Sambhal mosque row: Allahabad HC upholds survey order of Shahi Jama Masjid, rejects Muslim side's petition
Sambhal mosque row: The Allahabad High Court on Monday, upheld the trial court's November 2024 order concerning a petition alleging that a temple was dismantled to construct the Mughal-era mosque.
Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal hearing the case also added that the Hindu plaintiffs is prima facie not barred, reported legal news agency Live Law.
The Sambhal mosque management committee, on November 19, 2024, had filed a civil revision petition seeking a stay on the ongoing trial court proceedings in an original suit pending before the district court in Sambhal.
Widespread violence broke out in Sambhal on November 24, 2024, when a mob assembled to prevent the Advocate Commission team from conducting a survey at the 500-year-old mosque, leading to clashes with the police.
Tensions had been simmering in Sambhal since November 19, when a local court ordered a survey of the Jama Masjid. The court directive sparked opposition, and protests against the survey escalated into violent clashes with the police, resulting in the deaths of four people.
The court-ordered survey stemmed from a petition filed by local individuals who claimed that the mosque stood on the original site of a Harihar temple—dedicated to Kalki, the final incarnation of Lord Vishnu—which they allege was demolished in 1526 to construct the mosque.
In November 2024, the Supreme Court intervened, staying the trial court proceedings and instructing it not to hear the matter until the mosque committee's petition challenging the survey order is listed before the Allahabad High Court.
Advocate Vishnu Shankar, representing the Hindu side in the case, said that the Allahabad High Court's decision to uphold the trial court's order to survey the Shahi Jama Masjid is a very important decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court slams accused in 2020 Delhi riots case for trying to delay trial
A Delhi court has criticised attempts to delay the trial in a 2020 Delhi riots case, observing that the matter is at an advanced stage and cannot be needlessly prolonged. The court noted that despite the trial having gone on for more than a year and only two witnesses remaining, a fresh application was moved seeking re-examination of a prosecution witness. The order was passed on June 4 by additional sessions judge (ASJ) Praveen Singh of Karkardooma Court, who took over the case recently following a reshuffle of judicial officers by the Delhi high court. The court was hearing an application filed by advocate Mehmood Pracha, counsel for accused Sonu Saifi, seeking to recall a witness for further cross-examination. Pracha argued that he was unable to adequately question the witness during an earlier hearing due to lack of time and that the witness's testimony was materially significant to the case. Rejecting the plea, the judge noted: 'Around 26 witnesses have been examined and it is only after a passage of one year that this application has been moved — at a stage when the matter is in its final leg with only two witnesses left.' The court underscored that a lawyer's delay in realising the need for further cross-examination could not justify prolonging a near-concluded trial. 'This application has been moved at the time and convenience of the counsel. A witness cannot be recalled merely because the counsel realised it after one year,' the court observed. The prosecution opposed the application, terming it a deliberate attempt to stall proceedings. It argued that the witness had been sufficiently cross-examined in May 2023 and that no new grounds were presented to justify re-examination. The case arose out of an FIR registered at Dayalpur police station involving charges of arson, attempt to murder, and criminal conspiracy during the February 2020 violence in northeast Delhi. Nineteen people are named as accused, including Faisal Farooq, owner of Rajdhani Public School. According to the prosecution, Farooq allegedly instigated a mob that torched DRP Convent School and nearby properties near Shiv Vihar Tiraha on February 24, 2020. It was further alleged that Farooq's Rajdhani Public School served as a launchpad for hurling petrol bombs and stones at Hindu-owned properties. Charges against all accused were framed in March 2023. Judge Singh replaced ASJ Pulastya Pramachala as part of a broader judicial reshuffle and is now presiding over several high-profile Delhi riots trials. His recent order sends a clear message on the judiciary's reluctance to entertain delay tactics, especially in cases nearing conclusion.
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
MHA nod awaited for renaming Talkatora Stadium, says Minister
The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) is awaiting clearance from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for changing the name of Talkatora Indoor Stadium to Maharishi Valmiki Stadium and will be passed in the next council meeting once it is approved, Public Works Department (PWD) Minister and NDMC Chairman Parvesh Sahib Singh said on Thursday. 'I have talked to Union Home Minister Amit Shah. The proposal is pending with him. Whenever it gets cleared from there, we will pass that in the next NDMC council meeting,' Singh told reporters after the civic body's council session. The announcement to rename the Capital's oldest indoor facility came during the campaign by the BJP for the Assembly elections held earlier this year. Singh, who was contesting against former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal from the New Delhi Assembly constituency, had made the announcement. Soon after he took oath as an NDMC member, he had promised to rename the stadium after Maharishi Valmiki, the author of the Ramayana. Built in 1974, the stadium derives its name from the adjacent Mughal-era garden. 'Talkatora' originates from two Persian words: 'tal,' meaning a tank, and 'katora,' meaning a bowl-shaped natural depression. The stadium is known for hosting some of the biggest sports, cultural, and political events. For the name change, the proposal has to go through various steps, made in accordance with the guidelines provided by the MHA. According to NDMC procedures, a name-change request must be submitted to its General Administration Department. After which, the proposal is then placed before its 13-member Council for approval. Once passed, it is sent to the Delhi government's Urban Development department for final clearance. Following the council meeting on Thursday, NDMC vice-chairperson Kuljeet Chahal said that the BJP government is committed to fulfilling its promises. 'The council is underway to get clearance, more shall be discussed in the next meeting,' he said.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump Administration Orders 500,000 Immigrants to Leave US
Immigrants admitted to the US from a Biden-era parole program for Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela have begun receiving notices of termination urging them to depart the US. Participants in the 'CHNV' parole program were also told that their employment authorization is revoked effective immediately in email messages from the Department of Homeland Security, the agency said Thursday. The notices follow a US Supreme Court decision last month allowing DHS to move forward with revocation of parole benefits for half a million immigrants after a lower court preserved the protections. A legal challenge to the Trump administration's dismantling of parole programs including the CHNV process is still ongoing. Revoking parole benefits is part of a larger effort by the administration to terminate temporary immigration protections that expanded in recent years. It has also terminated Temporary Protected Status designations that shielded immigrants from Venezuela, Afghanistan, Nepal and Cameroon from deportation. The revocation notices announcement came the same day President Donald Trump said he would issue an order to protect farmworkers from deportation in response to demands from agricultural producers. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said that the Biden administration hadn't properly vetted immigrants admitted through the program, and that paroled immigrants had undercut American workers. 'Ending the CHNV parole programs, as well as the paroles of those who exploited it, will be a necessary return to common-sense policies, a return to public safety, and a return to America First,' she said in a statement. The Biden administration launched the CHNV program in 2023 to reduce irregular migration to the US-Mexico border and give people an orderly way to flee humanitarian crises in the four countries. Applications far exceeded the 30,000 slots available each month, and US businesses hired the parolees in hard-to-fill jobs across the country. Industries including construction and healthcare are likely to face new worker shortages after the parolees' work permits are canceled. Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Global Refuge, said the immigrants receiving termination notices this week had played by the rules and already passed security screenings and secured legal work authorization. 'Instead of rewarding responsible migration through orderly legal pathways, this action punishes those who jumped through every hoop asked of them,' she said in a statement. US Citizenship and Immigration Services just this week lifted a freeze on pending benefits requests—like asylum claims and visa applications—for parolees in response to a court order. Processing of benefits was frozen in February, cutting off other legal immigration options weeks before the Trump administration announced the termination of parole benefits. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Kreighbaum in Washington at akreighbaum@ To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jay-Anne B. Casuga at jcasuga@ Genevieve Douglas at gdouglas@ This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
