of the George Floyd murder prompted Mayor Eric Garcetti to seek National Guard troops from Newsom. Garcetti asked for 1,000 troops. Guardsmen toting M-4 rifles could be seen patrolling streets between Skid Row and Bunker Hill. In combat gear, they stood guard outside shattered storefronts and graffiti-tagged buildings, where windows had been shattered and the street strewn with trash. Humvees and military trucks were present in the city. In 1994, after a 6.7 earthquake left more than 1,000 buildings destroyed and 20,000 residents homeless, the Guard was brought in. Convoys rumbled through the San Fernando Valley, patrolling mini-malls and parks to deliver water, deter looters, direct traffic and raise tent cities for 6,000 displaced residents. In 1992, thousands of National Guard and U.S. military troops patrolled L.A. amid the riot following the Rodney King trial. Mayor Tom Bradley requested the help when the LAPD could not quell the unrest. In 1965, 13,000 troops were sent to L.A. amid the Watts riots. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stormont strategy to tackle poverty 'not fit for purpose,' says charity
The first draft strategy agreed by the Northern Ireland Executive to tackle poverty is "not fit for purpose", according to a children's charity. An anti-poverty strategy was first proposed in 2006, with the aim of reducing social exclusion and deprivation. In March, Stormont's Executive Committee was found by a court ruling to be in breach of its legal obligation to adopt the strategy. BBC News NI has now seen a leaked copy of the document, which was agreed by executive ministers earlier in May, but has yet to be made public. Trása Canavan of Barnardo's NI, who is also chair of the Anti- Poverty Strategy Group, was among groups who met Communities Minister Gordon Lyons earlier this week about the document. She said she had "serious concerns that it will not make any difference to the lives of the children, families and communities that our organisations support every day, and we raised this with minister Lyons this week". "The current draft of the Anti-Poverty Strategy is not fit for purpose. "It clearly shows that the government has committed no new actions or funding to tackle poverty in Northern Ireland." The 28-page paper sets out the executive's approach to tackling poverty over the next 10 years. It outlines efforts already being taken by various departments to help minimise the risks of people falling into poverty in Northern Ireland, as well as reducing its impacts and ways to help people get out of poverty. The document states that poverty is "not a problem which the executive can solve in isolation", but one that requires community groups, business, councils and voluntary groups to help. It adds that the strategy will be accompanied by a programme of delivery to be updated on an ongoing basis. Ms Canavan added that earlier this year her group had outlined what it wanted to see in the document in order for it to be effective. "This included clear and time-bound targets, a lifecycle approach, new actions and clear funding commitments, rather than counting work that is already under way. "Unfortunately, the draft strategy does not meet any of these key principles. "It is quite simply not good enough for the people of Northern Ireland. "Our group remains committed to working constructively with the government to eradicating poverty in Northern Ireland." The SDLP, Stormont's official opposition, said it is "impossible to be anything other than deeply underwhelmed" by the strategy. Mark H Durkan said the executive should be "embarrassed to present a document that reads more like a list of vague hopes than a plan of action". The paper sets out measures already being taken by the executive and says it will "continue to deliver a package of welfare mitigations" while lobbying Westminster on reforms and to maintain the triple lock on pensions. It adds that legislation being brought by Education Minister Paul Givan will ensure all school uniforms are affordable, and that strategies on fuel poverty will be developed. It also promises that "everyone, including those in or at risk of poverty, has access to good quality, affordable and sustainable homes". But Durkan said: "This document acknowledges the direct link between housing and poverty and yet the Executive have confirmed they will only build half of the homes intended this year. "The strategy also fails to confront one of the most damaging policies hitting low-income families: the two-child limit. Ministers have the power to address these issues, but once again they've chosen not to." When it was agreed last month by the executive, First Minister Michelle O'Neill said the plan probably could "go further" but denied there was a row between Sinn Fein and the DUP over it. Communities Minister, Gordon Lyons, whose department oversaw the design of the draft strategy, said it had "drawn heavily on the work that has already been carried out". The DUP minister succeeded Sinn Féín's Deirdre Hargey in the role when Stormont was restored in 2024 after a two-year hiatus. The Department for Communities said: "The draft Strategy reflects the Executive's priorities in the context of the ongoing fiscal and other challenges we face. "The minister has listened to a wide range of views ahead of the consultation launch, which will give people from all communities a chance to have their say on how we tackle poverty and transform lives in Northern Ireland. "Minister Lyons would encourage all stakeholders in this area to provide their feedback when the consultation formally opens." It added that officials were working to launch the consultation as soon as possible. Alliance assembly member Sian Mulholland told BBC NI's Sunday Politics programme that she had been "a bit disappointed" by the draft document. "After the anticipation and the waiting, we had a closed briefing session with our committee to talk through it," she said. She said she believed it showed a "lack of ambition". "We have been waiting so long for it and in the context of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report, the NI Audit's report on poverty and child poverty in Northern Ireland we aren't seeing the recommendations and the lessons that should have been learned from the child poverty strategy making its way into this document," she added. You can watch Sunday Politics on BBC iPlayer. Stormont found in breach of duty on anti-poverty Anti-poverty strategy could 'go further' says first minister
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review to include £86bn science and tech package
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review. The package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost security. But research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by 2029. DSIT said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their areas. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers. "This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he said. John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." The shadow technology secretary, Alan Mak, said the investment for the sector seemed to be a "copy and paste" of Conservative plans set out in its manifesto last year. "As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back," he added. Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality". Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the economy. The Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to invest. Big chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three years. Whitehall insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.
